User talk:Mycota

Got something to say to me?

ToL for fungi
I'll help you, but don't expect too much of me. I do like fungi (and that sort of thing, I personally think slime moulds are where its at), but I'm not so knowledgeable about them. I study mainly neurobiology and pathology, so until someone discovers a fungal disease of the brain, I'm not likely to be learning too much about it, either. Again, I'm not sure I'll be an enormous help but I hope you'll find that having people on board will help the project get off the ground. --Mike C | talk 13:43, 25 October 2005 (UTC) P.S. One other thing, its conventional to start a talk page if someone doesn't have one, not to put the comment on their User page. There are several advantages to this: one, they get the "new messages" thing, two, they don't have to move the comment themselves, three, everyone knows where to find it in the mean time and lastly, they get the sheer joy of getting their first wikitalk message. Ah... --Mike C | talk 14:10, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Fungus Vandalism, 2005-11-01
No problem on the vandal report and reversions, it's what I like to do. In this case, it's some kid from a highschool in Iowa. Little rodents... :-) Darcrist 19:21, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

david cross
hello. forgive me if I missed something but why did you remove david cross from List of atheists? --Phil 12:42, 7 November 2005 (UTC)


 * I didn't realize that the list was divided into notable and not-so-notable atheists and I had added him to the notable list. I just removed him from that list, but he's still listed on the other list. I think that list needs to be re-structured. Mycota 17:23, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Fungi stuff
Thanks for your help on the fungi introduction- I had figured that if I just started as best I could that it would make other people build a better introduction, as opposed to leaving it. I tried to make it like the other kingdom pages, but it isn't there yet.

But yes, I have something to ask. I think the article needs some emphasis in that basidiomycetes have the biggest number of classified fungi, but don't have the greatest diversity of fungi just because people have been researching and classifying basidiomycetes for longer. Anyhow, I was thinking that something about 'described fungi' versus 'actual probable fungal diversity' should be in there, but I'm not sure where. Maybe it's own topic?

Featured article for December 25th
I noticed you have listed yourself in Category:Atheist Wikipedians. That said, you will probably be interested in my suggested featured article for December 25th: Omnipotence paradox. The other suggestion being supported by others for that date is Christmas, although Raul654 has historically been against featuring articles on the same day as their anniversary/holiday. &mdash; BRIAN 0918 &bull; 2005-11-28 08:27

Copwatch
I have personal information on the Copwatch citation. However, I do not wish to disclose names. I will disclose the PD however. BlueGoose 01:00, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * It doesn't matter whether you have "personal information" about it. In order to publish on Wikipedia, you must be able to cite verifiable sources. Feel free to publish this information on a personal website; it does not belong on Wikipedia. Mycota 01:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

I was surprised when I linked to it from another article, and found that the Copwatch article didn't exist. I created it, and basically added a bunch of info from the Berkeley site, plus a small bit of personal knowledge. I don't know what happened, as there was no record of deletion. Canaen 03:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Fungi
I could participate in a set of fungal pages, I have been busy for the past few months (teaching) and have not spent any time on Wikipedia, hence the delayed response.

I've just started a Wikiproject on Fungi, at least on "paper". How to get it off the ground I'm less sure of. Perhaps I'll post a notice soon on the Mycological Society of SF listserv, which might bring out some interested folks. On the subject of mycorrhiza - have you seen the arbuscular mycorrhizas page lately? It looks very good - the person who contributed most of the material, Msturmel, is not a regular Wikipedia contributor, but using the name and IP address listed on the history page, I'm quite sure the contributor was Marie-Soleil Turmel of University of Manitoba. Perhaps she might be interested in contributing more. I like your idea of working on taxa one doesn't know much about as a way of working on them. I've been meaning to learn more about the Kickxellales, Zoopagales, and Blastocladales, as these form a newly delineated basal clade in the fungi, but their groups I don't know the first thing about - maybe I'll read up on these and contribute some articles. Peter G Werner 09:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Article Improvement Drive: Fungi
I just came across this today:

