User talk:Kuzwa

Thanks
... for removing ... Sicherlich Post 19:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kris Austin


The article Kris Austin has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Supertouch (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Gregory Despres.PNG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Gregory Despres.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 04:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dzimitry Kanavalau


The article Dzimitry Kanavalau has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is not wikinews WP:NOTNEWS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ben Ben (talk) 21:55, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Dzimitry Kanavalau for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dzimitry Kanavalau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dzimitry Kanavalau until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ben Ben (talk) 16:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Jesse Imeson
Hi. I posted Jesse Imeson for deletion under notability standards. Please feel free to contribute to the discussion at Articles for deletion/Jesse Imeson. --Lyncs (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Burlington derailment for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burlington derailment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Burlington derailment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Speciate (talk) 05:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Riots vs Ethnic Violence
Can you take a look at this article and say whether it should be renamed? Even though it's a very important subject currently there's little interest in it. Thank you. Nataev (talk) 08:41, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

No personal attacks
It is fine to disagree. It is not fine to personally attack an editor like you did here. Please find a more civil way to express your displeasure, or better yet, just comment on the merits of the argument. Thank you. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;  Join WER 16:41, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Stale draft on celestial collision
Hello, Kuzwa. Could you consider moving User:Kuzwa/HD 172555 celestial body collision into the userspace or merging it with an existing article? Either would be preferable of course to deletion, but it seems to be a mightily stale draft (WP:STALEDRAFT). Magog the Ogre (t • c) 19:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Ian Gower listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ian Gower. Since you had some involvement with the Ian Gower redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 10:44, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Saint John city hall fire) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Saint John city hall fire, Kuzwa!

Wikipedia editor Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice article, many thanks!"

To reply, leave a comment on Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

&mdash; O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  14:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

ARB Notice
prokaryotes (talk) 00:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of disasters in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Almonte ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_disasters_in_Canada check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_disasters_in_Canada?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 2008 Flathead Valley avalanches for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2008 Flathead Valley avalanches is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2008 Flathead Valley avalanches until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm Bacon 14:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

FAR nomination
I have nominated Great Fire of London for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Renerpho (talk) 06:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Featured Article Save Award for Great Fire of London
There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Great Fire of London/archive2. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  17:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Battle of Vasylkiv
Which parts exactly were inaccurate? The ones with WP:RS or others ? Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:03, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * There was no prolonged occupation here. Don't confuse this battle with the larger offensive. --Kuzwa (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Feel free to restore those parts that omit mentions of a prolonged occupation. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)