User talk:Lennart97/Archive 3

Archive 3 (April-October 2021)

WikiProject Konkan
Hello Lennart97, I just noticed that there is no WikiProject for Konkan, also I noticed your contributions to Konkan, if you are interested in Konkan then why not start WikiProject for Konkan. I have also created a subpage for the editors to whom I have asked the same question, you could find it here. Also I request you if you are interested in this WikiProject then could you ask other editors about there interest in this WikiProject. Regards ExclusiveEditor (talk) 17:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the offer! I'll have to respectfully decline, as I have no specific interest in, or knowledge of, Konkan :) Lennart97 (talk) 18:19, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

That's ok, also if in future you are interested in any topic but there is no WikiProject regarding or similar to it then ping me, maybe I would be interested in it! ExclusiveEditor (talk) 06:09, 2 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks, will do! Lennart97 (talk) 17:24, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

FNAF 3
From MisterNerdly: I was looking through the source of FNAF 3, and I noticed you reverted a vandalism. I checked what it was, and the guy had copy pasted a bunch of Mr. Hippo lines from Ultimate Custom Night. Thanks for undoing that, but you have to admit it was pretty funny. XD — Preceding unsigned comment added by MisterNerdly (talk • contribs) 17:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, I guess that explains the vandal's "HIPPO" edit summary :) Lennart97 (talk) 17:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Neo Dada.webp
Thanks for uploading File:Neo Dada.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Khan el-Ahmar = ?
Lennart, hi. Please, be a bit more careful. Yes, I know, there was an old leftover link there that made no sense, but it wasn't wrong; yours was. It used to be VERY easy to get confused, I did often mix them up too, but now everything is in place to help avoid that, i.e. the Khan al-Ahmar disamb. page, three items branching off from there and each contains cautioning advice as to NOT confuse A with B with C. They do have yet another common element, they're all in the Adummim area, which is linked in all three. So DAB, cross-reference, cautioning text everywhere. Now I've placed hatnotes to the two historical sites, to add yet another layer of clarification. So:


 * Khan al-Hatruri = Inn of the Good Samaritan, SELDOM also called Khan al-Ahmar, has never been a monastery, is next to a castle.
 * Khan al-Ahmar = Laura of Euthymius, has changed from a monastery to an inn.

It's very confusing, I know. Have a great day, Arminden (talk) 10:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, and thanks for the message. You're right, it's confusing :) If I understand correctly, you want some of these links to refer explicitly to the disambiguation page and not a specific article, right? In that case, you should follow the procedure specified at WP:INTDAB, so that people like myself will no longer keep coming around to try to fix these links. Lennart97 (talk) 10:12, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't like ballast. A bot introduced somewhere something like that recently, that's hard to counter, but I'm not afraid of human editors - either they click on the link and see for themselves, or I write a note like the one here and all is good. It's maybe the Don Quixote in me - I write 12-5-2021, not 12-05-2021, 'cause I'm not a machine. People adapting to machines instead of the other way 'round is "against my religion", and also sooo 1978 :) Arminden (talk) 14:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, the INTDAB policy is not meant for machines; it's meant for humans like me, who otherwise assume that links to disambiguation pages need to be fixed, and try to fix them to the best of their abilities. The policy is there for good reason, and it certainly does no harm. Lennart97 (talk) 15:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Snappers
Care to explain? Quetzal1964 (talk) 22:34, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Why so snappy? ;) I assume you're asking why I removed links to snapper (fish) in some articles about snapper species, specifically from the following phrase: a snapper belonging to the family Lutjanidae. Basically, I was fixing links to disambiguation pages, as snapper (fish) links to the disambiguation page snapper. I figured that since Lutjanidae, the relevant snapper family, is already linked, there's no point in making snapper link to a page that lists some other "snappers" which are apparently unrelated to the Lutjanidae, other than that they share the snapper name. I'm no fish expert, though. If you do think there is value in linking to the disambiguation page, I don't object, but in that case the procedure at WP:INTDAB should be followed, i.e. linking to snapper (disambiguation). Seems pointless, but it actually keeps people like me from thinking the link needs to be fixed, as the policy page explains. If you want the links restored in this way, I'll be happy to do it myself, just let me know. Lennart97 (talk) 11:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the explanation. All’s fine.Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:33, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Hypothermia
Hi. I've replied here as I'm not sure how to reply that'll you'll get a notification. So I removed the notification you mentioned to clean up my talk page because it said clearly in the notification it was ok to remove it. As for not fixing the link, I was too busy with life and the disambiguation page wasn't so confusing and diverse that it seemed to be urgent, as what I was describing was made clear in the text. Thanks for helping with it. --Dr zoidberg590 (talk) 23:51, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for taking the time to reply. You can notify people using the "ping" template, as I did here: . That way you can reply on your own talk page and still notify the other person; more information is at WP:PING.
 * Anyway, you're right that a single link to a disambiguation page like that isn't a big deal. But they do altogether add up, so much that there's a whole project dedicated to cleaning them up: Disambiguation pages with links. It certainly would help if people clean up their own links. What's way more important than that, though, is to add sources for information you add to articles; verifiability is a core policy of Wikipedia. If you keep that in mind for the future, you'll be just fine. Lennart97 (talk) 10:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Question about Shaheen Khan and IMDb
Been trying to help out with Draft:Shaheen Khan (British actress) and filling out the Filmography. I think some of the entries on her IMDb page are incorrect. Should I presume entries that aren't actually in the UK, but were made back in India, such as Chiru Navvuto and Youth (2002 film) were actually starring Shaheen Khan (Indian actress) instead? Silver seren C 05:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Confusing isn't it? But yes, I think that's the best approach. I came across the two films mentioned above while fixing links to the disambiguation page, and those are definitely the Indian actress - more generally, there doesn't seem to be evidence of the British actress having played in any non-UK (or non-Western) productions, or the Indian actress having played in any non-Indian productions. It's not great for verifiability purposes - if a source just mentions Shaheen Khan as a cast member, that doesn't technically prove it's the British actress - but I think it's reasonable in this case to assume that British or American productions star the British actress.
 * Thanks for putting the filmography together, by the way! Speaking of verifiability, should I make sure every single entry has a reference before moving to mainspace? A lot of articles don't bother with sourcing the filmography at all, which is of course not the right approach, but it looks like it will be hard to find reliable sources to verify most of her mostly small roles. For example, I haven't yet been able to find a source confirming her role in Casualty, even though it's a relatively prominent show and she played in 10 episodes. Lennart97 (talk) 08:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Update: I found a reference for Casualty, thanks to another Wiki article; it's a book called Companion to contemporary Black British culture. I think there could be more information about her in this book. Do you know if there's a way to access it? Lennart97 (talk) 10:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I found it here, fortunately her entry is included in the limited preview! Good stuff, even birth year and place. What I really can't find, however, is a source about her Satellite nomination. Lennart97 (talk) 11:39, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Just to note, don't hold the move to mainspace merely b/c some films have no refs. They're desirable, but their lack is very far from fatal. --Tagishsimon (talk) 16:58, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Yeah, not necessary to ref everything. But if it can be referenced with a proper ref, then it should be. Some of the smaller pieces, such as the short films, may not be able to be just based on online/digitized sources. In related news, I found this source that lists all of her theatre work prior to 2004. Not her roles, so probably isn't a good source for the plays themselves, but is a good jumping off point to find other sources since we now know what productions to look for. Silver  seren C 18:29, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Alright, I'll move it to mainspace now :) I hope we can get rid of the cn for the Satellite award soon, but other than that, it's a pretty decent article at this point, and moving to mainspace may even invite some further work on it. Lennart97 (talk) 19:26, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, worry no more. Got it reffed. And Variety is a top tier quality source as well. Silver  seren C 19:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Incredible. How did you find it? Lennart97 (talk) 20:15, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, and another question, in case you know: is this a stub, or already start-class, for assessment purposes? Lennart97 (talk) 20:17, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Just did a deep Google search with her name and the satellite award. And I would say start class at this point. Silver  seren C 20:27, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Must have been quite deep indeed! Start sounds good to me too. Thanks! Lennart97 (talk) 20:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You suspect IMDb may be incorrect? I've seen split entries (one person with two different entries) and duplicate entries (one person entered twice). WP:IMDB exists for a reason. IMDb can be a useful resource, but keep your 10-foot pole handy. Narky Blert (talk) 19:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Working Wikipedian's Barnstar

 * Thank you, ! I appreciate your appreciation :) Lennart97 (talk) 11:59, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Happy days. Since you appear to be an expert in disambiguation, was wondering if you would be able to answer my query. In this situation, if you hadn't fixed the links, would a bot do it? I think there is a bot for double redirects, but is there a bot for such kinds of links?  starship .paint  (exalt) 12:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * No, there's no bot for it. I think such a bot has been proposed in the past, but never made it, although I'm not sure. In this case, while disambiguating, I caught a handful of links to Zosimus which were not intended for the historian, including a few for the pope and even one for the crab genus. So while it's definitely a bit of work, finding those few bad links is an advantage of having to update the links manually. Lennart97 (talk) 12:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are right on the advantage. Thank you for informing me on this, now I know I have to do it myself! XD  starship .paint  (exalt) 12:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Sad but true... ;) good luck! Lennart97 (talk) 14:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

San Pedro Airport (Nicaragua)
Please re-open the move request on Talk:San Pedro Airport (Nicaragua). There were no responses to the move request, and a quick search of the IATA database would show that the Airport in Bonanza is listed as San Pedro: https://www.iata.org/en/publications/directories/code-search/?airport.search=bza --Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 20:35, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, done, because of the IATA database. My bad, should have checked that. Lennart97 (talk) 20:45, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks
Looks to me like we are done. Many thanks. Andrewa (talk) 21:51, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Page mover?
Would you like me to grant you the page mover user right? I think it would be useful for your work at RM and you meet the standard criteria. —&#8239; The Earwig (talk) 05:37, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I would like that very much! It would certainly make closing RMs a lot more convenient, and allow me to help out at WP:RMT. I'll be very careful with it, of course. Lennart97 (talk) 08:42, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅! Pasting the usual message below:

Hello, Lennart97. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ALennart97 granted] the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! —&#8239; The Earwig (talk) 12:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much! Lennart97 (talk) 13:06, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It's a very useful privilege for us DABfixers. In uncontroversial cases, you can tidy the site up without losing history or breaking links, or formulating a request for an admin to do the work. (1) If FizBuz redirects to FizBuz (disambiguation) instead of the other way around, a WP:MALPLACED error. (2) If you come across a DAB page which consists only of FizBuz (politician) and Fizbuz (whoever), when that latter entry has been deleted by WP:PROD or at WP:AFD, per WP:PRECISE (tag as R from unnecessary disambiguation as the last stage in the cleanup).
 * At the rate you're going, you'll soon be able to add yourself to the 100k club. Narky Blert (talk) 19:50, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * you're right, I'm making my way up there. Time flies - or rather, semi-automated edits do :) Though I'm slightly diversifying my portfolio now with WP:RM. Lennart97 (talk) 23:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Question about a page move
Good day. Re the article Ford F-150 Lightning electric pickup you just page moved to Ford F-150 Lightning as a "technical" page move: I think that may have been a mistake, as the "Ford F-150 Lightning is actually a truck brand/model that Ford has used over approx 30 years, and refers to three different truck model versions of the F-150 "Lightning", not merely the new (in development for 2022 production) F-150 Lightning.

Moreover, the topic had been being discussed on the (now moved) article Talk page, where it had actually been another editor who brought up the question of might F-150 Lightning be better. There is a full explanation of the three models, and the Wiki article sections on each of them, on that Talk page if you'd kindly take a look.

At any rate, I was thinking that possibly a disambiguation page for "Ford F-150 Lightning" (links to all three) would probably be better than having the term go only to the current/2022 planned electric pickup. But now, with you WP:MOVE complete, it feels like I shouldn't do that.

I could just go away and figure some Ford truck loving editor will eventually worry about it and fix it... but thought I should also just tell you in the event you'd care to undo the page move, and we could set up that disambig page today, before I end my editor career writing about Ford trucks. ;) Cheers.  N2e (talk) 10:31, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi. Thank you for coming here, and my apologies for the move - I did not check the talk page and assumed the move was uncontroversial as requested. I know nothing about cars, but a disambiguation page seems like a decent solution based on the talk page discussion. I'm happy to undo the move, but before I do so, maybe, who requested the technical move, wants to comment. Lennart97 (talk) 10:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Yeah, sorry, I was unaware that the Lightning name had been used on other models. Since the Ford F-150 Lightning page had just been a redirect to the electric pickup, I didn't think there would be a problem moving it there. So if you need to move the pages around again I wouldn't mind. Saucy[talk – contribs] 17:15, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Alright, I undid the move. Ford F-150 Lightning is free to be turned into a disambiguation page. Lennart97 (talk) 21:34, 15 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks to both of you, Lennart97 and Saucy. Appreciate your serious re-look at the matter.  I'll try to get over there sometime soon and just create that disambig page.  N2e (talk) 22:34, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Wrong move!
Just to notify you that the move request at Codogné was made by the so-called MaoMio, a well known abuser that has been globally banned by WMF (you can check on Meta or just Special:Contributions/151.64.178.200). He is active on Italian articles, in particular with a obsession on accents. Can you please rectify or justify this misstep in the talk page, where other users are discussing about it? Thank you! -- Ruthven ( msg ) 20:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know! I'll reply at the talk page. Lennart97 (talk) 20:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

