User talk:Gladys j cortez/Archive3

:-)
My views on that topic are fairly well known. With all the talk about zomg conflict, zomg drama, zomg cats (see, now it looks like I reviewed your talk page before supporting), etc. going about, the last thing we need is something that produces more conflict, drama, and cats. If your nom contained a lolcat I'd have strong opposed. Seriously. Giggy (talk) 03:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

"I'll let him speak his piece here, but essentially, Keeper has declared that he will no longer be a party to throwing anyone under the great big painful bus that RfA has become. However, I give you this link. Quoth the Keeper: [1].Gladys J Cortez 03:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)"


 * Painful bus??? Nice metaphor. =) &mdash; the _ ed  17  &mdash; 04:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You met the Big Painful Bus and survived ...  Acroterion  (talk)  02:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Best of luck
...with your RfA. So far, it seems to be going well. I suppose it pays to know Keeper76. :-) –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  15:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It pays to be a good editor, which you are, and you will pass on your own talents and hard work. I am happy to add my support based on your excellent work here.   Keeper  &#448;  76  15:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Just got your note. You do what you need to do.  Adminning is mindless and easy and high burnout city, but also kinda fun if only to see really nasty deleted stuff :-).  People have their standards, I used to get angry about the most ridiculous ones, but I don't anymore.  Don't quit Wiki over RFA, that would be like walking out of a perfectly good roast). Except, in a roast, people actually like you while they ridicule you.  Dammit, I can't think of a good analogy.  There have been several terrific editors that have been flamed out of rfa.  Don't quit over it, leave on your own terms whenever the hell you feel like it.  Be well, I'll be lurking around here and there and I'll pop by and pay a visit --  Keeper  &#448;  76  21:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

This...
... shouldn't really be a subpage of an RfA. Would you have any objections if I were to move it to your userspace and have the RfA subpage deleted?   Ase ' nine ' '' 23:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Q11 follow-up?
In light of WP:TL;DR, I wonder how would you edit my follow-up to Asenine's excellent question? I was impressed by the range of response styles this question provoked; and I'm giving some thought to posting it myself in upcoming RfA threads now that Asenine appears to be abandoning it. I have the impression that not everyone who addressed the question recognized a lady or the tiger aspect; and I would have thought that the RfA thread becomes an essential venue in which to inject an unaswerable conundrum. --Tenmei (talk) 18:22, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It is no accident that the most thoughtful answer to Q11 may have been your "older but wiser" response to Q3 .... --Tenmei (talk) 18:31, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Ballistician
I thought that was the Ballet-Doux...? LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Keyboards-wise, we're even
Only in my case, it was tea rather than Pepsi. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 00:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Beat the crat!
I echo J.delanoy's congratulations - welcome to Order of the Mop. Now, get busy: there's a main page that needs deleting and a (co?)-founder that needs blocking. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 02:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Congrats! — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 02:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Condolences
Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 02:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Umm, she passed... J.delanoy gabs adds  02:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I think he realizes that. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 02:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * ARGH I'm not the first to congratulate you!!!! =( Well, good job, and have fun with the mop...(not tooooo much fun, understand, but...) &mdash; the _ ed  17  &mdash; 02:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Alas, it appears not everyone appreciates my rapier-like wit and incisive commentary. Philistines. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 02:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

