User talk:Mshake3/Archives/2007/December

AWB
Be more careful using this. You change a couple of foreign language links, which messed them up (like on the No Way Out 2005 article). Articles on other language versions of Wikipedia don't always match the English version. I know you didn't mean ti do anything wrong, just be more careful.  TJ   Spyke   23:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Lockdown (2007)
When are you going to start expanding Lockdown (2007) again? --  L A  X  00:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I stopped working on it since TNA completely changed their site and removed all of their news archives. --  L A  X  01:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Feud
Man idk i think we both acted retarded and we handled this in a stupid manner. I respect you and Im sorry.-- Tr U cO 93 11 (talk) 01:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

WQA Request
You have been served at WQA. Cheers,  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
You are receiving this because because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. If you would rather receive a notification of the newsletter sent to you, please add your name to this list. If you no longer wish to receive any notice of the newsletter, please add your name to this list. Delivered: 23:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

NWO
First off its not my responsobility to show u were every rule is figure it out. second off i know the commercials say there will be one but it is not on WWE tv so its not going in the article much the way we dont put smackdown and tna taping spoilers.LifeStroke420 (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Roster
Now look at it (my sand box) is that ok?-- Tr U cO 93 11 T / GB 05:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:Draft
Oh ok, so after the pick #, the "brand to" should be there, and then the "superstar" and then the "brand from" and then the "note"?

So should I get rid of the colors completly or change them (for brand boxes)?-- Tr U cO 93 11 TaLk / SiGn 14:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok I published it now! Go check it out. Comment (sign my guestbook thanx)-- Tr U cO 93 11 TaLk / SiGn 01:30, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:REDIRECT
WP:REDIRECT, specifically WP:R2D, recommends very specifically against changing redirect to redirect because it's a basically pointless change, it gums up the page source, and it removes information about the way the term is used within articles. Croctotheface (talk) 04:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC)