User talk:John Elson

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. -- The Red Pen of Doom  04:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * --Ronz (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Two accounts
Hi John,

Thanks for uploading images to the Wikipedia Commons. This is an excellent way to make images available to a broad audience.

Regarding User:Johnelson and User:John Elson, you may wish to read Sock puppetry for information about when it is appropriate for one person to have more than one account on Wikipedia.

Also, please see Help:Minor edit for when it is appropriate to mark an edit as minor – adding new content to an article, even just a link or a picture, is not regarded as a minor edit.

Thanks, Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 10:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Cross-posted to User talk:Johnelson


 * WHOIS for 3dham.com shows registrant Name: John A Elson --Guy Macon (talk) 03:07, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * That other account was created by accident and I don't know how to get rid of it, I haven't used it for years. John Alan Elson ★  WF6I A.P.O.I. 05:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The standard way to handle an old, unused account is delete the content of that user page and user talk page and replace the content with   with an edit summary saying Retired account. Now using User:John Elson . --Guy Macon (talk) 15:20, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Digital 3D
Hi, I noticed you've been doing some work on imaging / film pages, and thought I'd draw your attention to this. A new user has just created a page Digital 3D (Which used to redirect to Disney Digital 3D). I dont know much about digital standards but to me this appears to duplicate material on the 3-D film page and the Disney page. Do you think its notable material worth keeping or should it be reverted to the redirect? Cheers Clovis Sangrail (talk) 12:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

The locking out of jokers
Out of interest, what did you mean by "Isn't there some way to lock this joker out?" - is this a recurring style of vandalism you've noticed on this or other articles? The IP address itself only has one other edit, from a few weeks ago. --McGeddon (talk) 16:20, 4 May 2010 (UTC)


 * If it starts happening multiple times per day, you can request that the page be semi-protected so that anonymous IP editors can't edit it for a while. It doesn't look like it's getting that much vandalism at the moment, though, and getting recurring joke vandalism from shifting IPs can just mean that it was a joke made on a TV show or something, that different people are repeating. --McGeddon (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Preview, Group, Summarize
Please Preview, Group, Summarize

Thank you for your edits on the Stereoscopy and related articles. Please consider 1) Using the Show Preview button (beside the Save Page button), 2) Grouping edits together to avoid clogging the page's edit History which makes it hard for fellow editors to monitor the edits, 3) Describing each edit with the Edit Summary box (above the Save Page button).

Too many small edits bulk out the article histories and make it more difficult to find important edits. Previewing saves some doing and undoing edits. Thanks. Hu (talk) 12:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Cross Eye 3D image
If I open up the cross eye image on the 3D article page and attempt to look at it cross eyed, the image is patently 'inside out'. Looking at it in parallel view, it is the right way out. The cross eye image is identical to the parallel view image. But don't take my word for it - they link to exactly the same image. And to prove the point, I placed the following comment on the 'parallel view' image discussion page: "=== Same Image? ===". That same comment is now also on the cross-eye image discussion page, because they are the same image and the same discussion page. 109.153.242.10 (talk) 17:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

The poster is using Wikipedia's built in stereo image support. If you look at it in the page it will be normal or cross as appropriate but saving it to your computer will give you the original, normal image.

John Elson ★ 3Dham ★  WF6I A.P.O.I. 05:28, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Fulgurite
What is the point I having a stereoscopic image? If you want to show variety, a single image of either irregular specimen would be sufficient. --TimL (talk) 12:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

You could say the same thing about color images, since all the characteristics except color would be apparent in a black and white image which may clearer and sharper than a color image. The flat image would show all the characteristics except the depth. Many flat images are misleading with regard to the actual shape of objects and this is a good example. The more regular of the two tubes looks more like a blade when viewed as a flat image and many people see it that way, but when it is viewed stereoscopically the shape becomes clear.

Stereo images have become common enough to be used in articles not specifically about stereo images just as color images are used in articles not about color photography. The stereo support built in to Wikipedia allows only the right image to be shown by default so that to those not inclined to view it stereoscopically it looks like a flat image but the stereo viewing options are available to those who appreciate the clarity a stereo image offers. John Elson ★ 3Dham ★  WF6I A.P.O.I. 15:08, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

user Endophasy removed this text from the article, as multiple problems are evident. You cannot assume petrogenetic mechanisms simply by intuition; these intuitions are not validated by research and not consistent with the physical properties of electricity and plasma ==Shapes==

[Fulgurites may be classified in a number of different ways, but one of the more obvious is by their shape. Though subtle variations make fulgurites almost as unique as snowflakes, they can be classified into a few general categories.

Tubes: This is the most common fulgurite shape and is what people normally think of when they think of fulgurites. Tubes may be branched or unbranched and are generally rather rough on the outside with bumps and ridges. Sometimes openings are found in the middle and one end may have collapsed, leaving only one open end.

Blades: A blade is a tube which collapsed, leaving a relatively flat formation. Blades are not completely flat, however, and usually have a crumpled appearance.

Rods: Rods are similar to tubes, but, as the name suggests, they are solid rather than hollow. This can occur when a strike has partially dissipated and lacks enough energy to blast out the inside or a tube may have become filled with sand or other material which subsequently hardened. Like tubes, rods may be branched or unbranched. Some rods resemble fossilized roots.

Spheres: If material is sufficiently heated it may melt into a roughly spherical shape.

