User talk:InternetEnigma

September 2022
Hello, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. If you're going to keep adding content to Wikipedia, you need to learn how to add references to Wikipedia. Please read WP:REFB for help on that.

The inclusion requirement for being listed on List of concept albums is to have a reliable source that directly calls the given album a concept album. Please work on fixing this or your recently added entries will be removed soon. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me  13:34, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Anne Buydens. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽  ☏(ring-ring)  12:56, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

It's controversial to say a 102 year old centenarian that passed a year after her husband died of natural causes. InternetEnigma (talk) 17:43, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes. Please read the policy about adding your own ideas to biographical articles. Dying of "natural causes" is a fact, something that cannot be interpreted from the available sources. Wikipedia relies on reliable sourcing, which was not met by your additions.-- ☾Loriendrew☽  ☏(ring-ring)  21:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Except it can especially on Ruthie Tompson which both the source and article state she died Peacefully in Her Sleep I.E. the definition of a Natural Death, there is no evidence to suggest that either person died unnaturally or under suspicious circumstances if I was going for a direct cause of death then you would have a point however that is not at all what is happening when your own sources completely disagree with you and prove you wrong on this matter and is completely idiotic to debate that a centenarian and a supercentenarian died peacefully from natural causes, you yourself cannot provide a source to state this fact is controversial and is under high debate whereas everything suggests both parties did in fact pass naturally as many sources state they likely passed from age related causes which is in fact natural causes what more could you possibly ask for. InternetEnigma (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mini Ladd, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 01:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Everything I stated is already sourced by one of the linked sources, nothing I said was incorrect or un factual nor was it disruptive . InternetEnigma (talk) 01:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * You needed to specify which source(s) verify the information. It's not practical to go through every source in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 01:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Not to mention the page is already poorly sourced by linking to the Thirst Projects current page when he has long been removed from membership for over 2 years now so how about fixing your page instead of threatening to ban me over stating what literally happened thanks. InternetEnigma (talk) 01:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for pointing out that update. I've verified that he's no longer on the board and removed that. —C.Fred (talk) 01:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

"City of Derry ended their relationship with Thompson in July 2020 following sexual misconduct allegations made against him." Gee what source could I possibly be referring to its almost as if you didn't even read the page yet are over here threatening to ban me for stating the literal history of this person it's almost as if you haven't even read the page.

It'd honestly be better if you spent all this energy deleting the page instead of getting all riled up at me. InternetEnigma (talk) 01:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * And how were they able to predict his apology? —C.Fred (talk) 01:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

I literally said he was dropped in my edit it's actively like you didn't read the page to begin with. InternetEnigma (talk) 01:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

The apology was literally uploaded to his YouTube channel that source verifies the misconduct I stated that you deem worthy of banning me for stating. InternetEnigma (talk) 01:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

https://www.dualshockers.com/what-did-miniladd-do-twitch-ban/

Literally all you see when you look him up is things that I stated happened so no it is not a gross violation when one of your sources even stated it and anyone that reports on him mentions it. InternetEnigma (talk) 01:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Songs of Pain, you may be blocked from editing. The person is known as an outsider artist but every song's genre must be explicitly named in sources. Binksternet (talk) 23:25, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

List of one-hit wonders in the United States
The inclusion criteria for the article List of one-hit wonders in the United States has nothing to do with chart results. Instead, it is about having the media call the artist a "one-hit wonder". Each entry needs two such media sources. The assumption is that the media are referring to the artist's audience in the United States. Binksternet (talk) 01:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)


 * You still continue to ignore my point and keep going muh muh muh anti-billboard clause it's getting ridiculous how you keep arguing such non-points, Ranker.com is not a reliable source the fact that you are citing it is in clear violation of Wikipedia's rules of reliable sourcing where as I have at least provided sources to dispute the claim that this artist classified as a OHW that you are ignoring in favor of continuing to cite what is essentially no different from a Reddit post, also him being big in Puerto Rico is him being big here as Puerto Rico is apart the United States you're continual use of this point because he is a Spanish speaking artist is just idiotic. InternetEnigma (talk) 02:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree that audience scores are unreliable and should not be used. But Fonsi is found in many other sources, for instance https://thevault.musicarts.com/top-six-one-hit-wonders-from-the-2010s/ and the Stereogum source already cited. Binksternet (talk) 02:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)


 * @Binksternet then cite those sources instead as Ranker.com violates Wikipedia's main rules of reliable sourcing but either way I've still provided enough sources to say he is not meaning he falls into a grey area and should be left off the list until stronger evidence can prove that culturally-speaking he is a one-hit wonder.


