User talk:IHelpWhenICan/Archive 3

Orphaned non-free image File:HillsTitleCard.png
 Thanks for uploading File:HillsTitleCard.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Sugababes
Hey, didn't mean to disregard your picture like that, it would be a great addition to that section if no one else disagrees. Fixer23 (talk) 08:13, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

The Saturdays
Whoops! I'm embarrassed to have mixed up the US and Euro charts like that: good catch! Thanks for fixing it. Can you find (and post) their US chart positions? I'm not getting any results in my own search.... SteveStrummer (talk) 18:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I assume the comment for The Saturdays on my page was intended for SteveStrummer and not for myself. The Billboard edit was not made by me Pointer1 (talk) 19:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: Higher (image)
The image I've uploaded is from Amazon.co.uk, and is the same on iTunes and Universal Music store (colorwise). at 280×280 size is not really an issue. But thanks for the corrections anyway. --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1 &#124;  talk2me  22:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * If that's the case... feel free to upload a new version of the image (same as one b4) at a smaller size. =) As for my userpage... Thanks. I can create the basic code for you then you can personalise the fonts and colors if you like? --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1 &#124;  talk2me  22:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Did you mean "Did I delete them from the infobox?" If that's the question then I did because I intend to make the article a GA and one of the most common things is improving the readability of the page. Adding external music video links to the infobox unnecessarily increases the length of the infobox when links are already provided in the external links section. --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1 &#124;  talk2me  22:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Review
I truly wasn`t talking to you, but if you`d like me too I will.--Blackjacks101 (talk) 17:32, 20 December 2010 (UTC)


 * For the Background, you may want to double check some grammar issues such as "studio session with Jim Beanz, Aundrea Fimbres" < Jim Beanz, where Aundrea Fimbres stated


 * Also since this is only one song, not as much detail is needed to be put on the situation. Most of the stuff you put focuses on their album in general.  Try summarizing why they didn't like where they were heading etc.  That way their won't be as many paragraphs etc


 * For a Music Video that has allot of information about it you want to separate it into 3 parts. The three topics would be Background or Development, Synopsis or Concept and Reception.  Background includes what happened while making the video.  Synopsis is a brief summary of music video (Try summarizing yours bit). And reception is how critics felt about it (sometimes this is not included because there where no reviews on the music video)


 * If you feel that their is not enough information try summarizing the information more. A good example that doesn't separate the music video section is Poker Face (Lady Gaga song), and a good example that does separate the music video section isBad Romance


 * Try doing these things before I truly edit grammar etc. Sorry for being picky but the things I stated are important for articles, especially ones that may become future GA's.  If your looking for a guide I highly suggest you look at the examples are stated above.--Blackjacks101 (talk) 23:14, 20 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes that could work, you may have to adjust it a little to fit the article though--Blackjacks101 (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

RHWOA
Hello. I received your note and wanted to respond. Your message indicated your view is I am removing sources I dont agree with but I think you will find anything I may have deleted/removed as not in anyway able to meet reliable sources guidelines. Under no circumstances can a twitter feed or gossip site be used as a ref/ Going even further, these sources in this case are being used within an article about a show, but to describe individual pepople which would then draw in BLP standards for refs which is even higher. So, my point is that we cannot have unreliable, controversial refs used in a BLP fashion and the info must be removed immediately and only added back if refs that meet BLP standards can be found (which I suspect they wont, as the info itself is just gossip). 207.216.253.134 (talk) 19:24, 24 December 2010 (UTC)