User talk:FonFon Alseif

Regarding vandalism
So what kind of edit is considered vandalism? Just about any little things that I noticed and added after watching the anime Oda Nobuna's ambition get reverted. iamin7ove 13:51, 2 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamin7ove (talk • contribs)
 * You deleted the infobox twice without explanation. That is why me and Jamesx12345 reverted your edits.--FonFon Alseif (talk) 14:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Thomasce10 (talk) 17:57, 31 December 2013 (UTC)About The Sacred BLacksmith I added the info that Luke Ainsworth dies after two/three years and he only have two children, Luke ainsworth dies half a month after the birth of his second child.

Which is shown here http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%81%96%E5%89%A3%E3%81%AE%E5%88%80%E9%8D%9B%E5%86%B6 " 決戦後の二、三年後、セシリーとの間に二児を儲けるも、二人目の子が生まれて半月後に息を引き取った. "

六道仙人 - "2/3 years later, although he had two childrens with Cecily, he died about after half a month the second-born's birth." since the subject of the artcile is this Luke.

A message
You guys are both idiots! Excuse me since my english it’s kinda bad. I maybe an anonymous wiki editor but this feud I see between the both of you is just childish. Kenshin, yes FonFon may act immature and may have started this feud but the man does care about the work he does in the episode summaries and wants to make them understandable from a normal viewers Point of View, not an anime fan. Sure his grammar is bad, but he’s trying his best to solve it. Also it’s kinda hypocritical of you trying to make fun of him when he’s trying to be serious with you. In fact, I don’t think you realize the message he says about you wasn’t about you to stop editing wikipedia but to take a long break and come back later once you clear your head and cool down. Also, you should be thankful for FonFon since it was him that created and started the Maid Sama episode list when nobody wanted to. In fact, if it wasn’t for him, you wouldn’t be editing the Maid Sama episode list in the first place. I think it’s great that a clinical instructor like you wants to make Wikipedia better especially in the medical articles but the attitude you gave to FonFon is not the kind of attitude a teacher should show to his students. You should always Turn the Other Cheek even if that person was the one who wrong you in the first place.

FonFon, please don’t be so serious. Yes, it might be annoying for Kenshin to judge and change the work that you done but he’s the same just like you, a guy who wants to make them understandable. Also, being angry at him won’t change anything; it’ll just worsen the feud between the two of you. You’re a great guy and I have seen a lot of the work you done on this site but you don’t have to be such a perfectionist about it. You did say anyone has the right to edit Wikipedia so let Kenshin edit your work even if it isn’t the way that you wanted. I understand you don’t like criticism and someone changing what you done but consider it a help for your work to the people you want to help in Wikipedia. You should also practice what you preach. Kenshin did a good job in the summaries so there’s no need to throw a fit over it.

With all things said, it’s time for both of you to bury the hatchet. No more name calling, no more criticism of other work, no more defacing each other pages, no more negativity between the both of you and no more bad stuff between the both you. Both of you should just agree to make peace, stop criticizing the others work and hypocritical name calling. Those things stop right now. Just do what both of you do best, edit Wikipedia to be a better place. If both of you are editing the same article, just be respectful and accept each other work. I hope that helps the both of you and to start it, I’m deleting both of your criticism right now. It’s time to start being peaceful. Thank you.--202.93.220.178 (talk) 04:01, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

PS I'm been block send this mesage to FonFon, sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.93.220.178 (talk) 04:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Don't bother kid, i read your message. Your right. I realized i been a jerk to Kenshin over this matter. And Kenshin, i apologize for the way that i acted and the things i did. To start things fresh, i removed the message that i made at the Maid Sama episode discussion. So let's make peace and stop the name calling and never again criticize each other work. Deal?--FonFon Alseif (talk) 04:28, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

>>>It's a deal. I also apologize for the behavior I have shown. Anyway, I'm open to everything just so that things would be better for Wikipedia. I'll continue to collaborate, as usual.

