User talk:Numerounovedant/Archive 2

Your GA nomination of Kalki Koechlin
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kalki Koechlin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 12:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kalki Koechlin
The article Kalki Koechlin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kalki Koechlin for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 21:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kalki Koechlin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grey Goose. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kalki Koechlin
The article Kalki Koechlin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kalki Koechlin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 17:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Congratulations on your success and good luck for your future. :) Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:42, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you!

Your GA nomination of Randeep Hooda
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Randeep Hooda you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Randeep Hooda
The article Randeep Hooda you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Randeep Hooda for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Randeep Hooda
The article Randeep Hooda you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Randeep Hooda for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 01:41, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Congratulations for your second GA success in a very short span. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! You've a been constant support! -Numerounovedant 8:41, 31 January, 2016

Disambiguation link notification for March 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ellen Pompeo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moonlight Mile. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Sound of Silence (Grey's Anatomy)
The article The Sound of Silence (Grey's Anatomy) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Sound of Silence (Grey's Anatomy) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 04:41, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kalka–Shimla Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Koti. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Welcome
... to WP:QAI, aka the cabal of the outcasts. For reviews, look at WP:QAIPOST, open for all! Happy Easter! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:43, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Happy Easter!  Numerounovedant   Talk  18:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * ! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waiting (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lost In Translation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Peer review
Just in case you're unaware, this isn't the venue to get our articles copyedited. Take it to WP:GOCE. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 09:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * That said, you may invite reviewers (who are well-versed with the topic) for the PR though. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 09:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah I was looking for a complete Peer Review before moving on to the text which is the major issue. I don't want to go through another long FAC with issues other than the text. I'll put in a request at the guild as well.  Numerounovedant   Talk  09:39, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kalki Koechlin at Grazia young Fashion Awards (cropped).jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Kalki Koechlin at Grazia young Fashion Awards (cropped).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 22:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kalki Koechlin at Grazia young Fashion Awards.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Kalki Koechlin at Grazia young Fashion Awards.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 22:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Margarita with a Straw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Moseley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Daniel Radcliffe on screen and stage


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Daniel Radcliffe on screen and stage. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Daniel_Radcliffe. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Daniel_Radcliffe – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 18:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Jessica Chastain
I'm surprised that you'd go ahead and nominate her article for GA after 16 not-so major edits. The article is nowhere close to GA quality, and I have been meaning to expand it for a while now. I suggest you withdraw the nomination for now, and let me work on it. Cheers! -- Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 03:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Something similar has happened with Randeep Hooda's article. You never even updated his career section after "Ungli" and it still contains several unsourced claims.Yashthepunisher (fall) 04:06, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I am sorry that is just the way I work I made the basic required edits and put it up for a review and because I am really quick to reply to the comments I make the changes rather quickly (even if there are too many), I don't like dragging the article into unnecessary conflicting interests. If you guys have complaints with the quality of the article you could come up with them in the reviews! If I don't respond and fix them that's when your "opinions" should be brought up. I went through the entire GA review of Chastain's article and didn't find any serious lags so consequently I fixed the references added new where they were needed and put it up for the review. Prose issues are rather easy to fix and quick work can be done there. The only area where I can agree with you here is the coverage area of the article but again it's not like anyone is doing anything about it (I don't see any ongoing work on the talk page). If this review (failed/successful) helps make it better why not? As far as Hooda goes, it was a long time back and I felt like the article was comprehensive enough, nothing wrong came up in the review. As fir its cirrent state I'm a littlw busy thess days so i opened a PR for help, I don't see the problem here? If you have do many claims for the article why don't you come up with your suggestions in the Peer Review that I just opened, or is putting up claims here easier? I really don't want to sound resounding but no one bothered to come up with any ideas to help the article in the PR up untill never?  Numerounovedant   Talk  07:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Also before the "WP:GAN is not an alternative for WP:PR" I really suggest we try to work this through because nobody seems to appreciate any help here.  Numerounovedant   Talk  07:23, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * That makes no sense. Why don't you help improve the article yourself, by actually working to improve it? Don't blame others for not taking an interest in doing something, we are all volunteering here and have no obligation to help you achieve results. Anyway, I will be improving the Chastain article soon, so it would be better to avoid any conflict here. I am asking you nicely to withdraw the nomination for now, so the article history is not littered with failed attempts. Alternately, if you are interested in constructively expanding the article, you are always welcome to do so. A "green star" is of little merit if the article quality is so poor. -- Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 07:57, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I would like that for now too. No one is obligated to anything here and that should also include putting trivial complaints of how any article meets a criteria. I just believe signing up for a re-assesmennt (for Hooda's article) would have been the right thing here. I am not obligated to explain why my articles pass/fail the review either right? Also I did not see any edit from you that actually indicated any attempt to improve the article other than the filmography split. So I don't think I was conflicting anything there. Anyway I like your work and would love to work on the Chastain article.  Numerounovedant   Talk  08:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Randeep Hooda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equestrian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Kalki Koechlin
Hello Numerounovedant: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Kalki Koechlin has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