If you have anything you can contribute to the general "Fungus" article, please do. All the best. Peter G Werner 02:08, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Citizens Rule Book
Hello, I saw your message on Nilfanion' talk page. Indeed, the image could have qualified as fair use, however, the licensing requirements of Wikimedia Commons explicitly prohibit fair use images. The image may be uploadable here (I am not sure, as I cannot review the image, as I am not an administrator in Commons and Nilfanion is), but it is not in Commons, as Commons requires a free license. Tito xd (?!?) 04:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The relevant policy on Commons is commons:Commons:Licensing. I see you reuploaded the image to en.wikipedia, so no harm done really. Just remember Commons has tighter rules in future (having said that the image description was good).--Nilfanion (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia Fungus Collaboration as of Jan 2007
DYK there are no fungal Featured Articles on wikipedia at all? I've modelled this on the dinosaur collaboration which has yielded a few FAs. Please have a look and cast your vote and we'll try a concerted attempt at an FA. Link here......Fungi Collaboration

(hope I got all the templates right...) cheers Cas Liber 03:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Biological Value
I noticed you appear to be involved in biology articles or WikiProjects relating to biology and human processes. This article, on a method for evaluating biological utilizations rates of proteins in humans and animals, was started in August and is in need of the attention of an expert. We are having trouble locating one and the article desperately needs it. This method is used constantly in bodybuilding magazines and products and is the subject of much misinformation and half-truths. On the other hand it does appear to have some value. Please help if possible. In case you're wondering why I picked you I just looked through some Science WikiProjects and biology articles and your name appeared a lot in one or both categories. Incidentally if you decide not to do this for whatever reason there's no need to reply. I'll just take it you're busy or uninterested and leave it at that. Thanks. Quadzilla99 22:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Mycorrhiza
Thanks for trying to clear up the Mycorrhiza article. It definitely needs work. However, according to the Dictionary of the Fungi, 9th ed. by Kirk, et al, a mycorrhiza is a "symbiotic, non-pathogenic or feebly or weakly pathogenic association of a fungus and the roots of a plant." (Emphasis added.) It is compared by the authors to a lichen, which is also a symbiotic association, not an individual organism. Mycota 21:51, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You are absolutely right. Sorry for the incorrect edits. I made the mistake of trusting my dashboard dictionary (New Oxford American Dictionary), which said mycorrhiza was the fungus alone. Everything else I can find on the net agrees that it refers to the association. Your revised edit is much clearer. -

203.171.67.232 00:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Copwatch
It's pretty clear that you have limited knowledge of the Copwatch organization. If you haven't done the research on a topic, please don't start making edits. The editors of the page are working hard to ensure there is accurate information on Wikopedia. You seem to be very biased in your approach and it is showing in your underhanded and rude methods to prevent improvements in the Copwatch organization and in the Wikopedia page. Simply find a source that supports your position and state what that source says. If you do not have a third-party source for your criticisms, please do not add them. User:DivaNtrainin 1 September 2007

Dear expert in science,
I would like someone to do an experienced copyedit on the article Clonaid. I spent the equivalent of 2 shifts (16 hours) trying to improve the article from this to this. Since you know how to make featured articles, I was thinking that you would be interested. If you have any suggestions, please post them at Peer review/Clonaid. The article is currently a featured article candidate. Sincerely, Kmarinas86 22:08, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Holy crap
No problem. That stuff is dang annoying, though somehow i've gotten really into the kill em with kindness kind of approach. Oh, and you don't know how happy it makes me to finally see someone using the vasectomy userbox. Cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Murderbike (talk • contribs) 23:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nomoredeaths.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Nomoredeaths.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

