User talk:Moebiusuibeom-en

Errores en los mapas de trenes eléctricos y red ferroviaria Gran Buenos Aires
El tramo Avellaneda-Quilmes no está ni estuvo en obras de electrificación pese a todos los anuncios oficiales que hubo. Si está en planes pero nada se hizo.

Faltan las siguientes estaciones en el mapa de la Linea Roca

Yrigoyen (Buenos Aires) Don Bosco (Quilmes) Sourigues (Berazategui) Santa Sofia (Florencio Varela) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.46.117.162 (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Cordoba Metro
Dear Moebiusuibeom-en I have recently created this article and I was wondering if you could help me to improve it. Please let me know! Regards --Fercho85 (talk) 07:16, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Transportation
Dear Moebiusuibeom-en since you wrote to me in english I will talk to you in the same language.. Firstly I personally agree with you in changing Metro to Underground, nonetheless the term was not wrong, regarding the term tram I think it is better to change it by light rail since tram is "a railborne vehicle, lighter than a train, designed for the transport of passengers (and/or, very occasionally, freight) within, close to, or between villages, towns and/or cities, primarily on streets" whereas light rail "is a form of urban rail public transportation that generally has a lower capacity and lower speed than heavy rail and metro systems" Finally I will reorder the pictures if you don't agree please let me know.. --Fercho85 (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

TAVe
Estimado amigo, el articulo "Buenos Aires-Rosario-Córdoba high-speed railway" no tiene nada que ver con la linea TAVe Mar del Plata asi que parafrase tu valiosa informacion en una sección aparte dentro del articulo:  "The Mar del Plata connection", Saludos ~ Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 23:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Si tenes razon yo no me di cuenta.. y agrege como si fuera toda una sola linea..que bien que te diste cuenta si no yo ya metia que iba de cordoba a mar del plata. Un Abrazo Fercho85 04:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Fotos
como andas.. quedaron re bien las fotos en el articulo de puerto madero, estaba pensando la idea de poner una galeria porque tengo un toco de fotos mas para publicar ¿que te parece?..Si te interesan fotos de transporte o edificios avisáme porque a mi tambien como te dije tengo un toco de fotos... Fercho85 04:18, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

-Hola como andas.. perdona no te contestaba porque estaba de vacaciones..:s con respecto a lo del articulo en ingles de transporte quisiera saber si te parece poner en vez del tranvia un tren de TBA? esta bien la verdad que el tram no representa ni en joda al transporte de BA pero que querias que agrege una imagen del San Martin..? Despues estaba pensando de sacar el barquito ese y poner el tram que te parece?.Ah y lo ultimo..me borraron la imagen del mapa del tranvia no se porque, asi por que si creo que es por la licencia o algo igual la subo de nuevo pero decime que tengo que ponerle..bueno un abrazo salu2

Fercho85 02:18, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

-che perdona.. no sabia que vos habias puesto la imagen del bondi de ser asi no la hubiese sacado..(va ni me fije en historial) lo que paso es que pense que la foto estaba hace mucho tiempo y dije bue la saco pero no, no pienses que voy ahi por la vida cambiando imagenes y aparte que ya arreglamos de modificar fotos de articulos juntos..Salu2

PD:cuando termine de subir todas las fotos arreglamos para la seccion de transporte..

Fercho85 08:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

List of Puerto Rico railroads
I'm just dropping by to let you know I agree with the merge between List of Puerto Rico railroads and Rail transport in Puerto Rico. Feel free to do it yourself, I doubt they'll be any objections. Peace. - Mtmelendez (Talk 12:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Article Assessment
Dear Mtmelendez, in reference to San Juan-Caguas Rail article which has been rated as a  “Start-Class” on the quality scale, I believe article should be re-examined and re-rated to “GA” or “B” at least for the reason that great lengths to provide the correct information have been applied, direct contact with Alstom and High Rest images have been provided by them and all References available have been included and even contact with the Mayor's office in Caguas. I do agree that some minor editing may be needed.

The “importance scale” rating may also need to be relabeled since this project is of the outmost importance on an island where “Urban Sprawl” is rapidly dwindling the island's countryside and mass transportation has been proven to improve the environment. Please let me know your thoughts. Sincerely Moebiusuibeom-en 15:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Response
Hey, Moebiusuibeom-en. Sorry for responding so late, I hadn't noticed your comment on your talk page. ~ I've read the San Juan-Caguas Rail and I agree with you in part that the article is better than Start class, so I've re-assessed it as B. However, I can't assess it as GA until it passes as a Good Article (see WP:GA), it's policy and we can't do anything about that.

As for the importance, I know that this assessment is a controversial issue. I assessed it as Low because it is a planned construction project that is basically notable within most parts of Puerto Rico and in closely-related rail transport groups, but not say outside of such focus groups. This is different to the Tren Urbano, which has been subject to stories because it services the metro area of Puerto Rico, was very expensive, and used $1 billion in federal funds. However, you can change the assessment if you really think that its undeserving, but please be advised that consensus has been reached as to the importance scale of articles. So for example, don't assess it as Top or High, because that class is reserved for the most important articles and topics of Puerto Rico, such as Puerto Rico, History of Puerto Rico, Transportation in Puerto Rico, etc.

P.S. I'm trying to elevate the Rail transport in Puerto Rico to GA class by copy-editing and adding references to important info, and I could really use your help. I see you've added sourced info to sections which I deleted because I couldn't find any. Drop me a message to see how we can collaborate, ok? - Mtmelendez (Talk 15:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Hello Mtmelendez, thanks for looking over San Juan-Caguas Rail, agree 100%.


 * In regards to Rail transport in Puerto Rico, I've got lots of references, most of it in books in boxes (there aren't many thought), gladly I would help, it'll take some time, there is some changes that could be done immediately, shortly I'll take a look at Article which "could easily be reclassified", but we must keep it real though, the Bayamon train in the park I believe is dead and should be eliminated, Trolleys of San Juan are not mentioned anywhere and I've got info that I'm preparing.


 * I've recategorized Tren Urbano as you've noticed, if it's incorrect or if i make any mistakes feel free to comment. – Sincerely – Moebiusuibeom-en 14:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Awesome. The Rail transport in Puerto Rico article really needs "hard" sources (i.e. sources from printed books), because it basically uses sources from the internet, and those can change at any time. If you could add hard sources, it could really improve it.


 * Yes, I saw the Tren Urbano article. I removed certain categories because they were redundant (i.e. we don't need to categorize as rapid transit, when rapid transit in the US is already included). I also included more specific sub-categories for public transport and subways. If you want more info on what I did, check out Categorization.


 * Hey, you may want to join the WikiProject Puerto Rico. Its a community within Wikipedia composed of editors interested in editing Puerto Rican articles. Check it out! - Mtmelendez (Talk 04:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)


 * HI Mtmelendez, I'm willing to help, my aim is to put Puerto Rico on an international level!, join the WikiProject Puerto Rico may be next, love your island,  Cheers _ Moebiusuibeom-en 04:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Muchas gracias
Gracias por tu trabajo...ya veo que por ahora eres el unico interesado en mejorar las paginas de informacion sobre Rep Dom...Ando buscando wikipedians para que ayuden pero no encuentro muchos...Gracias Por tus cambios..EdwinCasadoBaez 01:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Estimado EdwinCasadoBaez; Ni un problema, me interesan temas de índole urbanística, ferroviaria y ambiental. Colaboro en Español e Inglés y algunas traducciones a otras lenguas, cualquier ayuda a vuestros hermanos latinoamericanos sera un placer! Moebiusuibeom-en 15:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey
Thanks for the help out...yeah i am trying hard but is just that i dont have enough sources to find info about santiago. I am trying to get some dominican people to help me develop this article because i think am not able to develop alone...thanks for your help..i really appreciate!And i'm sorry that i added those categories without having info about them..I just copied the standards from WP:Cities EdwinCasadoBaez 06:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Other languages in Cataño, Puerto Rico
Nope. The lenguage links go to real articles. However, I have noticed vandalism in other articles by linking to other language articles which are not related to the original english article, like linking the English Luis A. Ferre article with the Spanish Constitution of Puerto Rico article. The English Luis A. Ferre article should only be linked to the Spanish Luis A. Ferre article. Be on the lookout for those. - Mtmelendez (Talk 16:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Response - I don't think there's any policy on the order in which the languages should be listed. I believe the best route is to list them by order of which will users be looking for, which is probably the Spanish one. SO, to answer your question, Puerto Rico related articles should probably list Spanish as the first alternate language link in an article. But that's my personal opinion. - Mtmelendez (Talk 23:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The convention is to list interwikis alphabetically. Joelito (talk) 02:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I learn something new every day. - Mtmelendez (Talk 04:34, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Redirecting: It's very simple. That's it. The most important thing to remember is that Redirects should not be taken lightly. If an article already exists, like List of Puerto Rico railroads, be sure to notify users in the talk page of your suggestion to eliminate the article and redirect it to a better one. Some users might not agree with you. - Mtmelendez (Talk 04:34, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Blank the page (i.e. use the edit feature, and delete everything in the page), but don't save yet...
 * 2) Insert the name of the article which the page you're editing will redirect
 * 3) Either use the #R button on the edit bar just above the edit box, or just type #REDIRECT Insert text, placing the name of the article where Insert text is.
 * 4) Save the page.

