User talk:Gianmariot2

Proposed deletion of Quae ipso usu consumuntur


The article Quae ipso usu consumuntur has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced, doesn't make sense, not an asset to the encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  12:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alpino (chocolate)


The article Alpino (chocolate) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Subject product line appears to lack significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rebb ing  07:18, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Alpino (chocolate) is being considered for deletion
Hello! I've opened a discussion to consider the article Alpino (chocolate) for deletion because I don't think its subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. This is not a criticism of the subject or a judgment about the subject's importance; rather, it's about whether or not the topic belongs in this encyclopedia.

The discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/. You're welcome to participate, but please keep in mind that the discussion is not a vote; instead, it's based on the strength of relevant arguments. If you haven't yet participated in a deletion discussion, please read the participation guideline before commenting. Thanks! Rebb ing  05:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quae ipso usu consumuntur


The article Quae ipso usu consumuntur has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "While this expression is used twice or thrice per decade in the literature, it's impossible to find sources that cover the topic 'directly and in detail'. So fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBchrch  talk  16:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:De Odeslosa album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:De Odeslosa album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Hikaru Kurosaki moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hikaru Kurosaki, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 11:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hikaru Kurosaki
Hello, Gianmariot2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hikaru Kurosaki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hikaru Kurosaki


Hello, Gianmariot2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hikaru Kurosaki".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)