User talk:Non-dropframe/Archive 4

speedy
Please do not nominate articles for speedy deletion 60 seconds )literally) after they've been started. Give people a chance. DGG (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, you _just_ did this to me too :( --Phixxor (talk) 04:35, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * That is in refrence to a WP:CSD A1 or WP:CSD A3. I nominated yours for a WP:CSD A7.
 * Whether it is for no content or no notability, it is very discouraging to see this immediately upon creating the page, after spending so much time finding newspaper links and the review from Pitchfork to make sure it's notable. Does a page need to be perfect before it can be created? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phixxor (talk • contribs) 04:47, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I apologize for discouraging you. However, unlike no content, notability is much easier to determine. If something isn't notable, no amount of adding content is going to make it so. I would suggest looking at WP:MUSIC to see the notability guidelines for bands. Thanks, Non-dropframe (talk) 05:01, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

FYI
I removed your speedy delete tag from Dr. Thomas P. Rosandich. By the time you had tagged it it was clearly not a copyright infringement anymore. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for the update Non-dropframe (talk) 21:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
I was not actually test editing, I was speed-making userboxes for all minor political parties in the US, and copied a little too much.  TN  05  23:53, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh okay, I'm sorry. I was a little confused. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   23:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Not a problem; you were doing what was probably the best thing to do. I moved the article, BTW. :)  TN  05  00:02, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Victor III
What vandalism would it be? --&#39;&#39;&#39;Attilios&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 19:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm so sorry. I must have clicked on the wrong user. My apologies. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   20:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Total Riot
Well, I created some days ago a wikipedia page for the band Total Riot and was deleted. I request that you grand me permission on re-creating that page since this band is playing Wacken Open Air festival (a global well known festival) and on wacken's wikipedia page, Total Riot's name appears without having a link for Total Riot wikipedia page as there is with the rest bands.
 * Hello. I am not an administrator. I am simply a member of the New Page Patrol. We tag pages that we do not believe fit Wikipedia's policies and an administrator then deletes the page if he or she agrees with our reasoning. If you believe this band should have a page, after reading the section on musicians: wp:band, then you may go ahead and re-create the page unless it has been blocked from being recreated, in which case you need to seek an admin that will remove that block for you. Just be sure that your new article conforms to the notability guidelines that I linked you to before you create it or you run the risk of having the page deleted again. Thanks -- Non-Dropframe   talk   21:51, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
for the * ! NawlinWiki (talk) 21:53, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
GorillaWarfare talk 00:08, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Problem User
Re your message: Boy, I did really annoy somebody. Funny thing is that I'm not really sure who that is, so it's kind of hard to feel insulted. Materialscientist blocked the account. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Re your message: That makes it all the more funny. =) I guess he was so upset at me he couldn't type straight. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:42, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Walls historic site
Though I agree that this article can use references and wikification, I wonder why you are proposing deletion using BLP standards? This is not a biography of a living person, is it? Cullen328 (talk) 05:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, while the title of the article suggests its topic isn't exactly biographical, 90%+ of the content is. I would suggest that the easiest way to settle the matter would be to reference your article, just as would be otherwise required. I'm really not trying to give you a hard time or anything and I'm sorry if I come across that way, I'm merely attempting to make sure everything meets standards, you know? -- Non-Dropframe   talk   05:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I am not the author but am an editor who wondered why BLP standards were being applied to an article about an historic site. I have no knowledge about the subject other than reading the article. Much of the article is about the head of a college who served from 1924 to 1953 when he retired. Given these dates the chances this man is still alive are negligible. I now see the article is gone.  My concern is using strict BLP standards in this case, and now we may have lost a potentially good article about an historic site in a 3rd world country. Cullen328 (talk) 20:23, 16 September 2010 (UTC) Cullen328 (talk) 17:55, 17 September 2010 (UTC)