You will notice that I archived one of the article’s citations (#1). I suggest that you archive the rest of the URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop “dead links” over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the “Save Page Now” box on the archive.org site and click save. This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl=http etc|archivedate=13 February 2015}}. Not all websites allow archiving - CBS TV news and the NY Times are two I've come across, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:34, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for all the work that you have put in the ce. It has been a great help! All your help is really appreciated! I will work on archiving the references, Thank you again!  Numerounovedant   Talk  19:41, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I do have one query, Do you think the article is cluttered with quotes? And should they be removed from the prose?  Numerounovedant   Talk  19:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * @Numerounovedant You're most welcome. No, I do not think that the article is cluttered with quotes. They are relevant and add to the article's content. They should remain where they are. Only lengthy quotes are set up as block quotes. I don't feel that the article would have achieved GA status if quotes had been an issue at the time it was reviewed. Cheers. Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:41, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Allright! ThankS AGAIN. =)  Numerounovedant   Talk  05:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neha Dhupia Filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roadies. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

FAC reviews
I have started to review Featured article candidates/Kalki Koechlin/archive3. I am hoping that you might consider reviewing Featured article candidates/Emily Ratajkowski/archive5, which need some commentary.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I have an outstanding GA Review to look at but I'll surely get to it, maybe in a couple ore days.  Numerounovedant   Talk  12:08, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. As you can see in the nomination, I was hoping for prompt consideration.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look later today Numerounovedant   Talk  04:40, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll look forward to your comments.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Hardy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Miller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 19 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Ellen Pompeo page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=720997262 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F720997262%7CEllen Pompeo%5D%5D Ask for help])

Orphaned non-free image File:Grey&#39;s Anatomy Season 10 (cropped).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Grey&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lexie Grey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Sloan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Copy editing of Randeep Hooda
Hellow Numerounovedant, Just letting you know that your request for the Guild of Copy Editors to review Randeep Hooda has been completed. around 10 grammar mistakes were corrected. If you have any more requests please feel free to send them to us. thanks,


 * Thank you so much! Numerounovedant   Talk  13:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Moved ref.
Please explain why you moved the added reference without giving any explanation. Let the reference also be in the second paragraph of Phobia (2016 film). Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 13:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, so according to WP:MoS a lead should not have any footnotes and they should be placed in the body of the article wherever required. See WP:LEADCITE second paragraph, first line. Also, in case you are unsatisfied you can good though any good/featured article on Wikipedia and none cite references on the leas unless it is completely essential. Numerounovedant   Talk  13:43, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waiting (2016 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lost In Translation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Req
Can you perform a source review for this? Krish |  Talk  13:08, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I will try to take out some time later today. Numerounovedant   Talk  05:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Ben Affleck GA review
I'm confused that you have failed the article so soon. You indicated in your first post about the article that you were not finished reviewing ("Will put up the comments shortly, but I can already see a lot of issues", "I will take a look at the career section in a couple of days.") and would do so in a "couple of days". I was waiting for you to outline the issues before getting started on addressed them.Popeye191 (talk) 19:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but I was expecting some kind of response from you. It had been more than 10 days. You could have at least acknowledged having read the comments. Plus I did have a major concern on the long list of bare URLs which was unaddressed on the review page too, neither was the Quotefarm concern, nor the one of the Congo initiatives. Numerounovedant   Talk  20:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Nowhere does it say that an article up for GA review should be failed after 10 days, especially when the reviewer has not reviewed the vast majority of the article and has stated that the main body of the article would be reviewed within a "couple" of days. If you had even indicated that you were planning to fail it if nobody responded to your first few remarks, then the situation could have been rectified.


