User talk:Lenticel/Archive 2

Question
You asked on my talk page: "Talk:Antonio Taguba; May I ask why you reverted my assessment? The article is a part of a worklist in WP:PINOY.--Lenticel (talk) 13:32, 7 March 2008 (UTC); I'll revert for now until you have an explanation in my talkpage. --Lenticel (talk) 13:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)"

I'm not really sure what you are asking about; it probably relates to some edit which I made, but I am quite an active editor and don't recall what this might relate to. Can you please point me to the removal in question? Thenks. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 15:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi again. I took a look at the diff you sent me, and I can't think of any reason why I might have done that intentionally. I generally look at 100 or so watchlist hits first thing in the morning, usually in batches of 10 or so. My best guess is that this popped up in one batch of 10 or so watchlist hits and I somehow mis-clicked one of twinkle's tabs without noticing that I had done that. My mistake. Sorry. -- Boracay Bill (talk) 23:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I need your help!
Hi Lenticel, I can remember you voted me in the nomination for my adminship by Estudyante. Now it's quite over, and no consensus whatsoever took place. So I nominated myself. I need your help. Would you vote me this time? Please and thank you! -- Felipe  Aira  09:47, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

About my adoption.
I'm now done with my exams, back to guiding my adoptee. If you still have questions, suggestions and doubts, please use Special:EmailUser/Ianlopez1115 instead of my talkpage. --iaNLOPEZ1115 · TaLKBaCK · Vandalize it 05:59, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

barnstar
I am honored and humbled at receiving your barnstar. I only hope to continue to serve the community and make you all proud. Bstone (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
I truly thank you for supporting my adminship nomination. However Sky Harbor is questioning the legitimacy of the votes due to not having any explanation whatsoever. I don't really know if that's true but to make sure that your vote counts can you please put a simple explanation on why did you vote me? Thanks again! -- Felipe  Aira  04:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Admin coaching
If you're still interested in admin coaching, I'd like to help you as an admin coach. I noticed that you mentioned you wanted a DYK specialist. If I'm not enough of a specialist for you, I can help introduce you to someone else who is.  bibliomaniac 1  5  01:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure. I have four DYKs, so I'm fairly familiar with it.  bibliomaniac 1  5  02:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright, I've created the AC page at a subpage in your userspace here, which is the norm. I always start out with the traditional RFA questions first, then move out to examine your knowledge in other admin areas and about your opinions. I don't mind what you call me, but if I do forget to update your page regularly, then just give me a little nudge.  bibliomaniac 1 5  Midway upon life's journey... 18:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I had to find some angelic female. I was going to use Phaedriel, but then I would have to look for someone else belonging in the final sphere.  bibliomaniac 1 5  Midway upon life's journey... 01:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:PINOY
My Tagalog is pretty good, but I don't speak it much now that I'm back in the States. Looks like WP:PINOY is comprised of English articles, so that wouldn't be a problem. I just don't know a whole lot about the Philippines. I could edit the articles for grammar, spelling, and other WikiGnome work. Perhaps I will join the project. Useight (talk) 00:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank You!
Thank you very much for your review of my editing. Your comments are much appreciated. -- Evan ¤  Seeds  20:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

User Page
I'm sorry if I was to rushing, but I organized some of your user page's contents, so if you don't like it, you can just change it back.


 * O —— The Unknown Hi  tc  hh  ik  er  02:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Agus River

 * I've raised some factual concerns over at Talk:Agus River --seav (talk) 02:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, let's expand and promote Maria Cristina Falls as the next DYK. I've started expanding the article. --seav (talk) 06:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Lenticel. I stumbled on this article and improved it a bit. Maybe you are interested to help me with it and nominate for DYK, back to back with the above. --Efe (talk) 12:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

formatting
All done. Of course the precise formatting is only a suggestion, you can easily adjust it to your exact liking. If you require help with that, let me know. Dorftrottel (complain) 13:21, April 4, 2008

Tagalog Wikipedia/Nomination for adminship for User:Felipe Aira
Hello. I believe this nomination should be closed. I believe User:Felipe Aira is qualified enough. Would you be able to help in closing this issue over there (or even here at Tambayan Philippines, if need be)? Or perhaps talk to those who oppose the nomination. You have a very diplomatic approach to matters like this, I noticed. Thanks... And by the way, we also need to finalize that new look for the first page of Tagalog Wikipedia. - DaughterofSun (talk) 06:35, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Banaag at Sikat
That was really fast. Thank you for providing the book cover: Image:Banaag at sikat.PNG. - DaughterofSun (talk) 01:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Tiyanak
It's not that a better image exists. It's that I don't feel there's really a need for an image, and certainly not an amateurish one. It brings down the quality of Wikipedia. Even if your heart is in the right place, I took down the image previously because 1) I didn't see a need for it (and as a user of Wikipedia, I have just as much a right to contribute as anyone else, not that you disagree), 2) it wasn't distinctive for the topic, 3) it didn't look encyclopedia-quality, and 4) there was nothing in the image that wasn't covered in the article. It didn't add a new dimension. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.206.112.92 (talk) 20:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Ivatan people
Hey. Thanks for the great help. I was expecting you would formulate the hook. But its fine that you left it to me. I was thinking of possible hooks while at home. Just fix it if its not good. Hey, is this reliable? --Efe (talk) 05:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see. I was just skeptical whether that one is non-WP:RS since its a blog, and blog, as we all know, are no no here in WP. Anyway, its fine. You deserve the credit. Look, I got stash of pictures but will not add them in the page now. =) --Efe (talk) 07:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Sure. =) --Efe (talk) 11:36, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The article has passed GA today. --Efe (talk) 02:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Its up to you. --Efe (talk) 05:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Adminship
You should really become an admin here, and perhaps at Tagalog Wikipedia too, to work with User:Felipe Aira. You two will work well, combined... At least, even if you are active here (since this your main "stage"), hindi mapababayaan 'yung TlW, under your managerial skills. Nakikinig sila sa iyo... - DaughterofSun (talk) 05:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Korak ka dyan day. =) --Efe (talk) 05:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That's why I'm undergoing a admin coaching program. Hopefully I'll be given the admin tools.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Just let me know about the progress... I'm one of your supporters. - DaughterofSun (talk) 06:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Kindly take note of this: tl:Wikipedia:Nominasyon para sa Tagapangasiwa ng Wikipedia Tagalog, even while you're still going through the process of the admin coaching program. Thanks. - DaughterofSun (talk) 00:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Done?
I think I am ready to conclude our Admin coaching. Overall, I think you will do fine in RFA, and that you will be a good admin. My only suggestion is for you to be more thorough in your answers. You will be asked many questions about your own actions when you become an admin, and you should be as detailed as possible. Not that your answers weren't bad, I just think that you could elaborate more. I won't nominate you immediately, because I already have EyeSerene's RFA going on and I do not want two RFAs taking up my time (three if you count Mastrchf91's, whose coaching I am performing simultaneously with yours). I would like to wait a month or so to allow you to continue working in those areas you want. You mentioned that you wanted to pursue the areas of DYK and CSD. If that is so, please focus on these areas. Keep your eyes open for community discussion, it is important that you be aware of the changes in Wikipedia. Remember to always be civil, prompt, and thorough. And remember, if you have any questions, do not hesitate to stop by and ask me. It was a pleasure watching and reading your opinions, I think that you are a great editor. Just continue your work, and if nothing bad happens, I'll stop by and nominate you.  bibliomaniac 1 5  Hey you! Stop lazing around and help fix this article instead! 05:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I want award
i want award ... i edit or contribute an article but shalom only give me just a talk or just "thank you"... i want a barnstar because i worked hard for my contributions .......... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rrborjaplus (talk • contribs) 05:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * (Butting in) It was a welcome message. =) --Efe (talk) 05:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Wow, not even i would dare demand a barnstar, well..... not these days. ;-) --Realist2 (talk) 06:05, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Three people in one thread in one day? That's a first in my talk page.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 06:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Do not be surprised. YOu'll getting more threads a day when you're already an admin. Hehe. Meeeee tooo, I want an award. Yung nabibinta na award para may pamasahe ako papunta sa meet-up. Haha =) --Efe (talk) 06:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

thanks
thanks anyway .. sorry i forgot to write 4 tildes. .... Rrborjaplus (talk) 05:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