New Section: “Trolley” de San Juan
The info you added to the Rail transport in Puerto Rico is good indeed, but remember to try and find sources. I know it's hard, I've been there myself. But there's bound to be something out there. - Mtmelendez (Talk 01:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Santo Domingo
Well you have become one of my friends over here in wikipedia and i want you to do me a favor Moebiusuibeom!!!!can you please check the Santo Domingo Article and tell me your opinions! I think the article should be reviewd and be given B-Class!what do you say??EdwinCasadoBaez 05:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

San Juan, Puerto Rico
I see what you mean. I think some information in the section does belong there, including the different districts and some notable, though definitely not all, buildings and structures. The section should be divided between Natural geography and Districts (or communities, barrios, etc.). A good example is the Geography of Washington, D.C. article.

But the whole article is a mess, just like you said. It needs a lot of work. - Mtmelendez (Talk 14:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

RE:Arturo Alfonso Schomburg
The reason that I prefer the first image placed to the right of the introductary paragraph is because I find that it would not distract the reader as it would if it was placed on the left. It could be placed on the left, there is no policy as to were an image can be placed, but I personally feel that the article should have as its starting point the paragraph and not the image.

That said, let me tell you that I am gald that you have joined us here in Wikipedia. We need more people like you to help keep Puerto Rico "en alto". If you ever need me for anything, do not hesitate to ask. Tony the Marine 03:45, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey Moebiusuibeom-en...Replies
Well..First of all i think Your Changes were excellent in The Zona Colonial Page. I Believe you a great editor and I Have to give thanks to you for making the article more encyclopedia looking(As you may see, I don't have such a good vocabulary for Encyclopedias!) Thanks for helping me develop this Articles and posting those two images.
 * About the Changes you made in Ciudad Colonial:

Regarding your question about the TEST you made in the Article i think it looks good and it could stay there if you want to(You can ask another wikipedian for his opinion too if you want!).

"Hey, did some "tweaking" here too, tried to fusion together Ciudad Colonial with Zona Colonial District since Ciudad Colonial is Articles Name and it's also UNESCO's name but apparently to the masses its known as Zona Colonial District, please clear me up on this subject and if changes i did don't make sense let me know, I've also re-rated articles since I believe they where truly underrated"... Well, I could say that Zona Colonial is a more familiar name for dominicans and tourist but that the more correct name is Ciudad Colonial(and this is how the goverment refers to it in most cases). Well anyways i Redirected both names into one Article so people could find it more easily.
 * your Questions

um!!by the way did you re-rated the Articles of Zona Colonial(Ciudad Colonial) and Santo Domingo???they seen to have the same rating as before because they had Start Class Already and i believe that the Santo Domingo article should be rated B-Class?shouldn't it?
 * Re-Rating??

You told me to merge The Article Ciudad Trujillo Into Santo Domingo Which i already did in the beginning of the article...Should I make it separated or Leave the same way it is?.... And yeah am planning on putting a Music Section into the Santo Domingo Article when i have more Information and Sources! EdwinCasadoBaez 02:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
 * SANTO DOMINGO ARTICLE:

Re: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Thanks, I have been kind of inspired while doing it and with the help of Tony the Marine I have formated and referenced it up a bit, a few more refs and a check for grammatical errors and it's going up as a GAC, if you see something you think needs some tweaks just let me know and I will fix it, Peace. - 凶 17:18, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


 * gotcha – Moebiusuibeom-en 04:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Say by any chance are good at doing copy-edits? I think all the points have been attended exept that one, but I err... suck at doing those, if you are good a them can you take care of it? -- 凶 20:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks, the page still has the nesesity of a peer review but we should try to have it at it's best by then, Peace. -- 凶 21:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)


 * ... I just found this while intending to post a message to MtMelendez:

''Hello dear colleague, I think we got a problem, maybe I'm mistaken, you've mentioned me that a good article should have good references… "hard" sources (i.e. sources from printed books), because it basically uses sources from the internet, and those can change at any time. If you could add hard sources, it could really improve it., I truly believe this and go overboard getting "good hard evidence" for my contributions, well, did you take a look at San Juan, Puerto Rico, there are "64 References and counting", many of them are even "flaky", it looks like a time bomb, i know User: Dark Dragon Flame may have good intentions, but some may even consider this vandalism, check out what he has written to me User talk:Moebiusuibeom-en in reference to: User talk: Dark Dragon Flame; Re: San Juan, Puerto Rico, in other words, I have to inform him of any tweaks i may find and he will change them!''

The worst part of it is that you go to a collegue's talk page to express this istead of communicating it to me. That aside no all references have to be from books, and there is no chance in hell that this will or can be considered vandalism. Second I never told you that you had to inform me, I told you if you needed help with anything to ask me. You were the one to leave me a message in my talk page saying "good work" instead of saying your concern with the refs, talk abou being hypocrite. - 凶 07:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

I've responded to your concerns here. - Mtmelendez (Talk 21:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey. I've read your response at User talk:Dark Dragon Flame, and I admire your sincerity. The best thing to do was to talk to Dark Dragon Flame directly and discuss and settle issues and questions directly. It avoids misunderstandings.

But don't sweat. These things happen all the time, and I've been in much worse situations than this believe me. We just keep going on. Your contributions are good and highly necessary, so I just hope we can just get on to editing. Paz. - Mtmelendez (Talk 23:25, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh My bad
sorry!...i though the stations were already proposed according to some article i read...but probably it wasnt true..Anyways thanks for the editing!EdwinCasadoBaez 13:50, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Diplomacy
It seems to make sense considering that the Puerto Rico page doesn't have such a section at this moment, I already cleaned it up so it may be just a matter of copy and paste there, probably excluding the "sister cities". However a line mentioning the existense of such embassies should be placed somewhere in the page. - 凶 17:03, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey Moeb. What about having a short mention on both articles (San Juan and Puerto Rico), and adding the referenced list to the Politics of Puerto Rico article? - Mtmelendez (Talk 11:14, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, I learn something new everyday. - Mtmelendez (Talk 14:55, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Solo se que no se nada?
That's interesting. Wasn't that a quote from Aristotles (I'm not good in spelling his name). I just happen to see you quote him in Mtmelendez' page and that is one of my favorite quotes. You may be interested in the following conversation:. Tony the Marine 20:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Giant avocados in Plaza .jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Giant avocados in Plaza .jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Aguacates en la Plaza .jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Great avocados in Plaza .jpg. The copy called Image:Great avocados in Plaza .jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 17:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Golden Mile, Puerto Rico
Yeah, I know what you mean. But I got a better idea... why not merge and include it as a section in the San Juan, Puerto Rico article? The Golden Mile won't have much more content except added pictures, and adding it to San Juan as a new section of Geography could improve its chances of becoming a GA. What do you think? - Mtmelendez (Talk 11:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, I've given this some thought, and I came to the conclusion that maybe we should either merge Golden Mile with Hato Rey (since it is a subdivision) or merge both articles with Subdivisions of San Juan, Puerto Rico. Merging them with San Juan would make it bloated, and WP:MOS states that main articles should contain only generalized info in the main article's (San Juan's) subtopics (subdivisions), with links to the corresponding sub-articles. - Mtmelendez (Talk 17:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Tabebuia-schumanniana.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Tabebuia-schumanniana.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Tabebuia-schumanniana.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Tabebuia-schumanniana.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Mi Hermano
As you know too often the contributions which Hispanics have made have often been overlooked. This must stop! I believe that you should look at this and express yourself. Tony the Marine 06:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Jardín Botánico
Yes, thanks. The article is shaping up nicely, and I appreciate your good work.

I happened across this, as I worked a bit on an article about the Botanical Garden in St. Vincent, as an example of British colonial "economic botany" projects. This work was done by the East India Company's military surgeons, such as Dr. Hugh Falconer in India and Dr. Young in St. Vincent; some of them were excellent scientists.

Regarding Schaffner's position: Of course, he may have left his position, but I wouldn't know about that.

