User talk:JohnAdams1800

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Andre🚐 22:41, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Warning: don't remove sourced content
Or you will get reverted or blocked. Take it to the talk page first. Rjensen (talk) 20:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
–– Formal Dude  (talk)  01:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! — SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 01:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Minor edits
Hi JohnAdams1800! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Democratic Party (United States) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. ''You've been marking nearly all of your edits as minor. Although it's true that the edits you've been making aren't huge, sweeping changes, they do substantially change the meaning of the prose you're editing, and therefore should not be marked as minor. Thanks,'' — SamX &#91;talk · contribs · he/him&#93; 23:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the information. I'll apply this going forward. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 15:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Midwestern United States
Just letting you know that I removed the thumbs of the cities to fix the sandwiched text at Midwestern United States. I saw that you were trying to fix the formatting and I believe this takes care of it. 636Buster (talk) 16:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Hi JohnAdams1800! Thank you for your edits to Factions in the Democratic Party (United States). It looks like you've copied or moved text from Democratic Party (United States) into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 23:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello JohnAdams1800! Your additions to Timeline of the Russian invasion of Ukraine (8 June 2023 – present) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:12, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Political positions of the Democratic Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equality Act. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Allegations of misconduct by George Santos for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allegations of misconduct by George Santos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Allegations of misconduct by George Santos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Note on Status Quo Stonewalling
Hi John, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. While I have no doubt that you are contributing in good faith for the better of the encyclopedia, I am concerned that based on some of your recent edit summaries, some of which is bordering on WP:Stonewalling. Around the beginning of 2023, especially in years articles, we have had quite a few issues with regard to some editors' compliance with the stonewalling guidelines and one even being TBanned from Years entirely.

Some of your edits and comments do seem to imply that you wish we reinstate the old International Notability standards, the subject of an essay I wrote against implementing. If you wish to bring these standards back, it's going to be most beneficial for your cause that you propose them directly and not act as if a consensus existed. I understand that I may be fear-mongering, but I would like to give you a gentle reminder so we avoid a situation similar to Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., which we already had on ANI with regard to years. Thanks, and happy editing!  Invading Invader  (userpage, talk) 16:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to discuss on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years
Heya John. I noticed that despite some pings on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years inviting you to discuss on practices, I haven't seen your opinion. These discussions have a pretty big impact on years, and consider this a formal invitation to join us especially considering how frequently you contribute to the Years articles. Thanks!  Invading Invader  (userpage, talk) 21:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I replied to your top comment on "Was there ever a clearly-discussed consensus that Main Year Articles are to be international only?" Thank you for formally inviting me. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 22:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Joshua P. Kolar moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Joshua P. Kolar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Let&#39;srun (talk) 03:53, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Graduate unemployment in China (December 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Graduate unemployment in China and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Graduate_unemployment_in_China Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bilorv&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Graduate_unemployment_in_China reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv ( talk ) 18:40, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Note regrading copying content between articles
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Graduate unemployment into Draft:Graduate unemployment in China. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 00:57, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2024 in public domain into Draft:2024 in American public domain. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., . It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia.  Thank you.  —  Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 04:44, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 in American public domain has been accepted
 2024 in American public domain, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=2024_in_American_public_domain help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 18:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Deprodding of Digital Copyright Act
I have removed the tag from Digital Copyright Act, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! TartarTorte 01:51, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

