User talk:Lifeofconan

If you have any corrections on the things I wrote you can talk about it here.

May 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Taiwan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — MarkH21talk 19:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * I don’t think what I did was disruptive at all. Taiwan is a country and that is an fact and I saw an error in the text and just changed that. Finn.reports (talk) 20:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * already, telling you that there is an ongoing RfC about that precise issue. You followed up by without acknowledging the ongoing RfC. Please wait until consensus is determined. — MarkH21talk 20:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I didnt know what the RFC was and when i searched for it i didnt find a clear answer. so i didnt know i did anything wrong. I still dont know what the RFC is and i dont know why i did anything wrong.Finn.reports (talk) 21:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Click on the link in my comment above (here it is again). Here is what RfCs (Requests for Comment) are in general: WP:RFC. They're processes for resolving large content disputes. The disputed content is generally left in the status quo version until the RfC is resolved. — MarkH21talk 21:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You are welcome to add your opinion to the RFC at Talk:Taiwan. Eventually an administrator will close the RFC and that will determine which word is used.  We'll just have to wait for that.  Kanguole 21:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Okay thnx for the information. Finn.reports (talk) 22:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lau Siu-lai. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

I didn’t do anything disruptive the link redirects to a page which is called Hongkongers so I just saw a mistake and fixed it. Finn.reports (talk) 20:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lau Siu-lai, you may be blocked from editing. Ifnord (talk) 20:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

I didn’t do anything disruptive! Finn.reports (talk) 20:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:LISTEN. Disruptive editing is editing trying to make a point. You know there is a current controversy, participate in that. Don't edit just to prove a point. Ifnord (talk) 20:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Japan; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Telsho (talk) 07:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Unspecified source/license for File:Co-emissions-per-capita.png
Thanks for uploading File:Co-emissions-per-capita.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Lifeofconan. Thank you for your work on A12 blockade. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   11:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)