This is what the University's web page (May 29) says:

Equipo de Trabajo Dr. Fred Schaffner     Director, Jardín Botánico Sr. Carlos R. Díaz 	Oficial Ejecutivo Dr. Eugenio Santiago 	Director del Herbario Agro. Carlos Sánchez 	Coordinador, División de Educación y Relaciones con la Comunidad Sr. Rafael Rodríguez 	Jefe de Operaciones Sr. Walter Schellhorn 	Supervisor de Jardinería Sr. Angel M. Orta 	Encargado de la Brigada de Servicios y Saneamiento Sr. Cruz Cañuelas 	Supervisor de Construcción Sra. Daisy Santisteban 	Asistente Administrativa Sra. Betsy Roque 	Auxiliar en Contabilidad Sr. Heriberto Pabón 	Mensajero Sra. Ana Pereira 	Mecanógrafa Sra. Carmen Z. Santiago Mecanógrafa Sra. Lillian Dávila 	Guía Interpretativa, Jardín Botánico Sra. Carmencita Orria 	Guía Interpretativa, Jardín Botánico Fconaway 08:19, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

San Juan, Puerto Rico
No problem. I thought the section was pretty good, and you did all the hard work finding the references and the pictures. I was just tidying up for future GA nomination.

Hey, did you hear? San Juan is now a GA! Check it out! - Mtmelendez (Talk 10:31, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The best part has to be this the improvement is notable and it's satisfiying when hard work pays up, I will file a peer review request shortly to attend any issue remaining to have this article in shipping condition when it's nominated for Featured Article. - 凶 13:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Definitely. Also worth mentioning: I recently nominated Rail transport in Puerto Rico for GA. Please keep a close eye in case a reviewer offers suggestions. I hope it can pass too. - Mtmelendez (Talk 16:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

San Juan Botanical Garden
Remember that this article is about the garden, not the plants. And adding two much detail on such (like "striking") shouldn't be in an article, lest we get some arguments of POV from other users. Let's just try to include info on the Garden. But I do like the photo though. Where did you get it? Is it yours? - Mtmelendez (Talk 20:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I just reviewed the San Juan Botanical Garden article, making minor edits. I think the article is well written and sourced, but I feel it needs more info before nominating it for GA. Maybe include more information on its management, features, construction, plans, university uses, and such. - Mtmelendez (Talk 21:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but remember that the article is about the Botanical garden, not about the whole subject of Botany. You may want to start an article on Botany in Puerto Rico, and merge info on the Botanical Garden as well as UPR studies on botany, and the flora of Puerto Rico. It's a big task, but it could be a great article. - Mtmelendez (Talk 22:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

The revisions to this article on June 30th amount to a very hostile and deprecating or belittling review of the San Juan Botanical Garden. Some things can be restored, but others require verification (such as the *comment* that the orchid collection is nonexistent!). Can you help?Fconaway 19:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Portal:Puerto Rico
Hey! The Puerto Rico Portal page has been revamped with additional content, including a Selected series of Articles, Pictures, and Biographies related to Puerto Rico. However, maintaining a Portal is no easy task. As a member of the WikiProject Puerto Rico, please consider helping out in one of the following tasks:


 * You can add Puerto Rico current events and news to the In the news... section as they occur.
 * You can participate in the discussion of Nominations for content nominated to Selected status.
 * You can nominate content for Selected status in the Nominations page.

Your help and contributions are greatly appreciated. Enjoy the Portal! - Mtmelendez (Talk 04:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This is an automated message for all WikiProject Puerto Rico participants.

San Juan's tables
Yo Moeb I have an idea for the tables, I will post it here when I finish coding it. - 凶 17:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

According to the U.S.C.B. Excluding Rio Piedras


 * Here it is, I think we should use this since it allows the reader to see the chart in full detail and it doesn't spread outside the "Demographics" sub section, what do you think? - 凶 18:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * What has me worried is that they take up more than one section, in the past I was forced to make sure that images only took space in their respective section to pass FACs, that's why I think we should hide them, it's basically the usual JPG format inside a box and the tables can be seen in full detail. - 凶 18:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I did a Test 1 to give a clearer idea of what I mean. - 凶 18:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I know, but I have been trough this before and believe me when reviewers don't have anything to bite off they follow image location and table format. - 凶 18:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Yup, there is a [show] button at the side of both titles if you click there the tables come out in their full detailed size, perhaps a small line detailing how to show them might be useful. - 凶 00:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Bizarre they should be visible, from what you tell me I think there might be something wrong with your cache, either way I will add a message for now and call it a day, we can see what happens with it tommorow. - 凶 02:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I am starting to think this is taking too much time, perhaps we should finish the other points in the Peer Review and comeback to it after they have been attended, in my opinion prose addition should take priority since it requires more work. - 凶 22:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


 * A custom map would be great, a visible map is an important part of a article regarding a city. I will work with some prose on the sports section when I come back tonight, peace. - 凶 19:08, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Not really, I just moved the "Notable residents" to there temporaly, my intention is to fuse it with a new section on "Arts and culture" where we can mention some notable artists and sportsmen and add the "see also" link on top. - 凶 19:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Just busy
Hey! Sorry I haven't kept tabs, I've been really busy with work these past few days, and it looks like its going to get busier. I've logged on for a few minutes each day just to check recent changes, but yes, I have noticed 凶 's and your work. The article is looking really good now. After answering the peer review suggestions, I would submit it to another peer review just to make sure it has everything (also, ask Joelito to review it, he's really good at that). Then, on to FA! - Mtmelendez (Talk 10:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Arts and Culture in San Juan
Ok here are some links   with some information that I will be working with when I return on Sunday (perhaps late Saturday), this in combination with "Notable Residents" might make a decent section, any ideas of more to add to said section? - 凶 21:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I have been attending some personal issues and I haven't seen today's newspaper, I will add the section tommorow when I have some free time perhaps then we can see what is missing from a better perspective. -- 凶 23:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok I have created a new section and posted it on User:Dark Dragon Flame/Sandbox, I decided to post it here so we can work it to perfection before posting it on the article. I think a sub section on the history of Music is a good idea but I have no sources for that information, perhaps Mtmelendez may have some info since he is especialized in history, anyways feel free to edit the section on my sand box as you seem fit to improve it,I will be back in a few hours to add some references to it, Peace. - 凶 00:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * BTW, Image:Puerta de san juan-.jpg looks great where you added it, and the photo of the Museo de Arte de Puerto Rico would be a great addition to the new section. - 凶 00:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Check it out now, I think it's good enought to replace "Notable Residents" as it is, what do you think? - 凶  01:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks, so you are tackling the music section? - 凶 02:10, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * A section on tourism is a good idea, btw I have developed a "Economy" section wich I will add sometime during the day, after I reference it. -- 凶 07:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I reverted to the revision when you added the "Tourism" section, all seems to be in place. When adding references some times if you leave the last part of the template as it will eat the text, I don't know if this is the case but just letting you know - 凶 19:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok I restored your additions to "Tourism" and added a new "Economy" section, where we stand the article can probably pass a Featured Article Candidature, I suggest you add the "Recreation and Parks" section and we ask someone to do some text cleanup and we nominate. As a side note would you be interested in improving Ponce? I am heading there when San Juan makes FA. - 凶 23:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Tourism needs some expansion, I will copy Encarta's entry on this and leave it on my Sandbox please see if something can be useful, the reference is already being used on the page. I will not be available for a few days but I hope this helps, you can ask Joelito for a review as Mtmelendez suggested before. We definitely need a map. - 凶 03:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Featured article
I thought this might interest you: El Hatillo Municipality, Miranda; to use as yet another example for San Juan, Puerto Rico. It's a featured article about a municipality in Venezuela. Although they are different cities, the layout and content might prove suitable for San Juan. Hope its useful. - Mtmelendez (Talk 02:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lucien-Achille_Mauzan.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lucien-Achille_Mauzan.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Sunshine Man 17:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Re:Two things
I like the list of Argentine people separated by topic; it seams much more usefull than the plain list. I'm still not sure about the purpose of the article anyway.

On the google his, if I got yo right, it would take a lot of work (or a good script) to make a ranking of those articles on google hits...

--Mariano (t/c) 17:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Main Page
Surprise! History of Puerto Rico has been selected for presentation on the Main Page for Monday, June 18, 2007 (tomorrow!). My congratulations to all editors who helped bring this important Puerto Rican topic to FA, especially to Joelito. But don't celebrate yet. There's two important things we should do: Well, gente, take pride that on June 18, Puerto Rico's history will be presented on the grandest of pages in Wikipedia. Peace! - Mtmelendez (Talk 10:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Review the article. Since it became FA, it has received extensive edits from users, and therefore may need copy-editing and MOS-adjustments for presentation. Some users related to the Main Page-selection process have already made many edits, and we should continue their good work to make sure the article is pristine.
 * 2) WATCH IT!! Given the Main Page's exposure (millions view it every day), FA articles which are presented there get viewed by many people, including vandals. Please watch the page carefully, reverting vandalism as you go. I've seen Main Page articles get overwhelmed with vandalism, and since many more people keep going to it on the Main Page, we don't want them to see a vandalized article. This is a 24 hour task (as long as its presented), and requires the collaboration of the entire Puerto Rico WikiProject.

Almost there...
I have been working with information to expand the tourism section, it should be ready by today. We need a reference for the information about the San Juan Waterfront, I'm not sure if you added it but if you took info from somewhere and need me to format the references I will gladly do it. See you later Colega. - 凶 07:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok I added the information to the tourism section in San Juan as promised. I was thinking that perhaps we should fuse the "Economy" and "Tourism" sections and create a new Economy and Tourism one, what do you think? - 凶 22:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Lucien-Achille Mauzan.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lucien-Achille Mauzan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

History of Puerto Rico
PD means public domain. Please read Public_domain regarding the use of stamps as free images. Specifically, it states that works of the U.S. Postal Service are subject to copyright.

Regarding the alignment of images I changed them back for two reasons:
 * 1) having left and right-aligned images does not look good at all resolutions (especially left-aligned images).
 * 2) personal preference. Usually esthetical issues are left to the original author's preferences.

On a final note I must agree that you have done an excellent job on PR-related articles. Please remember that I have ample experience in Wikipedia and its processes/procedures and my decisions reflect that. Regards. Joelito (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Life been somewhat hectic these days, about History of Puerto Rico I replied here, cheers. - 凶 01:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

San Juan FAC
Ok I decided to be bold and I will nominated San Juan as a Featured Article Candidate later today, the peer review has already been attended and archived, in the past I have followed this pattern when raising pages to Featured Article and so far my personal believe is that this is the best way to raise the pages to this status because unlike a Peer Review in FACs there is a massive ammount of people reviewing the articles and willing to help improve it, thanks for all the work you have done in this article and I think we along Mtmelendez make a good team capable of raising all of the remaining articles about Puerto Rico's municipalities if we have the time and focus on doing so, cheers. - 凶 10:29, 23 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Jardin Botanico, been a while since I been there nice calm place as far as I remember. I think that my focus will be on the articles about the municipalities per se but as usual I might be able to work several pages at the same time (for example I have been working with Ejercito Popular Boricua and Héctor Lavoe while working San Juan) and my next goal is Ponce, my logic lies in if we raise the articles about these big cities with a long history and details first the work might flow better when raising the remaining pages as in No dejes para mañana lo que puedes hacer hoy. Now I think Milla de Oro should be merged in Hato Rey and so on. As for the coffee it may be a little hard at this moment, I am moving with my girlfriend to Orlando to study in the campus of La Universidad del Turabo located there on July 1st, so you can imagine how busy we have been with all the packing for the moving, this is the main reason for my limited time here lately and the reason behind why I nominated San Juan for FAC this fast. I will be contributing from a hotel next week until we locate to our new house, but I will hopefully make it back to the island by christmas to visit the family. - 凶 20:44, 23 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah Boricua Popular Army is extreme that's the reason I picked it up, for some reason people don't like fixing controversial articles, I really don't care about politics but cleaning that page up was a challenge and I took it. We will see what happens with the mile, the article could probably grow but Hato Rey looks so thin... Be back tommorow, cheers.- 凶 05:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Dissapointed
It is I who am disappointed in your behavior. Humbleness will get you farther than "have you seen what the articles we're working on looked like three months ago, A MESS, please consult anyone,". I could say the same about the articles I have worked on but I don't.

Have you consider that it was you who should have discussed the changes to the article before performing them not I? The article was promoted to FA with the images aligned to the right after all. Again, I am very dissapointed in your behavior. Joelito (talk) 00:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Santiago light rail
Con mucho gusto. Cleduc 10:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bar_in_Campo_Alegre.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bar_in_Campo_Alegre.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Look closely to the right of the image at http://www.flickr.com/photos/sminor/212752825/ under "Additional information" and you will see a link with the words "Some rights reserved." If you click on that link, you will see that the license the photographer chose does not allow commercial use. This is a non-free image by Wikipedia policy and should be deleted. -Nv8200p talk 21:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * But WIkipedia is trying to create free content that anyone can use, non-profit or commercial. If the photographer will change the license that would be great. If the image gets deleted before he changes his license, you can always re-upload the image. -Nv8200p talk 02:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Could you please check over the article of Santo Domingo Metro. I edited a couple of things and added a few images..could you reply your opinion please?EdwinCasadoBaez 06:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

hey long time, could you ckeck over the Santo domingo Metro article and point out what you think is wrong?EdwinCasadoBaez (talk) 05:13, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Villa Devoto
Hi! I wanted to ask you why you deleted the data about Devoto "R" in Villa Devoto... Does it look too unimportant to you? Regards. --Damifb (talk) 13:45, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your answer. I'll search for the lacking infos :) --Damifb (talk) 21:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

San Fernando, Buenos Aires
Don't know why you de-wikified San Fernando, Buenos Aires without a proper comment, so it had to be reverted. We are trying to wikify articles. Would you care to explain your reasoning behind the edit? (BTW, cool username). Happy wiking! -- Alexf (Talk/Contribs) 19:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Alexf, most partidos of Greater Buenos Aires have individual cities and towns and i'm working on filling in "quality data" for several Cities in Buenos Aires Province and categorising them as "Cities in Buenos Aires Province". I'm also filling in Barios of Buenos Aires city amongst other articles, regards Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 19:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Still doesn't explain the de-wikification of lengths and distances. It's great that you are working to improve those articles. Just don't hard-code distance/measurement conversions. -- Alexf (Talk/Contribs) 19:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:File 48105 42974.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:File 48105 42974.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Image issue
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:CZA8754_Alstom_%3FM_Czamanske.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-3.0 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you.
 * I didn't actually delete the image, but they are often deleted to avoid having non-compliant licensed images floating around. However, please re-upload the image if you are able to license it with one that will work on Wikipedia, as specified above.  Thanks.-- Kubigula (talk) 14:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Licensing advice
Hello again. First, let me thank you for putting in the effort to get this image for WP - it's a great photo. Second, let me apologize for how tricky the process is - copyright is complex, so the process is unfortunately complex too.

I understand that you received permission from ALSTOM via email. However, the current response you have from ALSTOM is probably not specific enough. It sounds like they would agree to license the image under the "cc-by-sa-3.0" license. So, my suggestion is to email them again and ask if they will agree to license the image under "cc-by-sa-3.0" - the link to the actual license is here, if they want to read exactly what it means. I think it's basically the legal version of what they have already agreed to. After that, I recommend emailing a copy of your request and ALSTOM's response to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, so there is a permanent record of the permission.-- Kubigula (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:CZA8756 Alstom ?M Czamanske.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:CZA8756 Alstom ?M Czamanske.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Line B .png
Thank you for uploading Image:Line B .png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Line-B .png
Thank you for uploading Image:Line-B .png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:39, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mapa Tren de la Costa .jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Mapa Tren de la Costa .jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Urquiza Line
Hi Moebiusuibeom, There's nothing wrong with your English - I only wish my Spanish was as good!

I have been thinking about setting up separate articles for each of the B.A. suburban railway lines: Linea Belgrano Sur/Norte, Linea San Martin, Linea Mitre, Linea Roca and, of course, Linea Urquiza, which you have just done. I have included a description of these lines in the articles relating to the companies which operate these lines: Metrovias, Metropolitano and TBA, and am planning to move this information to the new articles.

Do you happen to know when the name 'Linea Urquiza' first came into use for describing the B.A. suburban section of the rail network that used to be operated by FC General Urquiza? - was it after privatisation in the 1990s?

Keep up the good work. Best Regards David(Talk • Contribs) 13:14, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi Moebiusuibeom, Your input is much appreciated!! It would be great if you could add maps to the 6 new Linea xx (Buenos Aires) articles. I don't understand the whole question of copyright very well so I have avoided so far getting involved with pictures. Yes I used 'Linea', rather than 'Line', because that is part of the official name in Argentina. Incidentally I missed the accent from the 'i' in Linea in all 6 new articles by mistake as I'm sure you've already noticed!! In the case of the Linea Mitre (Buenos Aires) I notice that you have added the Retiro - Rosario- Santa Fe service. Is this strictly part of the Linea Mitre service?? I thought Linea Mitre refers only to the BA suburban services. David(Talk • Contribs) 01:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations on your new map of BA Rail services - an excellent piece of work which must have taken you a long time. I would have been in touch sooner but I have been away on holiday for the last 2 weeks. Can you make the names of the various lines into links to the relevant article? Keep up the good work. Best regards David(Talk • Contribs) 13:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

I like your Belgrano Sur route map very much. Well done! Sorry I haven't been in touch sooner. David(Talk • Contribs) 09:54, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Premetro_Map2.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Premetro_Map2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 03:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

RE:Placebox
Hi, It could be posiible to add a map of the province/greater buenos aires (like they have on dutch wikipedia) but I dont know how to do it. It just needs the map adding into the placebox parameters and linking so that it displays the pushpin according to the coordinates in the placebox. I'll raise the issue with User:Blofeld of SPECTRE since he did the work on adding the map of Argentina to the placebox in the first place. Kind regards, English   peasant  16:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

The national map should stay but another map of the location of the city on the province would help certainly. Many settlements have two maps -one national and one provincial to improve understanding  ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦       $1,000,000? 16:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Would it be possible to auto generate the other maps using the coordinates in the placebox? In the same way that the national map is generated. If it is I'd fully support your proposal. I would say that the Greater Buenos Aires map could probably just supersede the provincial map for places in Greater Buenos Aires in order to avoid map overkill and it would be great to include pushpin provincial maps for the other provinces too English   peasant  19:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi,could you point me to the discussion about the Argentina placebox, I haven't seen anything said at all for 12 days. BLOFELD and I made it clear that it would be OK to make modifications to the placebox, but you didn't respond, how is that discussion/analysis? You can change it now if you like, I don't know how to make maps so I can't do it and BLOFELD is busy, although maybe he would do it for you if you ask him nicely. Also please read Category, English   peasant  02:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)



It is a shame if you think removing the infobox is a good idea. There is a drive to add an infobox settlement to every place and a locator map and I believe i speak for may others think they are a very useful asset to articles. I;m afraid as you are in Argentina you're not thinking globally and that many people across the world find it useful to see where it is located in the country, rather than yourself where it is likely to be localised -but I agree a more specific provincial locator iwould be useful but not if it means removing the other. All I can say is the infobox MUST NOT be removed on any article as this is considered vandalism but we can see about creating provincial locator maps in addition. If you think the infobox is too big, you can alter the size of the map anyway which reduces it. You would need to create something like Template:Location map Buenos Aires Province if you would like a pushpin regionally too, to make it work. Other than this I think it would be a good solution to find a map which displays the provincial boundaries within the country. If you see Callao in Peru I believe that sort of map kills two birds with one stone so to speak. Regards  ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦       $1,000,000? 12:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes the reason why we didn't use the image you see on the right was because it doesn't work -it places towns out in the Atlantic unfortunately. ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦      $1,000,000? 12:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * They use this one on Dutch wiki Image:Buenos aires province.png, They also have this one Image:Buenos Aires outline map.svg for Greater Buenos Aires. I am requesting that they be added as additional parameters to the settlement box. Additionally I would appreciate it if you refrained from accusing me of vandalism, I have added the settlement box to hundreds of other places without any complaints and I will eventually get round to doing all the settlements in Buenos Aires Province, Partido Cabeceras first, then the rest. It is better if we try and remain calm over content disputes rather than insulting each other. Regards  English   peasant  13:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * All places within Greater Buenos Aires will soo have the map you see on Tigre. Replacing it with a better one (something like the one on this article) should be easy. 1 edit to the location map template will change the map in all the placeboxes using the current one. If you think you can design it go ahead, but remember it has to be properly scaled or the pushpin wont work properly. Also see the two maps in use in the province of Bs As on Monte Hermoso. English   peasant  21:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I've started to create the provincial maps which I think solve some of the issues concerned ealrier, The thing is people who don;t live in Argentina often don't know where the provinces are and a national location mark puts the article in its geograpical place. I would advise against creating a new map unless it is based on official latitude and longitude grids where they would be compatible with the infobox and pin pointer. I don't like the see infoboxes too big either but the edits the peasant and I made earlier I think are a step in the right direction  ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦       $1,000,000? 21:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I don';t know if you are aware but I;ve created locator maps for over a hundred countries worldwide see User:Blofeld of SPECTRE/Missing locator maps. Most of them are very consistent with the usage of maps for each country, but unfortunately the Argentine one didn't work so we had to use a different one. If you compare the existing national one with dutch wikipedia you;ll see it is a big improvement over that. Personally I'd rather use the map per standard as on the above right but as I said it wasn't compatible with the pin  ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦       $1,000,000? 22:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Garita del Morro.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Garita del Morro.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Agüeybaná 15:37, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Imagenes del SDM
No hay problema amigo, voy a tratar de conseguir una nueva sin copyrights!!!una pregunta: Te gusta como esta el articulo, o crees que hay que hacerle mas cambios??(Santo Domingo Metro)EdwinCasadoBaez (talk) 07:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Argentine Railway Maps
I am looking forward to seeing the promised railway maps! Best wishes David(Talk • Contribs) 10:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Your maps are very neat. How do you produce them? For maps of BA suburban services I am happy with regular spacing of stations although maps with the proper scaled distances between stations will obviously convey more information. Eventually I would like to include maps of all the major British and French-owned companies where the distances are large and should, I think, be scaled. Best regards.David(Talk • Contribs) 16:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Villa General Belgrano.jpg
Hi, Moebiusuibeom-en

Are you the Michel Elena B mentioned in the summary of the abovementioned image? I only ask since the license tag imply that you are the author, but the description implies that you got the picture from someone else. Anrie (talk) 21:20, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I notice that you have been active since I posted this message, could you please take a minute to respond to my question? Anrie (talk) 09:44, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Grammar
Hi! Please watch out for this kind of error. It's "its", not "it's", which is a contraction for the long form "it is". ("It is" means Eso es and "its" means su). Regards. --Damifb (talk) 11:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but... professional level of English? You should change that... don't be mad at me... :)

--Damifb (talk) 11:57, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Fusion
Hi Moebiusuibeom-en, If I understand the discussion correctly the question is whether Linea Urquiza and F.C. Urquiza should have separate articles. My understanding is that Linea Urquiza is the urban portion of the former F.C.Urquiza and is still used as a name to refer to this service. I believe F.C.Urquiza is a name which went out of use after privatisation? If you live in Argentina you will be in a better position to know than me. I believe it's better to retain 2 separate articles. I am looking forward to seeing your maps. Best regards David(Talk • Contribs) 10:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:High speed railway map 2.jpg
Hi Moebiusuibeom-en!

We thank you for uploading Image:High speed railway map 2.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 21:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:File 48105 42974.jpg
Hi Moebiusuibeom-en!

We thank you for uploading Image:File 48105 42974.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation. This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Rail transport in Argentina
Hi there! I am not an admin, but I can tell you that writing an article after clicking "Edit this page" atop a redirect article is encouraged under WP:BOLD (more words in my talk page) - Go for it!... and happy writing. B.Wind (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I realize that creating an article from a redirect can be a bit tricky, since to get back to the redirect in order to edit you need to go via the "redirected from " notice which will be at the top of the article you are redirected to. OK, I have probably confused you even more now, so to make it simple, just click here and you will be ready to create an article for "Rail transport in Argentina". Good luck, and happy editing! :-) Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Sjakkalle. I knew I was forgetting something there. After the first dozen or so of these, it's easy to do this without thinking... and I plead "guilty as charged." B.Wind (talk) 00:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Image talk:Mapa Tren de la Costa 2 .jpg
Tren de la Costa, orientation of map: Is this map "upside down"??? Something fishy here! Peter Horn 01:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Estacion Zarate.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Estacion Zarate.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Estacion-Saldias.jpg
Could you please provide a link to the place where the author explicitly releases the image under CC 3.0 and GFDL? J Milburn (talk) 16:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid that permission for use on Wikipedia is not enough- the copyright holder will have to release it into the public domain or under a license Wikipedia counts as free. This is so that content is free for others than just Wikipedia to use. Could you possibly contact the uploader and request that it is released? J Milburn (talk) 17:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * If he emails you releasing the images, you can forward the email to OTRS, as explained here. If the copyright holder wants the image only to appear on Wikipedia, no where else, then I am afraid we cannot accept it, as we aim to have content that others can freely use. Is it alright if I delete the image until you have express permission, or do you think you will be able to get a reply pretty quickly? (On another note, I am aware how awkward requesting images is- it took me days of chatter to get the images on Connie Talbot released...) J Milburn (talk) 18:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * If push came to shove and it all ended up in court, they probably would be. In the mean time, it doesn't do much for Wikipedia's image and goals to have content against its policies lying around! Thanks for dealing with it, I'm sure OTRS will handle it from here. J Milburn (talk) 20:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's no problem! See you around J Milburn (talk) 20:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mauzan-Sublimes .jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mauzan-Sublimes .jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:31, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Tagging for WikiProject Trains
Thanks for the heads-up and additional information. I plan to take a look at it later tonight. With under control, I'm moving on to  and reassessing those listed there, along with sorting the pages in  into the appropriate classes. Slambo (Speak) 17:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lucien-Achille Mauzan 2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lucien-Achille Mauzan 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Colectivo Clasico.jpg
Hi. The flickr license for this image specified it was for non-commercial, non-derivative use only (cc-by-nc-nd-2.0). Unfortunately, Wikipedia may only accept cc-by or cc-by-sa images, please see free content for more info. Thanks, ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Red Ferrovial Metropolitana.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Red Ferrovial Metropolitana.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:23, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi
I noticed your edits on the articles on the Ford Falcons. Would you be able to look over the article on the Argentinian version for me and check there are no obvious errors or things that should be mentioned but aren't? I rewrote much of the article some time ago, relying on a combination of machine-translated sources and puzzling out more difficult words and phrases so it could certainly use some attention from a native speaker. Thanks -- Nevard 13:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I've added the disambig to the Aussie model. I'm afraid it was easiest for me to understand the cosmetic and superficial technical information (engine volume, etc) so that's why the bulk of the history is made up of that. I'm sure there's a lot of stuff on mechanical changes (tougher suspension, etc) that I missed. Some freely licensed photos would be good too but I doubt I could make myself understood to the people who've taken them. Nevard (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Hmm, thanks for the heads-up on that. I'd only seen the Spanish version before. The Italian and Lithuanian Wikipedias seems to be the only other language versions that use the disambig/model name pages we have going. I'd agree that a good summary article is probably the way to move forward rather than a couple of links on a disambig page, and the German article does look quite good. I think I might look at starting on one later tonight. Nevard (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Auto Union 1000
Thanks for adding some information about the car in Latin America. Interesting information.

However, I do not understand why you have hreaded up the info box with a picture of a DKW 3=6. The cars are similar but not identical, and the two major external differences - the name and the arrangement of the front - are the principal differences. Both of which are clear in this picture taken from the front. The picture you have selected is perfectly fine but it, surely, is of the wrong car. And you have left in the 'gallery' section at least one picture of the 'right' car.

But I did not (not yet...) switch them back in case you have a good reason for switching the images as you did! Please share any thoughts. Thanks   Regards   Charles01 (talk) 08:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I like that one - the one with the little Dutch flag on the front grill.  Actually I like the one with the extra lights too, because I think it's a slightly better focused, less distorted by the widening of the lens angle and and maybe a more unusual / interesting color and taken from a slightly better angle.   And the eye-lids - sad or not - are the sort of things people used put on their cars in the 1960s at least here in Europe.   But I suppose they do look a bit weird to the modern eye, and I don't see the point of them unless it was to correct some obscure propensity to dazzle which couldn't be corrected by the reflector within the lamp unit....   Not my area of expertise.
 * I guess I don't really have too strong an opinion either way between these two pictures. But please don't, on my account, hold off replacing the DKW picture with one of them!
 * Where am I from?  I'm born in and living in England, though I've lived in other places between times.   I've never been to South America, but my grandfather was born in Chile to which his grandfather had emigrated (from Michigan or maybe Wisconsin) 1857 to build railroads.   (I think he was a surveyor, so the man with the pencil rather than the man with a shovel:  he was quite plump and seems to have eaten too much sugar.) I guess that's my South American connection, but not a very recent one and it doesn't mean I can understand much Spanish.  Regards Charles01 (talk) 14:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I answered you on my user page on the little DKW / Auto Unions from the 1950s.  Though I don't think I have provided any very compelling reaction on your comments!   Regards  Charles01 (talk) 17:55, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Merge Uspallata Pass and Paso Libertadores
Are Uspallata Pass and Paso Libertadores the same pass? If they are they should be merged. Peter Horn 18:28, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Line A .png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Line A .png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:23, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

La Trochita page photo captions
You wrote that "Rewording captions as "dumped" is misleading, great efforts are being taken to keep this extensive long narrow gauge steam in working order witch i have witnessed!"

I don't doubt that you are sincere in your support for La Trochita, but your lack of familiarity with steam loco operation and maintenance has lead you to make a number of remarks that are incorrect, which is why I altered the captions.

There's nothing misleading about describing the two Henschels at Nahuel Pan as being dumped, for that's what they are. That's how professional steam railwaymen - which is what I am - describe engines that are no longer operable, and have little likelihood of being returned to traffic, which is the case for these two locos.

While you are correct to a point about engines being "cannibalised" for parts to keep other running, you've a made a number of assumptions which are incorrect.

Locos get withdrawn from service because they have major defects, and then they are stripped for parts afterwards. They aren't withdrawn if they are operable just to supply parts for other locos. Both the Nahuel Pan Henschels have boilers that are beyond economic repair - that they have been stripped of usable parts is secondary to that fact.

Your other mistaken assumption is that steam loco maintenance involves buying-in parts from the manufacturer or an aftermarket supplier. But this is usually not the case. One of the great advantages of steam over diesel is that most components are not proprietary, and can be made by tradesmen with relatively simple facilities and limited resources. What I saw at El Maiten was a good example of this. My observation of the workshop staff and facilities there is that they are quite capable of fabricating the sorts of small parts needed to keep the remaining engines in service for a few years more, such as rod and bearing brasses, piston rings, cylinder and valve chest liners, crosshead slippers, and the like.

Where they WILL have a problem in the future is sourcing new boilers when they need replacing. El Maiten is not equipped to fabricate new boilers, they are only set up for minor repairs or overhauls. No amount of cannibalising other engines will help in that situation.

All the best,

Mark. 124.254.122.251 (talk) 14:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

(Sorry, didn't see the bit about signing with tildes - will do so in future!)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.254.122.251 (talk) 14:01, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Puerta de san juan-.jpg
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Puerta de san juan-.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-3.0 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you. Vinhtantran (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Mercado street.jpg
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Mercado street.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-3.0 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you. Vinhtantran (talk) 15:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Tu-logo2.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tu-logo2.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Maximiliano Larroquette
A tag has been placed on Maximiliano Larroquette requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 21:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Geniol .jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Geniol .jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

all right then... I`ve read it.

--Gonza777 (talk) 13:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Tren a las Nubes
Tren a las Nubes. Why run the train for the whole route length in winter and not in summer? This paragraph makes no logical sense. Peter Horn 02:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Moebius, I'm OK, what about you? Snow is snow, the higher you go there is more of it and the more problems there are. But we do get enough of the stuff around Montreal and around Laval. Peter Horn 03:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello, See also Talk:Tren a las Nubes. Perhaps this discussion should continue there? Peter Horn 16:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

gallery widths
Hi. I've seen your recent edits to Draisine, particularly the adjustment to the gallery.

Can I just alert you to the fact that a value of 6 will extend a gallery beyond the width of a standard 1024x768 monitor? For the user to see the image, the page will need to be scrolled sideways. I think users will find this annoying. A value of '5' will give a wider gallery with standard image sizes, without causing this problem.

I will adjust the width at Draisine when I proof-read the page later. Regards -- EdJogg (talk) 09:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Tren a las Nubes thru Chile
Hello Moebius, Why was the section thru Chile never built?? Please see Talk:Tren a las Nubes and leave your answer there.

GREATER BA RAIL NETWORK
Bueno... No soy un experto, pero le voy a dar una buena mirada y voy a ir colocando acá las cositas que encuentre:

Línea Roca


 * Estación H. Yrigoyen - Falta. Está ubicada donde figuran en este mapa las letras del nombre de la estación "Buenos Aires" del Belgrano Sur. O sea entre Constitución y Avellaneda, del lado de Capital.


 * Estación Zeballos - Error ortográfico. Figura como "Zebballos".


 * Estación Sourigues - Falta. Entre Bosques y Ranelagh. Aquí: -34.807255°, -58.213173°.


 * Estación Santa Sofía - Falta. Entre Bosques y Juan María Gutiérrez. Aquí: -34.825119°, -58.213482°.


 * Estación Vucetich - Cerrada para transporte de pasajeros. Ha quedado abandonada, pero UGOFE no la ha descatalogado, así que supongo que conviene dejarla en el mapa.


 * Estación Don Bosco - Falta. Entre Wilde y Bernal. Aquí: -34.703379°, -58.296016°.

Cavenaghi9 (talk) 06:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Seguimos...


 * Parada Hospital Español - Falta. Entre Temperley y Santa Catalina. Aquí: -34.786250°, -58.407365°.


 * Parada Int. P.P. Turner (antigua Kilómetro 33) - Falta. Entre la para Km. 34 y el puente sobre Riachuelo. Aquí: -34.733629°, -58.474244°


 * Kilómetro 29 - Se llama Estación Agustín de Elía.

Este mapa te puede ser de ayuda: http://www.ugofe.com.ar/lgr/planolgr.html Cavenaghi9 (talk) 06:32, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Vías muertas:

Mira... estuve revisando y todo lo que tienes marcado como "Otros servicios", son vías muertas. A saber:


 * La vía que unía Haedo y Caseros.


 * Las dos que van más allá de González Catán, tanto en dirección hacia 20 de Junio como hacia Canning. Éste último dicen que llegaba hasta Km 88 en La Plata. Abandonado, le habrían levantado el cambio de vías. Por tanto es totalmente inaccesible.


 * De Alejandro Korn hacia San Vicente. Ramal clausurado.


