User talk:Foxhunt king

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Deckiller 03:57, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Fair use rationale for Image:Franz Altheim with Trautmann.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Franz Altheim with Trautmann.JPG. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 16:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Beger at trial 1970.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Beger at trial 1970.JPG. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 17:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Gateway_to_the_sun.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gateway_to_the_sun.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Life points
Hi Foxhunt king. Go ahead and revert it if you like. I do encourage you to add some sources to it, though, so it's not deleted for lack of notability and/or sources. Cheers! --Fang Aili talk 22:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit of Standard conditions of temperature and pressure was incorrect.
Foxhunt king:

As clearly stated and referenced in the tabulation in the subject article, the current IUPAC standard is exactly 1 bar which is equal to exactly 100 kPa. You changed it to 101.325 kPa, which I have reverted because 101.325 is 1 atmosphere rather than 1 bar. It has nothing to do with "more significant figures" ... 1 bar and 1 atmosphere are two different units of pressure. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks, - mbeychok 04:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Article creating
Hey,User:Foxhunt King, how do I create articles, or what I like to call "files"? and I've got another guy who needs help with that. Trampton 18:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC).

The Simpsons WikiProject membership update
The Simpsons WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.

Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code , in order to renew or cancel your membership.

If you do not comply with any of the choices, at the end of 1 month after this message was posted, your membership will be canceled and your name removed from the list. If you wish to regain your membership, just sign in again!

The The Simpsons WikiProject team – June 29, 2024

Weapons of SOCOM: U.S. Navy SEALs series
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Weapons of SOCOM: U.S. Navy SEALs series, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Weapons of SOCOM: U.S. Navy SEALs series. Jfire (talk) 20:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

RuSHA (disambiguation)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of RuSHA (disambiguation), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Rusha. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Rusha (disambiguation)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rusha (disambiguation), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Rusha. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Beger at trial 1970.JPG}
Thank you for uploading Image:Beger at trial 1970.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Scrolling boxes
Scrolling boxes are not to be used in articles, for a variety of reasons. Please don't add them. --- RockMFR 23:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Indeed! Don't do this.  See the documentation and links at Template:Scroll box.  Scrollboxes break various accessibility features, printing, and are not correctly supported by the Wikimedia software.   siℓℓy rabbit  (  talk  ) 00:19, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Suitors of Penelope
I'm sorry to tell you this, but your article is redundant to Proci, and should be redirected there as a matter of principle; Proci is older than the article you have created. nevertheless, I have assimilated relevant content from your article, which now exists in Proci. I will presently perform the redirection. Again, I'm sorry to inform you of this. &mdash; Anonymous Dissident  Talk 11:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'll wait to hear confirmation from you that you understand and are happy with it. &mdash; Anonymous Dissident  Talk 12:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Adoption
Adopt me? Axmann8 (talk) 20:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Notability of Skylynn
A tag has been placed on Skylynn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 11:29, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

pontifex
Bless you! (he pontificated). That did the trick. Haploidavey (talk) 16:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

docx file for File:Roman_families_4_Nov_08.png
I would like the docx file for File:Roman_families_4_Nov_08.png to help me vectorize it. --Beao 06:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Franz Altheim
Hello,

I read your Franz Altheim article. (I have no clue about this guy, I just stumbled over the article using the "random article" button...) It seems to me that there is a full stop instead of a comma, but I don't know exactly where: I think it should read either

''...he became a private lecturer at the University of Frankfurt in 1928, after making friends with Leo Frobenius, a well-known researcher in Germany at the time. Frobenius attended annual events...''

or

''...he became a private lecturer at the University of Frankfurt in 1928. After making friends with Leo Frobenius, a well-known researcher in Germany at the time, Frobenius attended annual events...''

Can you verify and change this?

Best regards --Cyfal (talk) 16:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Foxhunt king I am new to the Wikipedia beta test and would like for you to check the edits that have been made to the articles complex systems, complex system and complex systems theory over the past couple of days --talk) 11:28, 11 May 2010 (Independent) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg Royston Molineux (talk • contribs)

Fair use rationale for File:Franz Altheim with Trautmann.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Franz Altheim with Trautmann.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:15, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Himmler inspecting cotton.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Himmler inspecting cotton.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:16, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Wolfram Sievers Doctors Trial.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:Wolfram Sievers Doctors Trial.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:17, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  05:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Christian Mootson


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Christian Mootson, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Logan Talk Contributions 05:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Christian Mootson, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 05:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Garden of Delights listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Garden of Delights. Since you had some involvement with the Garden of Delights redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Senator2029 “Talk” 04:28, 11 April 2018 (UTC)