User talk:Hardouin/Archive 2

Saints Wikiproject
I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.

Thanks! --evrik 16:13, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Archiving?
Ever thought about archiving your talk page? --Fang Aili talk 15:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. Hardouin 10:55, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:LRlogo1.gif.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:LRlogo1.gif.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello
How's it going, Hardouin? --Fang Aili talk 16:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I see my hello came at a contentious time. Well, I just wanted to send a pleasant vibe your way. Cheers. --Fang Aili talk 16:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey, I haven't forgotten you, don't worry. Also, don't worry about ThePromenader. Situation under control, so far. I was going to leave a message on that talk page you mentioned, but I was so busy lately, plus I started an article which turned out to be much longer and much more demanding than what I had anticipated. But I think the result looks good. I FINALLY put something on my user page. You like it? It sums up the spirit of editing on Wikipedia really. Anyway, I need to find the right words to leave a message on that talk page. One question I have for you: how is the female partner referred to in the English speaking press? Is she called "the lady"? or is she called "the woman"? I don't think I have ever watched a skating event in the US or in England, so I'm not sure. For example, would they say: "they looked set to win the gold medal, but the woman tripped in the last seconds"? or would they say: "they looked set to win the gold medal, but the lady tripped in the last seconds"? Hardouin 16:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * She'd be referred to as a female ice skater or by her a name. Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 17:00, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Heh, well feel free to chime in here. --Fang Aili talk 17:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * From googling and my own experience watching figure skating on tv, I can say that "women" is much more commonly used. The ISU's own competition coverage often uses "women" rather than "ladies". Dr.frog's main point of contention is that only "ladies" is used in ISU rulebooks, however nowhere does it say that you can't use "women", and since its own website uses "women", I do not see how this whole thing really matters. The word "ladies" is just a hold-over from the turn of the 20th century. --Fang Aili talk 17:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Women is used for the name of the sport women's ice/figure skating, female for an individual. To describe a group of skaters, female ice skaters will generally be used. See Google Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 17:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * No offense, but I don't think you know what's being discussed here. There are many arguments to be considered, and they don't all involve google. This was a discussion between Hardouin and myself. If you really wish to express an opinion about this please do so at the link I provided above, and please read the discussion at Talk:Pair skating as well. --Fang Aili talk 17:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm afraid my Chinese is got great; I understood maybe half the characters, but I think I got the jist of it. :)

One of the biggest arguments against the exclusive use of "ladies" is, in my mind, the existence of several agreements to use "women". (See the first decision, the second debate (note the table in that section), and the archived original debate.)

Re: your request for links:
 * A press release on ISU letterhead, which contains the sentence, "one of five women in history who has landed..."
 * Another ISU press release, "the first woman in history..."
 * Another, "the first woman in the history to land a quad..."

Cheers, Fang Aili talk 18:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * To be clear, I have no objection to the event being called "Ladies'", because that is its official name. I just don't want to have to call a women or girl a "lady" whenever I'm writing about them. Le sigh. Thank you for looking into this. What I eventually would like to do is improve pair skating to a good- or FA-level status, and thereby attract more attention from other editors. Then I doubt not that the issue will be raised again. --Fang Aili talk 18:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's exactly what I was going to propose: using "lady" for the official name of events, but using "woman" whenever talking about the female partner inside the articles. I feel too drained to write anything tonight. Will try tomorrow. Hardouin 18:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Thanks muchly and pleasant dreams. --Fang Aili talk 18:16, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Tallest structures - "Paris area"
A few of us have managed to come into agreement over an "in the Paris area" title - as a former participant in the discussion, your views and vote on the matter would much be welcome at Talk:List of tallest buildings and structures in Paris. Thank you. THE PROMENADER  17:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:SpeInf.png
Thanks for uploading Image:SpeInf.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 00:08, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

TfD of France infobox
Hey Hardouin, The France infobox is up again for TfD. I don't know if you knew that but I know (from past interactions) that you are one of the main editors of the France article and its infobox. While I favor one standard infobox, I remembered that the France infobox had some unique qualities to it. It seems like the standard infobox has been updated to accommodate these qualities, but I am not sure if that meets your requirements. In any case, I voted to delete (but cautiously). Which is why I am sending you this message so you have a say. Templates for deletion/Log/2006 September 6. Qu'en pensez-vous? MJCdetroit 02:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have tried to update the standard infobox to allow for the French infobox uniqueness. Hope I have settled the points raised. --Bob 00:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Moving Standard Mandarin
I've started a thread to try to build proper consensus about whether to move Standard Mandarin to a more intuitive and perhaps neutral title or not. I've left this message at your talkpage because you've participated in previous discussions about a possible title change. Please feel free to contribute with your thoughts and arguments at Talk:Standard Mandarin.

