User talk:Isfisk

Hi there, Isfisk! Welcome to Wikipedia. If you want, you can drop us a note at New user log to introduce yourself. You should also feel free to drop me a question any time on my talk page.
 * The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good easy-to-follow guide to editing Wikipedia.
 * Welcome is another good place to start.
 * How does one edit a page gives editing help.
 * Manual of Style gives formatting info.
 * Policies and guidelines tell about the principles we operate on. It's important, but don't try to read it all now.
 * Help covers a broad range of useful topics.
 * Help desk is a good place to ask questions.
 * You can sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~) to add your username and a timestamp.
 * Show preview explains how to double-check your edits before saving.

Happy editing! J OHN C OLLISON (An Liúdramán) 23:20, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

da: Primates
It's good to see that the da: site is adding new primate articles... I know 'cos I have all of the en: ones on my watchlist and I see you adding the interwiki links. If you ever see any new ones added at da: that we don't have here on en:, could you let me know? Thanks! - UtherSRG 19:03, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)

Here you go


You deserve it. Punkmorten 14:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Tree frog image placement
Hi Isfisk,

Why do you keep changing the image placement in the Tree frog article? --liquidGhoul 11:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)


 * What browser do you use, and at what resolution? --liquidGhoul 13:19, 17 February 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, I just opened the page in Internet Explorer, and it came up like you said. The problem with your new formatting, is that in Firefox, it doesn't appear on the right, but randomly placed in the middle. So, I will have to research as to how to properly format it. --liquidGhoul 22:29, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Userpage
By the way, I created a user page for you (because the redlink on "Isfisk" in the Newpages list keeps triggering my "possible new user; check for possible vandalism" reflex). It's very plain, but you can of course change it to be whatever you like. DS 17:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Brachycephalus_ephippium.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brachycephalus_ephippium.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 06:47, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging on the Danish Wikipedia
Hi,

I assume that you are the same user as da:Bruger:Isfisk. If this is not the case then ignore the rest. On your Danish account you have uploaded a lot of images that has not been tagged. I would appreciate if you would take the time to look at your user talk page on that account and find the suitable tag for the images.

Thanks for your help. --Maitch 23:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Spea intermontana.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Spea intermontana.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Dethomas 17:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Greenbone
OK, but you got rid of my addition, Greenbone. Hve now re-added it. GrahamBould 07:42, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

New species
It's great that you're adding species not yet in FishBase, but could you add references to the article when you do so? That way we have references for all the species we list, either indirectly via FishBase or directly for the new ones. See for example, , or. Gdr 11:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Redirect
Please do not redirect genus to species and it is unnecessary to put the same authority on Genus and binomial. --Stavenn 23:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Arthroleptis_tanneri.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Arthroleptis_tanneri.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:43, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Wikispecies?
Where you aware of Wikispecies? ShakespeareFan00 15:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Names
Hi Isfisk, I see you've had a bit to do with NZ lizards, I'm wondering if you know the current ruling on whether articles should have titles of the common name or the scientific name. Most I've seen are the common name, all fish articles (except if there isn't a common name of course) for example. I was about to Move some lizard names to common names, but thought I'd better talk to someone who knows the background. Cheers GrahamBould 19:01, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Mixophyes
Hey Isfisk,

You recently added two species to the Mixophyes article. I can't find the paper anywhere, do you know which journal it is in? Thanks. --liquidGhoul 13:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, unfortunately, my uni hasn't bought that journal. Even though the guy who wrote the paper is a senior lecturer! --liquidGhoul 13:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Dakshina
You recently added the new genus Dakshina to the Gondwanatheria article; however, the link to organismnames.com you gave does not seem to be working (though it was working a few days ago) and I have not been able to find any other reference. Could you please provide a reference to the journal where this new genus was described? Thanks, Ucucha 13:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I just found it: it is in JVP 27(2). Ucucha 16:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Asko
A tag has been placed on Asko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Nate1481 14:08, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
The article you created, Romo maybe deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
 * Articles for deletion/Romo.

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important. There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
 * 1) You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
 * 2) You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
 * 3) When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you. Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept. Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
 * 4) You can merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 16:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Isfisk! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Peter Tertzakian -
 * 2) Christian Mejdahl -
 * 3) Frode Sørensen -
 * 4) Margrethe Vestager -
 * 5) Pia Gjellerup -
 * 6) Svend Erik Hovmand -
 * 7) Jan Trøjborg -
 * 8) Tove Fergo -

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Ironholds (talk) 16:57, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Request for Comment
Does WP:SIGCOV apply to bio of career defending people on death row? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2012_December_17#Stephen_Aarons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aar095 (talk • contribs) 07:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)