John Brown Anti-Klan Committee
I have no familiarity with this group, and have never heard of them. I have edited, in passing, some articles about radicals, but I have no special interest or expertise. Generally, blogs are not very useful primary sources. Rather, well-known secondary sources are preferred at Wikipedia. See WP:RS. Have you tried Google news? Bearian (talk) 16:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Hey, thanks for the note, it encouraged me to learn a little more about this group I only knew in passing. But alas, I'm not finding much in the way of non-web sources. I threw a note on the U.S. Capitol article talk page asking for a source for the claim that JBAKC claimed responsibility for the bombing. If I don't get an answer soon, I'll probably delete it from there, but hopefully somebody will something we can throw in this article. I'll let ya know if I find anything at the library. Cheers! Murderbike (talk) 18:31, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool, I definitely don't have access to that database. Glad you do. Good job on the article on such slim sources! Murderbike (talk) 18:59, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Hammer Museum
Thanks for your response. I would say Hammer Museum (Haines, AK) would be best.&mdash; Rod talk 06:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Hammer Museum (Haines, AK)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hammer Museum (Haines, AK), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: The Hammer Museum. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Copy-n-Paste Moves
Please do not make copy-n-paste moves as you did with The Hammer Museum to Hammer Museum (Haines, AK). Copy-n-paste moves shouldn't be done as they disassociate the edit history which causes GFDL compliance issues. You should move pages instead. I have fixed this one. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. -- JLaTondre (talk) 17:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Citizens Rule Book.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Citizens Rule Book.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:52, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of You Made Perfect, Kid


A tag has been placed on You Made Perfect, Kid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 22:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lavender Country


A tag has been placed on Lavender Country requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 22:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Lavender Country for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lavender Country is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lavender Country until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Mycota/Patrick Haggerty (musician)
User:Mycota/Patrick Haggerty (musician), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mycota/Patrick Haggerty (musician) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Mycota/Patrick Haggerty (musician) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Saunders (skeptic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Dunning (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * The Lincoln Academy of Illinois (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Labor, Otto Kerner and Pat Quinn


 * Arthur T. Benjamin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Magician


 * Springfield Southeast High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Spartan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Please sign your DYK reviews
Mycota, I've run across more than one of your DYK reviews that were unsigned. It's somewhat confusing, because the next contributor looks like they did the review. Please remember to sign the reviews. — Maile (talk) 14:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that. I'm new to the DYK review process. I'll pay closer attention to this issue in the future. Mycota (talk) 01:05, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Mark Crislip) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mark Crislip, Mycota!

Wikipedia editor Khamar just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I have reviewed the Mark Crislip page. Nice job."

To reply, leave a comment on Khamar's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for March 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rachael Dunlop, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Croydon Park and Media release (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Rachael Dunlop
The DYK project (nominate) 00:01, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Mark Crislip
Allen3 talk 18:23, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

George Soule
The alternate spelling was already mentioned in three places that are a matter of public record and therefore important to note.

Since many people were illiterate and spelled names phonetically, there are numerous alternate spellings for most notable people of the time. It would be unreasonable to list them all and since it was mentioned 3x already in the pertinent paragraphs that name the records the alternate spellings are in, I saw no need to place it a fourth time in the lead. Since people are looked up by their last name, the alternate spelling of the first name is unimportant. His name was spelled correctly on the Mayflower Compact.Mugginsx (talk) 10:16, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oh No, Ross and Carrie!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Book club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Anne Nicol Gaylor
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:48, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited My Brother, My Brother and Me, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Roderick. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Song Exploder logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Song Exploder logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Mark Crislip
Just FYI, I noticed another editor put a "BLP sources" tag on Mark Crislip, an article you created. Basically, they're looking for some better sources for the article. If you know of any that have come up since the last time you worked on it, now would be a great time to add them. Cheers. --Krelnik (talk) 13:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:My Brother, My Brother and Me logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:My Brother, My Brother and Me logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Mycota/Oh No Ross and Carrie


Hello, Mycota. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oh No Ross and Carrie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Beland (talk) 18:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)