 * Also why is the page called List of One Hit Wonders in The United States and not List of Cultural One Hit Wonders that's been annoying me for awhile since the title is misleading as evident from the Talk Page going back a decade now as it is well established that people think of Billboard when they think OHWs so the change should be made to clear up the confusion. InternetEnigma (talk) 17:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Digital Bath. Magatta (talk) 16:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to 20/20 (The Beach Boys album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you.  freshacconci  (✉) 14:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * All information added is already cited by AllMusic which was linked on every page I edited and is a reliable source that is cited even by the Library of Congress as a credible database, the only person making disruptive edits here is you as you clearly didn't bother to even read the pages you were "protecting" from vandalism. Please refrain from further disruptive edits and false campaigns against other users without doing proper research beforehand thank you. InternetEnigma (talk) 22:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * We don't use AllMusic sidebar genres because they are machine-generated and unreliable. See WP:ALBUMAVOID which lists poor sourcing and mentions this problem.
 * The essay WP:EXPLICITGENRE represents the working consensus about music genres. More generally, Wikipedia relies mainly on WP:SECONDARY sources which in this case would be published prose descriptions of musical genres written by musicologists, music critics or career journalists. Binksternet (talk) 00:09, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Go (Mario album), you may be blocked from editing.  freshacconci  (✉) 04:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The person genre warring here is you as again I continue to provide sources for these edits you just don't look at them and claim it is unsourced despite this information already being cited on the page. If you have a problem with this information then you need to remove the sources already cited on the page as they are unreliable it's as simple as that. InternetEnigma (talk) 06:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Business Up Front/Party in the Back.  freshacconci  (✉) 06:34, 10 April 2023 (UTC)


 * It's weird that you are an editor on Wikipedia yet can't read a single thing someone writes. My sources have already been provided you just don't look at them and then claim unsourced. If you have a problem with these sources then you need to remove them. InternetEnigma (talk) 06:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 11:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

InternetEnigma (talk) 01:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Please place new posts at the bottom, thanks. 331dot (talk) 10:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lost literary work, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Achilleis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of lost films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. iMDB trivia entries are not reliable sources per WP:USERGEN. Belbury (talk) 08:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The problem with citations on this entry is that there isn’t really that great of choices in what to cite, Lost Media Wiki for instance isn’t eligible for citation as it’s another wiki and the rest of the sources eligible are a Medium blog, which has inaccurate information, or tweets and video clips of Mr. Jones talking about the film thus I think it can be acceptable in this instance to use IMDb as a source until a better one can be found or is made like I stated I would have used a better source if it was available it just isn’t as Wikipedia doesn’t allow for video citations or the like. InternetEnigma (talk) 10:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia can actually cite a director's WP:SOCIALMEDIA - although not for an "exceptional claim", which I think is probably the case here.
 * Sometimes Wikipedia just has to skip mentioning something, if reliable sources don't exist for it yet. Belbury (talk) 10:53, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Offensive language
You used a shortened version of schizophrenic on a talk page and in an edit summary both in reference to Twomad which according to google is offensive. Per AVOIDABUSE this type of language should not be used. Thank you. Sahaib (talk) 07:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)


 * This is unironically how Twomad both was described by his peers and would describe himself, the term itself is meant to describe insane ramblings on the Internet such as what Twomad had been doing for the past year so it was appropriate to describe his insane ramblings. InternetEnigma (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to House (TV series). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 20:46, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.

You've been warned about this over and over again. I can count more than ten such warnings on this talk page. You've been blocked for this twice before. How you can claim that you weren't warned is, frankly, staggering. How you can think a link to a wordpress blog counts as a WP:RS is also concerning. Any admin is free to unblock you (without consulting me) once you clearly demonstrate that, unlike very many of your edits since 2022, you finally thoroughly understand and will comply with WP:RS and WP:CITE. I'm just not seeing that at this time. --Yamla (talk) 00:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC)