User talk:Johndheathcote

Redirect of Disseminated
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Disseminated, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Disseminated is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Disseminated, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Disseminated itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:22, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Blastocytosis hominis
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Blastocytosis hominis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Blastocytosis hominis. andy (talk) 00:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Blastocytosis hominis
An editor has nominated Blastocytosis hominis, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Skin trauma
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Skin trauma, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Skin trauma. Tim Ross ·talk 18:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of List of biology animations
A tag has been placed on List of biology animations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Z i g g y  S a w  d u s t  19:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of List of biology animations
A tag has been placed on List of biology animations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Z i g g y  S a w  d u s t  15:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

List of biology animations
The information in this article might be useful, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's right for Wikipedia. Articles in Wikipedia have to be about notable subjects, and there are specific criteria about what "notability" means in this context. There are several places on the web that you can put the information; many of them are listed at Category:Web hosting. Hope this helps, ... disco spinster  talk  15:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of women in the Bible
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of women in the Bible, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * listcruft

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 05:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Solomon Hancock


The article Solomon Hancock has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not at all clear why he is notable, indeed no claim is made, seems only to have any significance at all to the LDS Church. Fails WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paste Let’s have a chat.  20:42, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mosiah Hancock


The article Mosiah Hancock has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable, even within the LDS Church. Was the son of a general authority, but notability is not inherited.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:09, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Solomon Hancock for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Solomon Hancock, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Solomon Hancock until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Paste Let’s have a chat.  22:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - A.T. Still University. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at A.T. Still University - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Phil ip.t.day  talk  23:28, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the article's . Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:48, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Replacing Speedy at School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona
It might not have been your intention, but you replaced the speedy deletion tag from School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, a page you created yourself, and argued to save. If you did not mean to replace this tag, please reply on the talk page page of that article as soon as possible so that I can remove it again for you. The article is at risk of being deleted at any time whilst that tag remains on the page. Please note that you should not remove the tag yourself. Phil ip.t.day  talk  00:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC) sorry that was my mistake. I am still getting a hold of this. I won't add or delete that tag anymore (as for now).Johndheathcote (talk) 01:01, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, not to worry, I'll keep an eye on it, and if User:SDPatrolBot|SDPatrolBot]] picks it up again in the next half hour or so, I will remove it on all our behalves! If you have any questions, feel free to get in touch on my talk page. Phil ip.t.day   talk  01:03, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! And I appreciate your corrections!Johndheathcote (talk) 01:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Δ
Thanks for your question there. Please be aware; when adding comments to people's talk pages, please add them to the bottom of the page. This can be automatically done by clicking the "new section" tab on the top of any talk page. I've moved your question to the bottom of his talk page and responded there. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Ohh yes, Thank you. I will do that from now on.  Let me know if you have any other advice. --Johndheathcote (talk) 19:52, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona


A tag has been placed on A.T. Still University School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It is a campus and a part of A. T. Still University, so it should be deleted or merge into A. T. Still University.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Assassin'S Creed (talk) 12:16, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Dermatome (embryology) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dermatome (embryology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dermatome (embryology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mbch331 (talk) 19:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Monoarticular Muscles


A tag has been placed on Monoarticular Muscles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ravendrop 00:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Polyarticular Muscles


A tag has been placed on Polyarticular Muscles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ravendrop 00:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. When you recently edited EABV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sympathetic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Hepatitis biochemical markers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hepatitis biochemical markers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hepatitis biochemical markers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JFW &#124; T@lk  13:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 10:35, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

--Johndheathcote (talk) 20:50, 26 January 2013 (UTC)Thanks! I appreciate the suggestion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Black widow spider toxin
Hello Johndheathcote,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Black widow spider toxin for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, :.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Lecture slides
These are not a sufficient ref for Wikipedia. Thus moved this here

=== Microscopy ===
 * 1) Apply drop sterile mineral oil to surface of burrow using sterile scalpel blade
 * 2) Scrape burrow vigorously
 * 3) Tiny flecks of blood will appear in the oil
 * 4) Transfer oil to slide
 * 5) Examine microscopically low power

Please read WP:MEDRS Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:13, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Ten lost tribes
Unless you have reliable sources to support your edits, I suggest you cease and desist editing the lead of the article in question, as it appears that you have a biased opinion and lack the requisite competence.

You are not a historian or social scientist, I gather. The comments you left on the Talk page are ludicrous, as the text quoted is the authoritative academic text on the subject.

Your comments are also in violation of WP:NPA, as you have accused me of being "manipulative and unethical", albeit indirectly.

If you persist with reverting the text in question without providing an RS-based rationale, this will wind up at the edit warring notice board.-- Ubikwit   連絡見学/迷惑 23:09, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

AN/I re: Ten Lost Tribes
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Ubikwit   連絡見学/迷惑 15:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I look forward to hearing back.83462 16:12, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for ZMapp
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Condylar decompression for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Condylar decompression is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Condylar decompression until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 07:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomas E. McWilliams for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas E. McWilliams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thomas E. McWilliams until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 10:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Lawrence Jones (physician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lawrence Jones (physician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lawrence Jones (physician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Natureium (talk) 15:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of George Helmer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Helmer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/George Helmer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Natureium (talk) 15:40, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Diffusion of pulmonary gas equation.gif


The file File:Diffusion of pulmonary gas equation.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned mathematical equation image."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 22:01, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Allotope


The article Allotope has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Dictionary definition. The use of this term in science has fallen dramatically (check the 'results by year' graph in . I can't find sources to build an article off of."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajpolino (talk) 00:05, 31 August 2022 (UTC)