User talk:Justin Ormont

Thank you
Thank you, I see you've cleared that out. Cheers Intelligent  sium  review 23:47, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Micro-SIM
A tag has been placed on Micro-SIM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Recipe For Hate (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Fool Us
Hi. Thanks for creating the Penn and Teller fool us article. --Rebroad (talk) 21:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

AfD
Hi Justin Ormont! I have nominated your article 2011 Israel protests for deleted. Please take a look at this page and feel free to respond. —Ynhockey (Talk) 23:46, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Civil Conflict
Template:Infobox Civil Conflict has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Y not? 01:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

oklahoma added
2011 United States public employee protests

i think your page is a good idea. i wonder if there might be a different name for it, as it is theoretically covering at least three issues... the budget problems, the legislation, and the protests, but i cant think of a good name so ... anyways. Decora (talk) 14:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I agree. I'm not certain what type of name would be better though.  I'm generally for naming a page to fit its content, but we could also focus the content to better fit the title too. ~ Justin Ormont (talk) 17:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

New public employee protest map
On the Talk page for the public employee protests, you mentioned that another map showing the states where collective bargaining was already illegal could resolve the whole "third color to the map" issue. I was wondering if you could or wanted to do that, as I don't know how to make and edit maps on WP. MAINEiac4434 (talk) 18:18, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Civil Conflict Infobox style
Template:Civil Conflict Infobox style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 08:17, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Canvassing
This wasn't appropriate. If you want to notify interested parties of a TfD which might interest them then that's fine, but dragging in an unrelated discussion in order to try to bring people onto your side is certainly not. If you think nominating two templates for deletion is a "rampage" then I suggest you try dialling down your sensitivity to other people commenting on your work on here. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 11:50, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It is merely a notice to their project that their main project template is up for deletion w/ appropriate notice to active members of their project. The inclusion of mine is only as reference for what types of arguments you and others are going to make and possible responses. I'm in no need of assistance.  The "rampage" is from your history.  ~ Justin Ormont (talk) 12:31, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Why wasn't it? But it's wierd that most of the WP members were notified personally, this hasn't done here before. I have no idea why we even used this template, but haven't read the discussion either, yet. Give my answer soon, when I know what we're dealing here. Btw we have WikiProject World Rally also. Pelmeen10 (talk) 12:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * So far, the WikiProject World Rally didn't seem to pick up the template for discussion. ~ Justin Ormont (talk) 11:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Infobox title styles
Regarding this:  uses   while   uses. If you want to play about with making the sandbox code be styled exactly like the present deployed code then it shouldn't be too hard, but there's still no actual reason to do so.

Furthemore,  is not a CSS attribute, so it won't have any effect in the   parameter. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 09:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Off wiki for a bit...wikibreak
Need to concentrate on work, projects & research; edits may be sporadic. Watch list & talk page is still being followed.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Collapsible bulletlist
Template:Collapsible bulletlist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Penn and Teller Fool Us - Ad.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Penn and Teller Fool Us - Ad.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blunt Talk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Starz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Infobox question
I am looking for a solution for a template issue. Specifically, I am trying to use the Template:Infobox civil conflict for a civil conflict involving three parties (see Input on proposed infobox on the Talk:Selma to Montgomery marches page. The issue is the width of an infobox to incorporate three parties becomes too large.  Is there a way to redesign the infobox to display each party in a horizontal section versus a vertical section (see 1940 Brocklesby mid-air collision as an example)?  Or two, disconnect the "Parties to the civil conflict" and/or "Lead figures" section from the infobox with a link in the infobox to the disconnected sections?  Not sure where to go on Wikipedia to examine this issue.  Thanks.  Mitchumch (talk) 07:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Machine learning stubs
Category:Machine learning stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:29, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited What Happened to Monday?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cologne phonetics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Umlaut. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Justin. The link you need is Germanic_umlaut. BTW I retranslated the whole text of Cologne phonetics where I thought nobody can understand what was meant. 194.174.73.33 (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC) Marco Pagliero Berlin

Speedy deletion nomination of FastText


A tag has been placed on FastText requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Theroadislong (talk) 11:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you! WMF Surveys, 18:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! WMF Surveys, 01:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

'''If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again.''' We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. WMF Surveys, 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (ML.NET) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating ML.NET, Justin Ormont!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for the newly created article. Could you create an article about LightGBM as well? I saw there are enough reliable references for it. I hope you will, that's why I kept the red link."

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robertgombos (talk) 03:27, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The New Screen Savers - Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:The New Screen Savers - Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Learning curve (machine learning)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Learning curve (machine learning).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Deb (talk) 09:38, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IBM Haifa Research Laboratory


The article IBM Haifa Research Laboratory has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence this company passes WP:NCOMPANY/GNG. Could redirect to IBM research, through it's dubious this sub-lab is a likely searchable term."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of IBM Haifa Research Laboratory for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IBM Haifa Research Laboratory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/IBM Haifa Research Laboratory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)