User talk:Michael Devore

Archives
An archive of most conversations from this page during 2007 is available at User talk:Michael Devore/Archive 1. Should I or others find the current talk page excessively boring or contentious, we can hark back to happier times by reading the archive's thank yous, or admiring the barnstars and awards, including the justly famous groundhog with a Santa hat. -- Michael Devore (talk) 22:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Archive the Second: an archive of this page for the approximate time period of January through September 2008 is available at User talk:Michael Devore/Archive 2. It contains more thanks; awards; barnstars; another groundhog(!); basic editor, article, bot and admin interactions; and minimal griping. Pretty boring stuff, if you're one of those editor who look for gory action and major drama. Well, there's always a chance of big drama next time. -- Michael Devore (talk) 03:54, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Archive Number 3: an archive of this page for late 2008 through 2009 is available at User talk:Michael Devore/Archive 3. Woo hoo! A bit of drama in this one. Not a whole lot, but sometimes you got to take what you can get. -- Michael Devore (talk) 07:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Archive Number 4: archive of this page for 2010 through August 2014, available at User talk:Michael Devore/Archive 4. Nothing really clever to say about that. Had a couple lean years there, life dramas and work schedules kept me away from Wikipedia for quite a while, as least as far as significant runs of editing work. What can you do, life is like that sometimes. Well, I'm back for now. Yay! -- Michael Devore (talk) 08:12, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=623538315 your edit] to Great River Charter Montessori School may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Each spring, the Junior High ends the year with a bike trip about 100 miles. The bike trips have started in several locations, in Red Wing the first year, Cass
 * Nah, it was a small typo in a sentence that probably shouldn't be in the article in the first place. But I fixed it for your botly self, so we're cool right? -- Michael Devore (talk) 05:55, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

hey
I fixed the 1st sentence of jennifer winget's page, can u please have a look? I did that as saraswatichandra has ended.Durr-e-shehwar (talk) 15:30, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi I added the award in the awards section, which I forgot to do earlier, can u see if u can accept that? regards120.23.240.140 (talk) 15:47, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

i added awards to the jennifer winget page, can u please see if they can be approved??120.23.240.158 (talk) 18:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * OK, the referenced checked out, so I accepted the edit and cleaned it up a bit in the following edit. Of course, your addition may be edited further by other users, but it looked solid enough to accept as valid in review. -- Michael Devore (talk) 18:30, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Faversham
Thanks for the fixes, I was sure there was a faux-pas in the article after I'd done a large copyedit, but I was too tired to tackle it yesterday. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  08:58, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Memling's Annunciation
Thanks for the copyedits there. Much appreciated. Victoria (tk) 20:59, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for fixes in Garage rock article
Thank you for your fixes and corrections in the Garage rock article! Garagepunk66 (talk) 05:35, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

"San Diego Jewish Flim Festival" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect San Diego Jewish Flim Festival. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 01:09, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Ashanti (protectrate)
This article is wrong. There was never an Ashanti Protectorate. See: Ashanti (Crown Colony). Apologies I do not know how to move this article. I have updated my note to include an appeal to editors with more technical know how to delete or move the article. If you have the Wiki know how, please could you do that? I never claimed my note would fix the problem. It’s intention was to encourage an editor with he know how to do so. There isn’t any doubt or controversy about the matter. The story of Ashanti is set out at its article. It was a Crown Colony and not a Protectorate. Anyway, if you would like to help, that would be great. WP is too complicated now for me to make article deletions moves.


 * Generally the method to delete an entire article that isn't clearly vandalism, made up, testing, or non-notable would be to submit it to Articles for Deletion at WP:AFD, which has detailed description of the process. It's not trivial to do, but it's not impossibly difficult if you follow the directions. It can be a bit tedious to get it done manually, I've done it a few times, but not for years. Be prepared to provide a good reason for the deletion other than opinion or hearsay, and provide follow-up support for that assertion against other editor's queries.


 * An editor simply stating that an article is not correct or shouldn't exist is not sufficient reason to remove an article. For example, I have no idea whether what you say is accurate, although it seems likely you think you have good reason to believe it. However, I'm not an expert or even educated on the topic. It is never correct to post individual editorial comments about an article within an article itself, otherwise practically every Wikipedia article of any controversy, and many without, would be chock full of various editorial remarks. Other potential suggestions for you are to tag the article as in need of citations or unreliable (there are a great many other available tags, though I personally think they are heavily overused in Wikipedia) using perhaps WP:TAGGING as a starting point; present your objections or attempt to gain deletion consensus on the article's talk page; possibly enlist the effort of an experienced Wikipedia editor to help with the deletion or rewrite, or change the content to reflect what you think is accurate about it even if that means it is a spurious belief; including citations to support that position. -- Michael Devore (talk) 19:21, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I am not willing to invest the time to learn the procedures and follow them. I am not sure I have the skill or patience for that anymore. It used to be easier. I was hoping some one who could ‘do it in a jiffy’ might simply do so. I hoped you might take the time to read up a little (I linked an article) so you could come to a view and ‘have an idea’. It’s not complicated. It’s a very marginal topic so little interest is paid to the article. It cannot be a protectorate and a colony at the same time. The colony article is well referenced. The end result is that I’ve received a dull sermon, no one bothered to interact collaboratively with me to improve WP, and WP still has an article on a fantasy (as in, invented on WP) jurisdiction. You were entirely mannerly and respectful and thank you for that. Frenchmalawi (talk) 20:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)