 * De Ringuelet a Coronel Brandsen - Por ahí pasaba 'El Platense', un tren que unía La Plata con Mar del Plata. Cuando cesó el servicio quedó abandonado.


 * Más allá de la Estación Marinos del Crucero Gral. Belgrano (hacia Km. 38, Romero, etc.), es vía muerta.


 * El ramal que salía del Urquiza en la estación Rubén Darío

Puedes conseguir más información sobre ramales clausurados en éste foro: http://www.forotransportes.com/showthread.php?t=235

Si para la nueva version te interesa incluir una categoría de vías muertas, me avisas. Puedo investigar, calcarlas del Google Earth y enviarte el archivo. Hay varias vías muertas... Por ejemplo, toda una línea de (ex)estaciones desde Avellaneda hacia el sur (Fernandez, Mte. Chingolo, Pasco, etc). Y desde cerca de Villa Elisa hasta Punta Lara.

Cavenaghi9 (talk) 08:20, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

No sabía que vivías acá en Puerto Rico. Yo "vivo" en Mayagüez, pero duermo en Aguada. Cavenaghi9 (talk) 00:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Me di cuenta porque ví su página en español... Para el cafecito vamos cuando quiera, acá en la plaza de Mayagüez hacen uno muy bueno. Y... Como qué hago por acá? Vivir y hacer que estudio. Vivo en la misma casa desde que nací. :p Cavenaghi9 (talk) 02:07, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * .. Su página de wikipedia en español, quise decir. Me puede escribir a cavenaghi9@gmail.com o agregarme al MSN con esa misma dirección. No da tener que estar entrando a Wikipedia a mirar si me escribieron. No suelo mirar mi talk page seguido. Y usted que hace por acá? Cavenaghi9 (talk) 03:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Y? Como le ha ido el viaje? Tireme un mail cuando pueda, para saber a que dirección puedo pasarle un par de archivos kml? Cavenaghi9 (talk) 05:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Railbus and railcar
Help me understand why you have removed a significant amount of material on the railbus from the railcar article? Have you transferred it elsewhere? AFAIK there is no universal hard and fast distinction between the two; the terms are nowadays used interchangeably in some quarters. I think it would be helpful if you put the text back and opened a discussion on the talk page about the changes. --Bermicourt (talk) 06:22, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Capital MetroRail
Yes, I'm aware that the Texan system is using Stadler main-line stock. The term 'tram-train' was adopted through discussion on the article's talk page, as the best way to characterise the system's combination of existing railways with on-street running, not as a description of the vehicles themselves (though modern European trains do bear a stronger resemblance to trams than to anything that the U.S. government would allow to run under heavy-rail rules). In this case, it's really only a question of the direction from which you're approaching the dividing line. I've modified the wording slightly to avoid any potential confusion.

I'm glad you like the maps! My current focus is on an improved version of the Vancouver SkyTrain map to coincide with the opening of the Canada Line. David Arthur (talk) 20:38, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Utility bicycle
Hi. I left a note for you on the Talk:Utility_bicycle page. Check it out. Thanks! --Keithonearth (talk) 08:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Aparicion con vida de Moebius?
Que es de tu vida? No te llegaron los mails o te hiciste el dolobu? Jejeje... Todavía me debei un café. Estoy a full con la escuela de derecho, asi que no tengo mucho tiempo de leer, escribir o hacer fotos, pero tambien sigo a full (como me encanta esa frase!) con lo ferroviario y tengo un par de proyectos en mente. Tengo una bibliografía parcial para pasarte, y un par de páginas que recomendarte sobre historia ferroviaria de acá de Puerto Rico. Avisa si todavia te interesa el tema... Cavenaghi9 (talk) 04:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Estacion-Saldias.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Estacion-Saldias.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Alpertron (talk) 19:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I deleted this file until you can send the permission into OTRS. It would be better if you could get the version of the photo that does not have the copyright text on it.  When you get permission sent in, just write in the email that the image has been deleted and ask for them to undelete it.  Or you can ask on my talk page. kmccoy (talk) 13:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Files listed for deletion
Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Files for deletion/2009 October 22 if you are interested in preserving them. Thank you. Alpertron (talk) 16:44, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Retiro-Terminal.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Retiro-Terminal.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 07:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ferrovias Northbound.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Ferrovias Northbound.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:24, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Estacion Zarate.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Estacion Zarate.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ferroexpreso pampeano 2 .jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Ferroexpreso pampeano 2 .jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:27, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Alco RSD 35.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Alco RSD 35.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Westwood rim
Nice picture! -AndrewDressel (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, one or two rim cross sections would make nice additions to the bicycle wheel article. -AndrewDressel (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Geniol .jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Geniol .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Sprint Rims
Holy Smokes! Thanks for commenting out my comment that "One manufacturer calling their rims "sprint" doesn't make all tubular rims "sprint" rims." I never meant for that to go into the article. I must have been crazy tired to mistake the article for the edit summary. -AndrewDressel (talk) 13:08, 23 March 2010 (UTC)


 * "Tubs", eh? How do they refer to just one? "Hand me that tubs, would you?" As for "tubular rims", check out this sentence from the Park Tool Website "The tubular is then glued to a special rim, called a tubular rim." Finally, I would not mess with the spelling of "tyre" or "tire" with a ten-foot pole. (I realize upon rereading this that it may sound sarcastic, critical, or harsh. I completely do not mean it that way. I am enjoying learning about this stuff.) -AndrewDressel (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:File 48105 42974.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:File 48105 42974.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:File 48105 42974.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:File 48105 42974.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 06:27, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

aparicion con vida de cavenaghi9
Después del 21 de abril, cualquier día. Escríbeme a cavenaghi9@gmail.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cavenaghi9 (talk • contribs) 03:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Bicycle Commuting
How exactly do we know this is the "predominant" form of utility cycling -- is this conjecture or sourced information? A big statement like that needs solid sourcing, imho. Thanks! 842U (talk) 22:15, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


 * There's plenty of data online. It is the most common type of cycling in the world. Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 22:23, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The information in the article needs to be verifiable -- especially big statements in the introduction. So, if you add a statement, then add the source for the information, obviously.  To serve the reader, find a source for the exact statement you added: "bike commuting is the predominant form of utility cycling throughout the world."  Or, another solution would be to trim the statement to what you can find a source for.  842U (talk) 04:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation Style - One Link per Line
Thank you for your work on Ford Falcon. Unfortunately, disambiguation pages do not follow the same stylistic rules as normal pages.

Please see the disambiguation style guide for more information. If you have any questions not answered there,

or try the help desk.

Ubcule (talk) 21:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Urquiza Line (Buenos Aires)

 * See User talk:Anthony Appleyard. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Honestly...
Hey fellow, honestly I gave up with putting pictures in wikipedia. The licensing and copyright laws are just to much of an issue with this. The whole gallery of images that i had for the Santo Domingo Metro got deleted by administrators with the supposed arguement of copyright violations. The pictures werent mine, but i was given permission by the owner of those images. I also made the owner send an e-mail to wikipedia requesting the images not to be deleted and that he [the owner] gave explicit release to the public domain. Still, admins went and removed them. I guess no body ever read that e-mail. Since that point, I been getting copyright violations in my Talk page all the time so i ceased placing images at all except those that [I] create to avoid getting banned. Flickr images tend to be to dangerous and copyrighted to post in Wikipedia. I'm staying in the low and out of trouble from the next few months and then resume to posting images again. I been fairly active in article contributions though, so thats good. Until later friend!EdwinCasadoBaez (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Glad to help out!! I think metro is the best choice. It is the most common word used. I am also sure that if one asked for the "metro" in BA, they would be directed to the Subte, but not as likely with "subway" or "underground." I hope it stays this way. I will watch it for changes. Cheers!! jsfouche &#9789;&#9790;   talk  05:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Achille-mauzan-saga.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Achille-mauzan-saga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

NSU R080
Thank you for cleaning up the image I uploaded a few years back. I wish I had looked after my old pictures better! Salutados Charles01 (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Colectivo Linea 107 .jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Colectivo Linea 107 .jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kobac (talk) 19:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Minerals of argentina


A tag has been placed on Minerals of argentina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ttonyb (talk) 03:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)


 * AGREE—Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 03:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Lacroze Interior.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lacroze Interior.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 21:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Lacroze Trainset 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lacroze Trainset 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 21:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

File rename notification
A file you uploaded  has been renamed to  File:Buenos Aires-Rosario-Córdoba high-speed railway map.jpg as the original filename appeard to be a procedural name generated by the equipment (such as a camera or scanner) used to generate the media.

In line with current policy, efforts have been made to ensure usages and links to this media have been updated.

