User talk:NRKfan

Welcome!
Hello, NRKfan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --John (talk) 00:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm John. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --John (talk) 00:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

The Beatles 1956-1969, 1994.
1956: John Lennon's first band, The Quarrymen was founded in 1956. Later Paul joined, then George, then Pete Best but was replaced by Ringo. Technically, it was the same band, founded in 1969. Then they changed their name a few times. Johnny and the Moondogs, The Beat Brothers (with Tony Sheridan), The Silver Beatles and then The Beatles. But it was the same group. Well, it was more members in The Quarrymen, (Colin Hanton, John Duff Lowe, Rod Davis, Len Garry, etc.) but they later left the band. So I would say The Beatles technically is the same band as The Quarrymen, The Moon Dogs and Silver Beatles.

1969: The Beatles recorded both of their last CDs in 1969, but Let It Be was just released in 1970, but they had already broken up. The Beatles broke up in 1969, right?

1994: Paul, George and Ringo teamed up one last time for the Anthology series in 1994 and remixed "Free As A Bird" and "Real Love".

That's why I changed the page to 1956-1969, 1994. But it was wrong?

--NRKfan (talk) 00:27, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Interesting. Can I suggest you bring this up at Talk:The Beatles. --John (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Sure. I'm sorry. --NRKfan (talk) 00:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Not at all. Thank you for trying to improve an article. --John (talk) 00:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Richard Lester. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 02:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kjell Veine


The article Kjell Veine has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 06:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of In And Out Of Focus Records


The article In And Out Of Focus Records has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable label. Sources here and in a WP:BEFORE search are either not independent of the company or unreliable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of In And Out Of Focus Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article In And Out Of Focus Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/In And Out Of Focus Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Focus concerts for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Focus concerts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Focus concerts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with List of Focus concerts. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- Finngall  talk  01:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Actress Angourie Rice photoshoot (Photo by Mark Lobo).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Actress Angourie Rice photoshoot (Photo by Mark Lobo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dina Jewel


A tag has been placed on Dina Jewel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that has essentially the same content as an article on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please see Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 21:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source
Hi NRKfan. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for biographical information in Ava Max. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 03:04, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Album cover for Focus 11.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Album cover for Focus 11.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thijs van Leer Live solo album.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Thijs van Leer Live solo album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Links to user pages and sandboxes
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Focus (band). Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 09:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:Songs covered by Tiny Tim has been nominated for deletion
Category:Songs covered by Tiny Tim has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 17:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)