Peter Isotalo 12:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:StMaur.png
Thanks for uploading Image:StMaur.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:RAlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:RAlogo.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 12:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Etymology of Myanmar
Hello, I noticed you removed the "wrong etymology" (see ) the Myanmar article. As a native Burmese speaker, I know that "myan" means "swift" or "fast", and "ma" means "sturdy" or "strong". But I may be incorrect (in that specific usage), so can you verify that the etymology is unclear with a citation? Thanks. Also, I reverted your addition of "Rakhine" to the Explanation of the names of Burma/Myanmar article because "Rakhine" does rhyme with "alpine" in standard Burmese, and the initial "r" was added to note that the Arakanese dialect pronounces it with a "r". The commission used romanisations that were already prevalent during the colonial period. The British attempted to anglicise words like "waing" (meaning "round") to "wine", and these spellings remain common today. --Hintha 21:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:AUflag.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:AUflag.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Mediation
Quelle rigolade...merci de m'avoir prevenu :) --Stevage 20:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Your latest revert spree
Hi. You've just added another page to your RfA case. Reverting a) against consensus b) for invented reasons is unprecedented. You have no leg to stand on, so please stop. Thanks. THE PROMENADER  11:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * There is mediation going on at Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-09-10 List of Tallest buildings and structures in Paris. You and User:Grcampbell are bypassing the mediation by editing the very language that is being discussed on the mediation page. It's as simple as that. I'm quite sure that at some point some admins will intervene. Hardouin 11:32, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * You know full well that you cannot ever hope to tie the two together, and your trying to do so is just a desperate attempt to buy time. I could only welcome admin intervention, which explains my added complaint on the admin bulletin board. THE PROMENADER  11:45, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Paris disputes...
Although I agree that making those changes while the underlying issue was being discussed in mediateion could violate WP:POINT. However, I am glad to see that a compromise is developing that clearly identifies that it is part of "greater paris" but not in paris "proper." Though I wish the citizens of the appropriate sections of the Île-de-France would just establish a Regional Municipality and put us all out of our misery.

I know this is very frustrating - especially when it is about articles you care about and have made substantial contributions to; however, I would suggest you leave them alone for a month or so - if only for your own health - and trust in time and the community concept to get it right Sorry I couldn't respond right away last week. -- Trödel 23:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately both seem to be insutling each other. If they want to make it more difficult for the average English speaker to understand Paris - I guess that's how it'll be, and some of the audience will just find a better resource. -- Trödel 15:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Mail
Désolé Hardouin, j'avais cru que ma tentative pour t'envoyer un mail avait échoué. Je viens de te répondre. Metropolitan 10:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC).

Localization maps in the Paris region
Hello, Hardouin. During last week end, I've spent a lot of time to create maps of localization of Paris suburbs. I thought it could be a nice feature to add it in the municipality template for each commune involved. Probably the best would be to remove the image which illustrates sometimes those commune to put that map instead. I just wanted to know your opinion about this. On the left you can see a preview for Créteil.

The map represents waters, greeneries, communes and departments boundaries. It is an svg file, which means that it is easy to edit it. For now, I've only made Créteil, however, it's very easy to do the same for other municipalities as you just need to fill any commune layer with transparent red. As layers for each department also exist, I guess we could use it for their articles too. What do you think ? Metropolitan 19:13, 4 October 2003 (UTC).


 * Okay, as obviously you're not here I will make a test with municipalities of Val-de-Marne. Here's a first shot with Créteil. Metropolitan 23:05, 4 October 2003 (UTC).


 * After thinking about it again, we talk here about adding more than 120 maps. I'm not used to operations of such a scale and I would definitely like better to have your opinion about it before doing anything. Hope to see you later. Metropolitan 23:05, 4 October 2003 (UTC).

Ok Hardouin, je viens de lire ta réponse. J'avoue que je m'attendais à quelque chose de plus chaleureux, mais bon. Si j'ai fais apparaître les zones boisées, c'était surtout pour mettre en évidence les zones urbanisées. Je ne trouve pas ça si idiot que ça. Au moins, ça permet de réaliser que la plupart des excroissances de Paris intramuros sont dues à l'intégration de zones vertes. En ce qui concerne l'idée d'aller au-delà des départements de petite couronne, j'y avais pensé, mais cela m'amenait à des difficultés techniques puisque l'on rentre dans un espace où l'urbanisation est moins homogène.

Par ailleurs, la petite couronne, c'est déjà pas si mal. Ca fait plus de 120 plans et c'est du boulot à uploader. De toute manière, il est écrit que la carte représente "Paris and inner ring departments", en ce sens, on s'imagine bien qu'il y a quelque chose au-delà sans quoi on ne préciserait pas "inner".

Cette carte m'a demandé pas mal d'heures de travail, j'aurai espéré plus de considérations, mais je respecte aussi ton point de vue. Les cercles n'apparaissent que pour les communes inférieures à 3 km². Je pensais que ça améliorait leur visibilité. Enfin, je ne me fais pas trop de souci par rapport à ceux qui voudraient les remplacer par des cartes de départements. Les cartes que j'utilise situent bien mieux les communes en question que de simples cartes départementales. En ce sens, les remplacer représenterait nécessairement une baisse de qualité. Je vais néanmoins étudier la question en ce qui concerne l'idée de nommer la ville de Paris. Bon bref, tu me fais quand même douter sur ces cartes. je vais sans doute chercher à connaître aussi l'avis d'autres wikipediens avant d'uploader le reste. Metropolitan 22:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC).

