User talk:JetLover/Archive 1

sockpuppetry
Hi this is mrbsball825, and i am sorry for any inconvience. My cousins, brother, and I are bored out of our minds since we're on summer break. Crocsie is only 9 and he really doesn't understand that he should respect other people's userpages. sorry once again.
 * (user:mrbsball825

Chicago Landmark Stubification
I noticed that you have edited Whistle Stop Inn this week, which is one of the new WP:CHICOTW stubs. This week, we WP:WPChi are focussing on stubifying the numerous redlinks in Chicago Landmark with a goal of getting over half the redlinks stubified (we began with about 25%). This will improve our chance of getting it approved as a featured list candidate. When reviewing this week's new stub contributing editors your name was absent. You may want to choose a redlink or two from Chicago Landmark and create a stub before this week's project ends on 5/16 so that you can be a part of our drive for featured list status. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:36, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! JetLover 01:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

CHICOTW
TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:51, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Chicago Landmark Stubification
I am writing you because you either (1) edited Chicago Landmark 5 weeks ago when it was the WP:CHICOTW (2) edited it or created a stub last week when we had the stubification drive for it or (3) you nominated an article to be the CHICOTW in the last few days.

I have finally had a chance to take a tally on last week’s stubification effort. Based on my manual count we now have 109 bluelinks on a total of 241 landmarks. Preliminary indications were that for our article to be successful at WP:FLC we would need to eventually rename it (something like List of Chicago Landmarks) and get the majority of the landmarks linked. Based on my cursory count we need to write 12 more articles to get to a majority. It would be great if you might be able to assist by creating a couple stubs to assist in this effort. Here are some of the stubs that were created during last week’s efforts: Black Metropolis-Bronzeville District, Historic Michigan Boulevard District, Arthur H. Compton House & One North LaSalle. Among the articles still redlinked are 2 buildings on this week’s CHICOTW, Magnificent Mile (Perkins, Fellows & Hamilton Office and Studio, Woman's Athletic Club). Recall that each redlink on Chicago Landmark has a footnote to a reference that gives you enough info to create a stub. If you create a new stub please add it to WikiProject_Chicago so that we can keep track of the progress. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

AJ Allmendinger
Excuse me but that AJ Allmendinger edit was not vandalism, if you can check, he made the Coca Cola 600 in a current car, making my edit an update not vandalism. He made the race, i have proof.

http://www.nascar.com/races/cup/2007/12/data/lineup.html

and thanks in return
I tend to revert anything by an active vandal as soon as possible after he edits, so he gets the idea that his edits won't last more than a few seconds. --Rrburke(talk) 03:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Cool. JetLover 03:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Substing
Hit JetLover. When you add warning templates or other messages to user talk pages, please try to remember to Subst: them. To subst the template uw-vandalism1, for example, type {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}. Picaroon (Talk) 00:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I wondered why that was different. Thanks. Cheers, JetLover Talk to me! 00:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks...
for watching my back! Freshacconci 01:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Its ok
Thank you, I am having vandal issues from people. I really appreciate your help! Neranei 02:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
I am part of the Counter-Vandalizm Unit, i just joined today and already i have removed vandalizm from 4 pages, But i have caught them by going threw the recent changes list is there a faster way to check for vandalizm.

Oysterguitarist 21:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

GuerillaClock
Hi there; I have, indeed, blocked this user for a short time, as you warned him would happen. But it is better if you use the authorised templates for issuing warnings, which can be found in WP:TEMPLATE. It can sometimes be difficult, as an admin, to be fair to an article editor who may not understand the details of wikipedia without undermining the comments of a competent editor such as yourself.--Anthony.bradbury 21:10, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. These are great templates.

Blocking An ip if your not an admin
How do you block an ip? cause i have a user User talk:24.46.121.255 that is on his last warning.

Oysterguitarist 21:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Help Me
I need your help with a vandal he is User talk:68.192.56.88

Oysterguitarist 02:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Taken care of. Cheers, JetLover -- Talk to me! 03:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Wiki
Hello, I read your userpage and noticed that you like airsoft. There is a wiki I'm a part of, called the Gun Wiki (guns), that has a few articles on airsoft; I wanted to ask you if you might want to come and join, the wiki can always use users with knowledge pertaining to guns. Happy editing! Brain40 04:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I've been there before and I'll try to contribute as much as I can! Cheers, JetLover -- Talk to me! 04:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Also, you're pretty good with vandal-fighting. Good to see someone on here dedicated to keeping Wikipedia safe from vandals. Brain40 04:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Sandboxes
I made a sandbox on my userpage to test things, Later i found a red link to my sandbox because it was deleted. I have corrected the link, I think this link is correct sandbox tell me if this is correct before i make it and put tests on it. And why do most wikipedians say cheers? Thank You.

