User talk:Highschoolpuppettier

Welcome!
Hello, Highschoolpuppettier, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 11:09, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Věra Vovsová
Hello Highschoolpuppettier. I don't think Vovsová is particularly notable in the context of Czech art. I can't find any reliable mentions of her online or in the books on Czech art. A catalogue of her works has been published by a local gallery in Pardubice, but that's all. The sources you've added to the article cannot be considered reliable in Wikipedia terms (it is a blog and the website estránky.cz, where anyone can buy a domain). Do you have any better sources? --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:54, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Everything in the Wikipedia mainspace should be reliably referenced and all subjects and topics should be notable. I'm quite familiar with Czech art history, but this is a new name to me. Of course, it doesn't mean that Vovsová doesn't meet our notability requirements, but - trust me - I've checked carefully many possible news and books search engines. The result is pretty poor. Your article is very nice, but I'm afraid that you picked a not notable topic. Please, don't be discouraged ... I'll give you more time to look for better sources. Best regards. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:20, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Vovsová is in my opinion a classical example of a regionally known personality, but it is not enough to meet our notability criteria (see WP:ARTIST). --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * OK, please, don't forget that the sources must be independent of the article's subject. It means that personal documents or correspondence cannot back up articles alone. Thanks for your understanding. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:34, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry. It´s just hard to make a new page on Wikipedia considering it has information on almost everything.
 * It isn't so hard, there are thousands of missing important topics ... Recently, I'm trying to develop this list with my limited skills. Each one of the buildings deserves a stand-alone article :) --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:43, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

La Digue Article Assessment
I have reviewed the assessment request you submitted to WikiProject Biography for the La Digue article, and determined that the article is not within the scope of the WikiProject. If you still feel that the article is in need of re-assessment, I would suggest contacting one of the WikiProjects listed on the article's Talk page for assistance. --TommyBoy (talk) 18:59, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

La Digue
Hi, I replied at my talk page. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Church of Saint James, Beroun, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Plague and Saint James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 09:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)