User talk:JBsupreme

EVENTUALISM IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE ROUTE FOR WP:BLP CONCERNS



SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: I am switching from scotch to red wine for the month of August. I'm open to suggestions. JBsupreme ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 07:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

W h ine suggestion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Call the Waaaambulance that same old someone had a fit again. There is a ton of whining about us going on with his usual supporters chiming in. It is so nice of the same to give us the required courtesy of letting us know, isn't it? Miami33139 (talk) 04:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Maybe time for a cup of tea?
Maybe its time ] for a nice cup of tea? Active Banana (talk) 21:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)


 * How bout a glass of Scotch? First drink's on me.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 22:05, 12 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Bottoms up! [[File:Scotch.jpg]]

Blocked
you have been blocked from editing for the next 48 hours as apparently some kind of sanction is necessary to show you that this kind of edit summaries  are not acceptable - also not against obvious vandals. you have received multiple (more than five) warnings about this and it has had little effect on your behaviour leaving me no other choice than to show that I am being serious. Also the reason for the block is repeated and severe uncivilty - not exactly personal attacks - but it does fall under disruptive behaviour. there just is no blocktemplate for that sepecifically. You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ·Maunus· ƛ · 17:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Such incivility is in violation of JBsupreme's editing restriction at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tothwolf.   —  Jeff G.  ツ  17:43, 14 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Reviewing that, I have noted Maunus' block in the enforcement actions of the Tothwolf case - though it was not made explicitly under the arbitration case aegis, the reasoning is directly applicable and the behavior is identical. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 20:27, 14 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I had to correct the year.    —  Jeff G.  ツ  01:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Read a book
I hope lots of things. JBsupreme ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 17:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I sincerely hope that you get the message this time. It's not OK, it never has been OK, and if you keep pushing that particular button you become a liability rather than a net benefit to the community and the encyclopedia project.
 * I don't want to see you pushed out the door - I value your contributions to date. But if you keep being rude to people like that, even during vandalism fighting, it's going too far.
 * Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:27, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of fictional magic users
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of fictional magic users, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Arbitration/Requests/Case/Speed of light
You may wish to note that motions have been proposed that involve yourself on that page. NW ( Talk ) 18:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles to be deleted
You took part on this Article for deletion discussion, but you failed on these ones: Why? Partly it makes your result of your deletion article invalid. That's why i propsed all these articles for deletion for the same reason as your previous discussion about the List_of_XMPP_client_software today, but User:SarekOfVulcan reverted all deletion proposals. This should you know. --91.89.137.62 (talk) 16:08, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comparison_of_text_editors
 * Articles for deletion/Comparison of instant messaging clients
 * Articles for deletion/Comparison of HTML editors
 * List_of_disk_partitioning_software
 * Comparison of XMPP server software

Arbitration motions regarding Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tothwolf
Resolved by motion at Arbitration/Requests/Clarification that:

1), and  are banned from interacting with each other, broadly construed.  This includes things like not editing each other's userspace, not becoming involved directly with each other in discussions, and not nominating articles for deletion which another one has started.  This does not prohibit commenting in the same discussion without directly interacting or editing the same articles so long as they are not directly in conflict.  They may request enforcement of this restriction at the Arbitration Enforcement board or by email to the Arbitration mailing list; they may not request enforcement or action against each other for any other reason or at any other venue. Attempts to game this restriction should be treated as a violation of the restriction.

2) is subject to an editing restriction for six months. Should Miami33139 make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith or disruptive to deletion discussions, Miami33139 may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement portion of the case. The six months starts from the day this motion passes.

3) Remedy 2 (already updated once) is changed to " is subject to an editing restriction for six months. Should JBsupreme make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith, or disruptive to deletion discussions, JBsupreme may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling below." The six months is reset to start from the day this motion passes.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dougweller (talk) 15:49, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Abdus Sattar Ghazali article
I have opened a new AfD for the above article at Articles for deletion/Abdus Sattar Ghazali (2nd nomination). As you commented at the first AfD in February, I am letting you know, in case you wish to join in the discussion. Regards, --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 12:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Checkuser
Would you care to explain these checkuser results? Thanks! 67.80.250.138 (talk) 05:49, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

List of songs by Taylor Swift
Hello, I created the page List of songs by Taylor Swift without aware/known that the page List of Taylor Swift songs previously nominated for deletion.

The page created by mine has new layout and I really hope that it will be kept, as I will make further improvement to it. Have your say here, thank you. I will notice other users joined above AfD, too. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 08:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of fictional characters named Sarah or Sara for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional characters named Sarah or Sara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters named Sarah or Sara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem of joy (talk) 16:17, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of people with the given name Sarah or Sara for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people with the given name Sarah or Sara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of people with the given name Sarah or Sara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem of joy (talk) 06:16, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of people with the given name Darren for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people with the given name Darren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of people with the given name Darren until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem of joy (talk) 21:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

inre Articles for deletion/Jonathan Keltz
You wisely offered a delete comment in January 2010. So did I. But things have changed in this actor's career in the intevening 15 months. I'd like to bring the new and improved User talk:MichaelQSchmidt/Jonathan Keltz back to mainpage. Please visit if you have time and offer any coments you might wish on its talk page. Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

inconsistent deletion policy
I'm disappointed that you essentially just ignored my questions about the inconsistencies in your personal deletion policy with regard to tmux and things like GNU Screen and twin, for seven months, then quietly deleted my polite, well-considered questions without comment, a couple of years ago. I can, at this point, only reasonably assume you have some personal biases that prevent you from making consistent decisions about some topics. - Apotheon (talk) 23:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

GA Thanks
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your contributions to Lupe Fiasco, which has fairly recently achieved WP:GA status. --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM
— Northamerica1000(talk) 00:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM
From: Northamerica1000(talk) 02:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

RfC: On Software Notability.
There is currently a RfC on the topic of software notability (whether consensus has changed or if the essay needs updating) at Wikipedia talk:Notability (software). As you previously discussed on the topic I thought you might be interested. :) &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  17:46, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Deletion review for Ari Shaffir
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ari Shaffir. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. X538 (talk) 07:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Horrorcore artists has been nominated for renaming
Category:Horrorcore artists has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)