User talk:Nambio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding this edit;

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. OhNoitsJamieTalk 22:40, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OH MAN SO SORRYNambio 12:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Wickethewok 06:22, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry about the Phantom Menace block, I zapped the wrong person. Sorry about the goof. -- Curps 00:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that I also reverted Pieguy48 incorrectly earlier, which is kind of embarrassing since I reverted the vandalism correctly earlier the same day. Once again, my apologies. Note that multiple errors were introduced by the vandal, so when you revert it should be a full revert rather than just editing "David Boreanaz" in one or two places. -- Curps 00:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not a problem. it was just that i saw on the histoy page that ppl have edited back to george lucas multiple times only to have it reverted again (myself included) and i was wtf at that stage. thanks for the explanation -- Nambio 01:13, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Paintergate, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Metros232 03:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Branch 0003-1-.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Branch 0003-1-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:45, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell are you doing with this article anyway? Your edit doesn't seem to make sense. Please name sources. --81.62.34.60 (talk) 06:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Kbar.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]