User talk:Nice4What/Archive-4

Jesus Is King
Patched it up with a few changes, now GA nominating with you as the co-nominator... thanks a lot and let's go! --Kyle Peake (talk) 17:31, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Glad to hear! Thanks for the work you put in too. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 17:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Ringtone (Remix)
Hello! Your submission of Ringtone (Remix) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! mike•owen discuss 07:40, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Up from the Ashes (song)
Hello! Your submission of Up from the Ashes (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kingsif (talk) 19:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Authors and overlinking
Can you please add authors in the consistent name formatting with the rest of articles and stop wikilinking to sources already wikilinked to? --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice that you do Last, First while I typically put the name in order for the author parameter. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 18:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Shiny Suit Theory
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Lil Uzi Vert vs. the World 2
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Disappearance of Don Lewis
Hello! Your submission of Disappearance of Don Lewis at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:32, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Time (Childish Gambino song)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Ant Clemons
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Revert?
Did you just revert the change I made to the background section seen here? AzureCitizen (talk) 22:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Was not meant to be a revert. I was just sorting out the article in a more presentable way. Background isn't an allegation, and the NYT investigation is a development rather than an allegation too. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 22:20, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Please use edit summaries if you don't mind, when they're left blank the other editor wonders what just happened and why. Having a separate background section seems to be drawing people in who want to turn that into either 1) a mini-BLP for Reade, or 2) content "for" or "against" Biden.  With regard to developments, they are several "developments" above the new section that was just added, for example the NPR police report confirmation and the Business Insider interview of her former neighbor.  Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 22:23, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry for not using edit summaries. I will move the developments to the appropriate place. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 22:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, thanks! AzureCitizen (talk) 22:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Carole Baskin
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Tara Reade Allegations
Hello Nice4What. You have violated the 1RR page restriction on the Biden/Reade allegations article. As you know, that restriction was placed under Discretionary Sanctions.

The reverts are and.

Please undo the sectond one, which reinstated the disputed dual-headshot illustration of Biden and Reade. FYI you also violated 1RR yesterday when you reinstated that same illustration after I challenged it. These are clear violations for which an editor can be blocked, so I hope you'll just undo your second revert linked above. Thank you.  SPECIFICO talk 18:14, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

DS violation
Hi Nice4What, you have violated the editing restrictions on Tara Reade sexual assault allegation by exceeding 1RR and by restoring material (see below). Please self-revert the violating edits.


 * Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period).
 * 24-hr BRD cycle: If a change you make to this article is reverted, you may not reinstate that change unless you discuss the issue on the talk page and wait 24 hours (from the time of the original edit). Partial reverts/reinstatements that reasonably address objections of other editors are preferable to wholesale reverts.

Thank you. - MrX 🖋 18:15, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Which edit? And thank you, I will self-revert. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 18:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Revert #1 (OK), restoration/revert #2, restoration/revert #3]. I suspect that if I dug through your edits over the past 24 hours there would be more. - MrX 🖋 18:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Yea, I fixed that image revert. "Revert #3" isn't a revert, it's fixing an orphaned citation. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 18:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, be sure to check the talk page so there's no issues like the one found at "Revert #2". A discussion was ongoing regarding that content. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 18:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Nice4What - you repeatedly edit-warred your 2 photo illustration into the article. The single Reade photo had been stable for weeks since its first appearance. Don't keep saying you were restoring a good version pending discussion to change it. Anyone who looks at the diffs will know that is not true.  SPECIFICO talk 19:12, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Discussion ongoing with most in support of two portraits, so say what you want to say 🤷 You are correct that I was the one that added the photos to the lede (edit). Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 19:22, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for self-reverting. SPECIFICO talk 23:20, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

You did good work at the Joe Biden sexual assault allegation talk page
Thank you for your work, if it wasn't for you that farce would've probably been successful. Excellent work. MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken (talk) 18:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, you too! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 19:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milk War
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Milk War you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 20:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Up from the Ashes (song)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Edit conflict at Biden allegations
Hello Nice4What. I believe that, due to an edit conflict, you reverted two of my preceding edits, here: My edits here Your edit, (edit conflict) that reverted mine: here

I believe you may have corrected some of the edit conflict, but some of my edit is still missing. I'd appreciate it if you could correct this. Thanks.  SPECIFICO talk 13:15, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * How is that an edit conflict..? There was a tag about the lede needing a rewrite, which I completed. I saw I accidentally removed the reaction from Gillibrand, but I swiftly readded it because I didn't want to edit war. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 13:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You removing the audio file would count as a revert, no? Use the talk page please... Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 13:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Your edit undid my removal of some of the list of reactions. Nothing to do with the lead. Are you going to take care of this or not? "Use the talk page" has nothing to do with a simple matter of an edit conflict. It sounds as if you're suggesting I'm asking you to make some edit so I can avoid discussing content on the talk page? I don't underestand why it's a problem for you to fix your error. When there's an edit conflict, the only safe thing is to exit and re-do from a fresh screen. Please have a look at my original links here. Thank you.  SPECIFICO talk 13:50, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * During my edit, you reverted certain additions to the article. My point is if you have a problem with said conflict, use the talk page and create a new section to discuss that content. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 13:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that you purposely reverted my edits to the "Corroborations" section? If so, I misunderstood and thought it was inadvertent removal due to the edit conflict. SPECIFICO talk 13:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * How did you interpret that from what I just said? I was editing this version of the article before the edit conflict. While I was fixing the lede, you reverted the addition of the Larry King Live audio sample and other content. That's my point. I didn't deliberately do anything, it was an edit conflict. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 13:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * In addition to the King bit, there was also my removal of some of the "collaborations" that was reverted by the conflict. Are you saying that you purposely reverted my edits to the "Corroborations" section? If so, I misunderstood and thought it was inadvertent removal due to the edit conflict. I need to know, because if you intended to revert my removals from the corroborations, I will indeed use talk and not edit war. But it appeared to me that this was just due to the inadvertent edit conflict and that you were not intentionally making a revert of my removals. If so, one of us can fix it and reinstate my edit that was reverted. Let me know and I'll proceed accordingly. Thanks.  SPECIFICO talk 13:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * It was an inadvertent removal. But was your edit to the corrobations section a revert of another editor's additions? If not, I apologize and please link me your edits so we can avoid an edit war. Thanks! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I gave you the link in my inital comment above. It covers two consecutive edits that appear to have been wiped out -- now we know inadvertently -- by your edit. I'd appreciate it if you could reinstate my edits per the linked diff. It will be a self-revert for you to re-do my diff that was caught in the conflict, and otherwise, if I do it it may appear to be a 1RR violation to someone who has not seen this thread, etc. Thank you.  SPECIFICO talk 14:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If it looks like that, then I could always explain. If you removed content, it seems like a revert of content, no? I propose we solve this through discussion. I'm starting a talk page section about the audio file. I'll also be certain to avoid edit conflicts and edit wars (again, sorry for the issue). Please let me know what you think! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Talk page discussion about the audio file. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * This article is not under zero reverts. There's nothing wrong with my having reverted content. I'm concluding that you refuse to correct the edit conflict that you say inadvertently undid my edits. Undoing a technical error is separate from any talk page discussion. Last try: Please undo the inadvertent revert of my edit. If you do not choose to do that, I am going to consider it a simple revert and will have a look at your 24 hour recent and future history to make sure there is no other revert. Please fix the inadvertent revert. That's all I'll have to say about this on this page. <b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b> talk 14:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Edit history already shows you violated 1RR by removing the photo of Biden and then removing content from the lede. What point are you trying to make by removing all mentions of LKL, removing the audio sample, and then "Remove content not specifically about the 2020 sexual assault allegation". I've tried to compromise and be civil. What more do you want? Should I reinstate your violation, really? I suggest you "self-revert" your removal of this content by accepting this accidental technical error. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Happy now? You should self-revert because you engaged on the talk page about this content claiming BLP issues, but then went ahead and removed the content (an editing pattern at this point). POV and 1RR issues. Am I meant to report this somewhere? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are saying you believe that I violated 1RR, please provide the diffs. I am careful to avoid that. Thank you. <b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b> talk 15:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , for starters, it would be easy for someone to claim that these large removals consisted of reverts, as the material has been going in and out recently. And here you reverted the addition of Biden's photo (which had already been reverted even though there was ongoing discussion). Mr Ernie (talk) 15:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Ernie, I think I've made clear above and elsewhere why your concerns are unfounded. Maybe have a look above and on the article talk page. Cheers.<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b> talk 16:28, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Removal of statement regarding Biden's denial
Hi, I have noticed that your edit has removed a sentence that explains that as of April 2020, Biden hasn't personally addressed the allegations (with two sources provided). Since this edit was labelled as an edit conflict, was that on purpose and is a revert, or am I okay to return that sentence? Thanks BeŻet (talk) 13:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was an accident based on technical issues. Go ahead, not trying to edit war! And I believe that content belongs on the article. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 13:19, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I assumed it was a mistake and that's why I thought I'll contact you directly. BeŻet (talk) 13:24, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Issues with your editing