I have edited your closure of Talk:Infiniti Q70
Hi Lennart97. I noticed an obvious error in your closure of this move discussion, and have corrected the link to the discussion page (you were missing "Talk:"). I'm letting you know since of course generally editing someone else's comment is discouraged, but to me a closure is not quite the same thing, and this was clearly your intention. Thanks. A7V2 (talk) 07:48, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for fixing it and for letting me know! Lennart97 (talk) 09:43, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. An edit that you recently made to MyCujoo seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 12:36, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You know it wasn't a test (I explained the rationale for the edit), so why are you leaving me this condescending template? Also, per MOS:BOLD: The most common use of boldface is to highlight the first occurrence of the article's title word or phrase in the lead section. The "MyCujoo" I bolded just so happens to be the first occurence of the article's title in the lead section. Crazy, isn't it? I don't see how adhering to the MOS obligates me to personally re-write the article. Lennart97 (talk) 12:40, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Re: The New Pope
Hi. It's been a long time since I worked on this article so I might be wrong about this. I remember them having a title and a family name as many noble families in the UK do. I rewatched episode 2 and there's a reference to "Duchess Brannox" and Lennox is not mentioned in that episode. I might have copied that from IMDb originally but I have no source backing that up. So we should change it to Brannox as you proposed. --TheVampire (talk) 11:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks for looking into it and getting back to me. I've restored my version. Lennart97 (talk) 11:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you so much, ! For the barnstar and for the other thing - I'm really enjoying being a page mover and I don't know when, if ever, I would have felt ready to request it myself :) Lennart97 (talk) 21:19, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Of course - I too dislike requesting PERMs I'm not sure I'm ready for. Generally I've found them to be granted though. (maybe Dunning–Kruger effect?) Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 21:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * That may well be it :p Lennart97 (talk) 21:30, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Re: Hyperinflation in Yugoslavia
Hey, thanks for the reminder, as it happens I was just doing that. I actually fixed most of the links yesterday, but because of a template being transcluded into 2 more templates, the WhatLinksHere output looked like a disaster. I did null edits a while ago to make it go away - the list will start getting reduced to what is actually still there eventually (it doesn't all get reconciled immediately). --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 08:51, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I owe you an apology - I'm very much aware of the lingering template transclusion issue and could have easily checked whether that was the case here, so I'm not sure why I instead assumed that you hadn't bothered fixing the links yet. Keep up the good work! Lennart97 (talk) 08:57, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Nah, no problem, this issue is very intricate, and indeed may well be indicative of an overuse of transclusion :) Sometimes editors get overly enthusiastic about navboxes and then we have a long tail of issues such as this one. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 09:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Deprecated API queries
Hey!

It seems your account (or more likely, some userscript you have installed) is doing quite a lot of API queries for the deprecated intoken like action=query&prop=info&intoken.

Would be appreciated if you could help find out what, and update it, in support of T286548.

Thanks!

Reedy (talk) 17:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi. I don't know anything about API queries, but the issue must be with the User:Qwertyytrewqqwerty/DisamAssist script, which I use intensively. Does that help? Lennart97 (talk) 17:23, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks like it, thanks; or at least, is one cause. es:Usuario:Qwertyytrewqqwerty/DisamAssist-core.js indeed does that query, but the user is inactive. I'll see about getting that script fixed! Reedy (talk) 19:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * should've fixed that one... See if you pop up again in the logs! Reedy (talk) 20:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Cities, towns and villages
A follow-up from WP:ANI.

The definitions are often hugely inexact, even within a single country.

As I understand it, the formal legal distinction in the Netherlands is between dorp and stad; but there are dorpen larger than steden, and the pragmatic Dutch just don't worry about it.

In UK, the historic definition of a city was to have either a cathedral or an ancient university - which is why St Davids (population 1,600) is a city. In recent years, some places have been formally given city status, often following from a popular vote; see e.g. Brighton and Hove and Sunderland. A town usually had a market. A village was smaller, but had a church. A hamlet had no church. Those latter definitions are not precise.

In USA, it varies between states. It often depends on what a settlement decided to call itself when it was established and got legal recognition. I know of US cities with a population under 1,000.