Hey
Hi there, i've seen you edits at the The World God Only Knows page. But are you also edit on the wikia site??. Rommelgem (talk) 20:23, 19 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I believe you are saying:"I seen you editing at The World God Only Knows articles on wikipedia but do you also do edits on it's wikia site as well?" The answer? No, i have never edit The World God Only Knows wikia site. I been there but ignored it. I only talk about that wikia site because of my intentions of getting rid of the unnecessary info and trivia in the List of The World God Only Knows characters article.--FonFon Alseif (talk) 02:31, 20 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey, I wanted to let you know I've been editing List of The World God Only Knows characters and putting in the relevant sources from the chapters. I haven't had any luck with the references to train stations so those are getting nuked, but found lots of good stuff from the author's notes about the author created the characters. Please take a look. Thanks! AngusWOOF (talk) 15:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Freezing Wikia
Hey FonFon? Since you've helped contribute to the Freezing articles from time to time, I was wondering if you can help contribute to the Freezing Wikia? It looks like it needed a major overhaul with the characters. Think you can help out? Here's the link:
 * Freezing Wikia

I'm also a Wikia member there as well (as KID2NR). I've done a major overhaul with the character infobox, but it looks like the rest of the Wikia still needs some work. K2NR (talk) 02:44, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Future Diary
What I did was revert an old edit where an IP address censored the ending. However, outright removing it just because it was not good enough, can be considered vandalism or a sign of bad faith. However, you did accept and copyedit the plot; So I believe the article is in good hands from vandals (specifically spoiler snubbers) and will remove it off my watchlist.



DragonZero ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) has given you a cup of tea, for taking the time to weather a dispute. Thanks for staying calm and civil! Tea somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

Spread the lovely, warm, refreshing goodness of tea by adding {{subst:WikiTea}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Anime Summaries
Just a rule of thumb regarding anime episode summaries, all you need are 4-5 lines of text (sometimes six) to completely describe an episode. Any more than that, it's overkill. To get a better idea, check out any of the featured lists. Your work is good; but I'll be proceeding with reduction in wordyness and grammar editing. KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 03:36, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Jaeger vs. Yeager
You know, WP:BRD dictates that after one revert you start discussion. It's not "start edit warring, then begin a discussion".— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 07:25, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Fine. Let's just go to the Attack on Titan Talk Page to discuss about Eren's surname over there, not here.--FonFon Alseif (talk) 13:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * This still does not excuse the fact you edit warred and insisted on discussion when you should have started the discussion first to determine whether or not we go with Kodansha or Funimation.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 16:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. I'm sorry about that. And let's just discuss about Eren's surname. --FonFon Alseif (talk) 19:04, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Youhad someone else change it back to Kodansha's spelling, which it what it was before you boldly edited the page to that regard. That means someone else reverted your change from "Yeager" to "Jaeger". Now you open a thread on the talk page to discuss these points because you've had two separate people revert your proposed changes.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 16:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

'''Do not reformat my comment in any way, shape, or form. I intentionally made a new thread and there was no reason for you to merge my thread with one from months ago.'''— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 08:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey, sorry about that. It looked like you reverted. My mistake.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 08:25, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Mirai Nikki
The Mirai Nikki Redial OVA does not coincide with the events of the manga and anime epilogue. For example, Ai is pregnant and not in Tsubaki's cult in the original anime ending but in the OVA she is not pregnant and has joined the cult. The events of Redial include the canon original manga ending but also a lot of self-parodies and call backs to the one off manga 'Mirai Nikki: Paradox.' (Like the giant Murmur Mech.) So you must admit the events of Redial cannot be considered entirely canon. -InnerMokaLuv — Preceding unsigned comment added by Innermokaluv (talk • contribs) 07:18, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gate (novel series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lynn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cast of idolmaster.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Cast of idolmaster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:55, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The World God Only Knows Blu-ray vol 6.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:The World God Only Knows Blu-ray vol 6.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)