User talk:Ncsr11

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 03:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Neon Genesis Evangelion (anime)
I've noticed you've made a lot of edits to Neon Genesis Evangelion (anime), most of which are minor edits, trying to get the format looking good. It may be better for you to use the "preview" button to view your editing, and mark your edits as minor by checking the "This is a minor edit" checkbox when saving your edits. Hope this helps :) MadManMarkAu (talk) 15:40, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

October 2011
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Gwinnett County, Georgia, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. SudoGhost 12:09, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkpage edits
Hi, please have a quick read of WP:REDACT. This explains why editing comments after someone has responded is considered bad practice, it is very difficult to follow the flow of a conversation if comments are changed ad-hoc. Thanks GimliDotNet (talk) 06:58, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikiproject Middle-earth
If you're interested in Tolkien articles, why not have a look at the middle-earth project page. It's a group of editors interested in all things Tolkien. GimliDotNet (talk) 07:48, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Emogene Thompson


A tag has been placed on Emogene Thompson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ~ &#8658;TomTom  N00  @ 14:40, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

.22
Not all rimfire rounds are .22 caliber and the edits you made tends to blanket them all together. There are a couple of instances in the article where they would not be interchangable. one good example is on pricing ("For this reason, rimfire cartridges are commonly used for target practice." instead of .22). 500 rounds of .22LR runs about $15, but a simlar amount of .17 hmr is 10 times as much. Please adjust your edits appropriately. MartinezMD (talk) 00:26, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

WIkipedia is not a forum
Please note that the talk pages for articles are for improving articles, not to discuss the topics of the articles in a general sense. Wikipedia is not a forum and there are plenty of internet forums that can be used to discuss such items as Starship Troopers. Thanks. Canterbury Tail  talk  18:40, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Holmes (father of suspect James Holmes)


A tag has been placed on Robert Holmes (father of suspect James Holmes) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ryan Vesey 21:00, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Netflix. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 15:41, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Dyatlov Pass incident
I reverted your edits since they did not appear to be constructive. First, no source talks of "murder". Second, you removed a lot of info without explanation. Third, you screwed up the formatting by removing the reference. Please if you want to contribute to this article do it constructively. Thank you for your understanding.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aircraft crash memorial sites


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Aircraft crash memorial sites requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ironholds (talk) 04:56, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Damnation Alley (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barstow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Federal Bureau of Investigation, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

How is it disruptive editing? Did you confirm that his is not the FBI's policy? Ncsr11 (talk) 03:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Joseph D. Helton Jr for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph D. Helton Jr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joseph D. Helton Jr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —  dain  omite   16:07, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Darwin's abominable mystery for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darwin's abominable mystery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Darwin's abominable mystery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:48, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WR 31a, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 24 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Cîroc page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=726797421 your edit] caused an unsupported parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F726797421%7CCîroc%5D%5D Ask for help])

Your submission at Articles for creation: Milla Sannoner (June 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Milla Sannoner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 19:44, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Milla Sannoner concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Milla Sannoner, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Milla Sannoner


Hello, Ncsr11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Milla Sannoner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anna (1970 film)


The article Anna (1970 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)