 * After having had time to think about it, do you now agree with me that BLP was the wrong policy to apply in this case? Cullen328 (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Your tagging on Anterria (world)
Thank you for your effort on tagging with maintanance templates on this article. Can you please explain why you chose some of those templates? I don't see any explicit Conflict of interest nor do I see how a specific POV is being pushed. I previously noted with twinkle that it was unreferenced and had notability issues. Please be careful with using twinkle as it appears to not respect previously created multiple-issues templates. Hasteur (talk) 18:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Alison Milbank
Hello Non-dropframe. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Alison Milbank, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Courcelles 01:54, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Tagging on 39 Episodes
Hi there! Thank you for your interest in New Page Patrol, however, it is often considered biting to tag articles A1 (insufficient context to identify the subject) or A3 (no content) within a few minutes of their creation. In the future, please consider patrolling further back in the log or checking the time that the article was created before tagging. Best, Danger (talk) 07:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Wind Power in Malta
Non-Dropframe, I expect the double posting of Your contributed article, Wind Power in Malta was an accident. Could you remove the first one? I would consider shorter headlines more neutral; here: Wind Power in Malta. In the main issue you have correct: The article was short and incomplete. The reason is that I focused in the project Category:Wind power in the European Union by filling the missing gap of Malta in this category. In my opinion each country has equal right for their own article in the series: "Wind power in "country". I call it neutrality, don’t you agree? The incompleteness or present state of an article is in my opinion not an adequate reason for deletion. The same applies to the wind power volume since there is high potential for Wind power in Malta. The publicity of the present status in the media including Wikipedia may promote the wind power development in Malta. Thanks to your question, I understood that the feed-in tariff article is also relevant in this category Category:Wind power in the European Union. Thanks! Watti Renew (talk) 14:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Same applied for the Category:Renewable energy in the European Union and Category:Solar power in the European Union. Watti Renew (talk) 19:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the name correction: Wind power in Malta. Watti Renew (talk) 17:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Please read the references
thx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barney the barney barney (talk • contribs) 22:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you 1. establish what you're talking about, preferably by using links. 2. be less rude. And 3. sign your comment? "thx." -- Non-Dropframe   talk   22:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Adolescence
Hey, no I'm not vandalizing. I'm just trying to edit and reorganize the page, also replace older outdated research with more recent. If you disagree with something specific, could you just revert that part and open a discussion? Thanx! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.91.76.238 (talk) 01:32, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi Non-dropframe. This page is tagged for deletion.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memini I have tried to improve this by adding reference in proper order, added one category also. I can try to improve it, only if it is not going to be deleted. Oherwise not intrested to use my time on an article which is to be deleted anyway. Regards.Mehmda (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Memini
I have declined the speedy deletion - since you tagged it, the article has developed and has three relevant references, enough to pass A7 and in my opinion enough for notability, though you can consider AfD if you like. By the way, you tagged it only four minutes after it was first input - with something like this, it is worth waiting rather longer to see what develops, as new users often press "Save page" to see what it looks like long before they have finished. Thanks for offering help on the author's talk page, though - that more than makes up for any BITEy-ness of the early tagging. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

re: Pteromerhanophobia
Regarding this feedback item, see also WP:ANI. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for asking. This is copied, but gives you the general idea. I have taken the advice given and will see where it goes. Thanks again--Mt6617 (talk) 05:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

'First, please excuse me if I am not familiar with your customs and procedures.

I have enjoyed the use of Wikipedia for many years. And all those that have been a part of Wikipedia I thank you.

I come here to ask that you improve an article that needs serious attention. This is not just my opinion, but appears to be others as well. (Please see talk page).

I do own a non-profit website, with forums titled Takingflight that I started when I was battling my own phobia.

I did put the website in the "External Links" and it has caused some discussion.

As I have "stumbled" and made mistakes, I have decided to make no further edits. I will however be more than happy to provide information to whoever wishes to take on the task of editing this article. But as my experience here, trying to do it myself has been.... less than favorable, I do not want to be directly involved in the actual editing of the article.

This is important to understand. I do not think my purpose here has been understood. I sincerely wish to see this article improved, or removed if it can't be. I do not care what links are placed, or what references are made, as long as they are reliable.

I have spent the last two weeks begging for help, only to be met with roadblocks, rules, links, redirects, etc. I hope that Wikipedia is better than this.

So again, so that we are perfectly clear, I wish for the article to be improved, accurate, and factual. I AGAIN do not care what links and references are presented as long as they are accurate.

Can someone please help with this project?

At this time I would like to acknowledge those that HAVE been helpful, and understanding.[82] [83] [84] [85] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mt6617 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Mt6617 has a conflict of interest with this article and has attempted to add links to his own website to it. He's been asked to post specific recommendations in the article's talk page, but he hasn't done so. He's primarily complained repeatedly about the how bad the content is. Mt6617 did find one useful source and was commended for it. He was encouraged to use it and find more like it. However, when pointed to WP:EL for an explanation of why he can't link to a forum in the external links section, he responded by seeking out some other article that had one. Unfortunately, when I pointed him to WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, some nimrod had nominated it a 2nd time (in five years) for deletion, and Mt6617 didn't read it through to find the link to the correct article. I do admit to getting testy with Mt6617's constant complaining, and I highly encourage other editors to try and help Mt6617 out. And good luck to you. Rklawton (talk) 02:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

The above is what I am speaking of. Again, again, and AGAIN... don't use Takingflight. Use something else. I don't care. Just publish an accurate article. Is that really too much to ask? --Mt6617 (talk) 03:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

And that's what I'm speaking of. Running around and telling us to publish a better article doesn't accomplish anything unless you have specific recommendations. We're all volunteers here. We edit what we like when we feel like it, so getting your shorts in a bunch because we're not jumping at your command isn't going to make you any more comfortable or pleasant to work with. Rklawton (talk) 03:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I have suggested numerous sources, resources, articles, etc, that seem to be more than acceptable everywhere else. You say I have a "conflict of interest" then by that very reason I should not be allowed to edit this article. Fine... Please publish an accurate article. Again, way before I came along this article was noted as in bad shape, by editors, administrators, etc. I am just asking that you fix it. Rklawton, frankly I suspect that you don't care about the quality of this project, just your own position. Regardless... just back off since you are unwilling to help. Thank you, good night, and good bye. --Mt6617 (talk) 03:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I have suggested numerous sources, resources, articles, etc, On the contrary. I read the talk page thoroughly some days ago, and you've made very few constructive suggestions. You've mostly complained about how bad the article is without providing the specifics needed to fix it, or fixing it yourself. In fact, I still don't have a clear idea of what you think is wrong with the article. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

If I may make a suggestion, how about starting small - pick one sentence from the article that is inaccurate and suggest an alternative onTalk:Pteromerhanophobia. Hopefully you could collaborate with the other editors to make it accurate (with reliable sources to support it). I've seen this process work well (but slowly) on Talk:The Beatles. Good luck! GoingBatty (talk) 03:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

@Mt6617: GoingBatty's suggestion is an excellent one, why not give it a try? There's nothing to lose and everything to gain! Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Good point. I agree. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 04:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm going to close this. Further interaction can take place on editor's or article's talk page. Thanks to all, Drmies (talk) 04:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC) ' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mt6617 (talk • contribs) 05:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Browser window.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Browser window.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. EditorE (talk) 22:22, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Canvas window.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Canvas window.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. EditorE (talk) 22:24, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Viewer window.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Viewer window.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. EditorE (talk) 22:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Timeline window.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Timeline window.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. EditorE (talk) 22:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

The Right Stuff: January 2012
  January 2012

ARTICLE REPORT Wikipedia's Newest Featured Portal: Conservatism

 By Lionelt On January 21, The Conservatism Portal was promoted to Featured Portal (FP) due largely to the contributions of Lionelt. This is the first Featured content produced by WikiProject Conservatism. The road to Featured class was rocky. An earlier nomination for FP failed, and in October the portal was "Kept" after being nominated for deletion.

Member Eisfbnore significantly contributed to the successful Good Article nomination of Norwegian journalist and newspaper editor Nils Vogt in December. Eisfbnore also created the article. In January another Project article was promoted to Featured Article. Luís Alves de Lima e Silva, Duke of Caxias, a president of Brazil, attained Featured class with significant effort by Lecen. The Article Incubator saw its first graduation in November. A collaboration spearheaded by Mzk1 and Trackerseal successfully developed Star Parker to pass the notability guideline. -

PROJECT NEWS

Project Scope Debated

 By Lionelt Another discussion addressing the project scope began in December. Nine alternatives were presented in the contentious, sometimes heated discussion. Support was divided between keeping the exitsing scope, or adopting a scope with more specificity. Some opponents of the specific scope were concerned that it was too limiting and would adversely affect project size. About twenty editors participated in the discussion.

Inclusion of the article Ku Klux Klan (KKK) was debated. Supporters for inclusion cited sources describing the KKK as "conservative." The article was excluded with more than 10 editors participating.

Project membership continues to grow. There are currently 73 members. Member Goldblooded (pictured) volunteers for the UK Conservative Party and JohnChrysostom is a Christian Democrat. North8000 is interested in libertarianism. We won't tell WikiProject Libertarianism he's slumming. Let's stop by their talkpages and share some Wikilove.

Click to keep up to date on all the happenings at WikiProject Conservatism.

DISCUSSION REPORT

Why is Everyone Talking About Rick Santorum?

 By Lionelt

Articles about the GOP presidential candidate and staunch traditional marriage supporter have seen an explosion of discussion. On January 8 an RFC was opened (here) to determine if Dan Savage's website link should be included in Campaign for "santorum" neologism. The next day the Rick Santorum article itself was the subject of an RFC (here) to determine if including the Savage neologism was a violation of the BLP policy. Soon after a third was opened (here) at Santorum controversy regarding homosexuality. This RFC proposes merging the neologism article into the controversy article.

The Abortion case closed in November after 15 weeks of contentious arbitration. The remedies include semi-protection of all abortion articles (numbering 1,500), sanctions for some editors including members of this Project, and a provision for a discussion to determine the names of what are colloquially known as the pro-life and pro-choice articles. The Committee endorsed the "1 revert rule" for abortion articles.



Hey... why did you try to get my edits to the Mackenzie (provincial electoral district) page deleted three and a hlaf years ago? Did we have a conversation that I had forgotten? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Papalopolis (talk • contribs) 02:25, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Macintosh for Spoken Wikipedia
Hi Non-dropframe, I noticed a tag at Talk:Macintosh that you were recording a version of the article for Spoken Wikipedia. With the tag over four years old and you apparently inactive since February, I've removed the tag. If it's still accurate, feel free to restore it and/or contact me on my talk page. Thanks, BDD (talk) 20:19, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edge of the World (Randy Stonehill album)


The article Edge of the World (Randy Stonehill album) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable album.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:31, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stonehill-edge-of-the-world.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Stonehill-edge-of-the-world.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:01, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...
As one of the previous contributors to Infobox film or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!
 * This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

The Endless Summer Tour Setlist
Please don't revise my edit to the page. It is ridiculous to have a fan made setlist on the page. There is no need for setlists (real or fake) as long as the tour hasn't begun, and even if the alleged setlist would be real, a screenshot from an iPhone isn't reliable enough to source it. 82.181.198.121 (talk) 20:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Não posso vandalizar artigos de corruptos? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.63.163.20 (talk) 00:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Dakota Schuetz
Thanks for helping out there! DMacks (talk) 07:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Vgenapl. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Web Slavery IT Services, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Vgenapl (talk) 10:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Information
Hello, it is nice that you are trying to teach me Wikipedia rules and policies, as I am an admin, CU and OS in tr.wiki for over 8 years. This information is totally not notable, and there is no reason to list all publications of a scientist in the article. --Eldarion (talk) 07:30, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello
Hi, not sure if this is the best way to respond to you about your query regarding my username. I'm happy for my username to be changed. I had a look at the instructions about how to do this, but they didn't seem very clear.

Do you have to initiate a username change for me?

Many Thanks.

(Andrew-Wikipedia (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC))

Metromile Notability
Hi- I added a note to the the discussion page, but the company is notable because they are the only company that offers a true per-mile insurance, which is different than behavior-based insurance. After some research I added additional citations that should support the notability- if it is possible to remove the speedy deletion tag that would be greatly appreciated. This is the first article I have created and am looking forward to being a more active member of the Wikipedia community. --MEG325 (talk) 06:28, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

99.225.178.35
Hello, I've been reverting all of 99.225.178.35's changes for several days now, they are making intentionally nonsensical edits...in this case, as they often do, they are adding information different TV shows into unrelated articles. It probably looked like I was just deleting a bunch of text, but I was actually restoring a vandalized article! Adam Bishop (talk) 09:56, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Jlassy
Hello Non-dropframe, many thank you for your mail and feedback! I apologize for not filling in the edit summary. I´ll do that and restore the latest version of the page. The sentence I deleted from the page was "external pages" as I was thinking it is no more necessary as the list of sources have been added. Later on, though, I undid the delete. I will use the accurate edit summary in future. (Jlassy (talk) 13:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC))

Talkback
RichardOSmith (talk) 18:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 Park Lane
Hey just wanted to drop you a line and let you know that I am supporting keeping this article based off the comments I left in the AfD. However, I completely understand your nomination as I learned that people really do want to keep these types of articles many years ago. I nominated the WallStreet Tower Omaha for deletion once in 2007 and it was decided it should be kept (see: Articles for deletion/WallStreet Tower Omaha) and then I nominated it a second time in January of this year after it had failed to ever reach construction, where it was decided to delete it (see: Articles for deletion/WallStreet Tower Omaha (2nd nomination)), Either way these two nominations served to alter my view on how these AfD's should be handled, and this case is very similar (only the WallStreet Tower had much worse sourcing that 1 Park Lane currently does). -War wizard90 (talk) 04:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Nico Santora
Yes, of course it will develop. That's why I just redirected it rather than deleting it, so that when he's ready, it's still there as the basis for him to create a proper article. Deb (talk) 21:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Understood. Perhaps I'll reach out to him and explain how to draft in userspace and re-redirect it thereafter. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   21:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Dezoito de Escorpião
You tagged Dezoito de Escorpião for speedy deletion as a copyright infringement (COPYVIO). I don't read Portugese, but the automated detecter reports show only a few phrases duplicated. Are you quite sure this is a copyvio of the listed URL? DES (talk) 23:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * When I read the detector report there were 25+ matches. It appears that User:Crow has weeded quite a bit out. I doubt there's enough left to G12 it. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   00:35, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for a prompt response. Will you kindly remove the tag, then, or do you want someone else to do so, or to confirm? DES (talk) 00:37, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Taken care of. Have a nice day/evening/night. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   00:45, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Sophia Abrahão
Please do not edit more What do I reverted on page Sophia Abrahão, I just wanted to do a test and forgot to do so in the sandbox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.177.178.57 (talk) 23:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I've removed the content on the basis that it was un-cited and basically just a restatement of what was already in the table anyway. Removing large chunks of content is always going to attract attention. In the future if you get confused, please reach out to an experienced editor to help you rather than getting frustrated and edit-waring. I'd be happy to help you if you should ever need it again. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   23:44, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of (playwright)
Really have no idea why filling in information about an award winning playwright is 'irrelevant' but cool story bro. It's fine. I was going through and was going to fill out all the bios, and in more detail, of the winning playwrights on that article but since apparently they are 'irrelevant' by your standards I won't waste my time. Better sites to get the info anyway. Cheers. By deleting it under the guise of 'credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject' it is saying it is irrelevant. Perhaps you need a thesaurus? The fact is the pages already exist and you'd rather they be blank. That makes no sense - delete the source article then? Call it not meeting the standards all you like, but it comes down to subjectivity when monitors are given so much power and the 'significance of subject' is something you have decided on when I'm guessing you don't know anything about the subject. There are other articles that are allowed to exist on this site that have less information and less 'importance of subject' - so it comes down to subjectivity. You really don't need to respond again - but I'm guessing you will because you seem to like the last word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beccaobrien44 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC) You linked to one article that is actually quite vague since it talks around itself and lists things that will be deleted when some of those same things exist on live pages - this whole site is based on subjectiveness. That's fine, but rather than acknowledging that you just keep carrying on about the guidelines which, as I've mentioned, are subjective. Yes, I am aware you don't make the guidelines - not sure where I said you did? I also didn't say you deleted it I said it was deleted. I did mention I didn't need you to continue to repeat yourself since I don't think you've been helpful (and this is actually OK). I also tried to walk away from this thread but I'm not allowed to delete my own comments either. Whatever man you're not interested in listening you're interested in talking so please come back again and tell me how helpful you are.
 * Hi there, I meant no disrespect in tagging your article for deletion. However, Wikipedia has standards for notability that subjects must meet in order to have an article. If I can be of any help in explaining these, please feel free to leave me a note here. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   03:28, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm very sorry you feel that way. Unfortunately, the fact is, an article that doesn't meet the standards agreed upon by the community will end up being deleted. There are ways to create an article in a semi-private space what allows you to take your time and ensure the article is up to snuff before posting it in the main article space. I'd be happy to help you with this as well as getting a copy of the deleted article if you'd like. By the way, I never used the word "irrelevant." -- Non-Dropframe   talk   03:40, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Believe it or not, I've actually been trying to help you. If you go back and read what I've written, I've linked you to the appropriate resources so you can understand what the guidelines are here. And as a matter of fact, I didn't delete your article, an admin who agreed with my reasoning did. I don't have the power to delete articles, only bring them to the attention of those who can. In any case, I'm sorry if you disagree the guidelines. I don't write them, I just enforce them. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   02:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

PC Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

iOS 9
Hi there,

Thank you for your help. I will now create a draft of the article and copy it over once it has been announced at WWDC.

Thanks! User:As11ley talk 18:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

why so fast?
you seem to not understand why I removed the http://patrickstewart.org/ link as being his website.

well, because IT'S NOT HIS.

(should you bother in the future to check a bit, you might avoid people shouting. Just sayin') — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.12.161.66 (talk) 03:59, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Had you put that information in the edit summary, I'd have known that. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   07:07, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Chenkodan Sabalingam
I am well aware of the guidelines, however please note that it was a mistake that I created a new page in Tamil language named கேப்டன் அமெரிக்கா: உள்நாட்டுப்போர் rather than translating its pre existing content from the article "Captain America: Civil War", and once I realised it I requested a speedy deletion.

Regards, Chenkodan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chenkodan Sabalingam (talk • contribs) 15:58, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  03:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Hi
Got your message on "my" talk page. Just wanted to let you know this is a T-Mobile IP address and I didn't make the edits. 172.56.34.55 (talk) 05:25, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, . I'm sorry that you got a message that wasn't intended for you. Attempting to warn unconstructive IP users is an imperfect science. I hope you'll consider signing up for an account in order not only to avoid this in the future but to join a fun, productive community! Thanks -- Non-Dropframe   talk   11:04, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

question about another user account
Hi there, a page I just made is being patrolled by the user Iamahashtag. I saw you commented on this user's talk page and it looks like they're been called out as a bot. Do you have any advice about what to do with this warning that the page I created and spent long time working on is being patrolled?

Thank you! Morelcasares (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

MINDBODY, Inc Article
Hi! I'm looking into the rejection of my recent article about MINDBODY. I know it was rejected for appearing as advertising, but I was hoping to get more detail about how I can improve it so that it can get approved.

Thanks! Dputgr11 (talk) 21:02, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi ! I'd be happy to help! First and foremost, I have a concern that you may have a conflict of interest or "COI." While editing a page with a subject you have a relationship with isn't technically against Wikipedia policy, it is nevertheless strongly discouraged -- even more so if you have a financial relationship. To move onto the article itself, Wikipedia policy states Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery." However, the article is overwhelmingly positive, essentially boiling down to a list of achievements. Of course it's not unacceptable to write about positive aspects of the company but balance is important. I would highly recommend reading some of the articles on mid-sized businesses that can be found here to see how those organizations are written about. If I can be of any further assistance please let me know! -- Non-Dropframe   talk   21:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Mousehearts
Hey You Lie to me because you know who wrote book by Mousehearts by Lisa Fiedler. Because it amazing that you could tell Wikipedia that were creating a MouseHeart by Lisa Fiedler. What do you say to that You show off! 90731fly (talk) 20:28, 17 June 2015 (UTC) I like to see you try? 90731fly (talk) 20:28, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello,, as someone with many stories that I have very strong feelings for and attachments to, I understand why my deletion nomination may be distressing. Please know that it is in no way personal. However, Wikipedia does have standards for notability and context. I would highly recommend reading this article which describes how to get started writing your first article. Also, the articles for creation project is an outstanding resource that incorporates feedback from experienced editors. If I can be of any more help, feel free to leave me a message here! -- Non-Dropframe   talk   20:57, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Danialesmaeili's repeated removal of Academic Presenter speedy deletion templates
What are we supposed to do about this? Should it be reported to WP:ANI? Also, did I accidentally violate WP:3RR? It seems hard to avoid three reverts before reporting (if that's what we should do) when there are four warning levels to be given before reporting. Is reverting removal of CSD templates three times allowed? KSFT talk 22:22, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I've already brought it to WP:AIV. And as far as 3RR goes, there is a list of exemptions, one of which is "reverting obvious vandalism." Intentionally removing CSD tags is obvious vandalism.
 * Ah, alright, I wasn't sure if it was considered vandalism. That also answers the question I was about to ask about whether it was okay to use rollback there. KSFT talk 22:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't use rollback the first or second time. The third time is definitely vandalism but once I go past 3 reverts, I like to use Twinkle's Rollback button so that I can note in the edit summary that I'm claiming a 3RR exemption in case there are questions. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   22:39, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Ouch! You've used a template to send a to an experienced editor. Please review the essay Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humor. Best wishes. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Alright,, don't call people "idiots" in edit summaries. No template. Better? --  Non-Dropframe   talk   22:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh okay then. Cheers. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your signature
Hello there! I'm working on a project trying to bring most of the coding on Wikipedia up to the most current standards (HTML5), and I noticed that your signature is using  tags which were deprecated in HTML 4.0 Transitional, marked as invalid in 4.0 Strict, and are not part of HTML5 at all. I'd love to help you update your signature to use newer code, and if you're interested,&#32;I suggest replacing:

with:

which will result in a 190 character long signature with an appearance of: --  Non-Dropframe   talk  compared to your existing 169 character long signature of: --  Non-Dropframe   talk — Either way. Happy editing! (t) Josve05a  (c) 23:45, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for the heads up. I've replaced my signature with the code you provided. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   23:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

User:188.30.192.26
[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Governorates_of_Syria&diff=668992438&oldid=668992393 All right, your choice. Good luck becoming an admin, I'll make sure to point this one out to the decision chief. You vandal.] --188.30.192.26 (talk) 03:52, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , My revert of your edit is entirely valid. Blanking content without a valid reason will get reverted and "don't worry about this" as an edit summary suggests intentional vandalism. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   03:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * It contains the line "Remains of olive oil have been found in jugs probably over 4,000 years old would you believe in a tomb on the island of Naxos in the Aegean Sea.". Would you believe? That is sensationalism not encyclopedia-editing. All my reverts contain one form of nonsense or another. 188.30.192.26 (talk) 03:57, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , I actually agree with the most recent edit you made. However, clearing out an entire paragraph rather than removing a few words is not constructive.Also, please note that article is not your article. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   04:28, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Delete a page
How to delete a page Adevil7 (talk) 11:53, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * , you can learn about deletion processes at Deletion process. Let me know if I can explain further. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   11:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

List of Banks in Kosovo
Why have you got involved? Your history shows you are not someone who follows Kosovo matters. I have explained in the summary why I reverted Anastan. Would you like to revert yourself? PS Stop sending me template warnings, any problem with me can be reported to AE. Newquartermaster (talk) 12:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I need not be an expert to become involved in simple general editing matters. The talk page exists to reach a consensus and I recommend you use it to do so. The issue here is that you believe these institutions are not "legitimate." Yet, they do indeed both exist and operate in the area in question. Therefore a consensus must be generated to determine if so-called "illegitimate" institutions should or should not be included. Further, you removed the reflist, among other things, which would have gotten your edit reverted regardless. Finally, I'd rather not report you. I think we can work this out civilly. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   12:13, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for understanding, and thanks also for taking part in the talk. I admit it is of political nature but changes I feel need to be made. I self-reverted anyhow as you see when adding the remark of illegal. Newquartermaster (talk) 12:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Remind me not to help in future
Wow...nice person — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.71.143 (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Ouch! You've used a template to send a to an experienced editor. Please review the essay Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humor. Best wishes. Frood 21:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

They're obvious VOAs, if you look at their edit history. Frood 21:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

fuck u
U delete all of my pages u jack ass go fuck yourself and leave me alone get a life bitch Saverofyourlife (talk) 00:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Your acceptance of a pending change on Alex Jones (radio host)
I undid your acceptance of this change to Alex Jones (radio host). Per WP:BLPCAT, for a category to be added to a page about a living person, "the case for each content category must be made clear by the article text and its reliable sources." Because the article did not discuss Alex Jones's activism against GMOs or vaccines, those categories cannot be added to the article. In order for those categories to be appropriately added, the article would have to (1) discuss his stances on those issues and (2) use reliable sources to verify the addition of that content. This is especially true because those categories have the potential to be controversial and could potentially portray Jones in a poor light. Inks.LWC (talk) 20:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

05:48:03, 14 July 2015 review of submission by Nazrul Islam Bhuyan
Nazrul Islam Bhuyan (talk) 05:48, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Not mine
Dear Non-dropframe, The article that you deleted was not mine. The thanks were a message from PepeDadankest, who created the article. I nominated the article for deletion. However, I do thank you for deleting the article. --Nile481216 23:35, 14 July 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enj481216 (talk • contribs)

Request on 01:52:45, 17 July 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Esemee2
After providing context as requested, my submission was rejected. A specific reason or reasons would be appreciated. Esemee2 01:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Esemee2 01:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * , I left a comment at the top of the draft . Please review the links provided. If you have any specific questions regarding my comment, please let me know. Thanks! -- Non-Dropframe   talk   02:06, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Creation of Emma Swan article
Thank you for reviewing and creating Emma Swan. I just would like to know if there is any possibility to have my old sandbox back, since the Emma Swan article was created (moved) from a draft I wrote in my sandbox, and the revision history of the Emma Swan article is actually the history my sandbox.

Greetings! -- LoЯd  ۞pεth  19:26, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello and congratulations on a very well written article! Page moves leave behind redirects which I apologize for not cleaning up in your sandbox. I've removed the redirect resulting in an empty sandbox. However, if you want to wipe out the page history, you can place a template on the page to ask for an admin to delete it, allowing you to start fresh. Alternately, you may consider beginning new articles in the "Draft:" namespace which is the preferred namespace for articles you intend to submit to AfC. Thanks! --  Non-Dropframe   talk   20:31, 17 July 2015 (UTC)