Irregular: This category is for shapes that defy classification. These can be formed when other shapes fold in on themselves before fully hardening. It is also possible that an already formed fulgurite was hit and partially melted by a subsequent strike. It is even possible that two or more fulgurites were partially melted and fused together by a subsequent strike.]

Why
does your signature not link to either your User or Talk page? --Lexein (talk) 08:09, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=590433523 your edit] to Stereoscopy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:17, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Pepax, thought to be an amalgamation of PErspective and PArallaX, involves the use of a wider than

April 2014
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Avocado. In addition, your signature appears to violates WP:SIGLINK. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Microscope
Before raising an issue on the article talk page, I thought I had better try and discover why you believe that Microscope should be written in American English. The first recorded edit is by Sodium, an editor who says of himself that he is an English doctor in London. The article then goes through very many edits before any words that can be assigned to American of British English are encountered. Can you please give your reasoning for tagging this article please ? Thanks.  Velella  Velella Talk 20:11, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carrot. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 20:19, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Forget-me-not. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.  Velella  Velella Talk 21:27, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Eye of a needle
Hello John,

I think you didn't understand well and some explanation would be useful. I NEVER said that the Jaffa Gate already existed in the time of Jesus. The "Eye of a needle" is a generic name for the little door inside a big one. You can see a lot of "Eye of a needle" in Jerusalem until today. Almost every big door in Jerusalem has a small door inside i.e. an "Eye of a needle". The Jaffa Gate is an exemple of that.

That's the "Eye of a needle" Jesus was talking about. It's important to know that it was a small gate, and not a literral needle. The difference is that a camel cannot enter through a needle in the literral meaning, but a camel can actually enter through the narrow door, although it is not easy. it is difficult, but not impossible. That make a big difference...

The little gate in Jaffa Gate is a good exemple of that kind of small door, even if that gate didn't exist in the time of Jesus.

Djampa (talk) 08:31, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

No, it was a literal needle the fact that it is impossible is the entire point. With man it is impossible, but with God all things are possible Just as Jesus himself explains in the very same passage.

John Alan Elson ★  WF6I A.P.O.I.

Talk:Bath School bombings
Wanted to let you know that your signature there seems to be somewhat mangled and does not provide linkage to your talk page or your contributions. As a matter of fact, your user name comes up as an empty page. Shearonink (talk) 05:13, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your signature
Your signature to posted items violates Wikipedia's rule that some part of your signature must link to one or more of your user pages (see WP:SIGLINK). Your signature contains no links to this account's user space, though it does contain a redlink to a non existent account User:John Alan Elson. I suspect that this may be an error on your part, in that you have created the signature incorrectly.

Oh yes: and new sections to talk pages go at the bottom of the page (just like this one) and not the top. 86.153.133.193 (talk) 16:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

The above comment is correct. Also, your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change
 * : John Alan Elson ★  WF6I A.P.O.I.

to
 * : John Elson★ WF6I A.P.O.I.

It would be good to put in a talk page link also, perhaps like this:


 * : John Elson (talk) ★ WF6I A.P.O.I.

The talk link doesn't work here because this is your talk page, and on Wikipedia, when pages link to themselves, the link is suppressed and the linking text is bolded.

You can change your signature on the Preferences page. You can also revert to the default signature, as I do, by blanking the signature field and unchecking the box marked "Treat the above as wiki markup".—Anomalocaris (talk) 20:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. —Anomalocaris (talk) 01:00, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Reverting vandalism
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made&#32;to Race and appearance of Jesus: you may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. 86.153.133.193 (talk) 13:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

WF6I
I noticed that you have WF6I in your signature, and out of curiosity I searched the FCC Amateur Radio database for that callsign. It's always nice to see other hams on Wikipedia. - ZLEA T\ C 23:46, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

If you go to the QSL article you'll see mine. John Alan Elson ★  WF6I A.P.O.I. 03:40, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Please adjust your signature
Hello. Please adjust your signature so that it links to your user page. For more information about this, see WP:SIGLINK. Thanks. — Mudwater (Talk) 03:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

"P.S." I believe that you can fix things by doing this: This should make your signature link to your user page, even though it will look the same as before. — Mudwater (Talk) 10:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Click on Preferences, in the upper right of any page.
 * Go to the "User profile" tab if you're not already there.
 * Scroll down to the Signature section. In the Signature text box I believe you will see this:
 * Change it to this, by adding  as shown:
 * Click the Save button at the bottom of the page

Reese's Pieces article
Hi John,

Please refrain from reverting my edit to the Reese's Pieces article unless you can source a citation which disproves the bit of historical information I am providing. As you have reverted these edits several times I must assume bad faith on your part. Please cease your bad faith edits immediately or I will have no choice but to raise the issue with arbitration.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.39.68.249 (talk) 04:01, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

I reverted vandalism. Who do you think you, a mere IP address, are to tell me I have to provide a source saying your garbage is fiction? Reese's Pieces were inspired by Reese's peanut butter cups which which were created by a man named Harry Burnett (H.B.) Reese in 1928. This story about some Reese brothers has nothing to do with the subject of the article! John Alan Elson ★  WF6I A.P.O.I. 04:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Furthermore, your vandalism has been reverted multiple times by multiple registered users! John Alan Elson ★  WF6I A.P.O.I. 05:04, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * In case you run into this editor again, see User:Meters/Reese's hoax. Meters (talk) 01:26, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * A late note – thanks for reverting, but please keep the edit summaries civil. Whether someone is editing without or with an account is completely irrelevant on Wikipedia. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)