User talk:Muhammad Mukhriz

Welcome to my talk page!!



Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Muhammad Mukhriz! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! NotedGrant  Talk  09:06, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

My FAQs
Questions:

Q1: How to get other "tags" for my user page? ANSWRED

Q2: How should I contribute to Wikipadia? ANSWRED

Q3: How can I colour my font? ANSWRED

Q4: How can someone detect that I have vandalized one of the Wikipedia articles? Geez! I didn't vandalize, I am just asking!! ANSWRED

Q5: Can I use http://library.thinkquest.org for adding citations? ANSWERED

Q6: How can we identify "reliable" sources? I am confused about which one is a reliable source, honestly. So help me to understand. ANSWERED

(Answer like this A1: A2: with seperate lines each)

Answers:

A1: By tags, I assume you mean "userboxes", you can find some more here.

A2: You can contribute to Wikipedia constructively however you want! Take a look at:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

A3: You should only really colour your font in your signature (I think), but if you want to, the basic html code is Your text here So, if I wanted a red font, I would type My text goes here which looks like this My text goes here  Puffin  Let's talk! 13:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

A4: With tools such as WP:VF, WP:HG, WP:GLOO - which give information about changes to pages - around 150 pages changes per minute - tools have ways to filter out well known "good" editors, leaving the known "bad" ones, and the unknowns. Some tools then allow the viewer to revert the last user's edit(s) with the press of a single key (and issue a warning to the user's talk page).  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

A5: Citations in articles should be to reliable sources, published books, magazines, newspaper articles, etc. Although reliability is intimately related to context, in general ask yourself whether the source has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. library.thinkquest appears to be the epitome of an unreliable source because it is user created "by students for students", a collection of self-published sources. It is by random, anonymous people, with no editorial oversight. It is not by a professional, third party publishing organization known for journalistic integrity and accuracy. If that isn't clear, the short answer to your question is: no.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 10:00, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

A6: See WP:IRS. 11:13, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Muhammad article comments
Hi,

I've moved your comment from Talk:Muhammad to Talk:Muhammad/images. Please direct any followup there. Thanks!&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  15:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Islam
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Islam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 5-12 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 15:27, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Though WP:DEADREF is not very important issue in GA review, there are some dead refs in the article. If possible correct these. I have added the note in GA review page! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 22:28, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * No, you can not be both nominator and reviewer of same article. You have nominated the article for GA, now I (and if anyone else participates then he/she/they) will review the article according to the criteria. I have made some suggestion in GA review page, you can post comment in that page (there will not be any problem if you post comment in review page or answer my questions). --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 23:58, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit Revert
I have reverted this edit from your talk page, if you think it was incorrect, feel free to undo my edit. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 04:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 17:06, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Review Status!
Someone proposed to fail the review. Editors are not joining the review. Join review in talk page! --Tito Dutta Message 13:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * They have added a comment here: GA1. I have asked for some time, but an editor needs to join the review there! --Tito Dutta Message 14:03, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

GA Review Alert!
It has been proposed to fail the article, please join Talk:Islam/GA1 -- Tito Dutta  ✉  15:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

What do you think about this categorical name?
Do you think "Recognised" is appropriate to describe English on the info-box for Brunei's Wikipedia article? SirAlexOreo (talk) 01:55, 5 July 2013 (UTC)