User talk:Kdevans

License tagging for Image:Ruben1.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Ruben1.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 04:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ruben1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ruben1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Kirkyan
At the end of this blog post, you say "For anyone who manages to remotely understand what I’m trying to communicate, rip it up. It’s as much a ramble as anything." So even you admit that kirkyan is not encyclopedic. -- RHaworth 20:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry mate, that's not my blog. But you make a fair point about the kirkyan -- the idea may not be well-developed enough to stand yet as an article. Kdevans 15:00, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Encyclopedic
Encyclopedic? "broad in scope or content"? huh?

Or does Haworth intend to mean that the origination source of an idea must be... proper. No poets scratching thoughts on prison walls; poetry is only important if it's published. No art outside of the Salon; only the elite get to decide what is and is not Art. No equations on a napkin or sitting under apple trees; theories come only from the research lab and institutions of higher learning. And certainly no ideas on blogs, because they're just "outpourings of the chattering classes". - csven — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.0.97.133 (talk • contribs)
 * Yes I agree with all the above tests. And other Wikipedians are even more deletionist than me: see my comment in this debate and the riposte to it. Apparently the rules include "not even things which people can see with their own eyes".
 * Thanks for the "chattering classes" link - i had not seen it before and one always likes to get mentioned. -- RHaworth 07:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

What matters is whether a community (and not necessarily the Wikipedia community) begins to work with and write about a concept, and move it into wider significance and usage. That hasn't happened 'yet' with "kirkyan". Csven -- reckon there may be a place for it in some sort of Design or A.R. Wikia page? I dunno. Its a young concept yet, but time will prove it to have traction. Kdevans 15:04, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
Bhutto was deposed in a coup 6 July 1977, and hanged 4 April 1979. Cheers, AndersW (talk) 10:01, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Steven M. Greer
Please look closely at the references and WP:BLP. Unknowncountry.com is specifically not taking a stand on the event, but just reporting what one person said, and even qualified it with "If this happened...". That's gossip, and has no place in an BLP. --Ronz (talk) 17:17, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Ronz, there is now a second source for the alleged blocking / locking of doors and accosting of women at event . Second source report begins about halfway down the page, though it is asserted that the manhandling of the attendee happened during another speaker's (Wilcock's) segment.  Whether it was still Greer's bodyguards in place is not clear. Kdevans (talk) 07:15, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * That's not a reliable source. --Ronz (talk) 15:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sean Brock
Hello, Kdevans. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sean Brock, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Sean Brock to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ubiquity (talk) 17:39, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pnina Werbner (April 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pnina Werbner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pnina_Werbner Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bradv&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pnina_Werbner reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 23:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Dick Ford for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dick Ford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dick Ford until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to take a look at our first article
Hi!

We are students writing an article on  Mario Alvarez Ledesma  as part of our class Academic Discoruse and Writing at Tec de Monterrey. Since you are an experienced wikipedian and have an interest in this kind of topics, we would like to know if you take a few minutes to take a look at the article and give us feedback. Thank you for your time.--A01334563 (talk) 21:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

-- Hi, I added some notes on the 'talk' page for your article. Also run it through http://www.hemingwayapp.com/ or grammarly to fix up usage & grammar. Thanks for sharing! Kdevans (talk) 14:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Kdevans! Thanks for taking a quick interest in my students' article. I thought you should know that there is a process they have to go through in the creation of this article (which is why its on a subpage off my user page). They should be at a stage where they have a list of facts/short sentences from their sources, roughly organized into sections... working towards grouping them within the sections into what will be paragraphs. Then we will work on sentences (spelling grammar etc) and then putting in the citations in the correct form. Its the same process I use when I do my articles. I asked them to contact Wikipedians to have more eyes on their work, trying to get people who know their topics better than I do. The finished product is supposed to be between 400 and 500 words.Thelmadatter (talk) 15:24, 24 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Very good Thelmadatter, I think it's a very good educational exercise.Kdevans (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Josephine McCarthy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josephine McCarthy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Josephine McCarthy& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444 (talk) 13:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of JJ Foley


A tag has been placed on JJ Foley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. JMHamo (talk) 17:06, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fake news, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Critical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sharon Duncan-Brewster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intergalactic. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm IAmChaos. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Ken Paxton have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos  05:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Richard Leo Enos
Hello Kdevans -- Thanks for contributing this article. From a Google Scholar search, I believe the subject is notable as an academic and author, and so I've marked it as patrolled. However the article needs to do more to make the notability obvious. The subject appears to have written at least two highly or moderately cited books, so adding any book reviews would be particularly helpful. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 19:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)