User talk:JacobTheRox

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, JacobTheRox! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:


 * Introductory tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Writing an article
 * Five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community portal
 * Help pages
 * The Teahouse (newcomer help)
 * Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! FuzzyMagma (talk) 13:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

 * @Scope creep I was translating the article from German. All I did was read each paragraph and translate it, rather than writing the article as one usually would (finding and reading sources, writing content etc.) Any issues have simply been passed on from that article. If the article in German was promotional, then so maybe is this I guess? But to be honest I was presuming that these issues would have been raised on German Wikipedia, and translation is translation; I can't just write what I think is correct and publish it as a translation. I'll take a look. JacobTheRox (talk ) 09:17, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi That is fine. Everybody translates articles from de wikipedia. I do that all the time. What is not fine is adding references that point to a persons blog or website. The English Wikipedia has very strict requirements around biographies of a living people. They must be WP:SECONDARY sources. These refs you added are promotional WP:SPS and WP:PRIMARY. I would suggest if you want to do translation from the de wikipedia find a women scientist or a well established actor or something like that, that has plenty of sourcing. I hope that helps. Sorry for the warnings.    scope_creep Talk  09:27, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Well those were just the sources on the page; I am very new to content translation as you need to be extended-confirmed and I have only just reached 500 edits. Sorry but I just thought "if it's fine on the german wikipedia it's fine here". My German is not good enough to easily translate complex pages (e.g. scientists): I am not good with very subject specific translation so I was sticking to more basic pages. I see how that's a problem with carrying over referencing issues. JacobTheRox (talk ) 09:35, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
 * You can't do that either. You can't unsourced content that is WP:BLP. Every sentence needs a reference. I will check it later.   scope_creep Talk  09:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Elke Jeinsen moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Elke Jeinsen. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and '''Redirected article to WP:BLP that is effectively unsourced. '''. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  09:38, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Septermber GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elke Jeinsen has been accepted
 Elke Jeinsen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Elke_Jeinsen help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Ortizesp (talk) 04:43, 19 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much! I prefer using AfC as it helps get feedback and I am always worried about publishing bad articles! - JacobTheRox (talk ) 16:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Good wishes


-- Thinker78  (talk) 04:12, 25 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi there @Thinker78. Your comment made me feel so happy after I took a Wikibreak for various reasons but mainly due to workload outside of Wikipedia. I'm glad to know that people here care for each other like that. Thanks ever so much, JacobTheRox (talk ) 06:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I am happy that I made you feel happy. Cheers! Thinker78  (talk) 06:15, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Zev Sebastian
Hello, JacobTheRox, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Owain.davies, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Zev Sebastian, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Zev Sebastian.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

OwainDavies (about)(talk) edited at 12:49, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Doctor Who FA
I saw your Peer Review request, you said you wanted to get the page to FA a nd I also wish the same. Would you be intrested in presuing this idea together, Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:29, 15 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @OlifanofmrTennant yes of course. I have been shying away from the  Doctor who page as I am used to editing small pages rather than complicated ones. However, as a Whovian Wikipedia editor ir would be my dream come true to get Doctor Who back to FA status. Kind regards, JacobTheRox (talk ) 22:21, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/The Chequers, Potters Bar at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Doctor Who images
Hi Jacob

I have seen you have added to screenshots from iPlayer to several Doctor Who episodes, and I understand you plan to add more. All copyrighted images on Wikpedia have to meet a series of criteria (WP:NFCC) to ensure their use is fair to the owners of the image. I'm sorry to say I have therefore added deletion tags (although I have not removed the images from the articles they're used in yet, although this will happen in 7 days unless there is consensus that the images are fair case) to all the Doctor Who screenshots you have added recently. The reason I believe these images do not meet NFCC is because the 8th criterion says Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Your justification on all the file pages is The episode itself; informing viewers what the episode is like / looks like, and I don't not believe this rationale shows that not including the image would be detrimental to understanding, nor do I believe it increases understanding significantly: the only purpose I see for these images is so that readers can see more quickly which episode they're looking at, but this doesn't increase their understanding of the episode. This would be in contrast to say the image on The Unquiet Dead, which shows the precise CGI effect that caused the CG budget to go over.