Je vois que tu as ajouté la carte aux communes de Seine-Saint-Denis a- sans tenir compte d'aucunes des remarques que j'avais faites, et b- sans même attendre que des gens répondent à ton message dans le template French commune. Pourquoi donc avoir contacté d'autres personnes si de toutes façons tu ne veux en faire qu'à ta tête? Je comprends pas la cohérence de ta démarche. Je répète une fois de plus que les infoboxes de Argenteuil, Sarcelles, Saint-Gratien, Massy, Vélizy-Villacoublay, Grigny, et près de 150 autres communes de banlieue dont j'ai créé les infoboxes, ne peuvent pour l'instant pas profitter de cette carte puisqu'elle ne couvre que la petite couronne, alors qu'il n'est pas si compliqué que ça de faire une carte couvrant toutes les communes jusqu'à la Francilienne. Donne-moi ton document source et je ferai cette carte moi-même si c'est le travail qui te rebutte. Hardouin 15:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Hardouin, les cartes précisent dans chaque cas qu'il s'agit de "Paris and inner ring départements", quiconque ne connaissant rien à l'agglomération parisienne en déduira tout de même qu'il existe un outer ring sans quoi la précision inner ring n'aurait aucun sens. Ces cartes de Paris et la petite couronne permettent déjà de traîter les deux tiers de la population de l'agglomération, c'est tout de même pas rien.
 * La raison pour laquelle ne figure pas sur ces cartes les communes de grandes couronnes sont très simples et je te les ai déjà expliqué. Mon document de travail ne dispose pas des délimitations du bâti, mais il dispose des délimations des zones vertes. En petite couronne, cela n'est pas un problème puisque l'agriculture représente moins de 1% de la surface. Néanmoins, ça n'est pas le cas en grande couronne où l'urbanisme est beaucoup moins homogène.
 * Si j'ai tant tenu que ça à maintenir les zones vertes sur la carte, c'est pour la simple raison qu'elles permettent de réaliser que les départements de la petite couronne sont totalement urbanisés, puisque ce qui y apparaît en orangé semble être logiquement le bâti. Alors certes, je te l'accorde, ça n'est pas ultimement précis puisque Dugny, Noiseau ou le Nord de Tremblay ne sont pas totalement urbanisés, mais bon, c'est déjà mieux que rien.
 * D'accord, OK, toute la banlieue ne figure pas sur ces cartes et elles ne permettent pas la localisation des communes de grande couronne, mais c'est quand même déjà pas mal, non ? Metropolitan 16:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC).


 * Petite précision, je vais maintenant m'occuper des communes des Hauts-de-Seine. Metropolitan 16:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC).


 * Hardouin, j'avoue avoir beaucoup de mal à te comprendre et je te trouve à la limite de la paranoia pour être parfaitement honnête. Non, tu as parfaitement tort lorsque tu dis que cette carte donne l'impression d'un éloignement. Au contraire, elle présente le tout comme un ensemble cohérent. Ajouter une échelle pour de telle carte de localisation n'est pas une obligation, ni les cartes de localisation de Bruxelles-Capitale, ni celles de Greater London ne disposent d'échelle. Et je ne vois pas ce que de telles échelles changeraient sincèrement. En ce qui concerne la finesse du découpage français, les choses sont comme elle sont et il faut faire avec. Par ailleurs, je ne pense sincèrement pas que le lecteur moyen s'imaginerait qu'il s'agisse nécessairement d'une région immense sous prétexte que beaucoup de municipalités y figureraient.
 * L'objectif de ces cartes est d'accroître la visibilité des banlieues parisiennes. Je ne trouve pas ça plus mal. D'ailleurs, j'ai aussi dans l'idée d'utiliser le même modèle pour les arrondissements parisiens. Je compte aussi l'utiliser pour localiser La Défense, et les bois de Boulogne et de Vincennes. Par ailleurs, ces modèles peuvent aussi illustrer d'autres cartes, comme celles de la densité de population ou de la densité d'emploi.
 * Si tu crains réellement que certaines banlieues apparaissent comme plus distantes qu'elles ne le sont réellement, tu devrais faire comme moi et rajouter des photos montrant à quoi elles ressemblent physiquement. A ce sujet, les peintures du XIXem siècle présentant les communes des Hauts-de-Seine comme des villages paisibles sont beaucoup plus dangereuses que ne le sont mes cartes de localisation, qui, je le répète, rapprochent ces banlieues de Paris bien plus qu'elles ne les en éloignent.Metropolitan 16:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC).


 * [[Image:Ile-de-France_accurate_nu_jms.svg|250px]]

THE PROMENADER  18:45, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I did this one not so long ago. All the commune limits are there, and it's there for the taking. Cheers.

Thanks for this map ThePromenader, but once again this does not show what are the urbanized areas. By the way ThePromenader, you haven't told me what you thought about those locator maps for municipalities of inner ring départements.

Hardouin, to answer to your question: More importantly, I do have severe troubles to understand how you can see those locator maps as leading to a distanciation of Paris suburbs from the city proper.Metropolitan 18:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC).
 * 1) My source can't be found on the internet, and because of its size I cannot upload it (It's a big .gif file).
 * 2) I've explained exactly my point of view on each of your advices.