2024
You said here that there was a consensus to not include the content which you reverted. Could you direct to me where that consensus is? As far as my knowledge goes, a talk page discussion was just opened. 33ABGirl (talk) 16:46, 3 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Talk:2024 JohnAdams1800 (talk) 16:50, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Please explain to me how one person opening a discussion is considered a consensus. 33ABGirl (talk) 16:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @33ABGirl I just want to add some context as to why the inclusion of this event is so contentious. Editors in years have previously taken strong stances on transportation disasters where they feel domestic flights and those with low death tolls don't belong in main year articles. For instance, Tara Air Flight 197 a flight that killed 22 people in 2022 is not in the main year article for 2022 as it was considered domestic, and I personally found myself fighting for inclusion of a deadlier air disaster that same year.
 * I think editors who frequently work on year articles, including myself, have been working on an unwritten consensus as to what warrants inclusion while not doing a good enough job explaining why. Hopefully the talkpage entry can better allow everyone to reach a consensus, even if it isn't something these users agree with. PaulRKil (talk) 17:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @PaulRKil Thank you for providing this clarification. I have no objections to inclusion based on documented consensus. My issue here is that the content was removed with the edit summary there is a consensus that.....didn't merit an entry in this article, when there was clearly no discussion on the content beforehand. This was a straightforwardly untrue statement, so I wanted an explanation for it. 33ABGirl (talk) 04:33, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page 2024 has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. As there has been no further response from you to the previous discussion, please consider this a formal warning against using false edit summaries in the future. 33ABGirl (talk) 14:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Economic history of the United Kingdom into Protectionism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Note regarding Arab-Israeli conflict
You have recently made edits related to the Arab–Israeli conflict. This is a standard message to inform you that the Arab–Israeli conflict is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 06:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024 (2)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:2024, you may be blocked from editing. 33ABGirl (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Absolute monarchy
Hi, you recently added the line about Frederick the Great's sexuality. I have no problem with the statement although I'm not sure that it's germane to the topic. If you leave it in, please add the five sources for footnote 20 that are now raising no-target errors. Thanks. Andy02124 (talk) 20:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 19
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Hell's Kitchen (American season 22), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand Prix.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Joe Kent : Talk
Talk:Joe Kent Can I get your opinion on that dispute? Tonymetz (talk) 01:23, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
This edit summary was unwarranted. Vandalism--Vladimir Putin's statements alone do not qualify to be on this page... Please be aware that the word vandalism has a very specific meaning on WP, which does not include good-faith additions. 33ABGirl (talk) 05:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (third request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Educational attainment in the United States into Higher education bubble in the United States. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:43, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Animal Farm. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I did not add original research--the dogs in Animal Farm represent the secret police of the USSR (i.e. Cheka, NKVD, KGB, etc.) that were used to suppress dissent and conduct purges in the Soviet Union.
 * I am familiar with the history of the Soviet Union (I edited the Russian Civil War), and Mollie represents the White emigres who benefitted from the Tsarist system and fled Russia for Constantinople and Europe.
 * Similarly Stalin's liquidation of the kulaks, or smallholder peasants, was part of his Five Year Plans and purges in the 1930s. The hens represent the kulaks because they are part of the animals (the proletariat), and were forced to surrender their eggs (land) to Napoleon (Stalin).

JohnAdams1800 (talk) 01:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Making such claims without providing any sources to back up your assertions is the definition of original research. DonIago (talk) 06:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Republican Party discussion closure
Hello. I saw that you closed the discussion on the Republican party talk page. I think the closure is premature - it was made less than 24h after the last comment, and closures should be made by uninvolved editors. Cortador (talk) 13:54, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at John Eastman. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RodRabelo7 (talk) 20:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Graduate unemployment in China
Hello, JohnAdams1800. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Graduate unemployment in China, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Map of Sudan war
In the edit summary comment 'The photo is from March 11' you was obviously not right as it is not a photo firstly... And about the date: my correction of a location of one of the towns done on 11 (on a request by another user) does not warrant that on this day any information about the war was in fact updated. Unfortunatelly the map was not updated for a longer time.. ('unfortunatelly' in a case when there did happened some changes on the ground during the recent period).IHaveBecauseOfLocks (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
You need to read WP:TITLECHANGES and stop trying to impose your beliefs against Wikipedia policy. Stop moving the article. Dylanvt (talk) 15:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Read Neutral point of view and Contentious topics. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You're both edit warring and it must stop. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * So I see that you're already aware of the CTOP designation, so let's skip that. NPOV disagreements are not exempt from 1RR. Only what is listed in WP:3RRNO and edits to enforce WP:ECR are exempt. Do not edit war. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Signature
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOjs UI icon signature-ltr.svg located above the edit window.

Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, JohnAdams1800,
 * Just a reminder that if you nominate another article for an AFD discussion, you should sign your nomination statement so that editors do not have to look at the page history to see which editor launched this deletion nomination. Basically, all statements on Talk pages and Project noticeboards should have a signature. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Malta
Whack! The above is a WikiTrout (Oncorhynchus macrowikipediensis), used to make subtle adjustments to the clue levels of experienced Wikipedians.

Good day. This is to inform you that you might have made a mistake in inserting this edit in 2024 in Malta when you should have been inserting this in 2024 in Moldova. Borgenland (talk) 15:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at New Mexico, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You deleted huge sections of text with the edit summary "moved paragraph", when in fact you deleted them. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I moved the paragraphs to the main articles about those topics to clarify. I won't do it again. JohnAdams1800 (talk) 16:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 * All you had to do was say this in your edit summary. I'll revert. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Graduate unemployment in China


Hello, JohnAdams1800. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Graduate unemployment in China".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northeastern United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Coast.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Excessive deletions
I see you (predictably) removed the Assange entry from 2024. Please stop removing nearly every new event that's posted – almost always for dubious reasons. It's beyond tiresome, and so excessive that it's now bordering on vandalism/trolling. Wjfox2005 (talk) 15:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Solid South
The article Solid South you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Solid South for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Phlsph7 -- Phlsph7 (talk) 08:21, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

On JB Pritzker coi
Hey, I was reviewing J. B. Pritzker and looked into your reported conflict of interest back in May. I agree with the promotional tone, but as you know that's different than a coi. Unless you have more info on the editors of that article, I wanted to know if you'd agree if I change it to rather than coi.

Cozyenby (talk) 22:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)