Hi Nice4What. Yesterday, as a courtesy, I alerted you to violations of 1RR and enforced BRD at Joe Biden sexual assault allegation. I was disappointed to see that you are continuing in that vein, forcing your preferences into the article by making several reverts:. In addition to this, I believe you are editing aggressively, and with a strong POV, for example making sure that certain material appears in the article in two, and even three places. Before I bring this to WP:AE for review, I wanted to give you an opportunity to address this voluntarily. - MrX 🖋 13:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm confused. "Making sure that certain material appears" yet I've been cutting down on duplicate content ? Your second "revert" also shows cutting down on duplicate content, as I was merging two sections about The Union into one. "Revert" three was also rephrasing duplicate content as it was already stated that Reade's brother was unaware of the assault at first. You have quite literally characterized my edits as the opposite of what they are. Point to any "self-reverts" you believe I need to make to fix this issue. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:01, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * See above RE: Edit conflict.<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b> talk 14:04, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * See above, as it was a technical issue and you engaged in the reverting of content added by other editors. I even did my best to undo the accidental removal of content. That audio call in no way could be considered a BLP violation. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:08, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Every time I think we've sorted things out, I'm surprised to see a comment like that, Nice4What. There's no restriction on my having reverted the "corroborations" content, and I explained myself in my edit summaries. "BLP violation" was not in my summary - I'm not sure why you bring that up. <b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b> talk 14:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * POV accusations? You added an opinion piece criticizing Reade to the article. This can go both ways. If your concern is that I'm somehow "anti-Biden" because I'm against a page move or I want a photo of Biden in the lede, then that doesn't add up. Go through my edits on the article and I've added content related to both camps. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:08, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Do not let these two intimidate you, but it may be a good idea to slow down a bit there. MrX is one of the most effective and prolific AE filers in the AP2 space, so please really ensure you are staying in line with the sanctions. Mr Ernie (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Of course, and thank you Mr Ernie. I haven't been adding controversial content, just rephrasing what exists. That's why I've been using the talk page more to adhere to WP:ONUS. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I listed four reverts above, and it looks like you made another while I was writing this. If I have to point out ever revert, I will do it at WP:AE. If you don't understand what a revert is, or why material should not appear three times in a article, then you should edit in a less serious areas of the encyclopedia. I don't know how you can be confused about the fact that Collin Moulton appears three times in this short article, since you added at least two of those instances. You have also been previously warned about edit warring, and blocked for it, but it has apparently made little impression on you. - MrX 🖋 14:15, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Mr X, I added Moulton to the lede because that's what a lede is for (summarizing) and there was a tag for rewriting. I have explained in-depth that those four examples you listed are not reverts. I have cut down on content, maybe you are looking at it wrong? I'm not edit warring, look at the many sections I've started on that article's talk page. Maybe at this point you need to be reminded of WP:GF as well? Want me to "self-revert" so The Union is mentioned twice, Moulton initially not knowing about the assault is mentioned twice, the anonymous allegations are mentioned twice, and to reinstate the unrevised lede? I'm not trying to insult you, but you have to be reading my edits wrong. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:20, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you don't want to be sanctioned, you should self-revert all of your reverts in the past 24 hours—the ones I listed, and any others where you removed material that someone added, or added material that someone removed. In addition to that, you really must stop violating the page editing restrictions, and WP:EW. You have had more than enough warnings. - MrX 🖋 14:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * All of my reverts in the past 24hrs have been self-reverted. Retract your statement that I was because if I revert what you allege to be "reverts", the article will appear that way. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * "Self-revert" done. Want to fix up the duplicated content on the article now, or would that be a revert of my self-revert? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You're acting like a thug, MrX. How about instead of puffing your chest and issuing threats of sanctioning you show some civility? MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken (talk) 15:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Actually there are some ambiguities about what a revert actually is. For certain, it is using the "undo" button to remove content. Less certain but still likely is if you go in and manually remove information someone recently added. I say less certain, because in that case technically every edit you make where you remove text could be construed and portrayed as a revert. And this also depends on the admin who reviews your report, because there isn't a hard and fast rule about what type of text removals are reverts and what are simple editorial decisions (what you called cutting down content). In the case of Biden, where there's lots of things being added and removed daily, it may make sense to err on the side of caution until things calm down a bit.
 * MrX you need to be careful too, as you look to have gotten away with a few 1RR's too. Mr Ernie (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I made one accidental 1RR vio because I mistakenly thought the Forbes content was user contributed (which it usually is). Once I realized that, I was going to self-revert, but someone already reverted it. - MrX 🖋 14:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I made one accidental 1RR vio because I mistakenly thought the Forbes content was user contributed (which it usually is). Once I realized that, I was going to self-revert, but someone already reverted it. - MrX 🖋 14:34, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Jesus is Born
Why do you insist on classifying Jesus is Born as a Kanye West collaboration? Nowhere does it state this. It is credited everywhere as a Sunday Service album, not as a Kanye collaborative album. You seem to be ignoring credits for your own classificatinons.