Image tagging for Image:Evry Loc.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Evry Loc.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 00:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:F_ww2_DeGaulle.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:F_ww2_DeGaulle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Dévots
Greetings Hardouin, I was just reading through your page D%C3%A9vots and I'm having trouble understanding one sentence, which I noted on the talk page. I'm no expert on the subject, and possibly this is the cause of my confusion....but possibly you could take a look and see if a revision is needed? Cryptonymius 07:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Gascony
Bonjour, je contribue sur la wiki fr, et je viens de voir qu'il y a sur la version anglaise une carte de la Gascogne que tu as téléchargée. Les limites de cette carte sont douteuses...en effet la Gascogne remonte jusqu'à la pointe du Médoc et englobe tout l'Ouest de la Gironde. Crois tu que tu puisses retoucher cette carte? Cordialement Matthieu 87.88.248.33 22:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok laisse tomber, j'ai corrigé! Larrousiney 21:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:La Défense.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:La Défense.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Nv8200p talk 13:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:FranceCities.png
Thanks for uploading Image:FranceCities.png. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - SCEhard T 03:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Seihamuni1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Seihamuni1.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 10:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bordeaux map.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bordeaux map.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU ≈ talk 03:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bordeaux1 map.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bordeaux1 map.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU ≈ talk 03:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bordeaux2 map.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bordeaux2 map.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU ≈ talk 03:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Bordeaux3 map.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bordeaux3 map.png, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU ≈ talk 03:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Untagged image
An image you uploaded, Image:DaCo.gif, was tagged with the coatofarms copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as seal. If you have any questions, ask them at Media copyright questions. -- 00:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:AUcoat.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:AUcoat.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:AlsLogo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:AlsLogo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:BNormandie.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:BNormandie.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:F ww2 DeGaulle.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:F ww2 DeGaulle.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. &#124;EPO&#124; 12:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Philippe3-1.jpg
Hi,

I tagged this image for deletion, as it is not a phto of a 2D work of art - it's 3D.

kind regards,

213.84.115.169 10:40, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Philippe3-1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Philippe3-1.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BJBot 13:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:PA20.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PA20.gif, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex  16:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:TourEDF.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TourEDF.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 12:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Bordeaux1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bordeaux1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT ( 416 ) 00:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Bordeaux20.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Bordeaux20.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT ( 416 ) 00:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Drapeau_Marseille.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Drapeau_Marseille.gif, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT ( 416 ) 00:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Mars1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mars1.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT ( 416 ) 00:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:AbidjanLogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:AbidjanLogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:DaLo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DaLo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 17:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:DaLo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DaLo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 17:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:DaLo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:DaLo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:11, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:FoixCoA.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:FoixCoA.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:AlsLogo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:AlsLogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:EiffelLaDefense2.jpg
Hi. When you uploaded Image:EiffelLaDefense2.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with GFDL-presumed and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually GFDL-self or PD-self. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 21:58, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:HNlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:HNlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:SanofiAventisLogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:SanofiAventisLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:IDF logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:IDF logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:IDF flag.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:IDF flag.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:RA flag.GIF
Thanks for uploading Image:RA flag.GIF. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:PLflag.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:PLflag.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:ReunionLogo2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:ReunionLogo2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Axa_logo.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Axa_logo.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. TorontoStorm 14:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bordeaux10.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bordeaux10.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 02:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

How about...
...writing fact, instead of re-writing quite valid geographical info to your "own" benefit? I could care a fig of where you come from, or what you think about the same, but I do stress that fact is fact. Cheers. THE PROMENADER  21:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Lorraine (province)
You had previously commented on the idea of merging Duchy of Lorraine there. Please check out a draft I made of what that would look like. Tocharianne 16:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Alleged Sockpuppet use
I have no view about whether this claim is reliable or a tactical move as part of the on-going disagreement between you and ThePromenader. However, I wanted you to know that regardless of the merits of your view - some of which I agreed with last year - using sockpuppets will be much more hurtful than helpful.

As you know the issue underlying your dispute is esoteric; thus, there will not be many that care about it, and even fewer that will spend the time to understand it. Thus, if sockpuppets are involved, then the easy solution for the admins (including me) would be to take on the issue that is easier to understand and resolve - i.e. the sockpuppet issue. Thus, that issue will be resolved first, and the content issue you care about will be ignored. Furthermore, if the sockpuppet allegations turn out to be true, then you will likely be banned and any new users that try to make a change that resembles the change you would like will be labeled as sockpuppets, even if it is not true. And ThePromenader's language with which you disagree will remain in the article.

Thus, I encourage you to use long suffering and persuasion on the talk page - respond to lengthy explanations with pithy understandable responses. If you get too heated about the issue then edit something else - don't take a wikibreak entirely just from the Paris related articles - and edit other things that stir your interest. If the allegations are false then your continued edits and improvements to the encyclopedia elsewhere will insulate you from the accusations. Good luck -- Trödel 14:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Stop with the silliness, please.
My demand here was a valid one - you are being purposely manipulative of those less knowledgeable than we - needed for a complaint I have filed, so you can find the comment you removed on my own talk page. Cheers. THE PROMENADER  23:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, so you do acknowledge that admins are investigating this then. Thanks for admitting it. In the meantime, changing the articles to conform to your terminology can only be interpreted as a provocation, and I am not the only one thinking this, judging from the supportive emails I've received. Be aware that you're being watched by other users, so behave a bit please. It can't be much longer before the admins take a side on this. Hardouin 23:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


 * No, there were never any admins looking into the validity "metropolitan area", but there may be an admin looking into your behaviour. The changes you repeatedly reverted - down to even the spelling and grammar corrections - were 100% good faith and 100% verifiably factual - but god knows what you tell people in your behind-the-scenes e-mail campaigns. It seems as though you have a personal stake in all this - wiki is a repetition of fact; it isn't a reflection of you or your ideas. Lighten up. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  23:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Request for unblock
The article automatically unblocks on 28 July. I have no intention of unprotecting at this point or of entering into a content dispute. I would however, suggest seeking a third opinion. When that happens I will be happy to unblock. JodyByak, yak, yak 00:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Perhaps, Hardouin, you can start dealing in an over-the-table way - how about open discussion; you've got nothing to hide, right? By all means, please take the third opinion route, I can only second this. Cheers. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  07:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Cham
Champa Empire extended from proto-Khmer Funan to Annam (Central Vietnam). They are what we may call "original" Hinduized Cham around now the Vietnamese towns of Phan Thiet, Phan Ri, Phan Rang.The "Cham Museum" at Danang and the "My Son" site are about them.

