User talk:Luiysia

Welcome!
Hello, Luiysia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! WanderingWanda (talk) 08:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Copyright
Hi, Luiysia; welcome to Wikipedia. I have reverted the text you added at Autism—Tics, AD/HD, and other Comorbities and rewritten a piece of it to avoid WP:COPYVIO. Please have a look at not only WP:COPYVIO, but also WP:PLAGIARISM and WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE. While carefully sticking to sources, we must rewrite content in our own words. You might also want to view WP:MEDRS. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  22:21, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the assist, advice noted :) Luiysia (talk) 22:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * UPDATE! My apologies; I gave you bad info.  When I followed up with Copyvio people on how to scrub the article history of the copyvio, I learned something new.  See this discussion.  Regards, Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  02:21, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh cool! yay for creative commons haha Luiysia (talk) 02:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Sandy Liang

 * Hi there! I saw you were active in the Fashion wikiproject and was wondering if you could take a look at a draft I've written about the designer Draft:Sandy Liang. I was very surprised to find that she did not have an article because of her notability and wide coverage in various publications. As a novice contributor I would love your feedback and review. Thanks! Luiysia (talk) 20:44, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm not really active there. I was just putting up some pages on Roman footwear and then noticing a few other places that were badly handled. Wikipedia—like Western culture generally—tends to look down its nose at fashion and to not document it very well. I'm also busy enough at the moment that I can't really go through the full review process your page seems to be asking for. Since you asked so nicely, though, and are working to improve something Wiki so badly needs, here are the informal and offhand bits of feedback I can give you:


 * A) Your article is already well-sourced enough, well formatted enough , and establishes Ms Liang's enough that it could just go live now. People can always fix formatting and other mistakes as you go.
 * B) If you're unfamiliar with, you should go look it up. Handled well, it brings a few thousand visitors to your page and they will very quickly point out and fix any glaring issues, even if the review itself doesn't. To me, something about a Chinese American fashion designer inspired by grandmothers, used her own grandmother as a runway model, and/or gorpcore would be effective elements for hooks.
 * C) None of which is to say that the article doesn't have major problems:
 * a) Passing the length requirement for is the only reason that the human being and the fashion label should be sharing a single article. They're entirely different s that should be split even if that leaves the biography a stub for now. Compare Coco Chanel and Chanel, Donna Karan and DKNY, and—as an example of what not to do—Anne Klein (fashion designer). Even with Ms Klein's article, the  is focused mostly on the person and the company and actual fashion is an afterthought. That's bad generally but correct for a bio page. If there's honestly only 3 sentences of verifiable information on Ms Liang's life besides the label, then she'd be a part of the fashion label article and not the other way around. On the other hand, some aspects about the development of the brand belong in Ms Liang's bio and in the history section of the fashion label page, although they might have to be worded slightly differently.
 * b) There are no categories, templates, or external links. Again, compare Coco Chanel, Donna Karan, and Anne Klein (fashion designer).
 * c) This is obviously something you couldn't've done yet without the page being live but there's nothing linking in from other pages yet. There's nothing linking into the main page even though red links could be set up ahead of time if this is actually a notable figure. Seems like maybe 2 or 3 mentions in the wild already. You'd redlink those for now and also look for other pages where you could appropriately mention your topic. Gorpcore, Respect, Old_age, and various New York fashion related pages seem like obvious candidates. Ageism and Age discrimination in the United States seem like they should fit too, although they currently seem to lack sections on looking down on old people's fashion and culture, which is what Ms Liang is pushing against.
 * d) You don't have her actual name or date of birth. It's possible she just has the English name 'Sandy' (not Sandra, Alexandra, or Cassandra) and absolutely no Chinese name. It's not terribly likely. That's vital enough it should be fixed before a bio article goes live even if it's a bit hard to find. For what it's worth, the brand seems to have the Chinese name ·, Sāngdí Liáng, which is just the translit of the English name but might point towards the right character for her family name. Also be aware that Wikipedia has a higher standard  for biography of living persons.
 * e) Once you separate Sandy Liang (fashion designer) from Sandy Liang (the ), you should also create Sandy Liang (disambiguation); create redirects to Sandy Liang at Sandy Liang (brand), Sandy Liang (label), &c.; and add a hatnote on Sandy Liang pointing at the biography article.
 * D) Any added info is better than blank voids of no content, always. That said, there's some small stylistic stuff that you ideally should learn about, fix, and not leave to other editors in the future:
 * a) Add the infobox that you see at Coco Chanel, Donna Karan, and Anne Klein (fashion designer) to the Sandy Liang (fashion designer) article. Add the infobox you see at Chanel and DKNY to the Sandy Liang article. That'll also point you towards some other important information that you're currently missing, like her real name.
 * b) Try to follow . Generally speaking, there should be no sources provided in the lead of the article. Everything should be repeated at greater length and clarity in the body of the article and the cites should go there.
 * c) Try to follow and . The fact that the magazine styles their name a certain way doesn't affect that we write Harper's Bazaar.
 * d) Personal quirk but I prefer easier and more accessible phrasing and easier and terser section names. I use anchor to say and then the actual section title is just ==Life== . I do the same thing with  and ==Names== in articles about places. I know that's just me but it seems more helpful to s.
 * e) Some editors will object to subjective, hedged, and "peacock" terms about what she's known for and what her inspirations are, at least when placed prominently in the lead. It's fine for a starter article like this and it's fine buried further down the article where it gets less weight, but it's something to be careful about.

— Llywelyn II   00:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your feedback! I agree about the issue with the person/label sharing an article. I haven't done the most thorough research, but I haven't been able to find much biographical info about Liang the person separate from the brand; since she founded her brand at a young age most of the information about her is limited to where she grew up and some stuff about her father's restaurant. I'll rework this article to be about the brand specifically and put the biographical info into the
 * I do find it somewhat likely that her legal name is actually Sandy, assuming the Chinese name on her site is correct. It's not really unusual for Asian immigrants to give their kids English names that English-speakers might consider nicknames, since they want it to be the same as the version in their language. (example: Jenny Han)
 * I'll polish up this article and publish it, thanks :) Luiysia (talk) 18:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandy Liang (fashion designer) has been accepted
 Sandy Liang (fashion designer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Sandy_Liang_(fashion_designer) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! gobonobo + c 22:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Luiysia, and welcome to Women in Red. Thanks for all the interesting articles you have created in such a short time, especially those about women. As you have a good command of English and are interested in a variety of subjects, it looks as if you'll be a useful member of the project. You might like to look through some of our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Perhaps you could also sign up under "New registrations" on WikiProject Women in Red/New members where others will be able to take account of your interest. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Kasama (restaurant)
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Kawal (food)
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 12:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your DYK Nomination for Dongbei renaissance
Hello! Your submission of Dongbei renaissance at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Johnson  524  21:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Sandy Liang
Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Dongbei renaissance
—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A kitten for you!
Li Xueqin (comedian) is nicely written and researched, well done! Keep up the good work and happy editing!

 Just ' i ' yaya  03:34, 3 October 2023 (UTC) 


 * Thank you :) Luiysia (talk) 15:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Patty Aubery moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Patty Aubery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 18:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Hm, fair enough. Sadly, there don't seem to be enough reliable sources about her. Luiysia (talk) 21:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

AFDs
Hello, Luiysia,

You just started an AFD on an article and AFDs run at least a week. You can work on improving the article in question but do not take action on the article (Merger, Redirect, blanking, Moving, etc.) until the AFD discussion is closed. Your actions were especially improper as you were the editor who nominated the article for deletion. It's not your call to close the discussion. Please do not jump the gun in any future AFDs you start. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your draft article, Draft:Patty Aubery (2)


Hello, Luiysia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Patty Aubery".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  14:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

"Scientific sexism" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scientific_sexism&redirect=no Scientific sexism] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

New message from Prince of Erebor
You are invited to join the discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Shushu/Tong.  Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ）  14:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

New message from Prince of Erebor
 Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ）  17:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanglewood Numbers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Times Union. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Shushu/Tong
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging