User talk:Monstermike99

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Seba5618 (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment&#32;with the page Robert Kotick. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. PatGallacher (talk) 17:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Persistently making test edits is not good practice. Please refrain or explain yourself. I am regarding this as a level 2 warning. PatGallacher (talk) 17:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted.; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- DQ  (t)   (e)  18:45, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Richard Santulli. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Good job, not Wikipedia's purpose I'm afraid.  Captain Screebo Parley! 11:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Randy Falco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. When you recently edited Nelson Peltz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palm Beach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

RGupta
Thanks for your words on this one. No apology is necessary. Yes, I do see the trial as notable. Many more thoughts ... but all I can manage for now. Cheers. Swliv (talk) 20:06, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20
Hi. When you recently edited Gary Friedman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Gap (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited UniMás (television network), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galavision (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tricadia Capital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=565375545 your edit] to Daniel J. Arbess may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 2010 Tips Did the Best|author = Ira Sohn |date= May 24, 2011 |publisher=”Hedge Fund Intelligence” }} and is a frequent media commentator {{cite interview |last= Arbess |first= Daniel |

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ralph Whitworth concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ralph Whitworth, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 07:52, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Ralph Whitworth


Hello Monstermike99. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Ralph Whitworth.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Merging Red Bull GmbH and Red Bull
Hi Monstermike99, Thanks for spotting the company article Red Bull GmbH, that I missed in the introduction section of Red Bull. I suspect I am not the only one, so yes, I think Red Bull GmbH and Red Bull should be merged. Merging them makes sense, because knowledge about the company enlarges knowledge about the product, and merging will get rid of a lot of duplications, while swelling up the Red Bull article only some. Do you agree? Let's see what others think. If nobody replies in a week or so, we should go ahead. Do you want to help merging it? Please reply on the Red Bull talk page, where I posted this message.--Wuerzele (talk) 18:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=617532614 your edit] to John D. Rockefeller may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:03, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Quote |What makes him problematic—and why he continues to inspire ambivalent reactions—is that his

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=618806687 your edit] to Anne Dias-Griffin may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Category:Illinois

Disambiguation link notification for July 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anne Dias-Griffin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of George L. Rose for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George L. Rose is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/George L. Rose until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 09:18, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Stephan Cohen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attorney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest guideline
Hello, Monstermike99. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Michael Lynton, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Brianhe (talk) 00:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Blocked for paid advocacy and violating the Terms of Use
Per Wikipedia Signpost/2015-04-22/Special report, your editing privileges have been revoked. In order for any unblock request to be considered, you must publicly disclose all clients that have paid you to edit Wikipedia. MER-C 01:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I have never been paid for any Wiki edits. I wish, I've been editing for 8 years now.--Monstermike99 (talk) 14:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you aware of the 6th paragraph of that Signpost article?  DGG ( talk ) 15:41, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I read it but it wouldn't let me comment. I have a real job, Wiki is a hobby. Never compensated.--Monstermike99 (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Most users of Wikipedia are aware that Wikipedia is not "wiki", so that raises an eyebrow right there. You probably should see this, by the way. Tharthandorf Aquanashi (talk) 16:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

No red flag because I said "Wiki", give me a break. And that was resolved and the editor that actually accused me only contributed to that page, so that was something that "raises an eyebrow" that I pointed out.--Monstermike99 (talk) 17:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 23:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)