User talk:Jasonkhanlar

Welcome!
Hello, Jasonkhanlar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Comparison of 3d printers, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Comparison of 3d printers


The article Comparison of 3d printers has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTCATALOG. This is a list that also violates WP:LISTCRUFT - we do not collect indiscriminate information

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Comparison of 3d printers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of 3d printers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles_for_deletion/Comparison_of_3D_printers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nonsense
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Talk:President of the United States, you may be blocked from editing. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  00:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Note, I had a genuine concern, not intended in any way to disrupt, such that I introduced the concern in the talk page, the page to talk, such that it doesn't affect the main article, such that disruption is not directly affecting the article, and intended to contribute to discussion/talk-based flow of content production, and in any case, when I see this claim of narrative suggesting that my comments are disruptive, that is incredibly absolutely logically ridiculous! Jasonkhanlar (talk) 06:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Also I see that my comments on the talk page are gone. This is the revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:President_of_the_United_States&oldid=1001703875 And I was trying to find the edit/revision after mine that removed my comment, and somehow it is not even listed? What? This is even more absolutely ridiculous! As if to conceal the very disappearance of my attempt to discuss something, to hide it, censor it, as if it never happened, to make it even more difficult to realize it disappeared. I am so confused! Did I miss it maybe? Or is there some sort of censorship that is not publicly included in the revision history? If so, that's so absolutely ridiculous! Jasonkhanlar (talk) 07:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Indeed! I don't consider myself a disruptive editor but readong https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing#Dealing_with_disruptive_editors "First unencyclopedic entry by what appears to be a disruptive editor:" given that this seems to be the first time a homosapien on Wikipedia has ever communicated this type of narrative in entire history, the very first process of the dealing is already not even having been represented. What? th is is absolutely absolutely absolutely absolutely absolutely absolutely ridiculous! I would not be surprised if the person claiming I disruptively edited is potentially projecting their own disruption disguising their disruptions by accusing those that they disrupt as being the disruptors, such that, they disrupted my talk page statement, and then threaten me with being blocked. What type of ridiculousness is this? that doesn't even conform to the very page they linked to me Jasonkhanlar (talk) 07:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Even the "A disruptive editor is an editor who exhibits tendencies such as the following:" list, I don't see a single bulletpoint that characterizes my situation, such that, I see absolutely no relation to my sentences as being disruptive in any way whatsoever, such that this section titled "Nonsense" by User:Orangemike that the initial message seems to be nonsense in and of itself, and by a person that seems to be in a position of authority, practically symbolizing what seems to be corruption, corrupted person in position of authority engaging in behavioral acts that potentially evaluate to presumably be corrupted behavioral phenomena, with corrupted logic to otherwise be seemingly impossible to reverse engineer in accordance with the documentation, including that which was linked to me citing as sources. Jasonkhanlar (talk) 07:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Comparison of online trading platforms for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of online trading platforms, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Comparison of online trading platforms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of foreign aid to Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Financial assistance. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Comparison of online trading platforms


Hello, Jasonkhanlar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Comparison of online trading platforms".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:15, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello User:Liz. This is not true! It has not been over six months since I last edited Draft:Comparison_of_online_trading_platforms. I remember editing it recently in the last few months. I just now noticed my user history is completely blank now. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jasonkhanlar&action=history What happened? This is not true! I have edit history! Where did all my history go? Jasonkhanlar (talk) 02:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Ah, I'm dumb! Contribs is what I meant to look for. Special:Contributions/Jasonkhanlar but otherwise, I could have sworn I made a revision to the article within the last 6 months. I'm trying to find an archive to see, but I don't think I made an archive of the edit history page for the article. But even checking my edit history that I can see, there are definitely missing entries! For example http://web.archive.org/web/20220604211646/https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Comparison_of_online_trading_platforms&action=history shows I made an edit on January 18, 2022, but it doesn't appear on my contribs page, probably because the entire article is deleted, so I guess that also includes all my history to appear as if I never did those doables. Jasonkhanlar (talk) 02:37, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, Jasonkhanlar,
 * This draft is due to be deleted again for inactivity. Just go to the deleting admin's talk page or to WP:REFUND if you want your work restored. I can see you put a lot of time into this page. Liz Read! Talk! 03:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)