The "southern" Cham of the Mekong delta are ialamized and Malayan like. I've spent last november with this Cham community in Tan Chau, facing Chau Doc, in the border area with Cambodia.

Takima 17:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Nice2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nice2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Himasaram 23:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

UCM.png
I'm wondering if you created the image "UCM.png". It's very well done but it may have been labelled incorrectly. English is my first language and I lived in Montreal for the first 44 years of my life but moved to southern Ontario 4 years ago. While in Montreal, I never heard what is indicated on your image as Northern Ring & Southern Ring as such. In English, I always heard them referred to as the North Shore and the South Shore, respectively. Also, the city of Longueuil was considered part of the South Shore and not referred to as a separate entity (unless one was talking about the different cities comprising the South Shore, e.g. Greenfield Park, Brossard, St. Lambert, La Prairie, Châteauguay, etc.). When we spoke about the South Shore in casual conversation, it was usually in reference to those communities quite close to the shores of the Saint Lawrence River (extending to about a 10 or 15 minute drive south or southeast of the shore). What you label as the Southern Ring looks like what is officially called Montérégie, which extends further west, south, and east than what English-speaking Montrealers called the South Shore while the Montérégie area still includes those South Shore communities listed above. Thanks for the effort and for taking an interest in my sorely-missed hometown!! CWPappas 05:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi Hardouin, Thanks for your response to my message. No need to apologise for the time it took you to reply...I have a long memory and have been known to take my time getting back to people, too! You're right, I have seen government references to the "rings of Montreal". It's a shame that they didn't use terms that were established. If you ever need info on Montreal from the perspective of someone who lived there, don't hesitate to ask me. CWPappas 05:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Could you...
...clarify the licence of Image:Goree1.jpg, particularly whether or not it's PD-self, or what? Thanx. 68.39.174.238 00:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Mediation Cabal
Hello,

I've decided to take your case at Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-09-02 Economy of Paris. If you have no objection the discussion can begin right away-- Pheonix15 18:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Other occupations?
Your only "raison d'etre" on Wikipedia seems to be reverting to "your" propaganda - no matter whatever agreement we've come to. I suggest, if you'd rather not present what other references do, that you find another occuptation (than following me). Wiki is not your diary. Cheers. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  20:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


 * You even reverted another contributor's edits and my corrections to the same. Give me a fucking break. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  20:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Now you're just being pigheaded - stop. Read the concerned talk page. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  09:16, 28 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Are you all done with your crying to those you hope will back you without looking to fact? You are reverting in ignorance of reason, agreement, fact and consensus - the usual, what. I've edited the article to reflect our agreement, so this issue should be over now. Cheers. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  12:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Stade de France
bonjour. Où as tu trouvé cette histoire concernant le nom du Stade de France comme quoi cela ferait référence au "pays de France" et pas à la nation française? Les déclarations du jury qui donna le nom à ce stade ne vont pas du tout dans ce sens : "Le stade que la France entière attendait depuis si longtemps s'appellera tout simplement Stade de France." Le plus stupéfiant, c'est que tes affirmations sont en ligne depuis 2 ans... Clio64B 15:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ReunionLogo2.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:ReunionLogo2.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

==Image source problem with Image:Jaurès03.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:Jaurès03.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 88.134.232.95 18:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:SecretaireVersailles.jpg
hi, is this your photo? I heve chenge is, but the license is not korrect? --87.185.243.104 11:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll try to help with this request. The above question is from User:Marcela, he uploaded your picture to Commons (commons:Image:SecretaireVersailles.jpg), editing it in the process. The problem is that you do not explicitly state on the image description page that you took this picture, making it impossible to select a correct license for it on Commons. If you did take the picture, please mention this in the image description page and also choose an appropriate license ( normally). Thank you. Regards --Rosenzweig 11:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the edit but...
...you really have to change your attitude. That phrase was sitting there for months with a "citation needed" tag on it, yet you only correct it now, just hours after I removed it - and this as your first and only edit since one month. This is pure and provocative stalking, and shows that your motivation is other than a concern for the quality of the article itself.

If you really want to help, get to finding citations for all the article's other challengable claims - most of these are yours, anyway - as this is one of few things keeping the article from gaining FA status. Cheers. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  14:13, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * You remove information by claiming that there is "no real source available" without doing even the slighest research, then you're surprised I have to come after you to correct this. As for not editing, the only reason why I don't edit Wikipedia anymore these days is because of your harrassment and constant bickering. I have contacted several editors to let them know, and despite your widespread reputation as a pain-in-the-ass endless arguer, I hope that eventually someone will step in and help clean the mess in the Paris articles. I know Stevage would like to help editing the Paris articles, but your attitude has completely turned him off of these articles. Nothing to be proud of, Promenader. Hardouin 14:35, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Your stalking is obvious, and assuming that I did no research at all is but dishonest defamatory speculative nonsense. Your correction was correct, but change your attitude. Cheers. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  14:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * In terms of stalking, you're certainly a master, so don't take the moral ground here. As for attitude, I know several users who think you should change yours. Cheers. Hardouin 15:14, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Me, a stalker. Right. Listen - can it with the false allegations, because everything in all your manipulative whining to others has never been anything but suggestion or outright mistruth. Your behaviour and motivations for the same, on the other hand, with just this morning as a perfect example, is perfectly visible for all to see. Sorry for questioning the questionable, but much of what you try to forward here, and your means of "pushing" it, is exactly that. Instead of undertaking the obvious provocation of adding even more questionable content (suburban centres not labelled as such) to an already overly-long article, find citations for what you've already done. That is, if you have the article quality in mind, but you've already proven that you don't. Do me a favour: prove me wrong. Cheers. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  15:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * It's great because you prove exactly my point: endless arguer. Hardouin 15:51, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Your "contributions" here are certainly something to argue about. Photos with no accreditations, claims without sources, obfuscative or irrellevent phrasing, blanket reverting, sock puppetry, stalking, manipulative attempts at defamation aimed only at those ignorant of subject matter, refusal to discuss article items, tit for tat editing having nothing to do with anything quality or veracity, revert-warring to "push" personal WP:OR "interpretations" that go against documented fact created/published by this country's highest institutions - the list goes on...


 * By the way, putting districts all as one into "alphabetical order" is just an in-your-face provocative counter to my earlier comment. You're quite a piece of work. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  17:05, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Don't you have better things to do than filling people's talk pages with useless rant? At least it makes the harrassment case quite clear to all. Hardouin 20:55, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * What's "useless" - and an enormous waste of time - is your behaviour I outlined above. I'm sorry that you don't like me taking the time to make it quite clear to you what you are doing is wrong - but I'm glad though that you're the only problem on the same Paris pages I tread, where your goal until a year ago was publishing/protecting your quite personal theories about where "you live" in spite of all existing reference, contestation and consensus. By today's edits as a witness, it's obvious that, not only are you still biased by your own agenda, but that you're not the slightest bit interested in correcting your ways. If you don't want long messages from me, then stop your fact-obfuscating edits and your disruptive and antisocial behaviour. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  21:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Creeping Propaganda, dogging editors.
In what way is a template listing often distant suburban communes relevent to an article on an arrondissement of Paris? Don't even try to pretend that anyone will see a connection - or that anyone even cares. Will you stop with the creeping propaganda please - yes, yes, we know you live "in Paris" too.

How about finding another occupation here than dogging me everywhere? Your "spy and revert" attitude is not exactly what you can call productive, and it is frankly annoying - but I guess that's the whole point. I hope you feel better. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  09:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Your protective reverting and and misleading comments are truely disruptive, provocative and unproductive. Not only is that template useless, it is cumbersome and of no informational interest - yet you insist as using it as a badge of some sorts. I've proposed that it be deleted. Cheers. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  17:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I would really appreciate it if you refrained from leaving slanderous and frankly dishonest "denunciations" of myself on other user's talk pages. You are obviously in the wrong, as per the sources provided to you thousands of times, so stop trying to garner the support of only the ignorant - seek the opinion of those knowledgable for a change - and stop whining please! <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER   17:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, you state quite clearly your agenda here in your complaint to others - to make it look as though there's a "Greater Paris" even before it exists. I'm sorry, but you can't make things up or be misleading here - everything must be verifiable fact, not personal whimsy. Cheers. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  17:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:CUS infobox
Greetings! Template:CUS infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Cheers! bd2412 T 17:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Alsace-Lorraine: Geographical and historical data
Hardouin,

As best as I can tell going through the history for the article Alsace-Lorraine, you created the population table listed in the subsection titled Georgraphical and Historical Data. Your numbers look good, but could you please add a source for your information? Having a print source for that information would be very helpful for me in a paper I'm revising. Please contact me if you can recall where you got these numbers.

--Lnbaker104 (talk) 07:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BRlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BRlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 07:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CUS6.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:CUS6.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 07:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CUN2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:CUN2.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 07:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CUN1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CUN1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 07:20, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CUS7.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:CUS7.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Retropunk (talk) 07:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Ch1.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Ch1.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Timichal (talk) 19:59, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Camera 1974 05.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Camera 1974 05.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Camera 1974 05.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Camera 1974 05.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GuadLogo1.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:GuadLogo1.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Will you please grow up?
I'm getting very tired of your counter-factual whining campaigns aimed only at the ignorant and those very few who share your "big-international-city-wannabe" POV. Wikipedia is not a pedestal for personal propaganda - it is for fact. Grow up. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  17:32, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * (Looking up) And perhaps you could explain your (to what effect?) reverts to even my image contributions even in subjects that don't even concern Paris - this is pure and petty stalking. Again, wise up, grow up: Wiki is for those who contribute factually useful information for the benefit of others; it is not a pedestal for obsessive and opinionated pains in the ass. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  17:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:BOflag.gif
A tag has been placed on Image:BOflag.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 04:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bama.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bama.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kelly hi! 17:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Tit for tat editing
If you're spending so much time 'guarding' 'your' article, why do you refuse to finish it? There are dozens of citations needed to claims originally written by you - you've been asked repeatedly to fix this in the past.

