User talk:NeoGeneric

November 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Windows Phone version history has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Windows Phone version history was changed by NeoGeneric (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866483 on 2014-11-14T14:04:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:04, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Windows Phone version history with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. — BranStark (talk) 14:09, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Windows Phone 8.1, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chrome and Android. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Windows-related templates with article content
Hello NeoGeneric, I have listed your recently created Windows templates for discussion at Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_February_5 - to discuss substituting them back into article namespace. Per Template namespace templates should not be used to store large chunks of article content outside of the article itself, effectively creating a subpage of the article. Please join the discussion at the linked TfD section. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to DirectX, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 04:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

For being new
For being new to wikipedia, you sure do know what your doing. Might I suggest not making so many different edits though, instead just you should preview and then save. (For example, there are 10 edits in a row on the windows 10 page by you) Mathmanboy (talk) 13:59, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I will keep that in mind next time, thank you. NeoGeneric   💬  14:42, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Excel ui 2016 preview.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Excel ui 2016 preview.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Insider
Hi.

I thought perhaps I should invite some of the active contributors in Windows 10 article to Articles for deletion/Windows Insider. Personally, I feel Windows Insider article has nothing new to warrant a separate article.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 03:27, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: Wording
Actually, your insisted wordings are merely hypernyms. "Upgrade", in relation to Windows, implies installation of the operating system and migrating files/settings from a prior installation. Due to how it will be distributed upon its launch, almost all installations of Windows 10 will be upgrades, so the wording is essentially the same.

"Succeed" means to "take the place of, take over from", meaning that it is an hypernym of "replace" in this context.

Additionally, the Microsoft source makes no reference to being able to set it manually. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

On The Google Chrome Logo...
I do believe the official Google Chrome logo is in fact the material design logo. This is simply because while the "official" desktop website has not been updated in quite a few months, the Google Play version of Google Chrome's logo has been updated for material design. I am very sure once the desktop Google Chrome is updated, the new logo will also come. Please edit this section for further debate.

-- Best wishes, Evan C. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AwesomeSaucer9 (talk • contribs) 22:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

about what you said on your userpage
hello this is dfrr. you said on your userpage that you wanted to put more stuff on there. well no worries I can help you with that. here are two links.:-)


 * User page design center
 * User page design center/Menus and subpages

Thank you and have a great dayDfrr (talk) 19:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC) (Talk to me:-))


 * Thanks heaps for pointing out those pages, I will be sure to make good use of them! NeoGeneric   💬  12:26, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, I'm Mdrnpndr. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Windows 10 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mdrnpndr (talk) 02:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Windows 10.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Windows 10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Christopher Lee Vatican City 1944.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Christopher Lee Vatican City 1944.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 08:37, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Christopher Lee Vatican City 1944.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Christopher Lee Vatican City 1944.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Windows 10 (mobile).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Windows 10 (mobile).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DirectX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page XACT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

This article needs a serious rewrite or sectioning
This article needs a serious rewrite or sectioning.

Please Neo help on this.

10:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreamofworld (talk • contribs)


 * Wait, which article do you refer? Do you mean my userpage? Because yes, there's a lot of whitespace :) NeoGeneric   💬  10:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

I am very sorry for Hurry. I mean Microsoft hardware article. This article is mentioned in see also of all Microsoft article, but is very badly written or categorized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreamofworld (talk • contribs) 10:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, I think part of the issue is that it is a spin-off of the Nokia page, so some information is incomplete because of this. I'll look into it over the next few days. NeoGeneric   💬  10:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry! - My mind was stuck into thinking you were talking about the Microsoft Lumia page (I was guessing before) and I didn't check your link. Yes I see what you mean, I will look into it in the next few days as I mentioned before. NeoGeneric   💬  10:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Windows 10 (mobile).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Windows 10 (mobile).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Re: thank you for edit on Pillars of Creation
Thank you for the thank you! Oct13 (talk) 20:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tasmanian giant freshwater crayfish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Migration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tasmanian giant freshwater crayfish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Launceston. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Detention Falls) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Detention Falls, NeoGeneric!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thank you for creating this useful article!"

