User talk:Jason-Jimmy Kent

Copyright
Hi, as I've told you once before, copyrighted image cannot be uploaded to commons. Instead they must be uploaded locally on Wikipedia with an appropriate fair use rationale. Movie posters from this century are all copyrighted unless otherwise noted. See Uploading images for further help and Category:Fair use images of movie posters for examples of how to write the rationale. Opencooper (talk) 14:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The Cycle (2015 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Cycle (2015 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Cycle (2015 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:49, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on The Doomsday Project
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:11, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about The Incredible Mrs. Ritchie
Hello, Jason-Jimmy Kent,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Incredible Mrs. Ritchie should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/The Incredible Mrs. Ritchie.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

TheLongTone (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Please don't copy material you find elsewhere online
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 12:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of No Good Reason


The article No Good Reason has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:NWEB nor WP:NTV."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Without Remorse (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Please don't add cast members to unreleased films without citation. Even if someone is listed on IMDb, it needs to be supported a reliable source, see WP:IMDBREF.'' BOVINEBOY 2008 12:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Justin Chatwin
We don't have a rule that the photographs in our articles about people necessarily have to be "current" — but we do have a rule that the photographs have to be licensed under a Wikipedia-compatible copyright model, such as GFDL or Creative Commons. What that means is we can't just go traipsing around the web grabbing and uploading just any photo of him that exists — we can only upload (a) photos whose owners have already released them under GFDL or Creative Commons to begin with, (b) photos whose owners voluntarily file an OTRS permission for us to use their work, or (c) photos which a Wikipedia editor personally took themselves with their own camera. So there's no guarantee that any photo of any person can easily be replaced with a different one: if there's no new photo available that meets one of those three conditions, then there's no new photo we can use at all. Bearcat (talk) 17:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello Jason-Jimmy Kent. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Aaron Kaufman (producer), gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jason-Jimmy Kent. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Your pattern of contributions of up-and-coming directors and films, as well as the content of the articles themselves, raises concerns that you may be affiliated with these production companies and/or working in PR. signed,Rosguill talk 16:33, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello Rosguill. I AM NOT affiliated with these up-and-coming directors / producers, I AM NOT paid by them and I AM NOT working in PR. I'm just a simple guy who wanted to create pages for those new directors who worked with Justin Chatwin, an actor that i really like.
 * I find the above simple disavowal unconvincing in this case, as it doesn't explain the speed with which you created these articles or the PRish language used therein. Your edits suggest that you may in fact have a conflict of interest with Justin Chatwin that goes beyond simply being a fan. Any explanations, or should we proceed to WP:COIN? signed,Rosguill talk 19:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't know where in the pages that i created is the PRish language you are talking about. Can you give me examples regarding Aaron Kaufman's page ? I want to see what are you talking about and where i did wrong.
 * I have started a thread at Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard where I describe the issues in further detail. signed,Rosguill talk 15:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Robert Scott Wildes moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Robert Scott Wildes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Preproduction films
Hello! I reverted your edit to Chris Evans on the Ghosted movie because it’s still in pre-production. Even with reliable sourcing and even a confirmation from the director, you still just never know if something will happen to extend principle photography. When PP does happen, and with sourcing, we’ll add it back in :) Thanks! LADY LOTUS • TALK 22:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brink (2011 film)


The article Brink (2011 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable short film"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  13:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, as you did at David A. Armstrong. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must: signed,Rosguill talk 16:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
 * State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
 * Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Proposed deletion of Prodigy (TV pilot)


The article Prodigy (TV pilot) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Pilot episode that never aired. Sources are not substantially about it. No source for Young Artist Award nomination, which still would not be enough to pass WP:GNG if nobody saw the pilot"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Blake Robbins (actor)
Hello, Jason-Jimmy Kent. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blake Robbins (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:35, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Blake Robbins (actor)


Hello, Jason-Jimmy Kent. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Blake Robbins".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Robert Scott Wildes
Hello, Jason-Jimmy Kent. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Scott Wildes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:22, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Scott Wildes


Hello, Jason-Jimmy Kent. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Robert Scott Wildes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)