And again: Will you kindly stop stalking me? As always, your only edit since days was to 'footprint' the contributions of another contributor within hours of his edit to one of 'your' articles. There was nothing erronous or wrong in anything I wrote, so your negations to my edits were pure proprietarialist prissiness. Please change your attitude, as it kills all possibilities for a constructive interaction with other contributors. Cheers. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  06:41, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ask yourself why I and other editors such as Stevage and Metropolitan do not edit the Paris article anymore (an article we were frequent contributors to in the past). Hint: it is mainly because of your harassing editing behavior, your disagreeing and fighting about every single little detail, your frequent rewriting of other people's edits. If you think I exagerate, just ask Stevage, and be honest with yourself and with your behavior for once, instead of taking the moral self-righteous ground as you always do. Hardouin (talk) 11:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Bullshit. All that results from your 'footprinting' any edit, blanket reverting and widespread whining when you can't 'out revert' your way. I've never had to resort to any method of the sort. Those who don't know any better or share the same agenda as you are the only ones who can possibly support you - and it is exactly for this that you complain only to they. I have only sought the support of those knowledgeable - because I publish for fact, not agenda or appropriation. Reality speaks for itself, no matter how you spin it. Cheers. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  16:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Anyhow, none of this can hide the fact that you are obviously stalking me. Stop. Thanks. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  16:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Will you kindly piss off with your antisocial and unconstructive editing habits? You are causing nothing but problems. I 1) make an edit after having made none since weeks 2) you arrive only hours after to (as usual) revert those changes to then 3) accompany your reverts (to a version, oh irony, that was of my writing) with dishonest commentary to then 4) partake on a widespread whining campaign. What's even more ironic is that the sense of my additions was quite in the same direction as your pet agenda... you know, it is quite possible to write coherently without vagueness or misleading (lack of) details - you have much to learn. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  19:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Then if 1) it is a version of your writing in the first place, and 2) it goes against the supposed direction of my supposed "pet agenda", then it is indeed ironic that you wouldn't accept this version or yours that goes against my supposed "pet agenda". All I can see here is you don't understand that your edit was too long and complicated for the lead of the article, which ought to remain simple. There are already unité urbaine and urban area articles where people can find all the details, as well as a demography section inside the Paris article where it is stated that the urban area is 26 times larger than the city proper, so no need to restate all these details in the lead of the article. Perhaps you think people are too dumb to click on the links so you need to read out the linked articles for them? Or perhaps you think the fact that the urban area is 26 times larger than the city proper is such an important info that it is really impossible not to have it in the lead of the article? Be serious please. Hardouin (talk) 20:26, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Stop spouting tripe. My original edit was clearly an improvement reflecting recent events and demographical fact, intended only as that - and you reverted it just for the sake of - reverting it. Get a life already. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  21:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You can also edit the sections of the article you know. You always make your edits in the lead, as if it's the only place where edits can be made. The lead is already quite long. It is supposed to be a short summary of the most salient points in the article, not an essay on details such as the exact size of the urban area or the latest events in the local administrative reform. There are dedicated sections for these. Use them. Hardouin (talk) 21:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not for you to tell me where to edit - the article is not 'yours' - and we both know that your 'only' statement is not at all true. Nor is it an error to include certain elements in an introduction that is a summary of/introduction to the entire article. Your behaviour today is typical of your editing in the past: 10% fact, 20% (purposeful) lack of clarity, 30% protectionism, and 40% whining, dishonest tripe to 'save face' for the rest. The introduction today is one hell of a lot shorter than it was - largely thanks to me, so thanks for that - and your opinions on that are not paramount to 'knowledge'. Would you leave the edits, I'm sure the only thing that would have been improved upon is the language. In addition to your stalking, you are one sorry, classic case of WP:OWN. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  22:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Carte_25communes.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Carte_25communes.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 04:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Carte_25communes.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Carte_25communes.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:49, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:LMCU1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LMCU1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell   babelfish 00:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:LMCU2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:LMCU2.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell   babelfish 00:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:LRflag.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:LRflag.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell   babelfish 01:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:AlsFlag.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:AlsFlag.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 05:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Hongwu Emperor image
Hello. I have recently put an article up for Featured Article status which includes your image Image:Hongwu1.jpg. However, someone has brought up the issue over licensing, since you forgot to add a proper source of where you found it and uploaded it from. I was wondering if you could verify where you found the image. Thank you.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 16:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Qinzong.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Qinzong.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wakkubox (talk) 01:19, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:SongGaozong1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SongGaozong1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wakkubox (talk) 13:41, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:De_villepin_xavier86050e.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:De_villepin_xavier86050e.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Nice12.jpg
Image:Nice12.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Nice12.jpeg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:57, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * File:Louis11-1.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Louis XI of France.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:12, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Population2Centuries.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Population2Centuries.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:10, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Image:FClogo.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:FClogo.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. - AWeenieMan (talk) 20:34, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:MPM1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MPM1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 18:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Missing image Image:ZhaoZhuan.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:ZhaoZhuan.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:ZhaoZhuan.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:ZhaoZhuan.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:RA flag.GIF listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RA flag.GIF, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  Ja Ga  talk 00:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:IDFlogo1.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IDFlogo1.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  Ja Ga  talk 00:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:PLflag.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PLflag.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  Ja Ga  talk 00:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:PC2.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PC2.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  Ja Ga  talk 00:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:PicFlag.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PicFlag.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  Ja Ga  talk 08:00, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:PC1.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PC1.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  Ja Ga  talk 08:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:PicLogo.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:PicLogo.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  Ja Ga  talk 09:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:ChALogo.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:ChALogo.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)  -- Skier Dude  ( talk ) 06:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:MarieGalanteMap.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MarieGalanteMap.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:CANCA.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:CANCA.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 00:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:ParisFlood.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ParisFlood.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