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 16:55, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

need a close look
from your recent edits (well done) suspect you need to have a close look at how https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_Marine_and_Coastal_Regionalisation_of_Australia can be incorporated - or at least see also'ed - cheers JarrahTree 04:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bringing the topic to my attention, the information would do well to supplement the characteristics of each area marine reserve. NeoGeneric   💬  05:37, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * My personal problem with IMCRA is it's three dimensional nature - IBRA is less problematic to encounter and explain - the maritime environment has things that belong to particular zones in some parts - does my head in I am afraid - whats left of it JarrahTree 05:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I think the article needs a dose of diagrams to help explain the differences between the types of regions. Thankfully it appears these maps are available under CC-BY here. I will add it too my to-do list because it appears to be an integral topic for the Commonwealth Marine Reserves, especially considering the somewhat vague and general descriptions on environment.gov about what sort of ecosystem each reserve protects. NeoGeneric   💬  06:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * It is an immense relief to find someone interested in this sort of thing - the IBRA and IMCRA material have long needed a lot of adding and reinforcing with links and contexts - anything you do is help - thanks ! JarrahTree 06:46, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I appreciate your support! :) NeoGeneric   💬  06:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Tasman Fracture Commonwealth Marine Reserve) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Tasman Fracture Commonwealth Marine Reserve, NeoGeneric!

Wikipedia editor Winged Blades of Godric just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Good!"

To reply, leave a comment on Winged Blades of Godric's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Winged Blades Godric 04:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ING Direct Australia Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:ING Direct Australia Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

thanks
for your tasmanian maps JarrahTree 12:38, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you! NeoGeneric   💬  12:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

thanks

 * Thank you! Again! Appreciate the barnstar! NeoGeneric   💬  00:31, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

btw
suburbs was an issue some years ago - most local government areas do not have them it was a abs invention - I tend to turn them to localities. JarrahTree 05:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC)


 * OK, I'll keep that in mind. Thanks for the heads up. NeoGeneric   💬  06:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)


 * and adding ext links can attract WP:SPAM if the material is not linking in with something in the text, but... JarrahTree 23:52, 22 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes I see what you mean - helpful links, but extraneous to the article/s itself. NeoGeneric   💬  11:22, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * dont panic - just dont fill the whole australian project with stuff like that :) JarrahTree 12:27, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meander Valley Council, Tasmania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deloraine ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Meander_Valley_Council%2C_Tasmania check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Meander_Valley_Council%2C_Tasmania?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Australian marine parks
Hi, in respect to the above subject, I am interested in those marine parks adjoining the South Australian jurisdiction because I started most of the articles. This is because of the complexity of the marine protected area situation in SA and in Commonwealth waters in the Great Australian Bight. For example, there are now three articles about entities called the 'Great Australian Bight Marine Park'. When there were two (i.e. Great Australian Bight Marine Park (Commonwealth waters) and Great Australian Bight Marine Park; the latter being a collection of marine protected areas), I spent considerable time sorting these out. I have started to upgrade articles in my area of interest starting with Great Australian Bight Marine Park (2017). I am wondering if you would like to divided the work up in respect to existing articles? Please reply here in order to keep every thing in one thread and as I am now watching your talk page. Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 09:56, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Cowdy001, I would be happy to update the marine parks of the South-east network. Also, my plan was to slowly make new stub-like articles for each of the new reserves, similar to what I have already been done for the South-east network reserves. Cheers, NeoGeneric   💬  06:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for the reply, I will do the rest of the existing articles in the South-west Network. I will have a look at what you have previously done before commenting. Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 10:19, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * , Hi, I just tried to rename Southern Kangaroo Island Commonwealth Marine Reserve as the 'Southern Kangaroo Island Marine Park' to discover that you have create a redirect with the same name. Please reply to discuss how to fix. Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 05:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Whoops, didn't think about that. I will speedy delete the redirects I made where a Commonwealth Marine Reserve article already exists (which can then can be moved once they are deleted). My mistake! NeoGeneric   💬  05:23, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I just discovered that same applies to the 'Western Kangaroo Island Marine Park'. Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 05:25, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah I did the whole lot at the same time, but didn't think about if there were existing pages that needed to be moved first. NeoGeneric   💬  05:27, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * HI NeoGeneric, I have finished renaming the existing articles about marine parks in the South-east Marine Parks Network and advise that I will continue with the creation of articles for the remainder of the marine parks in that MP Network.  Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 03:53, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Nice work. I intend to do the same with the SE network, and some new articles for other "significant" marine parks (i.e. high conservation and/or big in area) - except for the the HIMI reserve, since you said below you were looking at making a start there. NeoGeneric   💬  04:47, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have problems like this again, let me know, I can delete to make space if needed. Cheers, &middot; &middot; &middot; Peter Southwood (talk): 09:26, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Cods Grounds Marine Park
Hello NeoGeneric. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Cods Grounds Marine Park, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''This is a useful redirect from the name of one marine park to the article about all Australian marine parks, so I am removing the speedy. .''' Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:49, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry... I restored the speedy tag once I realized that Cods in the title was an error. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:52, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries. This typo originated from the officially released geospatial data, so you weren't the first! NeoGeneric   💬  04:52, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

