User talk:Frederic Y Bois

Hello, Frederic Y Bois, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for several statistical articles including Sensitivity and specificity. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Note that ~ doesn't expand to your signature in edit summaries, but your username and the date will always be shown next to the edit summary anyway.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. By the way, as you seem to be interested in statistics, you might like to take a look at WikiProject Statistics or the Statistics Portal if you haven't already. Again, welcome! Qwfp (talk) 23:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your encouragement! (Frederic Y Bois (talk))

Proposed deletion of LibSBML


The article LibSBML has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a notable free software.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidon01 (talk) 01:45, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

>> I think this was stupid

Speedy deletion nomination of LibSBML


A tag has been placed on LibSBML requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tchaliburton (talk) 02:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

>> I think this was stupid too

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

 * I have replied to your second post. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Your feedback on Wikipedia: The Missing Manual
Hello,

I saw on Wikipedia: The Missing Manual, and thought you might appreciate a response. I see that the nice people at the Teahouse have already given you an answer about language links.

Though the original printed book did include an index, the editable version here on Wikipedia does not have an index. For reading the book online you can use the search box on the table of contents page (right side) instead of an index. I can see that an index would be useful for people who order a printed copy or print it out themselves. Unfortunately, I can't think of a way to do this. The main problem is that we need page numbers to refer to pages in a printed copy, but the page numbers could be different depending on paper size, page margins, font size, etc. I'm also slightly worried that an index page would get out-of-date as editors make changes to the Missing Manual. If you have any ideas, please let me know or post your suggestions at Help talk:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual.

I'm a little surprised you had difficulty understanding "described in the next section". Though the word section does have a specific meaning on Wikipedia, I thought the phrase made sense with just the standard English meaning (a part or subdivision of a document). I've so the words "next section" link to the "How to Create Internal Links" heading, which I hope makes things clearer. If you have any suggestions for clearer wording, post to the page's talk page, post further feedback or let me know.

Thank you for raising the issue of language links. As far as I can see, they aren't mentioned anywhere in the Missing Manual, and I think they should be. I've made a note to add a section on them somewhere, which I'll probably do in the next few days.

Thanks for your feedback! – PartTimeGnome (talk&#160;&#124; contribs) 00:58, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Autobiography
I noticed you are writing an autobiography at Frederic Y. Bois. I strongly encourage you to read our guideline on writing autobiographies.

Creating an autobiography is discouraged on Wikipedia. Editors who do so often run into trouble, because it is difficult to write about oneself in a way that is neutral and verifiable. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our guideline for articles about people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Thank you. – PartTimeGnome (talk&#160;&#124; contribs) 01:10, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Another reminder
Please keep in mind that your signature in the form of ~ will not expand inside of edit summaries, and in any case is not a substitute for a clear and concise explanation of your edit. Thank you. HectorAE (talk) 18:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Frederic Y. Bois
The article Frederic Y. Bois has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. HectorAE (talk) 18:18, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

>> OK, an effort was done to improve that (I got to understand better the RefToolBar). I also saw that the tag was removed by someone else. Thanks anyway. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:12, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Frédéric Y. Bois. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

SomeImage.jpg

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:46, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Frederic Y Bois. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Frédéric Y. Bois, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. &#8208;&#8208;1997kB (talk) 02:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Max Oppenheimer (artist)


A tag has been placed on Max Oppenheimer (artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.moma.org/s/ge/collection_ge/artist/artist_id-4073.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dom from Paris (talk) 07:36, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Frédéric Y. Bois. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 07:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Frédéric Y. Bois while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 07:42, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Frederic Y Bois, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Max Oppenheimer (artist) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:04, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Victor Kissine
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Victor Kissine, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20140314044503/http://victorkissine.com/victorkissine.com/Biography.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Victor Kissine and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Victor Kissine, in their email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Victor Kissine. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Victor Kissine with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

See Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Victor Kissine saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:46, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

External academic review and publication of Wikipedia pages
Hi Frederic. In case you'd not come across it before, I thought I'd message to ask whether there are any Wikipedia articles that you'd be interested in creating/updating/overhauling and submitting for external, academic peer review.

The WikiJournal of Science (www.wikijsci.org) couples the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, it's a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.

Anyway, let me know whether you'd be interested in putting an article through academic peer review (either solo, or with a team of coauthors).

All the best - T.Shafee(Evo &#38; Evo)talk 03:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)