File:PhiesaKhmae.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PhiesaKhmae.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:04, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:CUS2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CUS2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:57, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:CUN.gif
Thanks for uploading File:CUN.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:CUS1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CUS1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

File:LorCoat.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:LorCoat.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Damrei.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Damrei.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 20:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:GT3.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:GT3.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 20:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)  -- Skier Dude  ( talk ) 20:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Cub.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Cub.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 22:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)  -- Skier Dude  ( talk ) 22:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

File:IDF flag.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:IDF flag.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 23:48, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Lille8.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lille8.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:LimCoat.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:LimCoat.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)  -- Skier Dude  ( talk ) 04:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Lille3.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lille3.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 18:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:PO1.gif
Thanks for uploading File:PO1.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:19, 26 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 05:19, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:PO2.gif
Thanks for uploading File:PO2.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Cixi2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cixi2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:CixiTitle1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CixiTitle1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Yuanmingyuan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Yuanmingyuan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

File:FrMo1.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:FrMo1.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File:GT4.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:GT4.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:GuyaneLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:GuyaneLogo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 11:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File:LorCoat.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:LorCoat.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Nantes7.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nantes7.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Nantes6.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nantes6.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Nantes5.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nantes5.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Nguyen.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nguyen.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Nice11.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nice11.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Nice4.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nice4.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Nice10.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nice10.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello
Hello. I've seen your article Quatre-Vallées, which I found very useful. If it is OK with you, I'd like to exchange views and info on that subject. If you are so kind, please e-mail me at: gabriel.artigue@gmail.com. Regards. Gabriel Artigue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.134.0.189 (talk) 10:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Philippe3-2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Philippe3-2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

File:PicCoat1.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:PicCoat1.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:21, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Cub1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cub1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 21:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Tour fermat.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tour fermat.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:56, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:56, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jaurès01.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jaurès01.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Viensmongrand.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Viensmongrand.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:SongTaizu.gif
Thanks for uploading File:SongTaizu.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:TangXuanzong1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TangXuanzong1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:SongRenzong.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SongRenzong.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:SongGaozong.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SongGaozong.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:QinJinZhuan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:QinJinZhuan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:QiZhuan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:QiZhuan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:QiJin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:QiJin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:ChuZhuan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ChuZhuan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:ChuJin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ChuJin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:JinZhuan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JinZhuan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:ZhaoJin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ZhaoJin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:JinJin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JinJin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 22:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:SongShenzong.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SongShenzong.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Ascánder (talk) 13:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

ANI
Hi, just a note to tell you that you are the subject of a section at WP:ANI. Looie496 (talk) 22:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi. Again, even after an absence of almost one year, I see that you're 'footprinting' any article I work on only hours after I edit - and again I see you insist on reverting to your trumpeting speculations (based on studies that themselves make admitted 'estimations') presented as fact, rather than providing information based on readily available fact. Rather have the results of my first edits since perhaps a year return into the usual revert war, I decided to complain.


 * Both articles I was working on have, save vandalism, lain dormant since months - you could have made corrections and critiques yourself any time. It's quite obvious, by the fact that your first edits since nine months were only to articles I had been to only hours before, that you are dogging me, not the edits themselves. Stop. <span style="font-family:Futura, Helvetica, _sans;color:#ddd7a3;font-size:95%;">THE PROMENADER  05:36, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Charles7-1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Charles7-1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:48, 19 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 07:48, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of languages by number of native speakers according to two websites
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of languages by number of native speakers according to two websites. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/List of languages by number of native speakers according to two websites. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Hardouin! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Xavier de Villepin -
 * 2) Guillaume Sarkozy -

File source problem with File:Lyon_Arr.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lyon_Arr.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Par_Arr1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Par_Arr1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:07, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Paris1.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paris1.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Stras2.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stras2.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Grandlyon2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Grandlyon2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Paris1.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Paris1.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 07:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Stras2.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Stras2.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 07:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:SongTaizong2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:SongTaizong2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Francis1-2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Francis1-2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:06, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:06, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Louis8-2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Louis8-2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:55, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:55, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Pompadour4.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Pompadour4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:De Maniban de Cazaubon.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:De Maniban de Cazaubon.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:HoteldeVille.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:HoteldeVille.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:46, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:46, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Le-duc-de-bourbon.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Le-duc-de-bourbon.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:1stPrinceChun1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:1stPrinceChun1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:36, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:36, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Grandlyon1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Grandlyon1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:31, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:31, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:LimLogo2.gif
Thank you for uploading File:LimLogo2.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Cambodia2.png
Thank you for uploading File:Cambodia2.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Damrei.png
Thank you for uploading File:Damrei.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:32, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:32, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Dangrek.png
Thank you for uploading File:Dangrek.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:33, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:33, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Myanma.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Myanma.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:02, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:SecretaireVersailles.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:SecretaireVersailles.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 01:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

File:NPCflag.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NPCflag.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kelly hi! 02:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Nantes map.png
Thank you for uploading File:Nantes map.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jaurès02.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jaurès02.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:LimFlag.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LimFlag.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:18, 29 June 2011 (UTC)