User talk:Lawaspirant5580

Film infobox
Hi! Just spotted this edit, and you are correct, there is no such parameter as "box office" for the film infobox. However, this can be replaced with "gross" instead. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 08:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * This is an interesting point that I thought I knew but grew increasingly skeptical about as I was editing these infoboxes the other day. I read through some of the archive discussions on the Template:Infobox film talk pages and the number of comments about if box office and/or gross included home video distributions intake, post-release features, merchandising, etc., etc. seemed non-conclusory.  So although I originally assumed the gross and box office were fungible, I'm still not 100% if the number reflected in an incorrectly declared BO param is an accurate reflection of actual accepted gross (i.e. IMDb-sourced or some other).  In this instance, you're clearly right and the two are interchangeable - I'll admit I didn't pay enough attention to the supporting ref; however, I'll admit to a degree of ongoing skepticism for unsourced BO numbers. Lawaspirant5580 (talk) 16:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi. Thanks for the ping. I'm not sure if you look at WT:FILM, but the box office issue is a current hot topic, with these posts being the most recent about the current issues: (one, two).  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 16:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Great sources, I hadn't gotten quite that far into it yet. Thanks for the references.Lawaspirant5580 (talk) 16:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Snooker Infobox
Just as an FYI as your edit on Sam Craigie - the current ranking is generated from Template:Infobox snooker player/rankings. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:27, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Annapurna (goddess), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:University of California, Davis fellows


Hello, Lawaspirant5580. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "University of California".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Category:University of California, Davis fellows has been nominated for upmerging
Category:University of California, Davis fellows has been nominated for upmerging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of John M. York for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John M. York is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John M. York until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. BD2412 T 16:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Lawaspirant5580. Thank you for your work on Michigan Journal of International Law. Trainsskyscrapers, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 20:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)