User talk:IHelpWhenICan/Archive 2

URGENT CHANGE REQUEST TO DANITY KANE PAGE / FACTUAL ERROR!
Hi,

Not sure if this is the right place to do this but can you please correct a factual error on the DANITY KANE Wikipedia page?

The error is in the Current Activities section.

The statement in error is, "Under Russell Simmons Plastic Cash International, Danity Kane's image will be featured on Visa debit cards."

The fact is that Russel Simmons does NOT own Plastic Cash International and he is not affiliated with it in any way.

The Visa product featuring Danity Kane is called the MYPLASH Visa Prepaid Card, and it is owned and marketed by Plastic Cash International, LLC. Neither the MYPLASH Visa Prepaid Card, nor Plastic Cash International, LLC are affiliated and/or owned by Russel Simmons.

If somebody could correct this error asap it would be much appreciated.

I am the president of Plastic Cash International, so please contact me if you have any questions, etc.

Thanks!

Dklein1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dklein1 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Danity Kane/ blacklist
No. I just removed the information you sourced to a blacklisted site. We have blacklists for a reason, and, unless you get that site whitelisted for that article, you can't reference it. I just watch over the page for vandalism and fake record chart information. I've never heard the group's music, and, from the description, I doubt that I will ever hear it except by accident.&mdash;Kww(talk) 02:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I edit thousands of pages for groups that I've never heard, and will continue to do so. A phony chart is a phony chart, a bad reference is a bad reference, and a blacklisted URL is a blacklisted URL ... doesn't matter if it's for an article on Danity Kane or on Led Zeppelin.&mdash;Kww(talk) 02:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hi there IHelpWhenICan, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. However, remember that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam; and remember that misuse of the tool, either by reverting edits you simply disagree with, or by using the tool to revert-war with other editors, can lead to it being removed from your account, and some administrators may not even warn you before they remove it, should the tool be misused. For practice and further information, I invite you to see New admin school/Rollback. If you think an edit isn't vandalism, but should be reverted, then don't use rollback to revert it. This all being said, you now have the tool enabled, and I wish you good luck. Best wishes. Acalamari 23:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You're more than welcome. :) Acalamari 00:03, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank you for your complimentIcevirgo99 (talk) 04:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Danity Kane
Will you talk over "big" changes before making them? Flyer22 (talk) 02:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Plus, the part where you moved O'Day's February 2009 interview discussing her dismissal from the group ahead of Richard's January 2009 confirmation of the group having split up does not flow right. It really should be in order. Thus, I am against that type of change. Flyer22 (talk) 02:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

LOL. I went to revert that IP at the same time you just did. I could not revert with my rollback because you had just used your rollback at the same time (I got a message about that when I did it). I just felt like telling you that. I found it a little funny for some reason. Flyer22 (talk) 22:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey, the reason Shannon's full name (Shannon Bex, instead of just Bex) is mentioned and linked in the End of group section is because though her name is mentioned and linked higher within the article, it is much higher (all the way back in the Making the Band 3 section). Generally, for cases like that, we should mention and link the person's name again when that person is only mentioned once within the body of the article and are not mentioned again within that body until much further down. The reason being...readers not familiar with the group (as in casual readers) are likely not to remember who that person is or might have skipped the one section where that person is mentioned (excluding the lead, whether that person is noted in the lead or not). Flyer22 (talk) 02:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

The Rise and fall of Danity Kane
Go to that editor's talk page to see what I stated about that. Flyer22 (talk) 23:05, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:MTB All At Wintern.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MTB All At Wintern.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Linking tour dates
Current consensus is not to wikilink dates generally, although the Arbitration Committee is currently considering the point, and has issued an interim injunction prohibiting "mass or automated" linking or unlinking of dates. Until we have a definitive ruling, consensus should prevail. Thanks. Rodhull andemu  23:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Aubrey O'Day image
You know that I replied on my talk page, right? Flyer22 (talk) 00:23, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

On another note, what do you think of Danity Kane's so-called third studio Album "From the Ashes"? I redirected that article, for the reasons I stated on its creator's talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 00:23, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:DK Bad girl screenshot.png
Thank you for uploading File:DK Bad girl screenshot.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —  Σ  xplicit 16:47, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Damaged remix cover.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Damaged remix cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ xplicit  20:48, 30 September 2009 (UTC)