User talk:Flordeneu

APOLOGY
Hi. This is [if you're okay with first names] N. I apologize for my brother's actions. He likes to log into my Wikipedia account from time to time and... well, you see, he's autistic and gets upset about things. I mean, REALLY UPSET. He's very particular about a lot of things and doesn't like to explain himself. Thinks the words do all the talking.

So...

I really am sorry.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.  Galatz Talk  13:28, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Odssf.com as a source
Hi Flordeneu. I noticed that you used odssf.com as a source for information in a biography article, Raúl Esparza. I don't know why it wasn't noticed when it was being discussed at Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_236. I'm going ahead and removing it from all articles. Let me know if you think this could be problematic in any way. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 02:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

TFD note
This is tangential to the discussion, but regarding Special:Diff/849521503 - what's needed is consensus. That, and a healthy dose of patience. Plus, an admin who has the time or energy to sift through that much text to determine what's going on. And to be quite honest, it's very tempting to just walk away from a discussion when someone asks "why hasn't this been closed yet?" Primefac (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Amazon Video Template Merging
In an effort to avoid engaging in an edit war and possibly having the both of reprimanded (or even banned) for breaking the three-revert rule, I have opened a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television in order to help come to an understanding and compromise over our disagreements in regards to this template. I am hoping to get the input of other editors heavily involved in editing television articles so that we might reach some sort of community consensus. I the interest of being diplomatic, I warmly encourage you to join in the conversation over there. Sincerely, BoogerD (talk) 23:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Your recent editing history at Template:Amazon Video original series shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 04:43, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Mazinger Z: Infinity
When it comes to anime, only the Japanese and English releases are mentioned, because if other territories are included as well, where do we draw the line? Besides, if you're gonna revert someone's revision, at least fix the grammatical errors that were there originally. Otherwise, you are advocating that a revision cluttered with them is better. And if you ask me, I'd much rather just take them all out. Please compare revisions before reverting. Sk8erPrince (talk) 03:57, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Highlander character
Template:Infobox Highlander character has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox character. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Highlander character
Template:Infobox Highlander character has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox character. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stargate Atlantis Ladon Radim.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stargate Atlantis Ladon Radim.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Stargate
Template:WikiProject Stargate has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:39, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Stargate task force/Portal:Stargate
Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Stargate task force/Portal:Stargate, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Stargate task force/Portal:Stargate and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/Stargate task force/Portal:Stargate during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 16:53, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Engineer (comics)


The article Engineer (comics) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:46, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Engineer (comics) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Engineer (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Engineer (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 13:56, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Amazons article- deletion of "Hero cults" and "In art"
Hello, in the Amazons article you have deleted whole sections ("Hero cults" and "In art"). Is there a reason you did this? Gre regiment (talk) 10:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Gre regiment (talk) 15:18, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sean Brosnan (actor)


The article Sean Brosnan (actor) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:14, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fantasio


The article Fantasio has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability, unreferenced. French Wikipedia article is longer but does not suggest any notability (it's just a lengthy plot summary, list of appearances, etc.). In the spirit of WP:PRESERVE, I suggest redirecting this to Spirou & Fantasio, without deleting article's history."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:44, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Mythology of Stargate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mythology of Stargate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mythology of Stargate& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)