User talk:Norewritingofhistory

Love the username
Hi there! I was just dropping in to tell you that I love your username. 🐍 Helen 🐍 17:54, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

haha thanks girl. I can't believe no one has made this username, especially on wikipedia lol Norewritingofhistory (talk) 17:59, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm MarkH21. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Mongol invasions of Vietnam that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MarkH21talk 19:50, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Hsrd to argue with someone who is very wrong. Even your assessment on the map of the east asia cultural sphere was wrong and was corrected by CMD. Norewritingofhistory (talk) 19:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Talk:Kingdom of Vietnam, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.
 * This is not acceptable. Do not cast slurs on the ethnicity of other editors, whatever it is. This is also unacceptable. Furthermore, your user name suggests that you at not here to contribute constructivly. If that is the case, then you will end up being blocked. Mjroots (talk) 07:35, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I did not cast slurs on ethnicity. All I said and implied in Talk:Kingdom of Vietnam was that every South East Asian country and culture is different. The Balkans are in Europe, do I say that all of them are Catholic? The grouping of all of these countries together is a long and aged misunderstanding typically from people who have no knowledge of said countries and their respective cultures, people who have no knowledge or understanding of that particular region, am I wrong? And that was on the Talk Page, which did not affect the contents of the main article. If I came to be seen as "rude" then I will try to sound less rude. I have also reflected on my actions for this, I consider myself more empathetic now and to be as neutral as possible in explaining perspectives.
 * Was when I was fed up with content on Wikipedia with mass articles relavant to Asian history and studies that was biased and with clear intentions that have political agendas associated with pro-China tones, as if China was superior to all, the edit history of those affected articles were a mess, and it took months to a year for an admin to correct and protect it. You should have kept these in check. Every article that has any relevancy with China has been affected. I apologize if I use the term "Chinese shill" or "Wumao" 50 Cent Party. I made this account to revert disingenuous edits. As you can see, this account hasn't been used much, and it is because I am still inexperienced and content to see these edits being corrected by more capable editors, which was why I have held off from editing and have reflected upon my actions to not make those types of edit summaries with passive aggressiveness tones.Norewritingofhistory (talk) 17:55, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Recent edits to Sino-Vietnamese War
You mind explaining why you claimed in this edit you made that the source cited did not mention the material you removed when it said it nearly verbatim? Also to clarify once more, the reason why I removed the "Vietnamese figure for Chinese troops" in this edit is because the source given mentioned 600,000 VIETNAMESE troops prepared for a possible invasion by China, not 600,000 Chinese troops that actually fought in the war. The source also did not mention any tanks, so whoever originally added that citation, much like you, did not read the source. Centre Left Right ✉ 23:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * You are right, it is my mistake. I should have read it more clearly. Apologies for that. Norewritingofhistory (talk) 01:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

What articles are you referring to?
You claim that countless articles have used the transliteration system you are proposing, but I cannot find these articles. For example, Nong Zhigao, Nong Zhigao rebellions, Nong Quanfu, and A Nong, all central subjects related to the article Song-Viet War, use a different transliteration system from the one you changed to. Qiushufang (talk) 01:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Why did you edit yourself so many times? You kept on making errors and my post wasn't able to go through. First of all, you accused me of revising history in Special:PermanentLink/1065327939 when the source listed DID show it. This proves you are too hot headed and impatient and you resorted to insults and mockery. You also would latet delete the source after realizing your mistake in Special:PermanentLink/1065334965 Special:PermanentLink/1065330107.

And now you are accusing me of creating articles just to push my POV? Did I also create Nong Zhigao, A Nong, and Nong Quanfu to push my POV? I changed the transliteration to accommodate with WP's own usage. Seeing as others on your talk page have accused you of ethnic slurs and insults, it's quite ironic. What's more ironic is that you're accusing me of not understanding English, yet your own contributions are full of countless errors. It's ok to not be good at English, it's another to insult another person for their own. Qiushufang (talk) 01:37, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Accusing? It was a fact. You said countless articles when I had never said that. So I questioned your ability of English reading. And yes, score more points for yourself, I am sure.you want.to let others know of your higher standards of morals.

A discussion has been started on Talk:Song–Viet war for consensus on the transliteration system used in article. I hope you explain your POV and why the article should have a different transliteration system than all the other related articles. Qiushufang (talk) 01:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, instead of clogging my talk page up from your impatient rants, let's take it to the talk page of the article.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)