DYK
I believe you deserve the credit. I was wondering why these admins forget to give you this one. --Efe (talk) 06:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Ikaw kasi hindi mo ako nilagay agad. Naisama ko na rin naman siya sa Articles that I helped with subpage ko.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 06:32, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hoi. Diba ikaw naglagay ng name mo don? And besides, nong una, nabigyan ng credit si kuya seav so I was thinking that admins will go over with the article's history to find out who contributed significantly. Ewan ko kung anong nakain nila, kinalimutan ka. Hehe. --Efe (talk) 11:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Askal
Can I put one or both in? Thanks. (May askal din akong alaga; yung comments ko na parang pilospo e directed dun sa nag-iinsist na "breed" yung "Aspin". Term lang naman yun e, di ba?) Uthanc (talk) 10:47, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Already did. Hope you don't mind. Salamat uli! Uthanc (talk) 10:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome :)-- Lenticel ( talk ) 21:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Philippine barnstar
Thank you! - DaughterofSun (talk) 03:45, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome and you deserve it.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Maxschmelling
IN SUM, please enlighten me how to contribute well in Wikipedia, since this user might be a genius, unlike all of you and all editors and administrators, who, since he began deleting my works, never even bothered to delete any of my edits. Specifically what is news and how do you definedable, since this is the very lis mota of our debate and his deletions. This was not taught at the Ateneo, so please enlighten me so that at midnights I might be able to pray fervently for this user for wisdom and imprecation. [If this message is too long for you page, please edit to shorten it with due respect. The angel of death with 3 dwarves. - --Florentino floro (talk) 08:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice in Editor Review
Thanks for the advice in Editor Review. Some of it I knew having done a lot of reading(such as 4000 edits and half on mainpage), but a lot of it was EXACTLY what I was looking for. I asked for a review as I don't want to end up with bad habits and I figure its better to fix them before they become ingrained. I especially appreciated the part about lurking on admin related pages as I would never had known I could post there if I thought I could be helpful. I'm also currently working to get a page up to FA status. Thanks so much.--DizFreak talk Contributions 18:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 22:01, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Pasalubong
Helu Lenticel. We tried to edit and add information in Pasalubong, but to no avail, I think it is not yet a good article. If you have time and if you are interested, feel free to add information and reference in that article. TY! Axxand (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Ty for adding references! Axxand (talk) 16:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

San Sebastian
Thanks for your suggestion, which I'll most likely take up on. I guess there's no harm in nominating it, and it could only lead to further improving the article. Best regards, --Anyo Niminus (talk) 09:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure! Feel free to edit as you please, I'll also see if I could add to it pa. Anyo Niminus (talk) 11:11, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

The GA review of Basilica Minore de San Sebastian has commenced, and you may want to check out what has transpired so far. I've posted my initial comments, but I'll be leaving for a vacation abroad in the next few hours, and will not be able to attend to the article for a significant chunk of time within the 7-day holding period the nomination is currently in. There are a few issues which will have to be settled, but I hope it all turns out fine. --Anyo Niminus (talk) 18:23, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Perna viridis
Sure, will try. Need to get my Wikipedia-legs back though, haven't been editing in half-a-year. :P Shrumster (talk) 12:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the review, I will bear all that advice in mind, also I would have got back to you sooner, but I was away from a PC for a couple of days.-- Kerotan Leave Me a Message  Have  a nice day :) 22:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Am I so cute?
My question, is - is the UP law signed yesterday, a budget legistlation, to be not notable. I did not learn this at the ATENEO, so, were you taught this at Valencia? I still keep you barnster. --Florentino floro (talk) 10:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Coffee
Its now in Negros: Organic coffee at the foot of Mount Kanlanon, Negros Occidental. --Florentino floro (talk) 09:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, please, help Filipinos protect the landmark Organic coffee from Negros Occidental, beside your farm / door steps. A cursory perusal of this renowned editor's adds, with mystic musings (Vide: his/her contributions), reveals that daily, from the very TIME I was known by this editor, his edits are solely focused on my edits. Bewitched is not the proper term, but may in the MEAN time be ...: I quote this discussion for your perusal: This is grown at the foot of Mount Kanlanon, Negros Occidental. --Florentino floro (talk) 09:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The list is of the "primary" producers of organic coffee, not an exhaustive list of all producers. maxsch (talk) 19:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you not NOTICE the edit by other editors, which claim that: "The primary producers of organic coffee are; Guatemala, Peru, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Mexico[citation needed]." - do not have citation? And Wikipedia edits or anything added must have resources or references, otherwise, they are not reliable. I can put there Chile or Spain, but how can the reader or scholar cite this article if there is no citation? So, my edit of Negros, is supported by 2 links. Refer this discussion to improve this article to Filipino editor -- Lenticel ( talk ), Ateneo expert and for Valencia, Negros, just a road away from this coffee. ---Florentino floro (talk) 06:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Petition to Block User, Apology
I was adopted by a diligent administrator. I just found 7 damning evidence to block this user, please read this: But I ask apology thru you, for quoting a confidential letter, from my former adopting parent. Sincerely. --Florentino floro (talk) 09:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Gone?
Can't find User:Maxschmelling, miss the debates. Just visiting your page. --Florentino floro (talk) 10:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

"Unauthorized"
This error should be fixed now.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 06:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Yahoo! ID
Hey my Yahoo! ID is felipe_aira (note the underscore). Just told you for the Virtual meeting this night. Add me. -- Felipe  Aira  10:40, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:Barnstar
Thanks for the Barnstar. Maybe you should also give one (maybe of a different kind) to Kasuga, the creator of Wikipetan. Wikipetan in the baro't saya is my request so I can surprise everyone in the Tambayan, but the image is still Kasuga's work after all. It is still nice to receive one. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 08:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

New awareness
Thanks Lenticel, for raising my awareness of the Philippines through spiders, children's games, the warrior princess on the Refdesk, and Askals -- : ) Julia Rossi (talk) 01:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. :)-- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Please participate on Wikimedia Philippines discussions
 Call for participation to Wikimedia Philippines As one of the participants of Wikipedia Philippines, we are inviting you to participate in the discussion about the revised Articles of Incorporation. Feel free to comment and scrutinize the document. Some of the topics to be resolve include:


 * a) start-up capital;
 * b) bank account of choice;
 * c) and nomination of a treasurer.

For your information, last May 5, 2008, Mr. Vincent Isles reserved the company name “WIKIMEDIA PHILIPPINES, INC.” from the Securities and Exchange Commission. The reservation will expire on August 3, 2008. The next steps will be the approval of the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws. We are fast-tracking the process that is why your inputs are vital and very much appreciated.

Please visit the following links for your reference:

-Jojit (talk) 03:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) The revised Articles of Incorporation: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Philippines/Articles_of_Incorporation
 * 2) Discussion page for the revised Articles of Incorporation: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_Philippines/Articles_of_Incorporation
 * 3) Mr. Isles’ email regarding the company name reservation: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/philwiki/message/156
 * 4) Josh Lim’s (Sky Harbor) pseudo-manifesto: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/philwiki/message/168

Please cite reliable source??!
That's why I edited the Sigma Rho page. It's full of unreliable, unverifiable, and unconfirmed information! THINK brother. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Duck You (talk • contribs) 05:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Citing reliable sources means that the sources are independent from the subject itself which in this case is the Sigma Rho fraternity. That means that you can't cite yourself as a source.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 10:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

RFA thank-spam
, just a note of appreciation for your recent support of my request for adminship, which ended successfully with 112 supports, 2 opposes, and 1 neutral. If there's something I've realized during my RFA process this last week, it's that adminship is primarily about trust. I will strive to honour that trust in my future interactions with the community. Many thanks! Gatoclass (talk) 06:26, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

5th Infantry (STAR) Division
In regard to the article 5th Infantry (STAR) Division, you tagged it for speedy deletion as a copyright violation. However, the page you said the article was copied from did not resemble the article. Perhaps there was an error in the URL of the link. Also, the site the article was copied from appeared to be a Philippine government site. Consequently, it is not clear to me that the Philippine government would claim a copyright in its web sites; see Philippine copyright law. If an exception applies and the site is copyrighted, I would want to get some sort of confirmation of that. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

6th Infantry (Kampilan) Division
After you tagged 5th Infantry (STAR) Division and 6th Infantry (Kampilan) Division for deletion as a copyvio, I cut them down to a non-copyvio stub and got rid of the copyvio text. Sometimes cutting a copyvio article down to a non-copyvio stub so that someone else can rebuild it is better than deleting it outright. --Eastmain (talk) 16:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please see Special:Contributions/Chewygum for some other Philippine military articles from the same editor who created 5th Infantry (STAR) Division and 6th Infantry (Kampilan) Division. You may want to cut the other articles such as Philippine Army Reserve Command down to stubs as well. --Eastmain (talk) 01:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay will do.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

bagets
lets do what you've been proposing, ok? Someone's thinking of rewriting the plot. --Eaglestorm (talk) 16:10, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

my RfA - Ta!
Hi, I already added new stuff to the uplb page. Mind upgrading its class on the assessment scale? ;) Joe_fob [UPLB Talk Page] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe fob (talk • contribs) 09:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

DYK
Thanks! Monzonda  c",)  23:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

UPLB Good article nomination
Thanks for reassessing the site! Cheers! Joe_fob [UPLB Talk Page] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe fob (talk • contribs) 08:32, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

RFA thanks
Hey lenticel, I just wanted to thank you for your participation in my RFA. I've prepared an in-depth RFA analysis where I referenced your support statement, you may find it interesting (comments are welcome). i've also left some templated thank spam for you below. cheers, xenocidic (talk) 23:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC) templated rfa thank-spam 

I would like to thank the community for placing their trust in me during my recent request for adminship, which passed 72 13 2. Rest assured, I have read each comment thoroughly and will be addressing the various concerns raised as I step cautiously into my new role as janitor. In particular, I would like to thank Balloonman for putting so much time into reviewing my contributions and writing such a thoughtful nomination statement after knowing me for only a brief period of time (and for convincing me that I was ready to take up the mop now, rather than go through admin coaching).
 * Thank you for your support

To my fellow admins - please let me know right away if I ever take any mis-steps with my new tools. Should I make a mistake, and you reverse the action, I will not consider it to be wheel-warring (but please tell me so I can understand what I did wrong).

To everyone - please feel free to slap me around a bit if I ever lose sight of the core philosophy of Wikipedia as I understand it - the advancement of knowledge through the processes of mutual understanding and respect. As always, feel free to drop by my talk page if I can be of any assistance. =)

Sincerely,

~xenocidic, 01:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Adminship
Hey. I've looked through your contributions and they seem quite nice. As a result, I was wondering if you were interested in becoming an admin. I'd nominate you at WP:RFA if you're interested. Let me know. Wizardman 21:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I'll be honored to. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright then. I'll get the nomination set up tonight or tomorrow. Until then get the answers to the first couple questions ready. Wizardman  23:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

 Wizardman would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Wizardman to accept or decline the nomination. A page for your nomination at Requests for adminship/ . If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

Hey bud, I sent you a co-nom. If you want me to change anything, just go ahead and tell me. Good luck! I hope the community trusts you as much as I do.  bibliomaniac 1  5  01:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I hope I'll pass this Rfa. Even if I don't pass this one, I think it would be a very informative "editor review".-- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Good luck. --Efe (talk) 01:33, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Did you transclude the nomination?  bibliomaniac 1  5  17:20, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I have just added my nomination on Rfa.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 22:09, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

User seemingly in need of assistance...
Can you assist, especially on policies and how things work here in Wikipedia? This guy seems to have violent reactions against me, Howard and Harlock jds after his edits on Pinoy Idol and Idol series were reverted (see his gripe at WP:EAR). - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 17:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Your explanation is good and concise and I feel that I don't need to improve on that at all. It seems that the user has stopped contributing since his post on WP:EAR and I hope he has read your reply. I'll monitor that section for any development and intervene if necessary.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:50, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I hope you won't bother reading his e-mail to me. I think he sent this before he posted his post (complaint?) on WP:EAR:


 * I think this guy has become ballistic to say the least when all we three did was remind him of his mistakes. I think this guy has a big problem. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 04:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * He's very pissed off indeed. However, I think it would be better for you to ignore this one. Pag-pasensyahan mo na lang. If he continues to harass you via e-mail and on-wiki then we'll make a case for a harassment block.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 04:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's why the moment I receive his e-mail, I only scanned it and deleted it into my trash. He seems to headed for a block anyway considering his recent actions are beginning to lean against WP:CIVIL. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 09:08, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Your RFA
Best of luck for your RFA -- <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 09:27, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks!.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 09:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

You are now an administrator
Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the administrators' how-to guide and the administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. Also, the practice exercises at the new admin school may be useful. If you have any questions, get in touch on my talk page. WjBscribe 22:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Congrats. Feel free to utilize my admin dashboard at User:Xenocidic/dashboard. You may transclude it with, or copy the code if you wish to make changes. xenocidic (talk) 22:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Congrats! --Efe (talk) 01:10, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations!
You truly deserved it, dude. I can think of just a few Tambays who truly deserved adminship (if ever), and you're one of those persons on my list. Congratulations! (Ate V. would have been proud of you, though I haven't heard from her for quite a long time :P ) --- Tito Pao (talk) 01:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Yeah I really wish ate Pinay was here.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:13, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I am not surprised at how nice it turned out for you. Remember to read up and not to rush into the role. An admission of thanks on WT:RFA is usually sufficient.  bibliomaniac 1  5  01:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Congratulations on your successful request for adminship.... I was very busy with my wikiprojects these days and hence couldnt participate in your RFA. Anyways best of luck -- <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 02:05, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

I have added administrator to your user page... Hope you dont mind ;) -- <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 02:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * thanks. I was wondering where should I get that thing.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Note
Hello! I was just preparing my comment at your RfA, so if you were curious, one way or the other, I would have said something like Neutral per Articles for deletion/List of sidekicks (2nd nomination) (a “per nom”), Articles for deletion/Differences between the book and film versions of The Da Vinci Code (another “per nom”), Articles for deletion/Gulf of Oman (Battlefield 2) (use of “non-notable”), and Articles for deletion/List of Worms weapons, tools, crates and objects (2nd nomination) (we can have articles that appear on other wikis), but he did change his stance at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Librarians in popular culture (3rd nomination). Good argument at Articles for deletion/Romulan Star Empire (Star Fleet Universe), Articles for deletion/Rizal National Science High School, and Articles for deletion/Wikitruth (5th nomination), Articles for deletion/Tough guy (2nd nomination). By the way, you're always welcome to toss your own two cents in at User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles/Deletion discussions. Anyway, I hope my comments are useful and congratulations! Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman"> Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles Tally-ho! 02:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you, to be honest I have forgot those Afd's. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:56, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome and good luck with the new role. Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman"> Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 03:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Congrats!
Congratulations! I heard that you're now an admin. Good job! &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  05:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Congratulations also! So now you're the second Filipino wikiadmin; nice! And also your nomination was the first unanimous AFD I've seen, great work! <font color= "#FCD116">-- <font color= "#0038A8">Felipe  <font color="#CE1126">Aira  09:57, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Belated congrats, to you. Sorry I didn't vote at the RfA. Nevertheless, at least you're lessening the load for all of the Tambays one way or another. -iaNLOPEZ1115 11:48, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Engkanto
I'd have appreciated it if you'd waited to I'd removed the inuse tag from this article before editing it as I was in the middle of a major re-write when you edited it. I believe this is the point of the tag! Dpmuk (talk) 00:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Nearly missed your useful addition about appearance differences to humans as I just copied and pasted my new text.  It's all cited but I'm reasonably new to major edits so feel free to change style etc.  I've finished editing for the moment.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpmuk (talk • contribs) 00:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

About your RfA
Congratulations on your successful request for adminship. I am glad you passed, and you are welcome for the support. For information on using your new tools, see the school for new admins; you will find it very useful. Good luck! Acalamari 19:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Congratulations on your successful request for adminship. :-) --Kaaveh (talk) 00:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

My pleasure, and congratulations! Jayjg <small style="color:darkgreen;">(talk) 00:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Fiasco
I simply cannot spend the time this am to find the refs but I disagree with almost everything at the bahasa xfd - its so easy to be smart - your suggestion at least has some element of compromise and considering the potential for outsiders of the indonesian and malaysia projects to pull things apart like a pair of puppies (sic) - big problem disambiguation has to stay disambiguation - just pulled the roadhouse bloated dismabig apart last week to make it a proper one. will probably recreate the material in a less vulnerable manner later - cheers SatuSuro 02:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Congratulations! I hope you will be a fine admin. Regards, Masterpiece2000   ( talk ) 08:56, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Shucks, I missed the chance to add my support vote on your RFA... not that it would make a difference, looks like support was unanimous. Congrats! :) TheCoffee (talk) 12:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Welcome. --Efe (talk) 06:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Congrats! I'm sure you'll do a fine job. --Anyo Niminus (talk) 10:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Congrats. I didn't know why you denied adminship in the TL wiki. Well, if you need suppport the TL Wiki community is there. Dar book (talk) 13:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Lomn
Just so you know, I replied to you there. Cheers, giggy (O) 10:33, 27 June 2008 (UTC)


 * So did I. ;-) <span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS,sans-serif"> Lra drama 20:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

User: Pinaypinay
Can you do something about user ? This user keeps posting info about this Ruvic Rea guy in the Tayabas City article without any source. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 11:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think their action warrants a block yet. The user has stopped editing after User:AO warned her. I have the article on my watchlist so I can act on it once the warning was ignored.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 12:49, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm... Typo put at least one AfD discussion in Twilight Zone...
Howdy. I've seen you close a few RfDs (on which I participate from time to time); so I hope you wouldn't mind checking into a rather unusual situation here. About two weeks ago, I participated in an AfD (The Hills Have Eyes documentaries), which should have been closed by June 16... except it wasn't. In fact, it wasn't even extended at that time to facilitate additional discussion. Not only that, we no longer have "June 9" in the open logs, and it doesn't show up on Articles for deletion/Log/2008 June 9... so I returned to the discussion (thank goodness the article is still tagged) and noticed a typo that put it on a separate page - Articles for deletion/Log/2008 juni 9. So it seems that something needs to be done here - as there seems no WP:SNOW argument one way or another... well, that's why they pay the admins the "big bucks" (double that of "mortal" editors), right? Anyway, I hope the "heads up" will help clean up a rather sticky situation with this AfD. 147.70.242.40 (talk) 21:10, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * hmm... I post this on WP:ANI to get more eyes to watch this. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 22:38, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

RFA and thoughts on Kurt
I'm perplexed by your oppose, which seems to be based on the fact that I answered the question asked of me irrespective of the particular answer. To address the point of the objection, though, I haven't posted such thoughts elsewhere because it's not (in my opinion) needed. There are several people who visit RFA far more frequently than I and make an equivalent point (which I see no need to duplicate) and said point rarely accomplishes anything. At the time of your oppose, for instance, there were 3 cases of Kurt's self-nom oppose garnering controversy on active RFAs: In those cases, it took 20, 28, and 2 minutes, respectively, for a voice of reason to refute the complainant. I don't visit RFA on a half-hour basis, so I'm not in a position to be first responder. Point one for no such essay. In each of those cases, said voice of reason did not in any way deter controversial discussion. Point two for no such essay, and why I tried my pre-emptive approach when filing my RFA. I imagine similar patterns hold across most such discussions, though I've made no effort at an exhaustive search.
 * Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SarekOfVulcan
 * Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Golich17
 * Requests for adminship/Headbomb

Anyway, what I'm most puzzled about: what sort of response to Giggy's question wouldn't have garnered an oppose from you? My read, admittedly from a skewed perspective, is that it constitutes a catch-22. &mdash; Lomn 00:01, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Its the pre-emptive approach that worried me which is the "first of all I'm a colts fan" with matching prima facie. It seems that you're out to please Kurt. To make it simple, giggy and wisdom put themselves between Kurt and the others saying "he has the right to opinion". You on the other hand wore an I heart Kurt t-shirt to your RfA.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 06:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the response. I had hoped the prima facie bit simply ran as a joke counterpoint to Kurt's "Go Colts" sig tag -- I had no expectation of anything but the usual oppose -- but I see where your concern arises. &mdash; Lomn 14:31, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * That kind of RfA comments are really subjective. What if its your RfA Lenticel? --Efe (talk) 03:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I hope the opposers will do the same. If I have the same attitude then they should stop me. For me admin attitude has more priority than admin knowledge.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:59, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Really a bad thing in RfA. Its getting bloody, according to Realist2. --Efe (talk) 04:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Correct. What is their knowledge and being WikiSavvy if they have a very destructive attitude. They're not supposed to be an admin. --Efe (talk) 04:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

RfD closures
Good evening. I just had to reopen a couple of RfD discussions that you'd closed. The pages in question were speedy-deleted (not by you) but had to be restored because the speedy-deletions were in error. Rather than go through the trouble and confusion of opening brand new RfD discussions, I took the liberty of reopening the existing discussions so that discussion can continue. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 05:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * good afternoon. Thank you for notifying me. I think that was the Nikolai thing right?-- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations, belatedly, coz I was sleeping, did'nt notice

 * I admire your diligence and integrity. Let us make Wikipedia a better place, but sorry, I am not fluent in Tagalog and Filipino, even if I am proud of my nation. I can better contribute here than in Wikipedia Filipino versions. Lots of congrats. May you serve more of us, poor and groping Filipino editors. And please disregard my choice of non-Filipino editors. You can be a good arbitrator of Peace. Pax Christi and Lux in Domino (may the Light of the Lord shine upon your family and this nation). --Florentino floro (talk) 06:35, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 06:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Just a simple thought (since I remain today, a pure scientist - for I worked hard in chemistry, physics and got A, a record in Math II, Ateneo, 1972). I debunked 3rd eye, 6th sense and psychic phenomena last year, when I rose above these in my Faith in St. Paul's Spiritual Gifts. It may be scientific, that if ever you will desire to bestow adoption upon myself a poor Filipino editor (who until now does not even know how to a) revert and b) to archive, I am nervous, so you may archive my page if too long, please help me on this, I might commit mistake), please ask the consensus of Filipino editors for my edification and yours, since I desire that my stay in Wikipedia will be, for its better future - reliability and with citations. Hope that you will adopt me to end all these problems (I am shocked that, and cannot comprehend, and you also, will never know the truth, why Diligent Terrier, based on his diligence, resigned as admin and RETIRED, just after he adopted me, Oh my God, and the horrifying email of resignation of IanLopez, he might just be too young and timid to comprehend Ateneo's Lux in Domino). But don't be afraid of adopting me, I will be an asset rather than a liability. Just watch my favorite movie Batman, the movie, it is all about how to debunk fear. Sorry for this kilometric congrats note, just shocked you are great. I envy your expertise. You can rightfully bridge the gap between us. --Florentino floro (talk) 07:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I can't adopt you. I'm not really a good mentor. I do suggest that you go to WP:ADOPT.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 08:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok.--Florentino floro (talk) 11:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
Gee, thanks for the barnstar, Len, God Bless and, anyway, here's a barnstar for you:

Blake Gripling (talk) 03:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks1 Not to sound rude but I prefer that you call me Lenticel rather than Len as it feels too girly for me.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome... Blake Gripling (talk) 04:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I prefer Lenti than Len. Girl ka? Nyahaha. =) --Efe (talk) 11:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Help with Admin-assisted move
Hello Lenticel, I need your assistance in moving an article to its correct name. Pekiti -Tirsia Kali should be moved to Pekiti-Tirsia Kali; I however, messed up the move and ended up trashing the redirects. (all for want of eliminating a single space) Help please? &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  02:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I see you're working on it. =) &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  13:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * User:NawlinWiki also helped so thank him too.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 13:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I noticed. Done! =) &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  14:32, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Invitation
May I please invite you to join this discussion, if you may., Regards.--Florentino floro (talk) 07:57, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Mantis
By now you may have discovered the List of mantis genera and species. Most of the articles linked to there are wikified and referenced, even if they are stubs. I made many of these. Some of the mantis articles, however, seem to have been done by a very young person (in Australia, if the range of the species covered is an indication) and do need much work. I am glad to see you tackled at least one of them. - House of Scandal (talk) 03:20, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Valencia
May I please respectfully ask you to review my edits here, since, I want to have my edits better worded and cleaned, the grammar. This is a magnificent tourist treasure.Talk:Valencia, Negros Oriental.--Florentino floro (talk) 14:50, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

User page help
Dear Lenticel...I see that you have requested help in getting your user page in order and am willing to help you. My suggestions will not be full of a lot of flashy formatting. In my opinion, the less a user page looks like a Wikipedia page, the harder it is to read and navigate. You can go to my user page to see how an infobox can handle most of the routine information which you can expand upon if you so desire in the body of your user page.

To keep this conversation all in one place, you can respond on your talk page here. However, I ask that you put on my talk page to alert me to your response. Either way, I would like to hear back from you.

Have a nice day! - LA @ 02:20, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I only have a few simple request really

Okay that's all. I hope you could pimp up my page soon. :)-- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Admin dog, status and star stays in the main user page
 * 2) Keep the moss green/forest green motif to match my talkpage
 * 3) Make it more compact to avoid long page loads. Use any means that you see fit
 * Lenticel, I can keep the dog and make it more compact (which will take a little bit of time on your part to fill things in). I am not so sure about having the look on your talk page translated to your user page. Is that what you want, or just the color scheme? I will set up the user infobox I mentioned before for you to fill in as you see fit. All of the parameters are optional.

Also, to alert me again, all you need to do is just add your sig under the banner on my talk page. Thanks! - LA @ 02:31, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Just include the talk page's color scheme. Just put the infobox, I'll fill it with the stuff that I need. Ok will do regarding the banner thingy.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * What you have now is just a start to get the ball rolling. If you hate it, you can always revert. :) - LA @ 03:00, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Looking good, I will look at it after work.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 03:05, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It's okay now. What do you think?-- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:34, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It will do, though I am not so sure about the dark green especially if it has links on it. I am not a big fan of that type of formatting for user pages, preferring for them to be readily identifiable as Wikipedia pages. However, you cleaned it up well. I am glad that I was able to nudge you in the right direction. Have a nice day! - LA @ 00:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * By the way, I am glad that you kept the user infobox. If you have anything else (gasp! what isn't already covered? right) you wish me to add to it, let me know. - LA @ 00:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I think it's okay actually. I especially liked the favorite animals portion.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:06, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Image, template -Kennedy v. Louisiana
I added this simple template, since I do not know how to make the very beautiful template of USA decisions. Note that this Sema v. Comelec is the only and first Wikipedia Philippine decision article. So, like in the USA Wiki decision articles like Kennedy v. Louisiana, we must have a template as User:Anyo Niminus made for others. Subic rape case, is not a decision but just another article. I also added the image but small, since, I just copied the USA format and I used the same image already displayed in Supreme Court of the Philippines. Please make a better one like Kennedy or Baze v. Rees--Florentino floro (talk) 09:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Plaridel
Greetings. Let me quote my message to my adopting parent on Max. "Dear Parent, I now have hard evidence that Maxs and User:Cma have no agenda here, except the hidden vindictive yet spiritual request to prevent me from editing secret unspecified articles in Wikipedia that Max and Cma desire. If this is what they want, both can specify these. Enumerate these, and if Wiki rules permit, I will not edit or add to these articles. Why confuse Wiki foreign and Filipino administrators and editors including you, on our conflict? As the long and tedious discussion rages, one could not really discover what both want. So, tersely, I made this. Please, parent, read this long discussion on Plaridel dire Aviation accidents and incidents on 3 Indian nationals. Any lawyer will tell you, that my evidence is not religious but circumstantial, pointing to the fact that Max went to India to consult Vedic and venerable tellers to decipher my very own dire actuations on many events worldwide which concerned many. Mystic India is not that simple, nor Max.
 * I am not sure if you can comprehend and read between the lines. Before these 3 deaths happened, the 3 Indians used regularly my own rented PC Internet in Plaridel. I had forewarned many Indians about the Cessna planes crashing - worst not the crash but mystic collisions before my every head and eyes circa the time Max had been on this Wiki thing. I resist and stay away from all of these controversial Wiki posting of religious discussions lest I be misinterpreted by skeptics and atheists, that I deeply respect, since I am a closed scientist and debunked psychic phenomena, even if I am a closed Catholic. Yes, I move things. Yes, I am gifted. But I keep this to myself. But Max is confusing editors here. Max should go DIRECT TO THE POINT." Regards--Florentino floro (talk) 09:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Request for Clarification on editing and creating an article
I found the template and read User:Cma page which states:As such, he is reported to have one of the biggest egos in history. Cma added and edited the template, stating it is n Wikipedia article instead of Wiki Page. So, I granted the request and found the links which established the fact that Cma is really the biggest egos in history. So, I opted to submit on Cma discussion page my propose edit: This article lacks information on the importance of the subject matter. If you are familiar with it, please expand the article, or discuss its significance on the talk page. :
 * Since the BBC link puts Cma there, aside from being Manager of IBM, then, may I ask if I can create an article Dominique Gerald Cimafranca. For your comment and approval. This is very relevant in resolving our Rfc with Max since Wiki rules require us to resolve this in good faith. Waiting for your comment.
 * news.bbc.co.ukDominique Cimafranca: Nothing has changed in Philippines politics (Dominique Cimafranca

Manager, Technical Support Group, IBM Corporation)Regards--Florentino floro (talk) 10:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I suggest that you go to Dispute resolution if you fail to gain consensus in the article's talk page.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 14:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Flaminsky vis-a-vis User:Cma and IP address of Max
Thanks for your terse enlightenment on this. May I respectfully ask for your view on this, which is so complex, but I tried to trim it down. I hope it is not TLDR. Cheers. --Florentino floro (talk) 11:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Request for enlightenment on the interpretation of Wiki rules
Question: Is a case of Suck puppetry the proper mode of action here? Please do answer this query.
 * Sock puppetry The general rule is: one editor, one account. Do not use multiple accounts to create the illusion of greater support for an issue, to mislead others, to artificially stir up controversy, to aid in disruption, or to circumvent a block.User:Flaminsky = User:Cma
 * Circumventing policy - Sock puppets may not be used to circumvent any Arbitration Committee or community sanctions, including blocks, bans, and probations. Evading sanctions will cause the timer to restart, and may lengthen the duration of the sanctions.
 * Meatpuppet is a Wikipedia term of art meaning one who edits on behalf of or as proxy for another editor.User:Flaminsky
 * Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets If you think that someone is using sockpuppets and wish to get further people's comments on the matter, you should create a report at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets and follow the instructions there.

Who is User:Cma?/Dom/Dominique Gerald Cimafranca
User:Flaminsky, deleted due to vandalism, created User:Cma. Who is Flaminsky and Cma? This is answered by Cma's edit of link: - which clearly and unequivocally showed that Cma is: Filipino Wikipedian and blogger:Dominique Gerald Cimafranca or "Dom" Village Idiot Savant | Web site: http://www.sketches.kom.ph, Dumaguete City, Philippines Before joining IBM, Dominique worked with Digital Equipment Corporation as a firewall and Internet consultant. He has been involved in customer engagements in over 18 countriesThe Camel and the Snake, or "Cheat the Prophet", Open source development with Perl, Python, and DB2; Jetspeed,
 * Evidence:
 * Dominique Gerald M. Cimafranca is an IT Specialist for IBM Asia-Pacific's Emerging and Competitive Markets team. In this role, he works on Linux, Digital Media, and Life Sciences opportunities. Prior to this, he also worked for IBM's NetGen and e-Business teams. He is responsible for the first RS/6000® SP-based ISP installation in Asia. He has been working with IBM since 1997 and is co-author of a firewall RedBook.
 * Web site: villageidiotsavant.blogspot.com ; http://www.sketches.kom.ph
 * Google, http://www.google.com.ph/search?hl=tl&q=Dominique+Gerald+Cimafranca+&btnG=Maghanap&meta=
 * DOMINIQUE CIMAFRANCA, 37, IT WORKER, DAVAO, MINDANAOnews.bbc.co.ukDominique Cimafranca: Nothing has changed in Philippines politics
 * Dominique Gerald CimafrancaDumaguete, Philippines
 * Cma blog;, , Cmas's 5 blogs,Friendster

Why did Cma/Dominique Gerald Cimafranca delete by edit the link?
Answer: Cma made a mistake of exposing his identity in Wikipedia, amid Cma's only agenda in Wikipedia: Surveillance and police investigative journalism as blogger contra all those who might be :inflicting their wrath through letters, blogs, Photoshop contests, and other zany means of reaction" commited by a specific User:Florentino floro. Cma committed a mistake that Floro is anti Gma. Floro never voted since 1965 and is apolitical, a pure scientist, and hater of psychic phenomena, closed Catholic though, but respect skeptics and atheists so much. The predictions and prophecies of Floro were all over internet, since Floro as lawyer is aware that Floro cannot Libel, defame or attack anybody lest he be indicted. Thus, Floro's wit, cleverly used religion and free speech by using Cryptology: angels, imprecation, etc. all protected by Wikipedia and USA Philippines laws and policies. [ -philippine-defense-squad.txt v 0.1- This text file seeks to become a comprehensive listing of all instances of times when Filipinos overreact to criticism (both deserved and undeserved) by descending upon the subject like a swarm of angry bees and inflicting their wrath through letters, blogs, Photoshop contests, and other zany means of reaction. Anyone who figures out how to contact me is welcome to contribute. * the spoon incident in Canada, which really turned out to be the fault of the boy; * former Chief Justice Isagani Cruz's comments against gays; *Inquirer inaccurately reports that Malacanang tells people to forget EDSA II. Bloggers furious. Other contributors (contact me if I've forgotten to add you): 1. Dominique Cimafranca for various entries - [[User:Cma]]; 4. Michael Gonzalez : Malacanang: Forget EDSA II - User:TheCoffee, Filipino Wikipedia administrator
 * We can’t trust gov’t with population funds DOMINIQUE GERALD M. CIMAFRANCA (via email)
 * Please edit or shorten this if TLDR due to complicated matters, which I must raise before the Rfc must proceed. Regards, and Thanks. --Florentino floro (talk) 11:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision history of User:Cma
Cma deleted the link *Location of CMA's personal website Nintendo optical disc -philippine-defense-squad.txt v 0.1- This text file seeks to become a comprehensive listing of all instances of times when Filipinos overreact to criticism (both deserved and undeserved) by descending upon the subject like a swarm of angry bees and inflicting their wrath through letters, blogs, Photoshop contests, and other zany means of reaction. Anyone who figures out how to contact me is welcome to contribute. * the spoon incident in Canada, which really turned out to be the fault of the boy; * former Chief Justice Isagani Cruz's comments against gays; *Inquirer inaccurately reports that Malacanang tells people to forget EDSA II. Bloggers furious. Other contributors (contact me if I've forgotten to add you): 1. Dominique Cimafranca for various entries - User:Cma; 4. Michael Gonzalez: Malacanang: Forget EDSA II - User:TheCoffee, Filipino Wikipedia administrator This article lacks information on the importance of the subject matter. If you are familiar with it, please expand the article, or discuss its significance on the talk page. add -
 * (cur) (last) 14:55, 21 February 2008 Cma (Talk | contribs) (1,466 bytes) (undo)
 * (cur) (last) 05:06, 30 October 2006 Cma (Talk | contribs) m (undo) -Cma created and identified his website that was already created:*Location of CMA's personal website When opened Cma's link showed and identified Cma as: - Gods, gameGoDS is a homebrew go game for the Nintendo DS.
 * (cur) (last) 03:53, 16 June 2006 RoryBot (Talk | contribs) (BOT- bypassing cross-namespace redirect using AWB) (undo)
 * (cur) (last) 16:37, 2 October 2005 Cma (Talk | contribs) (Did a subst instead of a category so my ego wouldn't actually be transcluded.) (undo)
 * (cur) (last) 09:31, 1 October 2005 Kjkolb (Talk | contribs) (removed "importance" tag, it was showing up in the category) (undo)
 * (cur) (last) 04:34, 15 September 2005 Cma (Talk | contribs) (Category: Filipino Wikipedians) (undo)
 * (cur) (last) 16:21, 24 August 2005 Cma (Talk | contribs) (undo)
 * (cur) (last) 04:25, 18 August 2005 Cma (Talk | contribs) (undo)
 * Flaminsky was deleted, and Flaminsky edited by a) using Cma user name, created the page with details and added a website to be created soon:Future location of CMA's personal website[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Cma&diff=next&oldid=17673895
 * (cur) (last) 05:33, 17 June 2005 Flaminsky (Talk | contribs)
 * Sorry about the Mel gibson edits, just playing around too much on my part, -FlaminskyUser:Flaminsky -Why was my page deleted?

Vandalism

 * Please do not edit other users' User pages. Please click the "Discussion" tab to put messages on a user talk page.   ral  315  05:34, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Oregon. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. VegaDark 05:46, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

User contributions of User:Flaminsky

 * 05:42, 2 August 2006 (hist) (diff) Oregon # 05:33, 17 June 2005 (hist) (diff) User:Cma # 04:23, 16 June 2005 (hist) (diff) m Mel Gibson

IP Address of User:Maxschmelling
With all due respect, may I please write hereunder, a very important - critical fact of this discussion. Max used an IP address and later asked apology for not using Max's username. This is utter bad faith, which might have caused the mediator/s to be misled. At any rate, I write this for the better solution of this dispute in good faith::Max admitted:
 * "I promise to be terse. It is not irrelevant to bring up evidence of a conflict of interest. You have a personal stake in "coconut healing oil" and thus what you choose to write about it should be critically viewed, especially if there are questions about the sources you use as evidence. 59.183.139.189 (talk) 06:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I wasn't logged in when I wrote this, but it was me. maxsch (talk) 12:28, 23 June 2008 (UTC)"
 * This is direly important in this discussion, since Max admitted per research that Max replied from India, Bombai.

Lookup IP Address: 59.183.139.189Hostname:triband-mum-59.183.139.189.mtnl.net.in ISP:Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.Organization:Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.Proxy:None detectedType:Cable/DSL, Country:India State/Region:16-City:Bombay, Latitude:18.975, Longitude:72.8258--Florentino floro (talk) 06:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that it is direly important. In fact I think it is pretty much irrelevant. I was passing through Mumbai, using an unfamiliar computer and I wasn't logged in. I soon added my username to the unsigned comments so that no one would be misled. I am not from India, but as I have said before, my natioanality is of no importance to this dispute. maxsch (talk) 14:02, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Shiva, Mumbai, Bombai
Requests for checkuser--Florentino floro (talk) 11:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Vedic
Can you help expand, cleanup, etc. Jyotiṣa, and can you drop me a mouthful of opinion on this, I was just baptized here, racing to be the very first but I had not yet created an article, still disecting it, just a thrill for I might be able to learn more how to use IT to make my skills better here in Wiki.--Florentino floro (talk) 11:32, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Falsification of Signature?
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Florentino floro (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. May I please put hereunder instead of linking my message to my parent, and may I please ask for your comment and kindness. "Dear parent, D.Terrier, as your adoptee, may I please ask for enlightenment on this grave or blatant violation of Wikpedia rules. Max used an IP address with India, Mumbai Server, alleging Max passed thereat. This is the critical fact: Max, in the Edit Summary, typed this:
 * Revision history of User:Diligent Terrier/Florentino floro and Maxschmelling:(cur) (last) 06:57, 14 June 2008 59.183.139.189 (Talk) (64,250 bytes)(→Statement by administratorUser:Rkitko) (undo)
 * Clearly, therefor, Max made it appear that administrator User:Rkitko participated, acted and signed the Wiki signer, when in fact Rkitko did not. Max in fact asked for apology, admitting that Max was the one who posted the falsified message.
 * Is this a blatant violation of Wikipedia Rules (which I will, as I hereby reserve) to present to the proper Adm. Notice Board, inter alia, for comment), after with all due respect to your reply. I will alert admin. Rkito on this, and admin User:Lenticel, for comment.

Fait accompli
I never tried to discover Max or Cma's personal phone, credit cards, etc. It was Cma's blunder to have edited Flaminsky and then added the link which revealed DOM. This is serious. Since, I am questioning deleted User:Flaminsky's right whatsoever to participate in these dragging Rfc, etc. HUMAN RELATIONS (n)Art. 19. Every person must, in the exercise of his rights and in the performance of his duties, act with justice, give everyone his due, and observe honesty and good faith. Art. 20. Every person who, contrary to law, wilfully or negligently causes damage to another, shall indemnify the latter for the same.Art. 21. Any person who wilfully causes loss or injury to another in a manner that is contrary to morals, good customs or public policy shall compensate the latter for the damage.]
 * Wikipedia repeatedly warns on the disadvantages of signing with IP address. Wikipedia know the scores of lawsuits that Google, etc. had had. Max's blunder of Mumbai signing, in essence revealed the truth. Truth was not sought for by me, but it fatefully unfolded amid assume good faith covers.
 * A user page cannot contain any use or misuse of the rules, law and policies of Wikipedia and US, UK and Philippine laws, lest Wikipedia's reputation and reliability be diminished. (Google, Viacom, YouTube were involved in tedious litigations).
 * User's Mike G., Cma, Lenticel and I, had indicated that we are either alumni or students of Ateneo de Manila University amid Wikipedia's policy and rule of harmonious etiquette among editors.
 * For 9 years, I studied in the Ateneo, as ex-seminarian and Jesuit ex-candidate for priesthood. In memory, I retain the noble "ratio studiorum" of St. Ignatius Ateneo's "Manual of Discipline" for students and alumni.
 * Articles 19, 20 and 21, New Civil Code is the most fundamental Code on Phil. human relations which also covers Wikipedia English (USA, UK, and Phil. laws govern). Article 171/172 RPC[2. Causing it to appear that persons have participated in any act or proceeding when they did not in fact so participate;3. Attributing to persons who have participated in an act or proceeding statements other than those in fact made by them;4. Making untruthful statements in a narration of facts]
 * [CHAPTER 2
 * Since you and my ex-parent Ianlopez indicated that you are Filipino Wikipedians, I appeal to you, in assume good faith, to faithfully try your best as parent, to amicably end this dispute, with the kindness of User:Efe.
 * I received today, the June 3, 2008 S.C. En Banc Resolution expunging from the records, my April 4, 2008 7th final appeal, without contempt warning however. I remain today a jobless judge in pretend world. This is my destiny, and I believe in Wikipedia rule of law. (It is now exactly 25 long years, that as ex-seminarian, the 3 holy angels ridiculed in judgment as dwarfs first appeared to us on June 2, 1983).
 * I fully respect Mike G, Lenticel and all of Filipino editors here, amid these. But I found compassionate application of Wiki rules by unknown foreign editors who could not understand these. I never found kindness in my own country, I found it in Wikipedia.
 * Vide: IP Address of User:Maxschmelling discussion above:With all due respect, may I please write hereunder, a very important - critical fact of this discussion. Max used an IP address and later asked apology for not using Max's username. This is utter bad faith, which might have caused the mediator/s to be misled. At any rate, I write this for the better solution of this dispute in good faith::Max admitted:
 * "I promise to be terse. It is not irrelevant to bring up evidence of a conflict of interest. You have a personal stake in "coconut healing oil" and thus what you choose to write about it should be critically viewed, especially if there are questions about the sources you use as evidence. 59.183.139.189 (talk) 06:57, 14 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I made history, by being the very first to be the first Wikipedian to register and create an article on Knol, I am an avid fan of David Dicks and Zac Sunderland. In conscience, please deeply understand not my sufferings but the dire pains of those who made my destiny more cleansed, amid their loved ones more painful ... Sincerely, your puppy. Please put back your Terrier Image, we (my guides) miss it. Please.--Florentino floro (talk) 13:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

RFA thank-you
Thank-you for your support of me at my recent RFA, which was successful. I have appreciated everyone's comments and encouragement there. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

AFD/Speedy of Paige Bell
Just curious as to why you Speedy A7'ed the article that was up for AFD, since there was a claim of notability in the article. I have been mainly gone for a few months, but I was under the impression that any article that attempts to make a valid claim of notability can't be speedy deleted. (for info, I was the one who AFD'ed the article, since it didn't qualify for A7). P HARMBOY ( TALK ) 01:23, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I believe that being an extra in a movie and being friends with stars are not valid claims for notability.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:55, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

GSIS-Meralco bribery case
Please visit this article and I proposed its enhancement etc., as current event, in the talk page. Thanks. --Florentino floro (talk) 10:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Radon fluoride
Can you explain how was there any consensus to delete? --Itub (talk) 05:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * There were two votes that prefers delete and I beleive that the nominator has a good point. You do have a good Keep reason but as you said, you're not so sure about your own argument and would like to be corrected if wrong. That made me think that your argument has less bearing on the consensus of the Rfd.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I was just being humble and challenging the deletion proposers to prove their case that the name is ambiguous. If that was the consensus, I see no choice but to turn it into a "disambiguation" page, despite having only one possible target. --Itub (talk) 06:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi, miss you, have time on this please
Hi, may I respectfully ask you some time to share your view on this. Essentially, I asked the WP:ANI on the validity of User:Cma vis-a-vis User:Flaminsky, - re Vandalism.
 * And if you have more time, please share more thoughts on the Rfc Requests for comment/Florentino floro, Thanks. - --Florentino floro (talk) 10:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi, I did a full research on Mt. Talinis from Firefox google. And I revised the entire sub-section on culture and eco-tourism. I had to preserve Born to be wild, since I spent one hour playing it over and over, since I could not get the correct names of the rare species, which are not in the english link of GMA-7. Now, I found it is 1903 and not 1864 or 1870. I had been amazed by this Mt. since it is the most, I say MOST bio-diverse in fauna and flora with rare species found only in Mt. Talinis. It is sad that my Bulacan has none of these, and since 1960, I had been using Winchester to shoot wild pigeons but none of these Mt. Talinis thing. I know that you would not want to be in our dispute. Thanks for the message. I only want to preserve this Mt. Talinis thing in Wiki, it is so great Mt.--Florentino floro (talk) 08:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Delisting RFD Subpages
When you close the last debate on a RFD subpage, please remember to remove that page from the "Current list" section of the main page. Subpages are only listed while debates are active. By the way, I appreciate your activity on RFD. We don't get a lot of admins who routinely close debates there. Thanks. -- JLaTondre (talk) 13:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * thank you for the advice.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 01:21, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

the man in the lighthouse
I started this page.. but as you know, I cant expand this article as I do not have any means of getting references as I do most of my editing at the office (and I dont have access to non-related sites regarding my work). I hope you could help, just adding some references here, and redirecting Ang Lalake sa Parola to The Man in the Lighthouse. I dont know how to redirect an article. Sorry for that. Hehe. Its okay if you cant do it the next few hours. This is not a rush though. Dont pressure yourself! Thanks in advance. btw, I had just watched the movie, I am sure to do the synopsis or the storyline, whatever is appropriate. I hope I could help you too some other time! Axxand   SPEAK    ACT  12:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * It seems that it is already redirected. I'm not familiar with the way LGBT films work so I think I can't help you here. You might want to userfy the article first so you can temporarily edit it without the risk of being speedy deleted. If you feel that it is complete then you could move it back. Here's a redlink that you could use to create your own sandbox User:Axxand/Sandbox. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Gerald's bullying me again...
Hmm, I guess this vain fanboy's still trying to harass me again... I only did the right thing, but his socks Loverboyz and ZMaxim are now targeting me, like as though I'm the culprit... Any suggestions? Blake Gripling (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ignore their "warnings" (don't talk back) to deny them of recognition. Post an entry on WP:ANI regarding their harassment. The admins there are more experienced with sockpuppets and checkuser than I am. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 06:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Exactly, although I made a statement on my talk page, and removed the entry they made against me on AIV... You may also check out Long term abuse/Gerald Gonzalez, if you like... Blake Gripling (talk) 06:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi, please fix my lost archive 3
I just replied, and I found my talk page User talk:Florentino floro a new section now. So, I restored the archives 1 and 2, but the 3rd archive is red, so please help me restore the valuable archive 3, #January 3 2008 to February 27 2008 please. Regards.--Florentino floro (talk) 09:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Animal Experimentation: Opposing Viewpoints
I found some reviews for Animal Experimentation: Opposing Viewpoints. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal Experimentation: Opposing Viewpoints. --Eastmain (talk) 02:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Gliricidia sepium
Hi Lenticel. I rarely do biological science articles, so I've done my best in starting the Gliricidia sepium page, with some intention to improve it later. Just thought I'd give you the heads up and solicit your watching the article in case I ever do anything stupid with dear old ubiquitous Kakawate/Madre de Cacao. :-D -- Alternativity (talk) 11:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Good grief, that was incredibly fast... thanks. :-D Alternativity (talk) 11:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Inquiry
Hello Lenticel, I would like to inquire if you could be good enough to delete my defunct user page at User:KurtGuirnela. I realize that I may have had used this account a long time ago and had forgotten the password. I'm using my current account at User:Kguirnela. Can the defunct account be deleted as well? &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  14:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * will do, I'll link to this post just in case some trouble happens 'kay.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 14:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. =) &mdash; •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ•  <sup style="color:olive;">Speak!  01:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Can you help me with this article?
Hi! Can you help me fix Bukidnon State University article? I tried to clean up the article a long time ago (June 2008, I think) but somebody (an IP address:210.5.126.53) and Tomorts keeps on reverting and adding unnecessary things to the article (such as Intramurals section and the intramural uniforms that are in my view, irrelevant/unnecessary to the article). Can we also semi-protect the article to avoid reverts from unknown IP addresses?Kleomarlo (talk) 10:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I halved the size of the article by removing unencylcopedic materials and copyvio. Keep this article on your watchlist and notify me on further developments. I cannot grant semi-protection as the IP edits are stale and there are no evidence of edit wars in the article.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah okay. ThanksKleomarlo (talk) 00:15, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

3 Segundos Antes da Queda
3 Segundos Antes da Queda created for the 3rd time in 20 minutes. Can we maybe salt this, since it did go to afd originally? Or at least admin lock it for a few days. Oh, and delete it again. P HARMBOY ( TALK ) 01:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Mahabone and Freemasonry Today RfD
Howdy, I see that you closed the discussion of the Mahabone RfD as a "delete." Was there a decision on Freemasonry Today, which was nominated/listed at the same time? 147.70.242.40 (talk) 18:17, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up Mr. IP.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 October 2
I was wondering why you closed this as a retarget when nobody in the discussion supported that decision (the person who mentioned the target was neutral on it and said it wasn't mentioned in the target article). --UsaSatsui (talk) 02:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I just thought that it was a more appropriate retarget. The delete votes we're made moot since it now points to another article. If you want to I could re-open it for you to discuss the new target. (just notify the rest of the commenters).-- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I know it's nitpicking, but yes, I'd like to see it reopened...if not overturned. Of 3 comments, 2 delete comments were not based on the target, and the third was a neutral mention of the episode.  If it is, I'll let the people who commented know. --UsaSatsui (talk) 15:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay done.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Something I notice
Thanks for your notes, and I replied there, with some observations.
 * BTW, I notice that in Wikipedia legal articles, there are 2 different creations: a) Subic rape case, for example is thus titled, since there is no decision yet; b) Sema v. Comelec, with info box, had and is a decision article. I wanted to copy the Scotus info box of Kennedy v. Louisiana but since I have no IT expertise, I ended up borrowing another Filipino editor's info box for my Sema. Thus, I added an info box for the Hultman-Chapman murder case. But I hope that as admin and IT expert, you will amend or make more beautiful our Filipino decision info box as great as the Scotus of Kennedy v. Louisiana, since, this has more legal advantages for the researcher. Another observation. Not that I criticize Chan Robles decisions, but, Chan virtual library is private, though fast opening. I dislike using our Supreme Court URL since it takes minutes to open, bad IT. So, I prefer to use Philippine Jurisprudence, since it is official, and so fast to open. But it will take months or a year for PhilJuris to upload a recent case like Sema. Thus we had to suffer using the S.Court URL.

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

User:Florentino floro) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message. --Florentino floro (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Can I use this pics on wiki
Hi, I wonder if I could use the pictures in this website about Lake Sebu. It's a DENR-PENRO website. Can it pass PhilGov fair use?Kleomarlo (talk) 14:00, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No, the lakes are accessible to people and it is possible that one can snap a photo of the three lakes without getting a pic from the web. Besides gov't public domain clause is very malabo so it is better to upload a free pic rather than a gov't owned one.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair Use Rationale in Pictures
Hi there, Lenticel. I moved some pages here in wikipedia, but I am not yet familiar how to update the pictures that was also moved--I am too afraid to try and update images with non-free use rationale. Here are the pages I had moved:


 * Sirena (Philippine Mythology) to Sirena (Philippine mythology)
 * Siyokoy (Philippine Mythology) to Siyokoy (Philippine mythology)
 * Kataw (Philippine Mythology) to Kataw (Philippine mythology)

As you can see, I dropped the capitalization in the word "mythology" there. My problem is I dont know what to do with the pictures in the articles I moved.. :) Hoping for your advise as I have the same problems with Polytechnic University of the Philippines subarticles too. I visited Non-free use rationale guideline but I need someone expert to fully understand it-- as they say, reading isn't just enough. Thanks! Axxand (talk) 04:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Those are Creative Commons licensed images so you don't need FU's as long as the author clearly states that it is indeed CC.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 13:26, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * With that, I can chill now. Thanks! Have a nice day ahead. Axxand (talk) 22:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Category
I would like to edit this: User:Arorozco - Angelito R. Orozco (b. March 6, 1972) is the chief legal counsel of the City of Olongapo - the article categories were improperly placed, as, I myself, had the same mistake. I discovered this, when I researched Category:Philippine. Thus, I would like to remove his wrong - Category: Filipino lawyers, Category: Subic Bay Freeport lawyers, and Category: University of the Philippines alumni. (User:Studerby - 17:01, 17 June 2008 Studerby (Talk | contribs) (51,357 bytes) (Remove main article categories from userspace article) (undo)). Is it ok? Cheers.--Florentino floro (talk) 07:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * remove the categories, they're used only in article space.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 09:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Pages linking to WP:COMMUNISM
Hi Lenticel. WP:COMMUNISM, a redirect which you deleted based on consensus on Redirects for discussion, was just recreated. I've deleted it again, but it occurs to me that it was probably recreated because it was widely used, including on the former target page: Ownership of articles. I have now gone through and replaced or removed references to the redirect, except in places where the redirect itself was being discussed. But could you please check if redirects are being used before (or right after) deleting them in the future? -- SCZenz (talk) 11:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the tips. Honestly, I never encountered that problem before,-- Lenticel ( talk ) 12:11, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Chocolate Hills GA review
I do think you need to apologize. Malleus Fatuorum, the editor who initiated the GA review, has apparently done a lot of fixing up of the article and simply stated the several things he might have trouble (or for lack of time) fixing himself. --seav (talk) 02:05, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know seav, I really don't like people who goad contributors using negative means in the wiki (ie. deletion, delist etc.). We are a volunteer group after all. Had the user simply requested (like you guys in the tambayan all do), I might have been in a more colloborative mood.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 02:10, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * But he is simply stating the observation that the article as it stands does not meet the GA criteria. It has to be delisted if it does not anymore meet the criteria. He already put up a lot of effort to fix the article to help it meet the criteria and is simply asking for help from others who are more knowledgeable. The mentioning of the possible delistment is simply as a point of context (why he is requesting for help in the first place) and not as a means of goading others. That is how I interpreted things using the Assume good faith guideline. It states there: "avoid accusing others of harmful motives without particularly strong evidence." --seav (talk) 02:23, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That is exactly right Seav. Had I been able to fix all of the issues myself then I would have done so, and have done that for many other articles. But I can't make decisions about image layout, or rewrite sentences that I don't understand the intended meaning of. Nor do I always have the time to track down dead links. I find it rather galling to be repeatedly accused of harassment, laziness, and now goading given that all I did was to raise a few relatively minor issues that needed to be dealt with so that this article could keep its GA status. I would have been well within my rights to delist it immediately as not meeting the GA criteria. Would that have been preferable? GA articles must meet the GA criteria. Period. No negotiation. It is not my job to fix all those that do not, simply to deal with those issues I can and request that others deal with the remainder by putting the article on hold to allow time for the work to be done. I really would like this negative language to stop now Lenticel. I don't expect you to apologise, but I do expect you to grow up. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 11:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)