User talk:Nantucketnoon

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Victory or death has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Fastily (talk) 03:26, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Nantucketnoon, upon closer observation, the edit you made to Victory or death, seems to have been made in good faith, but the formatting wrong. I have re-added your text back to the article and fixed the formatting. Please disregard that warning, it doesn't apply to the edits you made. - Fastily (talk) 17:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! tommy talk2me  11:36, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

April 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Warner Music Group. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Navy Blue84  12:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B043:61E9:1C8A:3D97:DB1C:9810 (talk)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

May 2018
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Fascism for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 20:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Fascism, you may be blocked from editing. -- Orange Mike  &#124;  Talk  23:37, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Courtesy notice - discretionary sanctions for the topic of climate change
--Ronz (talk) 19:21, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Anarchism
Hi Nantucketnoon,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 03:50, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Democrat Party (epithet). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:26, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your actions prove that I was right. The use of fear to cause self-editing to maintain narrative and control.

Nantucketnoon (talk) 00:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  01:56, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Continued Bias
Continued bias existing in the entries on Wikipedia sully its reputation, suggesting that it will fade away despite its high claims, and that it supports such, notwithstanding this being a known fact. It is no different than any other advocate entity ; it is not a serious encyclopedia. Its bias maintained by vigilantes that delight in their oppression.


 * I really don't know about your intentions. What did u write in that talk page? Write argument, if it is vulgar. Brainfrogk4mon (talk) 14:40, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

I made an entry that I immediately was changing~ however, it took, literally, thirty seconds for someone to jump on it before I could. My point is that a bias exists in Wikipedia that favors a certain view, decreasing the quality of the encyclopedia. I was self-editing from fear. Nantucketnoon (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Perhaps, not as bias has no place, nor intimidation. If continued 'vandalism' is what is called a fuller understanding of the subject than, obviously, Wikipedia does not have a place that it claims. Nantucketnoon (talk) 01:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 44264
is now closed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 18:08, 11 June 2021 (UTC)