The addition of "Heard Island and McDonald Islands Marine Park" to Wikidata
Hi NeoGeneric, I was just checking Wikidata because of previous issues with entries. I have noticed that you have added an entry under the name of "Heard Island and McDonald Islands Marine Park". I must advise that this name is incorrect. I have already done some research about the "Heard Island and McDonald Islands Commonwealth Marine Reserve" (HIMI CMR) with the view of writing an article about it. I found that the correct name is the "Heard Island and McDonald Islands Marine Reserve" as this appears on two management plans and on proclamations made under the EPBC Act, although CAPAD 2016 uses HIMI CMR. When one reviews all of the material published by the Australian government about Australian marine parks, one will notice that there is no mention of the HIMI CMR. I would therefore suggest that you rename the Wikidata entry. Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 03:49, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello. Yes, it looks like the HIMI was not part of the renaming schedule - the explanatory statement confirms this. Furthermore, looking at the 2014 management plan, it appears the HIMI reserve is managed by DoE under the Australian Antarctic Division, not Parks Australia (which might be why it was not renamed in 2017?).


 * The Director of National Parks has delegated responsibilities under the EPBC Act in respect of the Reserve to the AAD in recognition of the AAD’s considerable Antarctic and subantarctic expertise and its ongoing responsibilities for the administration of the Territory on behalf of the Australian Government (Part 1: Foreword)


 * So I agree that 'Marine Park' is the wrong name. NeoGeneric   💬  04:41, 15 August 2018 (UTC)::
 * I was going to change the names to 'Marine Reserve', which is what is used in the management plan. Would you agree?
 * Agree Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 07:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lord Howe Marine Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black cod ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Lord_Howe_Marine_Park check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Lord_Howe_Marine_Park?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Australian MPAs without articles
Hi NeoGeneric, I am going to create redirects with short descriptions for Australian MPAs without articles. If you want to convert any of them to full articles, just overwrite the redirect and amend the short description if you have a better one. This will automatically add the new article to the List of marine protected areas I am compiling. Cheers,&middot; &middot; &middot; Peter Southwood (talk): 09:37, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Aussie Broadband logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Aussie Broadband logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NITV logo 2016.png
Thanks for uploading File:NITV logo 2016.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kentish LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Kentish LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:King Island LGA InteractiveMap
Template:King Island LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kingborough LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Kingborough LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Northern Midlands LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Northern Midlands LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Burnie City LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Burnie City LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:50, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Brighton LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Brighton LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:50, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Break'O Day LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Break'O Day LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:50, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sorell LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Sorell LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Central Coast LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Central Coast LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Central Highlands LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Central Highlands LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Clarence City LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Clarence City LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Derwent Valley LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Derwent Valley LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Devonport City LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Devonport City LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dorset LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Dorset LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Flinders LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Flinders LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:George Town LGA InteractiveMap
Template:George Town LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Glamorgan-Spring Bay LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Glamorgan-Spring Bay LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Glenorchy City LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Glenorchy City LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hobart City LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Hobart City LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Huon Valley LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Huon Valley LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Latrobe LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Latrobe LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Launceston City LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Launceston City LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Meander Valley LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Meander Valley LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Southern Midlands LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Southern Midlands LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tasman LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Tasman LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Waratah-Wynyard LGA InteractiveMap
Template:Waratah-Wynyard LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:West Coast LGA InteractiveMap
Template:West Coast LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:West Tamar LGA InteractiveMap
Template:West Tamar LGA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Division of BraddonTAS InteractiveMap
Template:Division of BraddonTAS InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Division of Braddon InteractiveMap
Template:Division of Braddon InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Division of DenisonTAS InteractiveMap
Template:Division of DenisonTAS InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Division of Denison InteractiveMap
Template:Division of Denison InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Division of FranklinTAS InteractiveMap
Template:Division of FranklinTAS InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Division of Franklin InteractiveMap
Template:Division of Franklin InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Division of LyonsTAS InteractiveMap
Template:Division of LyonsTAS InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Division of Lyons InteractiveMap
Template:Division of Lyons InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tasmanian Wilderness WHA InteractiveMap
Template:Tasmanian Wilderness WHA InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Local government areas of Tasmania interactivemap
Template:Local government areas of Tasmania interactivemap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Map templates of Tasmanian local government areas


A tag has been placed on Category:Map templates of Tasmanian local government areas indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk  20:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:South-east Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network
Template:South-east Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:National parks of Tasmania interactivemap
Template:National parks of Tasmania interactivemap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:09, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Division of Bass InteractiveMap
Template:Division of Bass InteractiveMap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:10, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Map templates of Australian House of Representatives divisions


A tag has been placed on Category:Map templates of Australian House of Representatives divisions indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Map templates of Tasmanian national parks


A tag has been placed on Category:Map templates of Tasmanian national parks indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)