If you feel this notification to be in error, please conatct myself or an administrator. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:42, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Tranvia-en-Plaza-de-Armas-3.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tranvia-en-Plaza-de-Armas-3.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Geniol .jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Geniol .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 20:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. When you recently edited DKW, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Fe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. When you recently edited Chíva bus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arabesque (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Notice Tempate on Buenos Aires–Rosario–Córdoba high-speed railway
Hello. I'm slightly confused as to why you think this article requires a Notice Template. The text within it doesn't actually make sense, either: it is not well formed English. If you want to make the fact that it is in hold more prominent, I suggest you change the wording of the article to this end. Please justify your use of the Notice Template. Thanks, Plokijnu (talk) 21:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Italics.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Italics.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 00:54, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Achille-mauzan-geniol.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Achille-mauzan-geniol.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Achille-mauzan-geniol.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Achille-mauzan-geniol.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 5 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Here we are dealing with the abrupt removal of image of a highly respected cultural icon of Argentina without consulting with fellow wikipedians, I'm dealing with this matter at this moment in the following Talk:Buenos_Aires page. — Regards,  Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 06:10, 5 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I hope you didn't expect my bot to reply to you ;)  Hazard-SJ  ✈   00:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Achille-mauzan-geniol.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Achille-mauzan-geniol.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

BA Metro discussion
There is a discussion that may interest you related to BA metro. Articles for deletion/Plaza de Mayo (Buenos Aires Metro). jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 01:56, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

About Bicycle wheel article
So Andrew Dressel, you’ve turned down some of my edits because Sheldon Brown’s references where not good enough for you, hmmm, data was thoroughly researched, beginning to have doubts about reject, should have given some time to discuss matters with other Wikipedians, at least given me a buzz in my talk page about matter, but you were too quick, plus other constructive edits where blown away. Let’s keep Wikipedia neutral dude!, let us not fall into promotional gimmicks, history has already been written, let us be real, that’s how Wikipedia strengthens! Cheers — Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 01:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Yup. I checked the references, including Sheldon Brown, who is perfectly good enough for me, and none of them confirm that 650B is equivalent to 27.5", as you repeatedly asserted. In fact, neither reference even mentions 27.5" once. I don't know what there is to discuss. -AndrewDressel (talk) 01:50, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Its the other way around, 650B’s are NOT equivalent to 27.5", plenty of sources confirm that, which i've included a couple, ...and there's plenty more, lets not confuse facts by unfounded publicity contraptions, Sheldon Brown knows what his talking about, ...and i am very neutral, there's plenty of confusion about bicycle wheels and tires, let's not confuse even more,  i've researched data thoroughly, so if you don't mind,  i'll revert reverted version, peace brother —  Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 02:38, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * And i repeat and have been very clear, a 27.5-inch mountain bike wheel uses a rim that has a diameter of 584 mm (23.0") and with wide, knobby tires ~27.5 x 2.3 / ISO 58-584, sum up to ~27.5".


 * A 650B wheel has since the beginning been a 26-inch diameter wheel (584 mm rim) with ~26 x 1 1/2 / ISO 38-584 tyres, which sums up to ~26.0", or ~650 mm — Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 03:22, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * You were right. I just misunderstood what you wrote. I have restored your changes and added a few of my own in the hopes of making things clearer. I apologize for the hasty revert and thank you for coaching me through it. -AndrewDressel (talk) 14:58, 12 May 2013 (UTC)


 * OK, looks good, got to get things straight, we will not get fooled, but it is still 10 to 1, 10 being current misconceptions a 1 being the facts! — Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 01:48, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=565414507 your edit] to Buick Skylark may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Power-Glide transmission. Instrument panel padding and a cigarette lighter was standard. http://www.oldcarbrochures.com/static/NA/Buick/1963_Buick/1963_Buick_Full_Line_Brochure/1963%

Orphaned non-free image File:Tren de la Costa logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Tren de la Costa logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tren de la Costa logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Tren de la Costa logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 21:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Image File:Tren de la Costa logo.png has been put in use in Tren de la Costa history section of article as per Wikipedia claim of fair use. Kindly, Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 01:50, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Multi-Purpose Vehicle


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Multi-Purpose Vehicle. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – minivan. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at minivan – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. 65.94.77.36 (talk) 05:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

File:2007 Worldsbest Cities.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2007 Worldsbest Cities.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  Green Giant  ( talk )  00:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:HipodromodelaZarzuela.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:HipodromodelaZarzuela.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly hi! 18:40, 25 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy deletion? one day notice, plus i've never uploaded that image, Wikimedia Commons User:Esetena uploaded that image - Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Achille-mauzan-geniol.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Achille-mauzan-geniol.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The following page on the English Wikipedia link to this file: Culture of Argentina - Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 17:44, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ave Tipas, Ciudad Jardin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ave Tipas, Ciudad Jardin.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gunnex (talk) 08:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Considering (locally uploaded in 2008 with "Fotografía de Adrián Cambiasso, cargada con permiso. Photo by Adrián Cambiasso, uploaded with permission.", and later transferred to Commons) https://www.flickr.com/photos/ing_camb/166634521/ (2006, © All rights reserved by "Adrián"). --Gunnex (talk) 08:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Plantation Cottage.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Plantation Cottage.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
 * Considering (as indicated, locally uploaded in 2007) https://www.flickr.com/photos/atelier_tee/249385853/ (2006, CC BY- NC-ND 2.0 by "Terence Faircloth"). --Gunnex (talk) 08:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ave Tipas, Ciudad Jardin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ave Tipas, Ciudad Jardin.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Subte
FoCuSandLeArN and I have been working on bringing Buenos Aires Underground up to Good Article status. I noticed that this is an article you have contributed to significantly in the past, so thought it worthwhile to let you know in case you wanted to contribute further. SegataSanshiro1 (talk) 20:49, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia layout sample.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikipedia layout sample.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Aguacates en la Plaza .jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aguacates en la Plaza .jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Lacroze Trainset.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lacroze Trainset.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for City bicycle
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;City bicycle&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. João Pimentel Ferreira 22:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joao.pimentel.ferreira (talk • contribs)

File permission problem with File:Ruinas de Nicola di Bari.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ruinas de Nicola di Bari.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. XXN, 12:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Museo de arte puerto rico.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Museo de arte puerto rico.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. XXN, 12:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RED FERROVIAL METROPOLITANA.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:RED FERROVIAL METROPOLITANA.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Ship transport or maritime transport?
You have previously discussed the title of the ship transport article. There is a proposal to move this article at Talk:Ship transport if you care to participate. —  AjaxSmack 21:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Augusto Rodriguez
I reverted your well intentioned edit on the article of Augusto Rodriguez because in the military records of the 15th Connecticut Volunteer Infantry his name, even though it was Augusto Rodriguez, for unknown reasons was misspelled and he was listed as Augustus "Rodereques". Have a great day.


 * Note: Records show his surname misspelled as "Rodregues" with an "e" instead of "Rodríguez" with an "i" between the r and q in the Record of Service of Connecticut Men, Army and Navy, in the War of the Rebellion"; Compiled by Adjutants-General, Hartford, CT: Press of the Case, Lockwood & Brainard Company, 1889. Tony the Marine (talk) 15:35, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:San Juan-Caguas Rail map.jpg


The file File:San Juan-Caguas Rail map.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:30, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:San Juan-Caguas Rail map2.jpg


The file File:San Juan-Caguas Rail map2.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:31, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Buenos Aires-Rosario-Córdoba high-speed railway map.jpg


The file File:Buenos Aires-Rosario-Córdoba high-speed railway map.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 21:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:High-speed-railway-map3-.jpg


The file File:High-speed-railway-map3-.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 21:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:High-speed-railway-mapB-.jpg


The file File:High-speed-railway-mapB-.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 21:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:High-speed-railway-mapB1-.jpg


The file File:High-speed-railway-mapB1-.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 21:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:High-speed-railway-mapII-.jpg


The file File:High-speed-railway-mapII-.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 21:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:High-speed-railway-map2b-.jpg


The file File:High-speed-railway-map2b-.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 21:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:High-speed-railway-mapa-.jpg


The file File:High-speed-railway-mapa-.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 21:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Achille-mauzan-geniol.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Achille-mauzan-geniol.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Achille-mauzan-saga.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Achille-mauzan-saga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Achille-mauzan-geniol.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Achille-mauzan-geniol.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Track elevation 2-.pdf


A tag has been placed on File:Track elevation 2-.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:16, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Line-E .png


The file File:Line-E .png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Line-A .png


The file File:Line-A .png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Line-H .png


The file File:Line-H .png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:PreMetro-E2 .png


The file File:PreMetro-E2 .png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
We haven't seen you for awhile. I hope you're doing well.

The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 16:40, 7 September 2020 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>

File permission problem with File:CZA8756 Alstom ?M Czamanske.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CZA8756 Alstom ?M Czamanske.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --<span style="font-family: monospace, monospace; color:#69C;">Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 09:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mapa Expreso Patagonico.LR.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Mapa Expreso Patagonico.LR.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --<span style="font-family: monospace, monospace; color:#69C;">Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 13:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)