Oysterguitarist 22:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for answering my questions i am new so i have alot. Thanks for giving me the help link and telling me what cheers means. Cheers

Oysterguitarist 22:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

For Anti-Vandalism Work


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. I kept timing out while I tried to revert 121.72.231.135's edit to the Earth article, and when I went to report him, I found that you had beaten me by less than a second! Axeman89 23:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! That's very nice! Cheers, JetLover -- Talk to me! 23:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the barnstar :) IrishGuy talk 20:48, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Your welcome. '''Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 20:50, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, thanks for the diligence barnstar! :D -- K P H 2 2 9 3  00:37, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

NP
No problem:) Just doing my job:) Have a nice week and God bless.--James, La gloria è a dio 01:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC) 

has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Block Message
I came upon one of your edits while patrolling for vandalism the edit was to 72.146.114.242 you told him that he was blocked so, did you report him to AIV and tell him he was blocked before he was blocked or are you an admin and you blocked him? I am just curious. Cheers oysterguitarist~Talk 04:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Ok thanks so if i report somebody to AIV to i tell him he is blocked before he actually is. I am kind of confused cause of the way you put it. Cheers oysterguitarist~Talk 22:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, that makes sense now. Cheers oysterguitarist~Talk 22:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Users removing warning templates
What do we do with users who remove warning templates, cause i hade a user User:Corcyn who removed his warning message i just told him that's not allowed but i believe there is a policy on this and i would like to refer him to this now he is correcting grammer on my talk page (this happened while writing this message). Cheers oysterguitarist~Talk 00:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

The user above has brung up another question how do you deal with annoying users. I spent 00:33 to 1:43(UTC) dealing with this user. Cheers. oysterguitarist~Talk 02:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I saw you took care of that user for me except i removed the warning about the my sandbox because my sandbox said that you can vandalize it and he annoyed me about that so i guess that one does not count. Please correct me if i'm wrong. By the way if he harasses me over this can you help me. Cheers. oysterguitarist~Talk 03:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I looked at the history for AIV it says ACB: Account creation blocked what does this mean? and thanks for reporting him. Cheers oysterguitarist~Talk 04:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Last warnings
Hello. I noticed that you left multiple last warnings for User talk:85.211.30.179. Once a last warning has been left, the next course of action is to report the vandal to WP:AIV. A last warning should be just that. Leaving multiple last warnings will never get the vandal blocked. Thanks. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 00:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

RfA
Thank you visiting and commenting at my RfA, I have tried to expand on my philosophy and answers, and hope that these address your concerns. Even if they don't, thanks for stopping by. DrKiernan 14:07, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * As an outside party, I'd also like to invite you to visit the RfA again. Many more comments have been added to the discussion and I believe that some of your concerns have been adressed. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 14:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Ck lostsword's RfA - Thanks
ck lostsword • T  •  C  17:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for the Barnstar!! I truly appreciate you giving me one. Cheers oysterguitarist~Talk 23:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 23:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Block messages
Hi there; when I am in the process of blocking a user, I would be grateful if you would not take it upon yourself to tell the user that I have done so. I will do that. Thank you.--Anthony.bradbury"talk" 00:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)


 * OK, it's not a problem. But an admin will normally post his own messages, and hitting edit conflicts can be a little disturbing. Happy wikying.--Anthony.bradbury"talk" 00:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Curious
Hi JetLover, I am curious about this diff. Did you have a problem with the notice I had left? -- K u k i ni  hablame aqui 23:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No worries. As I had reverted the vandalism (I believe), I was just a tad confused. Keep up the great work! -- K u k i ni  hablame aqui 23:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Somone help! I've been blocked for vandalism! :O
Uh I tried to edit a page but it said my IP was blocked for vandalism what happened? Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 23:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You sure? I see no record of blocks for this username. Do you know your IP?-- K u k i ni  hablame aqui 23:28, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

67.150.169.132. Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 23:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

It's only for 99 minutes but weird. Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 23:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * User:67.150.169.132 is not blocked either. Sorry, not sure what to do to help! -- K u k i ni  hablame aqui 23:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Found it I went threw the block log it said 23:22, 19 June 2007 Can't sleep, clown will eat me (Talk | contribs) blocked "67.150.0.0/16 (contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 99 minutes (repeated vandalism from this range, sorry) it was a range block for ip's oysterguitarist~Talk 23:41, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Chicago Landmark WP:FLC
You helped us at WP:CHICOTW create and improve List of Chicago Landmarks. This week we have nominated it at Featured list candidates/List of Chicago Landmarks. Feel free to make comments about its candidacy or to come by and help respond to the comments of others. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar
I decided you deserve a barnstar for your vandal fighting after having to deal with 71.107.145.200. By the way that page is now protected. Also now you have somthing to put under your barnstar section hope you Enjoy!!. Cheers oysterguitarist~Talk 03:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Your welcome! Oysterguitarist~Talk 21:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

black hole article...
...If you would read the article at: http://physorg.com/news101560368.html

you'd realize that it wasn't a joke.

It wasn't worded all that great, but it was true.

Thanks
Thanks for the barnstar. You have done a good job here as well. Have a nice week and God bless:)--†Sir James Paul† 02:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I didnt removed
I moved

The article is not relevant enought to be JoJo, because JoJo has many uses E & M ( talk ) 03:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion
Maybe you should consider using Twinkle to aid you in your hunt for vandalism. It really helps! Hanoi Girl → Please sign! 00:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Cheers
Much better!-- Kubigula (talk) 01:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank on informing me about my page. I will be sure to look into what images I can use.TonyWWE 22:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC) TonyWWE

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the removal on my user-talk page. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 16:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

70.189.36.210 vandalism warnings
Hello,

I just undid some vandalism for "MP3 blogs", and was in the process of posting my warning message when you posted one. Does yours refer to the MP3 blog incident as well (in which case I'll scrap it since your username doesn't match up with the revert log), or does it refer to something else (in which case I'll bump mine up to level 2).

Email me at bobbyholley AT stanford DOT edu

Thanks,

//BHolley

Thank you...
Thank you very much for the barnstar, I'll try to make sure I've earned it. Peace.  Sp art an- Ja mes  03:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppets
I have to know how you catch so many sockpuppets! I noticed on this after TravisLovesCandiceMichelle, i just reported them to AIV and that was it i would have never thought they were socks, so do you normally check for sockpuppets? by the way like the new sig. OysterGuitarst 04:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for telling me that, sounds time consuming glad somebody does it. OysterGuitarst 21:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

my talk page
who the hell do you think you are?

i can edit my talk page if i want!

my talk page
and how can you add your sh*tty jet stuff and i can't add blank spaces?!?!

User:Joshuastallings
Thank you for sharing your concerns with me. I believe you are likely correct. If the user returns to the same habits, I am quite sure the account will be blocked indefinitely. Keep up the great work! -- K u k i ni  hablame aqui 02:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

A strange proposal, but it's worth asking
I want to nominate you for adminship. I may be out of my sane mind, but here's why.

I've recently seen a couple of cases you've forwarded to WP:SSP. I wanted to ask you, "If the sockpuppetry is so obvious, why don't you just block them yourself?" Then I saw that...you can't.

I've checked your contribution history, and I found that you've made more reports to WP:AIV and WP:UAA than a solid fraction of admins who have been editing for much longer.

On the minus side, you've been editing only for the last 49 days, and your only significant article contribution barely survived AFD (but it looks fine now). The mood at RFA is to shun candidates with low experience and minimal article writing.

Still, I keep thinking that you already know the system well enough to operate it correctly. If you're willing to take a shot at it, I'm willing to nominate you and see how it goes. Shalom Hello 03:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

More help needed
If you have been following along at WP:FLC you know we need help creating stubs for the List to make it a more useful list and help it achieve WP:FLC status. Since I reminded people of this 7 stubs have been created. We need about 40 more to be safe although we may have a successful candidacy with the article as it stands.