Furthermore, Jesus is King II is also not a collaboration, it will be executive produced by Dr. Dre, but that is another issue entirely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.48.113.152 (talk) 18:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You need to bring it to the talk page of Jesus Is Born. Let me know if you need help. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 19:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

File:1993 Larry King Live call from San Luis Obispo.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1993 Larry King Live call from San Luis Obispo.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. - MrX 🖋 18:54, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for How I'm Feeling Now
Vanamonde (Talk) 00:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Disappearance of Don Lewis
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Carole Baskin DYK
Hi, I removed this entry from the stats page because it does not qualify based on the pageviews the day before and the day after. Higher up on the Stats page you see this formula: VX &minus; (VX&minus;1 + VX+1). Your page therefore got 53,363 – (60,396 + 43,474)/2 = 1,428, indicating only 1,428 new pageviews because of the DYK appearance. Yoninah (talk) 14:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 14:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ringtone (Remix)
Hello! Your submission of Ringtone (Remix) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:41, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Please refrain from making bad faithed false accusations and personal attacks on talk pages as you did here (and a few other places).  Volunteer Marek  17:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't mind Marek, he's just like that. Cjhard (talk) 17:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * That's not a personal attack. You moved the page yesterday ignoring the ongoing discussion. You've made continuous edits while still ignoring ongoing discussions. Reflect on your own disruptive editing. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 17:52, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I second this, as Nice4What has been making personal attacks and accusations at me as well. Nice4What, you've now been warned and further personal attacks can be met with reports at ANI or AE. DS applies to this page. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 18:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Link the personal attacks. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 18:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

See below: Just so you know, WP:NPA does not just mean schoolyard name calling. It also covers accusations against other editors without evidence, misuse of the talk page for personalized criticisms, suggestions of bad intent or bad faith, and including editors names in talk page headings (which is a serious no-no). You are welcome to continue participating at the talk page if you can refrain from the above. If not, the above diffs can be presented at ANI or AE for repeated abuse of DS/NPA policy. Your call. Wikieditor19920 (talk) 18:21, 1 May 2020 (UTC) I will also say I have some understanding about/experience in "coming in hot" regarding an issue you might be passionate about, but you really can't engage with others in the way above. I'm not trying to threaten you with AE/ANI, but that's where this stuff ends up if you antagonize enough people.Wikieditor19920 (talk) 18:25, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Changes talk page heading to one about content to being focused on a "particular editor," violating WP:TPG.
 * Specifically names another editor in a talk page heading, accusing them of "disruptive editing" and violating 1RR, not knowing that a series of reverts counts as a single edit.
 * Accusations of blanking.
 * Says that another editors concerns about BLP "speaks volumes" about their intentions.
 * Calls other editors removing content concerning BLP and WP:ONUS bullshit.
 * Accuses VM of disruptive editing at the article talk page.
 * Accusations of blanking were true, speaking volumes isn't hostile or anything (point being that not many people see it as a BLP violation), and characterizing the removal of content as "disruptive" while discussions are ongoing... These are all defendable charges you're making here. Wow, you called me citing WP:ONUS bullshit – how dare you? (Get my point now?) Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 18:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "blanking?" You have no diff of any blanking of that section. You've been asked many times to stop repeating that charge. It is false and inflammatory and yes it is a personal attack to keep repeating a false claim. <b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b> talk 19:10, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Oh wow, Nice4What, you've got the misfortune of the SPECIFICO/Varek double-team. Don't take them too seriously, but do be careful. Cjhard (talk) 02:48, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:1993 Larry King Live call from San Luis Obispo.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:1993 Larry King Live call from San Luis Obispo.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for LA Monster
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Ringtone (Remix)
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Reverting my edits - editing war
Why do you keep reverting my Jesus is Born edits, it is not considered as part of his discography anywhere. It is a Sunday Service album, which is a Kanye affiliation.

He was the executive producer, it is not credited as a Kanye West collaboration, you seem have your own definition, can you please explain?
 * Use a talk page to discuss this. Here is an example. Kanye is a member/leader of the Sunday Service Choir. Though he doesn't have vocals on the album, his contributions are all over the album. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 13:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milk War
The article Milk War you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Milk War for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 16:01, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of New Body
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article New Body you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Raymie -- Raymie (talk) 03:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of New Body
The article New Body you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:New Body for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Raymie -- Raymie (talk) 00:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yi and iMi
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yi and iMi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Gooba
Hello! Your submission of Gooba at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thatone weird wikier &#124; Say hi 16:59, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 12.38
Hello! Your submission of 12.38 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --evrik (talk) 18:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yi and iMi
The article Yi and iMi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Yi and iMi for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Blinding (song)
Hello! Your submission of The Blinding (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 16:47, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Milk War
The article Milk War you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Milk War for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 17:02, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq (2020)
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yi and iMi
The article Yi and iMi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yi and iMi for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for 12.38
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for The Blinding (song)
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:43, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge)
The article Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge)
The article Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Act I: Eternal Sunshine (The Pledge) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ahmaud Arbery shooting video.png
Thanks for uploading File:Ahmaud Arbery shooting video.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jesus Is King Cassette.png
Thanks for uploading File:Jesus Is King Cassette.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Written Testimony
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Written Testimony you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Charli XCX 1999 alternative cover.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charli XCX 1999 alternative cover.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wcam (talk) 14:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Written Testimony
The article A Written Testimony you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:A Written Testimony for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A Written Testimony
The article A Written Testimony you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:A Written Testimony for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:01, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

24K Magic
Hi there,

I wanted to thank you first for reviewing the article, secondly for being so patient and understanding, and thirdly for helping out when it was needed.

Kind regards, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem, and keep up the good work. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 23:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

File:1993 Larry King Live call from San Luis Obispo.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1993 Larry King Live call from San Luis Obispo.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Time (Childish Gambino song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Time (Childish Gambino song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coolmarc -- Coolmarc (talk) 08:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

George Floyd protests
Your edit summary read, "Wait as talk page discussion is ongoing", but WP:ONUS and WP:BRD says the content, once challenged, should not be reinstated until there is consensus to do so. That there is a talk page discussion ongoing is the reason why this should be removed. We don't keep it in there pending talk page discussion; we remove it pending talk page discussion. Also, it is unsourced. "13" is just as much WP:OR as your modification "9-13". No source says "13" or "9-13" deaths occurred--that figure is arrived by editors counting up how many reports are in the article. It's using Wikipedia as a source, which is also very clearly against policy. Please self revert. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levivich (talk • contribs)
 * Somebody else has added to my edit now. I would be reverting their addition. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 16:26, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * That was me who added to your edit. Actually, I removed your edit, which had the death tolls at "13" and then "9-13", which were based on your adding up the instances listed in our article. I replaced that with "5+", sourced to a New York Times article that was updated today. I hope you now see that what you added was (1) factually incorrect, (2) unsourced, (3) based on your own calculations, and (4) directly contradicted by actual reliable sources. It's important that the information we put out is accurate and verified. That's in our core content policies and our pillars. It's essential to the very essence of what we do here that we do not make up numbers. Please don't do this again. Levivich&thinsp;<sup style="white-space:nowrap;">[dubious – discuss] 16:37, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Alright. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 16:44, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Time (Childish Gambino song)
The article Time (Childish Gambino song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Time (Childish Gambino song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coolmarc -- Coolmarc (talk) 19:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Gooba
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Yi and iMi
—valereee (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Psilocybin decriminalization in the United States
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Panini Remix Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Panini Remix Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nahnah4 (talk | contribs) 16:02, 20 June 2020 (UTC)


 * My apologies, I had uploaded a fanmade artwork on accident and your file is now back on the article. Cheers, Nahnah4 (talk | contribs) 16:24, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Capitol Hill protest zone
The zone is still active and many sources are questioning that it has, in fact, dissolved. It is premature for this to be in the infobox, (let alone to have a section request for expansion) after the claim was added yesterday afternoon, several RS were reporting that others did not recognized the "official" twitter or the self proclaimed leader. The account by CNN is a matter of dispute by several local RS. Kind Regards, Cedar777 (talk) 18:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ego Death (song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Coachella and 4/20 ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ego_Death_%28song%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ego_Death_%28song%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)