If you disagree with me, I recommend you start a discussion at Talk:List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present), where other editors can chip in. I would also like to make absolutely clear I see your edits as good faith, and I can also see you why you might be upset as I have seen you intended to make adding images to articles a project of yours, so I am sorry to have to send you this message. -- Ted Edwards  23:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)


 * @TedEdwards ✅, please see Talk:List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present) JacobTheRox (talk ) 14:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Further to my previous message, despite the template I added (Template:Di-disputed non-free use rationale) saying that the images should only be deleted 7 days after the deletion tag was added, an editor,, deleted them less than an hour after I added the tag. Obviously this should not have happened and I will bring it up with them, but I wanted to apologise that this happened. I will for the time being edit the articles you added images to so they don't have a blank image. Sorry again this happened. -- T<small style="font-size:60%;">ed E<small style="font-size:60%;">dwards  00:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Me again. The images have been restored as had simply made a mistake and has undeleted the images, and I've restored them to the articles for now, so if you want to contest the deletion tag I added you can. -- T<small style="font-size:60%;">ed E<small style="font-size:60%;">dwards  02:26, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:DoctorWhoThePartingoftheWaysthumb.png
Thank you for uploading File:DoctorWhoThePartingoftheWaysthumb.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:DoctorWhoWorldWarThreethumb.png
 * File:DoctorWhoToothandClawthumb.png
 * File:DoctorWhoTheEndoftheWorldthumb.png
 * File:DoctorWhoTheEmptyChildthumb.png
 * File:DoctorWhoAliensofLondonthumb.png
 * File:DoctorWhoSchoolReunionthumb.png
 * File:DoctorWhoTheChristmasInvasion.png
 * File:DoctorWhoRosethumb.png
 * File:DoctorWhoTheDoctorDancesthumb.png
 * File:DoctorWhoBadWolfthumb.png
 * File:DoctorWhoFather'sDaythumb.png
 * File:DoctorWhoDalekthumb.png
 * File:DoctorWhoNewEarththumb.png

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of books by Joel Osteen
Hello, JacobTheRox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of books by Joel Osteen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ronnie Archer-Morgan


Hello, JacobTheRox. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ronnie Archer-Morgan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  14:04, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:B.E. Boykin
Hello, JacobTheRox. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:B.E. Boykin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

A suggestion
A word to the wise... you say you'll request adminship this year (2024). Unfortunately, no matter how much experience you rack up, it is very likely that the majority of users would oppose that nomination, given that although you have a reasonably long tenure, your edit count is a little on the low side (the going minimum seems to be about 8,000 to 10,000 edits), and no articles (many people demand a GA; that has always seemed a tad excessive to me, but more content-writing experience is generally recommended), and light participation at AfD.

This isn't to say you're a bad editor, far from it, just to save you potential embarrassment at RfA, since in the eyes of many users, you aren't currently suited for the role of adminship. Cheers, Cremastra (talk) 00:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Ronnie Archer-Morgan has a new comment
<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ronnie Archer-Morgan. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ronnie Archer-Morgan has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Ronnie Archer-Morgan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Ronnie_Archer-Morgan help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! 97198 (talk) 10:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Brittney Boykin
Most of the professional references cited clearly call her by her name, Brittney Boykin, not her stage name (such as Georgia Tech and the Kennedy Centre). The others state Brittney Boykin (B.E. Boykin) not the other way around. Dan arndt (talk) 09:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Map Men has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Map Men, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Map_Men help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Toadette Edit! 18:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

WIkiProject Doctor Who Newsletter: July 2024
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)