User talk:Intentium

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Intentium. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Green Giant (talk) 23:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

I have reversed your edits to the Trinidad and Tobago article because I think you need to provide a clearer explanation of why Chaguanas doesn't count as a city and why that image needs to be removed. Please use the article talkpage for this purpose. Green Giant (talk) 23:17, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, so you are saying that Chaguanas is not a city and therefore it shouldn't be listed in that box. Why have you put Port of Spain there instead? I just looked at the 2011 census → here but be aware it seems to take a while to load. On page 44, I note that it states that San Fernando has 48,838 people compared to 37,074 in Port of Spain. Shouldn't we have San Fernando in that box instead? Green Giant (talk) 00:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC)


 * And, for the second time, you removed an image, only this time you rather bizarrely claimed some form of "Indo-Agenda", which is pure BS and pure orignal research, neither of which are acceptable. Please do not remove such again unless you gain WP:CONSENSUS through discussion on the talkpage - right now your multiple removals could lead to a block for edit-warring  ES  &#38;L  09:58, 11 January 2014 (UTC)


 * So, because you steadfastly refuse to start the discussion, I have done so on your behalf. Please do not make any of these changes again prior to gaining new consensus on the article talkpage  ES  &#38;L  12:21, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Trinidad and Tobago. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ES  &#38;L  12:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.