User talk:Maglorbd

Thanks for your contributions ... there are many BD-related articles listed at List of Bangladesh-related topics. You might also look into the WikiProject Bangladesh. Thanks. --Ragib 08:14, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

helpme I want to modify the following maps from Wikimedia Commons and Creative Commons and upload the modified maps in some of the pages/articles they are linked with:

1. Bg_map.PNG 2. Italy-Villanovan-Culture-900BC.PNG by ZyMOS 3. Hannibal's_Route_Of_Invasion.PNG by Frank Martini 4. Battles_second_punic_war.PNG by Panairjdde

I want to update the maps in the individual linked pages with information from the sources mention on those pages so they reflect the situation of those pages. Would Wikipedia policy permit this? Maglorbd 14:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The only image of those that I found was Image:Battles second punic war.png, which is licensed under the GFDL and CC SA 1.0. If you comply with either of those licenses, you can modify Image:Battles second punic war.png, upload it under a different name, and use it in other articles. If you comply with the licenses of any images here (by giving attribution, re-licensing the work under the original license, etc.), you can modify and reuse them.  W ODU P  00:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Punic_War_Naval_Battles.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Punic_War_Naval_Battles.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 21:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Osmani
Sorry, I mistook you for the serial vandal in these article. He has vandalized many independence war related pages, so I have to keep an eye on him. Keep up your good work. --Ragib (talk) 22:33, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

1971 Map
With reference to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Banoob71.PNG - AMAZING piece of work! - AMAZING doesnt do justice. Great Job!.

Have  slight corrections (and maybe more).
 * You say there were four Armoured Regiments and Five Armoured Squadrons in Indian Orbat. As per my knowledge there were three Armoured Regiments - 45 Cav, 63 Cav, 69 AR. Maybe I missed one?
 * Indian 50 Para Bde operated in the II Corps Sector and not XXXIII Corps area.

Maybe you can try a version of the map where you can link the brigades with the Divisions? The portion at Agartala gets real confusing and the lines that are drawn may resolve part of the issue.

jaiiaf (talk) 15:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Couple of corrections in the Air Squadrons page. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/40/Banair71a.PNG . 2 Squadron was not in Dum Dum but in the West. Similary 16 Squadron was at Gorakhpur. There was also an airfield at Kumbhirgram which launched some missions jaiiaf (talk) 17:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * ACIG unfortunately is wrong on some counts. To confirm that 2 Squadron was not at Dum dum, this page http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/History/Sqn/002.html gives the history and location. It does not mention Dum Dum. My guess is that the other book you mention may have mistaken 22 Squadron for 2 Squadron. I dont remember which source locates 16 squadron at gorakhpur but i heard that the squadron operated form there and is even today based there. jaiiaf (talk) 03:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Abacaenum
Thanks for this excellent article. One pointer: I note you've got a lot of things listed under "bibliography" that don't appear in the inline citations found under "references". Where you have used these as sources, could you note the book and page number using inline citations? Ironholds (talk) 14:01, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Brilliant, thanks. A few more bluelinks would be nice; the lead, for example, has none. You might do well in asking one of the Guild of Copy Editors to take a look, but other than that it's an excellent article. Ironholds (talk) 14:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Taurus394.PNG
Thank you for uploading File:Taurus394.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 17:35, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

How do I add the copyright status to that file now? I just forgot when I uploaded it -it was modified from a wikimedia commons file. Can you help? Maglorbd (talk) 17:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
ww2censor (talk) 02:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Help request
helpme If I want to modify an image file from www.livius.org and upload it to wikipedia, which license should I use? Is this permitted?Maglorbd (talk) 16:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * No. According to the website, the photographs are "often by Marco Prins © 2002-2009", and I see no indication that he has made them available under a free license, unless the photo you intend to use is clearly marked as an exception. Where is this picture exactly?  AJ Cham  16:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Location of the proposed image file: Marco Prins-Jona Lendering - is it permissible to modify this and upload it in wikipedia?Maglorbd (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The image can be seen at http://www.livius.org/sh-si/sicily/sicily01.html#Prehistory, and is marked ©**. According to http://www.livius.org/mail2.html, this signifies that the photographer or designer is either Marco Prins or Jona Lendering. Under the conditions mentioned above, you can use their pictures.


 * However, we cannot use it here, as the conditions to which he refers are not compatible with our free licensing policy, as they do not allow commercial use, nor do they allow the use of the image offline without additional permissions. The page is misleading, as it suggests that use on Wikipedia is permissable, but I suspect they are unfamiliar with our terms. Regards,  AJ  Cham  10:05, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
 AJ Cham  14:40, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Ban71may.PNG
Thank you for uploading File:Ban71may.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 02:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Taurusiege394.PNG
Thank you for uploading File:Taurusiege394.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 00:58, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Motya398.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Motya398.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Indo-Pak War West1971.PNG
Did you forget to indicate the copyright status of this image?

You may wish to read Image_copyright_tags, or ask what tags are appropriate.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Unreliable source pakdef.info
Hi, I thought of informing you about a wp:SPS pakdef.info the RSN discussion was here few editors here were inclined to add content from pakdef.info and had added it at a number of indo pak history articles. Even after the source was declared unreliable a lot of the associated content still remains on wiki articles with tags. Please do not add pakdef.info and feel free to remove source pakdef.info links and content that is otherwise unsourced and clearly incorrect statements. -- Ð ℬig XЯaɣ  08:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hamilcar Barca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syracuse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hamilcar Barca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Utica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Eryx244BC.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:Eryx244BC.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hamilcar Barca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Utica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=569849135 your edit] to M. A. G. Osmany may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * in May 1971, after reorganization of Eastern Command forces following Operation Searchlight generic representation—some unit locations not shown|alt=Military map of East Pakistan in May 1971]]

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=572865127 your edit] to M. A. G. Osmany may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * under the command of Lt. Col. A.T.K. Haque (Bengali), 1 EBR won a total of 17 gallantry awards including two Sitara-i-Jurat and 9 Tamgha-i-Jurat,  the highest number of awards won by any
 * Osmani was selected as the coordinator of these clandestine meetings. Bengali Military officers both retired and serving, alarmed by the buildup of Pakistani forces apprehensive about their own

Disambiguation link notification for September 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited M. A. G. Osmany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Ami Bijoy Dekhechi
Hi, you've added this citation in a couple places:

This doesn't appear to be a valid ISBN number, and I can't find a record of a 2004 edition of Ami Bijoy Dekhechi. Can you help clear this up? Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 15:31, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited M. A. G. Osmani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EPR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited M. A. G. Osmani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BSF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Your edits in Karna article
Please add citations for your addition in Karna article, else those edits may be reverted. If you have any question or comment you may contact me here Tito ☸ Dutta 16:37, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

In Wikipedia we do not work on "information now, citation later" basis. Please add citations soon. Analysis etc must have citations. Tito ☸ Dutta 18:05, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I want to enhance and properly reference the Karna Article. It was suggested that referencing from raw Mahabharata could be misinterpreted and good scholarly sources should be used. The Links in that article does not seem to quality. Can someone help locate some that can be used?Maglorbd (talk) 16:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Help me template fixed by Tito ☸ Dutta 18:00, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I'd go looking for peer-reviewed scholarly papers, either ones discussing Karna from a theological point of view, or ones discussing him from a literary point of view. A quick Google Scholar search brought up quite a few hits that may be worth investigating in a university library. Google Books is also worth a search and found this work which seems relevant enough. Huon (talk) 20:26, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * For what it's worth, you shouldn't be so condescending to helpful editors and we absolutely do work on an "information now, citation later", basis. It's just also perfectly valid to have other editors challenge or remove content and to discuss possible problems like incompleteness, inaccuracies, bias, &c. Thank you for being one of the watchdogs, but do kindly be a little nicer about how you go about it. — Llywelyn II   04:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

M. A. G. Osmani, references, ISBN numbers
Hello, I, and others, have been working on correcting ISBN numbers in references. Back in September of 2013, with, you added references to the M. A. G. Osmani page. Unfortunately, for several of the references the ISBN numbers are invalid. Specifically the ones for:
 * Ibrahim, Maj Gen. (ret.) Sayed Muhammad, Misrokothon p238, ISBN 984-70105-0434-7
 * General Osmany', Peer, M. Ataur Rahman, p11, ISBN 984-70059-0104-8

I have put a considerable amount of effort into trying to find the correct ISBN for the M. Ataur Rahman book. Unfortunately, I have been unsuccessful in either finding a valid ISBN, or verifying that the ISBN in the book is actually invalid. What I have found is that you appear to have translated the title and author name. Another time, if you are going to helpfully provide a translation, please also provide the title as it is on the book (I assume: জেনারেল ওসমানী) and author/editor (also assumed: পীর, এম আতাউর রহমান). In most cases, having the untranslated information makes it much easier to find the work in question.

As of yet, I have not attempted to find the Misrokothon book.

In both of the above cases, the ISBN numbers are either of invalid format and/or have extra digits. 13-digit ISBN numbers start with 978 or 979, not 984. However, 984 is the registration group (first digit(s) in a 10-digit ISBN) for books published in Bangladesh, which is probably consistent with these books. Thus, I expect that it is likely these ISBN numbers actually have three extra digits each.

I would appreciate it if you could verify the ISBN numbers for these two books. Thanks. &mdash; Makyen (talk) 04:15, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited East Pakistan Air Operations, 1971, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chandpur ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/East_Pakistan_Air_Operations%2C_1971 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/East_Pakistan_Air_Operations%2C_1971?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Siege of Motya
Astounding job on the Punic Wars. Just read your article on the Siege of Motya and it was very good, only some minor issues with word choice and some things I can't figure out, like Archylus' citizenship. He is signaled as "Thruian", but I never heard of it. could you clarify? Kapiski (talk) 16:28, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

I'm sure with some work on the references and a general polishment of the language we can boost the article to B class or even A. Look forward to collaborating with you. Kapiski (talk) 16:34, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Was he a citizen of Thurii (also called Thurium)? Kapiski (talk) 17:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Hamilcar
You're obviously very involved with the Carthaginian articles here so I assume you have a good source for the Punic name (in addition to the inscriptions  mentioned by Huss) and for its meaning "Brother of Melqart" instead of sth like "Melqart is Gracious" in parallel with Hanno and Hannibal. When you have time, kindly add it to the Hamilcar articles or leave me a message on my talk page with it so I can add it. — Llywelyn II   04:30, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Polybius1.png
Thank you for uploading File:Polybius1.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:27, 24 February 2019 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ron h jones (Talk) 21:27, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Diodorus.png
Thank you for uploading File:Diodorus.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ron h jones (Talk) 21:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Collaboration
Hi Maglorbd. I note your comment "Before I die or wikipedia evolves into something new, I wish to produce a "FA" rated article." Is that still your view? If so, would you consider a collaboration on Battle of Phintias with a view to seeing how far we can get it?

I have had 15 successful FACs in the past year, all on military conflicts, so know something about generating quality content; and recently took Battle of Ecnomus through FAC, so know something about naval conflicts of the First Punic War. (I am currently working on Battle of the Aegates.)

Let me know what you think. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Help request
helpme If I need to update a referencelist of an article or upload a new one, how should I do it?Maglorbd (talk) 06:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Cissa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of the Indus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khalaj.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Battle of Silva Litana. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Also, when copying from one article to another, please be sure to also copy details of the supporting citations and texts. Thank you, — Diannaa (talk) 17:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I will follow the the above. Just to mention, I had written some of the texts copied from Battle of Rhone and just inserted them as is. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.Maglorbd (talk) 07:17, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

No target errors
Hi Maglorbd. When using short form refs, for instance sfn or harvnb, the details need to match the cite exactly. I've just corrected errors at Battle of Parwan and I've previously done the same at Battle of Rhone Crossing. In general the format should always be, and should match the |last= and |date= fields in the cite (although only the year in the date field). You may want to turn on these errors so you can see them, as detailed here, or just ask of you have any questions. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 14:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Will do better.Maglorbd (talk) 13:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ায় আমন্ত্রণ
সুধী, একজন বাংলাদেশিকে ইংরেজি উইকিপিডিয়ায় সক্রিয় দেখে ভালো লাগছে। ইংরেজি উইকিপিডিয়ায় আপনার তৈরি নিবন্ধ এবং মুক্তিযুদ্ধ সম্পর্কিত মানচিত্রসমূহ উভয়ই বেশ উন্নতমানের। আপনি নিশ্চয় জানেন, আমাদের অনেকেই বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ার উন্নতিকল্পে কাজ করে যাচ্ছি। আশা করছি একদিন বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়াও ইংরেজির মতো মানসম্মত অবস্থানে আসবে। উক্ত কাজে আপনার মতো অভিজ্ঞ লোকদের সাহায্যও খুব প্রয়োজন। তাই আপনাকে বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ায় কাজ করার আমন্ত্রণ জানাচ্ছি। ধন্যবাদান্তে, ≈ MS Sakib  «TalK»  09:45, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I greatest regret is that I never learned to type in Bangla. If you need help with maps, I will assist.Maglorbd (talk) 04:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Silva Litana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acerrae.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Carthaginian Expansion
Template:Campaignbox Carthaginian Expansion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 19:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tripartite Struggle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Devapala.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)