User talk:Flordeneu/Archive 4

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dorabase.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dorabase.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:The doraemons.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:The doraemons.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Tina Turner We dont need another hero video.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tina Turner We dont need another hero video.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Barcelona
Hi. I noticed you were a big contributor over at Barcelona. The article, in its "Demographics" section, currently does a wonderful job of clarifying Catalan proficiency levels, but when looking for the same information about Spanish, nothing is found... strange. Could you help fix it? Colipon+ (Talk) 19:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarification. That may not be obvious to someone who has never lived there, or who has little background on Spain. Colipon+ (Talk) 00:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of female stock characters
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of female stock characters. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/List of female stock characters (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Andromeda! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:37, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Marco Torlonia, 6th Prince of Civitella-Cesi -
 * 2) Juan Antonio Samaranch Salisachs -

Can you feel the need to check before you edit tonight?
On Can you feel the love tonight, if you had actually bothered to check before making an edit for once, just maybe, you might have noticed the fact that the song was a #1 hit in France was already sourced in the chart positions section. And don't bother giving some rubbish excuse for your actions about information in the lead having to be sourced anyway. The UK and US chart positions are mentioned in the lead without a source, so don't even bother trying that one on me. Also, the #1 hit fact is far more worthy of mention in the lead than the UK and US chart positions anyway, because the song was not a #1 in either of those two countries.--219.89.70.122 (talk) 03:06, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.  MBisanz  talk 01:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Marco Torlonia, 6th Prince of Civitella-Cesi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marco Torlonia, 6th Prince of Civitella-Cesi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marco Torlonia, 6th Prince of Civitella-Cesi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. joe deckertalk to me 04:31, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Marsupilami cartoon.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Marsupilami cartoon.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:54, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Marsupilami 18 robinson academy.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Marsupilami 18 robinson academy.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:55, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Harlequin (comics)


The article Harlequin (comics) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The fictional characters do not meet the general notability guideline and, without reception and significance in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject, the topic of the article is not suitable for Wikipedia as a stand-alone article since it falls into WP:IINFO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jfgslo (talk) 02:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Civitella-Cesi
Category:Civitella-Cesi, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 04:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Civitella-Cesi
Category:Civitella-Cesi, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 04:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Wildstorm stormwathc force of nature.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wildstorm stormwathc force of nature.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:38, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. When you recently edited Joaquín Blume, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canarias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:24, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Unblock

 * I am asking a CU about the range block -- Guerillero &#124;  My Talk  22:05, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Loki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Avengers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. &#58;bloodofox: (talk) 23:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
Note that not only did you violate WP:3RR, you did so to violate WP:V, which mandates that inline citations be provided after material has been challenged. Since this is your second block for edit warring, it's 72 hours long.&mdash;Kww(talk) 02:54, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The challenge was unfair and against what is one in dozen of other pages without any problem. It was stupid and this is unfair. Andromeda (talk) 13:38, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Twins in mythology, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Navajo, Helle and Eumelus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. JOJ Hutton  21:24, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Brave edit war
Is there some way you and User:Jojhutton can resolve this dispute on Brave (2012 film)? It has gone on way too long, and I'm inclined to report the whole conflict to WP:AN3. It appears that the additions you're making are against consensus, and while I understand you disagree, the correct course of action is to discuss it on the article's talk page, or if you think you have a conflict with a specific user, with them directly (note, though, that several other users have made the same reversions). There are also dispute resolution options if you can't resolve it between yourselves, but I think that would be premature at this point. Just so you know, there is an old discussion on the article's talk page on the very subject of this conflict: Talk:Brave (2012 film). Please look it over, and comment there if you have anything to add. Thanks! --Fru1tbat (talk) 15:04, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I've tried to compromise by making it way shorter and to the point, but he just doesn't listen. He's hell-bent on his stupid crusade.
 * --Andromeda (talk) 15:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I understand your perspective, but neither of you have actually discussed it with each other directly, either on the article's talk page, or on each other's talk page. Also, please consider that the added detail might not actually be critical. In general, the plot summary should not replace the experience of actually watching the film; it should just provide a summary, and does not need to explain every joke, or cover every scene. I'm not saying the post-credits scene absolutely should not be added - I feel it may be a little superfluous, though I don't feel as strongly as some other editors - but consider that it might not be worth getting blocked over. Wikipedia does not need to contain every minor detail about a given subject - just the important ones are good enough. --Fru1tbat (talk) 15:56, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Lots of movie articles have information on post-credits scenes. Also, many people does not watch the credits if they don't know there's a post-credits scene, so I think is a good thing to mention it for the people who might want to wait and watch it. Really, I don't understand his stupid crusade. --Andromeda (talk) 19:44, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I understand how you feel, but these are the kinds of issues that need to be raised at the article's talk page. Arguing via edits and edit summaries doesn't accomplish anything. If there is consensus support for including it, it can be included. If consensus is against including it, unfortunately, there's not much you are going to be able to do.
 * I will say, though, that in general, just because a lot of articles have something does not mean they should. Either way, if you disagree, you really should find a way to discuss it, preferably on the article's talk page.
 * --Fru1tbat (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Almost Human
I wanted to thank you for adding a detailed 1x01 summary for "Almost Human". I have done a few copy edits, hopefully they are helpful. Your summary does, however, come in at 350-odd words and I just wanted to let you know that according to the episode list template, summaries should ideally between 100-300 words, with a maximum of 350 words for complicated plots. Obviously, since it's the series premiere a little leniency is acceptable. But I just wanted to tell you that if you're planning on adding summaries for subsequent episodes, they need to be a little shorter. Thanks, and good work! -- SchrutedIt08 (talk) 11:41, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Catalan culture challenge
I've seen on your userpage that you speak Catalan: From March 16 to April 15 we will be organising the Catalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). We look forward to seeing you! Amical Wikimedia--Kippelboy (talk) 08:40, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Andromeda. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Andromeda~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 21:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 10:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Highlander character
Template:Infobox Highlander character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:32, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David James Elliott, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Over My Dead Body and The Big Town. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Second Chance (2016 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brad Turner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of show business families, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Wilcox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Criminal Minds XII
In answer to your question, I was thinking about the clarity of the sentence. If you think what I did was wrong, that's fine. All I ask is that you correct the info in Collison Course because Reid's trial did not start. He was merely indicted for murdering N.R. --Njorent (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2017 (UTC)