Some of you may also be following the success of WP:CHICOTW at WikiProject Chicago/COTW/Good Articles. For the last 4 weeks no one has been very active. Thus, I am fearful that Historic Michigan Boulevard District, Harold Washington Cultural Center, Crown Fountain, & Art Institute of Chicago Building will all fail at WP:GAC when their turns come up. Also, Magnificent Mile did not experience the collaborative spirit. Our reputation as a successful collaboration is at stake. In addition to making stubs for the FLC we need your contribution to our collaborations. I am sorry to pull you away from whatever other wikipleasures you may be experiencing, but we need your help. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 16:59, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Reno Nightlife
I would disagree with your message that my add to the Reno Nightlife page was not constructive. I think it is inappropriate to only mention downtown as "nightlife" in Reno while there is nightlife elsewhere. That is like saying Disneyland is the only recreation park in Southern California. The Reno page I think is used by a lot of new people to Reno or tourists, and I would think giving them a fair and balanced view of nightlife in Reno is constructive and what Wikipedia is all about. If elitists like yourself take over Wikipedia, it will become an encyclopedia like all others with very narrow views of what is "constructive" and what is not. I feel Wikipedia has too many self-appointed, so-called editors who feel it their right to determine what is constructive and going beyond their real duty of simply keeping vandals out and inappropriate material.

Stubification
You may have missed the message from yesterday. We need more stubs to fully satisfy the WP:FLC reviewers. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 21:16, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

S. M. C. Y. S. O. A B.
hope you get it.

Thanks...thanks a lot. Cheers, Je  tL  ov  er  21:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

65.31.98.166
I saw that he had vandalised again, after receiving several last warnings. You gave him a very mild warning. Actually, you should have listed him to be blocked after several last warnings, one just the other day. I'm going to do it and see if there is any action taken. -- Elaich   talk 01:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

leave me alone
Please leave me alone. I do not like your ways of interragation, and how you threaten to block me. Jibajabba 12:37, 28 June 2007

Barnstar
Thank you kindly for the barnstar. I like to think that the work is its own reward, but it is nice to be noticed every once in a while. It's appreciated :-) Trusilver 23:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

aww thanks!
Thanks for the barnstar, I've never received one, now I know how good it feels! -- ♫Twinkler4♫   (Talk to me!)  01:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * ) haha I liked your vandalism on my

vandalize page (not encouraging vandalism but.. wikipedia can have some humor). I got a laugh outta that one (Other users reading this... this user is Not a vandal.) -- ♫Twinkler4♫   (Talk to me!)  01:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Warnings to a vandal about being reported to the admins
Hello - saw your message here and thought you might be interested to learn that there have been some pretty strong views expressed against templates that leave similar messages here and here - the basic theme being that it could encourage vandals to speed up before they're blocked. Just thought I'd mention it for future reference; otherwise, keep up the good work! Regards, Bencherlite 02:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for removing the abusive language from the page of a vandal that you reported and I blocked. Your anti-vandalism work is appreciated. Regards, Newyorkbrad 02:42, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for participating in my RfA. It was successful, and I am now, may God have mercy on us all, an administrator. Look at all the new buttons! I had heard about 'protect,' 'block user,' and 'delete,' but no one told me about 'kill,' 'eject,' and 'purée.' I appreciate the trust the community has in me, and I'll try hard not to delete the main page or block Jimbo. -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Username in Question
Hi! I saw your message about the concerns over my username, and there was another user who expressed concerns as well. I can assure you that my username was never intended to offend anybody. I simply thought of a nonsense, risque phrase off the top of my head and put it in. It was not directed at any specific person. However, I appreciate your concern over the matter and your politeness in discussing it. I know that some usernames are blocked for obvious reasons. Accordingly, I will change my username later today to avoid any confusion (and possible blocks) in the future. Thank you and take care. User talk:I Saw My Coach in a Skirt 2 July 2007

Barnstar
Thanks for the Barnstar, much appreciated. :) My first one. Erwinloh 05:34, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

User:72.224.14.110
I agree with you that the vandal at 72.224.14.110 should be stopped, unfortunately, that is an IP address held by Road Runner New York, an ISP. It is very frustrating. --Bejnar 21:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Sorry for anything I did wrong and I will assure you I will check the Main Page. Thanks for watching my back.

Sincerely, Portire 101

PS I found out what the Anonymous writer (S.M.C.Y.S.O.AB.) wrote. I'm not sure if such language is aloud on talk.

I forgot something


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

He Meant:
Suck my cock you son of a b****

Can't
Can't check his contribs cause I don't know his username. Portire