User talk:NickMartin

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

I noticed that you gave a final warning to User talk:71.229.177.35, although this IP only made one vandalous edit today. Final warnings are only normally given after repeat violations and disregarding prior warnings. There's also a first and only warning that is usually issued for single particularly egregious instances of vandalism. -- Broken Sphere Msg me 20:40, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I think you're doing a great job. If the vandalism is severe enough, a final warning should be issued post haste and summarily dealt with.  No need to fret over details not even the vandals care about.  (jarbarf) (talk) 21:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


 * By the way, which monitoring tools do you use these days? I'm seeing a lot of new things on my watchlist and think its probably time to upgrade. (jarbarf) (talk) 21:21, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

All that hard work deserves some reward
I've seen you in action for a few hours, it was more than due. -- Broken Sphere Msg me 22:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

And another...

 * Great work! Tiptoety  talk 23:39, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

AIV reports
As a reminder, use the and not the  template when reporting IP vandals to WP:AIV. There is a huge difference in how the templates display; the former is the one approrpiate for AIV reports. —C.Fred (talk) 07:16, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Please read the above...;) Dreadstar †  07:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Bathroomtvmirror.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Bathroomtvmirror.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, NickMartin! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 03:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Laptoptvmirror.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Laptoptvmirror.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:NewLenoxLibrary.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NewLenoxLibrary.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:40, 31 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

External links from metals pages
You've been adding external links to a lot of metal pages. What's up? Josh Parris 07:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * To NickMartin, I believe you honestly tried to improve WP, and I do appreciate that. Don't take me rude, but I've reverted those additions because they link to a self-published site that cites no (reliable) references. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 07:40, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I'll include some sources. I have them, but just haven't posted them. Honestly, it was my irritation at the fact that there were so few resources available for reactions in my qualitative analysis lab that led me to post these. All of the research is from literature at the Chemistry Library at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I'll work on the sources. Thanks for keeping me honest :D. --Nick Martin (talk) 08:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Nick, thanks for reply. Naive question: why don't you include that (reaction) information into the WP articles directly (with those refs) ? The elements articles are watched by several friendly and experienced chemists. They'll brush up whatever might need correction. Materialscientist (talk) 08:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I considered that, but I would imagine other people would have issue with element pages turning into a how-to guide for some common general chemistry course. Its just been in my experience that whenever you insert a substantial amount of data into an article, people tend to object. --Nick Martin (talk) 08:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I've looked again at those pages. Comments: (i) My eyes are certainly weaker than they used to be, but I guess many internet users could say the same: I have problems reading not only sub/superscripts, but even the main symbols are somewhat small. (ii) Many people would think that 3M is a company - would be nice to explain what mole is. (iii) It is not clear what is reacting, a metal or ion and where do those ions come from (original compound)? All that is evident for specialists, but those don't usually consult web sites :-) Materialscientist (talk) 09:04, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I hadn't actually looked that closely yet. I'll have to brush up on the whole thing tomorrow (after my actual lab, funny enough). Thanks again for the advice, it's much appreciated. --Nick Martin (talk) 09:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:EnDesertCoralVolOne.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EnDesertCoralVolOne.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  17:44, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:NicolasMartin.jpg


The file File:NicolasMartin.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Second Cold War
Hey there. I nominated Category:Second Cold War for speedy deletion as possibly a re-creation of a deleted category (see CFD discussion) and Template:Second Cold War for deletion. --George Ho (talk) 03:57, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Gotcha. Thanks, I didn’t see that Nick Martin (talk) 17:16, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:NickMartin.jpg


The file File:NickMartin.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused personal photo. Out of scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 15:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)