User talk:Kennethmac2000

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! smoddy 17:54, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Live 8
Please explain why you totally dispute the Live 8 article at Talk:Live 8, or the totallydisputed tag will have to be removed.

First Minister for Wales
Please see my comments on this article's talk page. I do take your point about "conventional usage in the English language when describing a head of state or government". However, the position is known as the First Minister for Wales, and regardless of whether this is for political reasons, or simply because the Government are obsessed with the word "for", I feel we should stick to a neutral point of view when presenting the facts in Wikipedia. Best wishes,  J Rawle  (Talk) 01:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Danish general election, 2015
Please start a discussion on the talk page rather than unilaterally keep changing and reverting the introduction. This is expected per WP:BRD. Thanks, Number   5  7  10:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Why are my reverts "unilateral" but yours are not User:Number 57? Kennethmac2000 (talk) 18:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Scottish Government 2016 logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Scottish Government 2016 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Trade Union (Wales) Act 2017
If you wish to change this article to reflect what you believe to be the case then the onus is on you to find reliable sources that reflect that. The legislation is being debated by the UK parliament and will apply throughout the UK. If, as you stated in a previous edit, Northern Ireland has separate trade union law then you need to find a source to demonstrate that. Reverting people with comments like "you are wrong" or this isn't in the spirit of Wikipedia are unhelpful. You need to take this to the talk page and discuss it. Or, if you feel particularly strongly, then post something at WP:3O and ask for their input. This is Paul (talk) 20:27, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The problem is the terms United Kingdom and Great Britain tend to be used interchangeably by the media and are often thought to be the same thing. It is wise to treat with caution any mention of either, and dig a little deeper. Consequently I feel it could cause confusion to use the term in the article without proper explanation. If you want to say the law will apply throughout England, Scotland and Wales then that's a sensible way around the problem, and in fact, once I've finished this post I'll change it to those. This has nothing to do with whether or not I created the article, I'd say the same thing regardless of that. Also bear in mind the article will need a reference to say these changes won't apply to Northern Ireland. This is Paul (talk) 13:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * But there is a quote from the UK government - which is included inline in the article - which says that it "intends ... to ensure trade union legislation applies equally across Great Britain". So this is not just some journalist sloppily throwing around terms without thinking about what they mean. Don't you think a UK government spokesperson - who would presumably by default refer to the whole of the UK - deliberately chose the term "Great Britain"? (I certainly do, since employment law is devolved in Northern Ireland.)
 * Why would it make sense for us to include a quote in the article which refers to "across Great Britain", but then elsewhere in the article say "across the United Kingdom"?
 * I also disagree with the premise of your point. Abroad, people often use the terms United Kingdom and Great Britain interchangeably (eg, in Germany), but this rarely happens within the UK. The terms United Kingdom and "Britain" are definitely used interchangeably within the UK, but people rarely say "Great Britain" unless they are specifically referring to the political construct (ie, England, Scotland and Wales). Because of the Northern Ireland Protocol, we have actually become more used to talking about "Great Britain" (or "GB") in recent times - eg, when talking about the checks which now exist between Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Kennethmac2000 (talk) 13:12, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I tend to think of Wikipedia as being for an international audience, so a bit of explanation never goes amiss. Another solution could be to link the Great Britain text so the reader can click on that if they wanted clarification. This is Paul (talk) 13:27, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I think linking to Great Britain is a very good idea, perhaps the first time the term is mentioned. Kennethmac2000 (talk) 14:07, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)