In short - you are absolutely correct to say that a city does not require a minimum population; and, equally, to say that having some minimum population does not make a place a city. Narky Blert (talk) 17:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey, thanks for dropping by :) There is nowadays actually no formal or legal distinction between dorp and stad. It used to be based on whether a place had been given City rights in the Low Countries, but we got rid of those in 1848. (Fun fact: the smallest town with such rights is Staverden with a grand total of 30 inhabitants.) I happen to come from Apeldoorn, a city with a large population (for Dutch standards) but without city rights or historical significance, so I'm used to people claiming it's not a city because of that. So it was actually quite unusual to see someone argue the reverse here - that Middelburg, with city rights and great historical and regional importance, isn't a city because it's too small! Lennart97 (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * My Dutch friend Willeke mentioned Den Haag, which never got city rights (also Almere and Lelystad, but they were underwater).
 * Fun fact - my mother's brother's wife was born in Middelburg. Narky Blert (talk) 18:46, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * That's so nice! I should go there sometime, it must be a beautiful town city. Den Haag is indeed by far the biggest city without city rights, and yes - I really have encountered people who like to smugly proclaim that it is, in fact, technically, a village :) Lennart97 (talk) 19:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Move conflict on Philip J. Pierre
Hi, looks like we both tried to process this at the same time! Sorry about that. You've fixed it already so I'll leave the rest to you to avoid any further conflict. ASUKITE 19:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No need to be sorry! Just doing our jobs :p Lennart97 (talk) 19:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Percy Anderson
Hi Lennart97, thankyou for your very kind offer at Talk:Percy Anderson (designer) to fix the incoming links to Percy Anderson. I just wanted to let you know that I did it when I closed the RM discussion. Thanks anyway, --Jack Frost (talk) 08:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem, and thanks! :) Lennart97 (talk) 08:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

An RM to close?
Talk:Equity Bank USA looks ripe for closure (anything to clean up my bookmarks...) Yrs, Narky Blert (talk) 18:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks for the suggestion! Lennart97 (talk) 19:42, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The easy ones are the easiest... Narky Blert (talk) 21:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

A MERGE to close?
Talk:Kai (entertainer, born 1994) has been hanging around since April 2021, and it seems unlikely there will be further input. Yrs, Narky Blert (talk) 09:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Also done. An RM disguised as a merge request, interesting... Lennart97 (talk) 13:51, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Another MERGE to close?
Talk:Battle of El Alamein - three posts in total agreement, the most recent being 14 July 2021. Narky Blert (talk) 12:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Done! Lennart97 (talk) 21:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Dank u wel! I've tagged as R ambig. (IMO Redirects to DAB pages (except for those with a (disambiguation) qualifier) should always be tagged R ambig or R from incomplete disambiguation. Both those templates accept a "printworthy" field to put redirects into the hypothetical megaindex to WP.) I've also fixed the double redirect from ; there's a bot which usually fixes those correctly, but it doesn't hurt to be sure.
 * I keep falling across things like this as I cycle through DPwL. If you don't mind, I'll post any which seem ready for WP:NAC in your direction. Yrs, Narky Blert (talk) 21:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't mind at all, keep up the good work! Lennart97 (talk) 17:16, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Yet another MERGE to close?
Talk:Health. Proposed 26 June 2021, no activity since 18 September; all !votes one-way. Best, Narky Blert (talk) 04:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Zhakyp Kozhamberdy and Sergey Terekhov
Can you help to move the page Zhakyp Kozhamberdy (footballer) to Zhakyp Kozhamberdy? There is no other person with the same name. And Sergey Terekhov (footballer) to Sergey Terekhov for the same reason. Thanks a lot!
 * Done. Don't forget to sign talk page messages with ~ in the future! Lennart97 (talk) 15:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Weywot (moon)
Hi Lennart,

With your recent round-robin, you left the page history for Weywot (mythology) at Weywot (moon).

— kwami (talk) 21:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks, I guess that means that before the swap, the history of Weywot (mythology) was located at Weywot, as the swap didn't involve (mythology). Anyway, if I now swap (moon) and (mythology), that should do the trick, right? Lennart97 (talk) 22:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

There's only one non-bot edit on the current 'Weywot (mythology)', where Dbachmann created a rd. to Tongva mythology on 2011-12-06. The current 'Weywot (moon)' starts as a (my) stub for the same topic in 2008. Dbachmann turned it into a dab page on 2011-12-06, the same day he created the rd. It was turned into a rd to the moon article on 2015-05-05.

So, I suppose that the history of 'Weywot (moon)' up to 2011-12-06 should be at 'Weywot (mythology)'. After that I don't know, it's kind of a mess. I guess you could just move it to 'Weywot (mythology)' with its entire history, as it will be obvious to people that the later history is just target changes, with no content to preserve. — kwami (talk) 22:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Done, the history of what was once mythology stub is now at Weywot (mythology). Lennart97 (talk) 22:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)