A suggestion
Your response to my oppose, and my obviously simple typo, was distinctly rude. I think you need to take care to maintain a basic level of civility and good faith now that you have the tools. A successful RfA is not a free pass, either to be rude or to write articles that lack references. Steven Walling (talk) 03:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Mr. Walling, let me be the first to applaud the way you managed to raise that point without throwing in any snide digs of your own. Good show! Sarcasticidealist (talk) 03:19, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I also appreciated that. However, as I told Mr. W on his own talk page, I didn't find it quite sporting that his oppose cited an error which I'd corrected well before he wrote his oppose. (Nor did I appreciate that he ALSO cited the "per blog" oppose, which pretty much chapped my hide all the way around.) Doesn't mean I couldn't have spoken more civilly, however.Gladys J Cortez 03:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Er, I was actually uncharacteristically living up to my user name just there - I thought his comment about writing articles (the one here, not the one at the RFA) that lack references was quite snotty and somewhat ironic given that it was in a civility warning. Anyway, you two appear to be patching things up, so I'll stop being a twit snotburger about this. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 03:27, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Gladys, I probably shouldn't have mentioned miranda at all, because it seems to have distracted from my core reason for opposition (lack of experience, as evidence by your answer to Q7, which I did mention). I can understand how bringing your personal blog in to the discussion would be frustrating. Steven Walling (talk) 03:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Everybody get in line...
I'm an ADMIN now! (puffs out Wiki-chest, which--lemme tell you--looks WAY better than RL-chest) As you can see, I've archived all my pre-RfA-ness. I will be thankspamming all my lovelies within the next few days, so brace yourselves for that. Meanwhile, though: THANKS to all of you who supported or neutralled. To you opposers--I seriously hope I can exceed your expectations. If I don't, I hope you'll feel free to let me know. I actually take criticism far more to heart than I do compliments, so believe me when I tell you that your words and thoughts have an effect on me. I'm grateful to everyone who participated, even the people who I kinda wanted to snark on. I'm learning to control my snark, and I'll be indebted to those who call me on it when they see it.Gladys J Cortez 03:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Read the first line, ready to retroactively change to oppose! LOL. Good luck! XF Lawtalk at me 06:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * What would that oppose look like, I wonder? "Oppose per saggy boobage"? "Oppose per RL cleavage issues"? (All right--I'll stop here. This is starting to sound like Friday afternoon in my office, truth to tell--and that's NEVER a safe place! :::roflcopters and lollerskates:::....)Gladys J Cortez 06:14, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Woah woah. No reason to call HR. I was simply responding to your comment. In fact, I think I've been harassed! Let's see how far I get with that complaint. :P XF Lawtalk at me 06:16, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * (pinches your butt) NOW try it! (Can you tell I work with all guys? or that I can, in fact, out-burp ANY of them?)Gladys J Cortez 06:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Your attempt at flirting has failed. Please see femininity. Lol. Outburp me, fine. Outdrink me, now that's where the serious debate lies. XF Lawtalk at me 06:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Congratulations, I'm sure you'll do a great job.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  06:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Well done on becoming an administrator, I wish you the best of luck. Camaron2 | Chris (talk) 15:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Many congratulations, Gladys, on your deserved success. I think that the constructive aspects of the criticism on your RfA will help you a lot to further improve your editing, and I know that you'll make a great administrator. You and I will meet again, methinks... [[Image:Smile.png|16px]] haz (talk) 16:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Congrats! Don't fuck things up too badly now... Erik the Red  2    23:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Congrats from me too! I've been lurking here and there, and never had a doubt about your rfa.  Ok, so a few times I had doubts, but you did excellente.  You proved what I knew about you all along, namely, that you rock, regardless of the state of your bosom.  I'm willing to bet that the vast majority of Wikipedian men could likely fill a D-cup themselves, making for a quite interesting wet t-shirt contest I'm sure.  Now that would be a fun meetup... :-).  Don't go crazy with the tools.  Nah, F that.  Go crazy!  They're loads of fun, and admin status is good for pickin people up in bars and nightclubs.  Of course, they're the wrong people, but hey, we can't be too choosey :-)  Kudos to you (btw, my kids fave show right now is WordWorld, a show I can actually stomach to watch with him).  Thank the Good Lord God Almighty that the Boohbah phase was short... Keeper  &#448;  76  02:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Congratulations from me, as well. I have no comments regarding your first post, though. :-) Good luck, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone


 * Welcome to the club... Please note that it is now available in floral patterns, pastel shades and is easily colour co-ordinated to go with your new sysop for tha laaaay-deeees apparel. If there is anything that you wish to ask, in an admin capacity, I can quickly furnish you with the names of many experienced Wikipedians to avoid; they have all failed me miserably, and I haven't a clue how it works (the illusion of flying is maintained by an extraordinary display of flapping...) Congratulations! LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:09, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Congratulations, Gladys, and welcome to the adminy team. If you ever need any assistance, don't hesitate to ask. Good luck with the bit! Cheers, Sarah 00:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Y'all are awesome....I've had the bit for a few days now and haven't done a single adminn-ish thing--RL has been just CRAZY-go-nuts, and the only work I've been able to do is some sneak-gnoming at lunchtime! Thank you all so much for your congrats, and believe me, I'll be asking a million questions any minute now. (Esp you, LHvU--flap flap flap...like that?)Gladys J Cortez 00:36, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If you want to get a start on being kick-ass Überadmin you're welcome to block me. I'm bound to have done something to deserve it. It's like eating potato chips; you need the first one to whet your appetite. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 02:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations on your successful RfA! Do everything you're supposed to and nothing you're not! Make sure to check out the new admin school. Good luck and feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Glass  Cobra  13:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
Gladys j cortez, I'd like to thank you for voting in my RFA. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again,  Spencer T♦C 02:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Notice of request for deletion of editor :)
, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the nomination (unless you wish not to participate); such removal will not end the deletion discussion (actually it will). Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :). Glass  Cobra  19:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks
I'm not as crafty as Thingg up there, but I'd like to take the oppurtunity to thank you for your support in my RfA also. Kindly, Lazulilasher (talk) 23:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Round Table and ANI comment
Did you mean Algonquin Round Table? Or were you referring to something else? Carcharoth (talk) 05:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oxford, Algonquin--they're both....erm....words that start with vowels, yeah. (Quit giggling. I'm sleep-depriveded, dammit. :))Gladys J Cortez 07:56, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Now, about semi-protecting Super Why!...
Congrats on thine success on becoming an administrator. Now that you're an admin, can you please see about really making the effort on semi-protecting the Super Why! page? those vandals will not stop changing those edits we have all made, including the fact that two episodes were knocked out that will air November 28th. And I'm also sleep deprived, too! NoseNuggets (talk) 4:58 AM US EDT Oct 14 2008

I can't believe I missed the chance..
I never voted on an RfA and would have definitely supported your nomination, but I guess I missed it (and well, you probably couldn't have let me know because of that pesky canvass rule, but hey, I wouldn't have said a word). But I'm pleased to see you passed and congrats on being an admin. You're definitely one of the more level-headed and funny editors here and I'm glad that hopefully PBS cruft and all of the other issues you go after will be a thing of the past :). Now if we can just fix all of the Nick-cruft (sigh; really, do we need an article about a Rugrats marathon from 1997?).  Nate  • ( chatter ) 17:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC)