User talk:Mithoron

Spoilers
Regarding your recent removal of content to The Order of the Stick, please refer to our official guideline Spoiler. Content you may perceive as a "spoiler" is still relevant content for an encyclopedia article, and should not be removed. Therefore, someone reverted your edit.

As Wikipedia has grown, so have the policies and guidelines that govern it, and I know it's hard to know them all. Thanks for your understanding. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:40, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=583532653 your edit] to List of Schlock Mercenary characters may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:41, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * //www.schlockmercenary.com/d/20070819.html Schlock Mercenary archives - Sunday, August 19, 2007

Her-Crb Great Wall
Hi. I think your comment was right. In cosmology, there are at least four different distances. The most confusing is the comoving distance. Folks cannot understand how a distance could be 40 billion ly, but the Universe is only 14 billion year old. Therefore, from at least one point of view your comment is right. I believe, keeping your comment is useful. Deleting it we are loosing information. Please, change it if you want, but put back some part. Proref2 (talk) 16:14, 16 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi. I'm the creator of the article of the Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall. Let me restate it to you—more strongly.

You may be confused with the light travel distance and present comoving distance. I will explain it simply. Light travel distance is the length where light first travels at the beginning of the universe. It means like this: When you created a hypothetical time machine and dated back to the Big Bang, then put out some laserbeam and shoot it out, after a 13.79 billion year waiting the first photon of the laserbeam was already 13.79 billion light years away. That is the light travel distance.

Present comoving distance is the distance where an object was currently it was after a 13.79 billion year expansion. Get it this way: Back to the laserbeam, it may have travelled 13.79 billion light years away from your position when you first emitted the light of the laserbeam. But according to Hubble's law, the universe is expanding. It may seem though as the laserbeam photon was moving away from you only. But the fact is you are also moving away from the laserbeam photon, and away to the point when you omitted the first light photon of the laserbeam. Your frame of reference tells that the laserbeam photon was moving away from you, and also does in the laserbeam photon when it was the frame of reference. After a 13.79 billion year time, together with the Hubble flow, will give you 46.5 billion light years. That is the comoving distance.

You might ask: "How can it be 46 billion light years? If the universe is expanding it must be 26 billion light years only, since nothing can be faster than light." But review again, Einstein's theories does not state anything. It says "Anything that curves spacetime and has mass will never achieve superluminal motion". But it was different when you're talking about the spacetime itself. It is massless and does not pertend to curve unless matter in it does so. So therfore, it may be surprising, spacetime can expand in a superluminal motion. It only carries galaxies away with it. So that's why it was 46.5 billion light years rather than 13.79 or 27 billion light years.

Look at the article starbox. You will find out in there its comoving distance, 15 to 17 billion light years. Obviously enough it was larger than 13.798 ± 0.037 billion light years. But its light travel distance was 10 billion light years. The sentence says: "At a distance of 10 billion light years means that we see the structure as it was 10 billion years ago,...". Because the speed of light is finite, we see it when it was 10 billion years ago. The comoving distance tells that the structure was already this far at the time when I was already pushing my nails on my tablet screen and typing all of these, because the universe is expanding. That's it, for you to understand it. ==Johndric Valdez (talk) 07:19, 17 January 2014 (UTC)==

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samantha Robinson (American actress) (September 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samantha Robinson (American actress) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Samantha Robinson (American actress), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Samantha_Robinson_(American_actress) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MurielMary&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Samantha_Robinson_(American_actress) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geralt of Rivia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Witcher ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Geralt_of_Rivia check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Geralt_of_Rivia?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Ana de Armas
Thank you for your message. In future, please do not edit my talk page. Blanking is allowed and is less hassle than working out how to archive.

I'm sorry if my frequent edits over the past couple of days have annoyed you. I am pretty much finished now except for fixing citations so it won't last much longer!

I will have a look at film years in the next few hours to address your concerns.Popeye191 (talk) 08:35, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm FilmandTVFan28. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Kung Fu Panda: The Paws of Destiny have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. ''I already explained that there were no 2 seasons, only one. The video clearly said season 1, part 2.'' FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 18:10, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

"Anastasia (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Anastasia (upcoming film). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 18 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 22:57, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Helium3
Thank you for reverting my erroneous edit: you are of course correct, i don't know what got into my head about Deuterium. I shall be more careful in future!Richwil (talk) 02:19, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Anya Taylor
Hello, she hanst the argentinian cityenship. She has British and American, and she have argentina recidense. Wath the video. www.lanacion.com.ar/espectaculos/la-frase-de-anya-taylor-joy-sobre-la-argentina-que-volvio-locos-a-sus-fanaticos-nid08092021/%3foutputType=amp WikiJuan (talk) 16:49, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

In dialogue with the magazine InStyle, they asked him if he had Argentine or American citizenship, to which he replied: “I have a United States and a British passport, and I also have an Argentine residence. WikiJuan (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Biographies of living people
Please do not add content which gives undue weight to some statement about a living person, as you did at Sasha Calle. On Wikipedia we take particular care over articles about living people.

New information, even if referenced, should be added only if noteworthy, relevant and documented in multiple reliable third-party sources. Wikipedia is not a newspaper and material should not be added if it is only gossip or has little longer-term importance, or if the only sourcing is tabloid journalism.

If challenged, the onus is on the editor who adds the content to justify its retention. Thank you. KyleJoan talk 02:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Natasha Bassett, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. WP:DOB is to be taken seriously. Toddst1 (talk) 22:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Rachele Schank moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rachele Schank, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:02, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rachele Schank
Hello, Mithoron. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rachele Schank, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emelina Adams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minx.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)