User talk:Geekboy6

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 22:43, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your edit(s) to the article 2006 World Series
Your contributions are very much appreciated. However, it should be noted that there has been a discussion about it a while ago. The final consensus was, I believe, to leave a link to the article's quotations in Wikiquote, which is already here on the right side. A shortcut of the collection of quotations can be found here for your own convenience. Regards,  Vic226  (chat) 14:53, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Jimmy Snuka
Only people who held the ECW title in August 1999 are considered world champs. TJ Spyke 21:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

ROH
The ROH Title does NOT have world title status (it doesn't matter if ROH says it does or not), so stop adding the world champion category to wrestlers that won the title unless they won a real world title.  TJ   Spyke   00:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * We go by PWI. PWI has not given it world title status, they have given the TNA title world title status though (it took over NWA's title spot when TNA withdrew from NWA).  TJ   Spyke   02:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * PWI mentions lots of titles in their almanac. They also listed ECW for several years before granting the ECW Championship world title status. Hell, just look at PWI magazine and you can even see they call the ROH "ROH Championship", not "ROH World Championship" (the only titles they use "World" with are the WWE Championship and the World Heavyweight Championship, which they refer to as "Raw World Championship" and "SmackDown World Championship" to avoid any confusion.).  TJ   Spyke   23:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please stop adding unsourced material to the Selena Gomez and Demi Lovato pages, as it is considered vandalism. If you have something to add, please discuss it in the talk page, or find a reliable source before you decided to put it. Thankyou. Narcotics (talk) 12:46, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I do understand where you're comming from, as I am also avid Selena and Demi fans. I know about their duet as well, but until it is offically confirmed (name, preview, etc...) from a reliable source, it's considered vandalism. Narcotics (talk) 02:52, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Selena Gomez
It appears so, the episode list says so, so we'll just have to wait and see. But for now, I'm going with yes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikiangelz (talk • contribs) 01:47, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. NrDg 14:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * It's only her MySpace page. How is that inappropriate? Please tell me on my talk page. --Geekboy6 (talk) 16:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Need proof or a reference that it is real. It is not a music myspace. The information details are obviously wrong. "Female 96 years old Los Angeles, California United States ". I looked for references from other places and all I found were statements that she didn't have a myspace page. Lots of posers on Myspace so need strong proof. Unlikely that THIS page is hers. --NrDg 16:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edgehead 5150  21:14, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Any mention of religious affiliation in an article must be backed up with a reliable source NrDg 21:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Demi Lovato
About Demi Lovato, I put her under American Christians, because she was originally classified under that category. I don't really get why she was removed from there. Let's not forget about her purity ring, which is a promise to God that she wouldn't give herself to intercourse until marriage. Can you please on my talk page tell me why she was removed from the category, American Christians? --Geekboy6 (talk) 04:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Purity ring is not sufficient to prove Christianity and nothing is in the article about that anyway. See WP:BLP. Categories must be justified by well referenced article content in that article and "The subject publicly self-identifies with the belief ..." and "are relevant to the subject's notable activities" all of which which also needs to be referenced and shown in the article. She may have stated she is Christian somewhere else but if the article doesn't prove this and show that is meaningful it can't be a category. Note that incorrectly characterizing peoples religious beliefs can be insulting to them - we must be careful. --NrDg 05:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Category:Deaths among active Total Nonstop Action employees
Just a quick note to inform you that I have nominated Category:Deaths among active Total Nonstop Action employees, which you created for deletion. Please feel free to join in the discussion at Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_August_19. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 12:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

The Corre
However, as a group, they have no established notability. "The Corre is just SmackDown's version of Nexus" is only a pov, not a certainty which we can speculate on which is, in it's own, entirely besides the point. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ ②  08:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited List of 1000 Ways to Die episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold digger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dutch Satanists


A tag has been placed on Category:Dutch Satanists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 20:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"My address is 130 Green Meadow Lane. Fayetteville Georgia. 30215." listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=My_address_is_130_Green_Meadow_Lane._Fayetteville_Georgia._30215.&redirect=no My address is 130 Green Meadow Lane. Fayetteville Georgia. 30215.] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Happy Halloween! The bats are out at Wayne Manor.


A tag has been placed on Happy Halloween! The bats are out at Wayne Manor. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 17:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of This isn't Hamlet, you know, it's not meant to go into the bloody ear.


A tag has been placed on This isn't Hamlet, you know, it's not meant to go into the bloody ear. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 17:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

"Oh, do not cry. Be good children and we will all meet in Heaven." listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oh,_do_not_cry._Be_good_children_and_we_will_all_meet_in_Heaven.&redirect=no Oh, do not cry. Be good children and we will all meet in Heaven.] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Bungle (talk • contribs) 17:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)