 * Furthermore, the issue of the long list of bare urls was rectified on 5 June. Popeye191 (talk) 16:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * No it wasn't, all the publisher name were not rectified. I still stand by the fact that it was short of GA standard by quite some margin. Anyway, you can anytime nominate it fir a re-assessment. I think that's our only option here. Right? Numerounovedant   Talk  17:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Pardon me for not giving a final say before failing. Numerounovedant   Talk  17:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Rajinikanth filmography
The list is nominated by Kailash29792 and Vensatry at FLC. Feel free to leave comments there, buddy. Thank you. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 04:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes sure, I will look at it later in the week. Meanwhile could you help me here. I am a little out of depth here. Numerounovedant   Talk  06:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Even I'm confused by that one as I don't recall BH photos being questioned like that. It looks like the image reviewer is not that familiar with Indian cinema articles. Try asking Krimuk, Cas Liber, SchroCat, Crisco 1492 or Nikkimaria about it. —  Ssven2  Speak 2 me 06:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback, and I almost forgot to tell you how much I admire your attempts to help fellow editors here.  Numerounovedant   Talk  14:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Mélanie Laurent
Hello Numerounovedant:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Mélanie Laurent has been completed.

Don't forget to archive the article's URLs when you have a moment.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you, again all your help is greatly appreciated. Numerounovedant   Talk  14:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Randeep Hooda

 * Thank you, all your work is greatly appreciated. Numerounovedant   Talk  05:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you, I owe you one! Numerounovedant   Talk  14:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations!

 * Thank you!

Disambiguation link notification for June 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kalki Koechlin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AIB. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you Krish! Numerounovedant   Talk  18:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * While I'm amazed at your FAC succes, I advise you against changing the article too significantly as it could lead to the article requiring a FA reassessment. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the heads up Kailash. Numerounovedant   Talk  17:12, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King?
Hey. I don't know if you remember me or not, but I was the person that did your review for the Grey's Anatomy episode "The Sound of Silence". I was wondering if you could review the article I just created for the Private Practice episode "Did You Hear What Happened to Charlotte King?"? I would like to have someone from the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors and revise/edit on my own to hopefully nominate it for GA. Thank you in advance and sorry for the intrusion. Aoba47 (talk) 06:47, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey, yes of course I remember you. It was easy to review it. It's in a good state but yeah c.e. would greatly help. Good luck, and let me know if I can be of any help. Numerounovedant   Talk  07:21, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 12:11, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waiting (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huma Qureshi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Waiting (2015 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Waiting (2015 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 21:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Waiting (2015 film)
The article Waiting (2015 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Waiting (2015 film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 19:21, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Waiting (2015 film)
The article Waiting (2015 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Waiting (2015 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:21, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot. Numerounovedant   Talk  12:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:08, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot Greta! I have great respect for the work you do appreciating the work of all the editors. Numerounovedant   Talk  08:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)


 * My pleasure, sincerely, so much nicer to do than arguments. - When should "she" appear? Her birthday? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, definitely Thank you so much. Numerounovedant   Talk  11:27, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * So ;) - I hope for 27 September 2016 but first need to write it ... but 16 July is fine, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I couldn't reply sooner. Thanks a lot though for the help. Looking forward to all these FAs being featured. Numerounovedant   Talk  17:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mélanie Laurent
The article Mélanie Laurent you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mélanie Laurent for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 06:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

GA Review
Hey Numerounovedant, I hope everything is going well with you. I was wondering if you could take up the GA review for Love, Inc. if you had some spare time. I have recently extensively expanded the article, and I would greatly appreciate your feedback if that is okay with you. Thank you in advance, either way. :-) Aoba47 (talk) 03:07, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I just went through the article briefly, will begin with the review soon. Numerounovedant   Talk  13:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I appreciate your help and I apologize for any inconvenience. Aoba47 (talk) 14:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

A note of thanks
Thanks for reviewing Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna award at its FLC. I appreciate your time and comments. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 18:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Congratulations on the FLC. Numerounovedant   Talk  04:53, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

A note regarding unreliable sources
I just saw some of your recent edits, e.g. 1 & 2, at the Jwala Gutta. The user-generated sources that you have added are not acceptable as per WP:USERGENERATED. Note that crowdsourcing websites like Sportskeeda can never be used unless the "content was authored by, and is credited to, credentialed members of the site's editorial staff". I haven't removed them yet as I thought you would systematically replace them with the reliable ones after going through the aforementioned wiki policy. BTW, keep up your commendable work of helping articles to reach GA/FA status! - NitinMlk (talk) 19:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for appreciating the work, and the observation you put forward. However, I have to disagree on this instance, because the article has been penned by a correspondent for the website. I am aware of the fact that reliable sources are the ones from either reputed news agencies or reputed journalists. This however, is just to support a simple claim of the credentials of the athlete which have also been discussed in the article. Let me know of what you think. Numerounovedant   Talk  09:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Firstly, I guess you neither properly read the policy cited by me nor read the quote I picked from it. The author should be a credentialed member of the site's editorial staff. You cited a source authoured by a guy named Shankar Narayan, who is 'a die-hard Rahul Dravid fan'. But what are his credentials as a journalist? You have to understand the working of crowdsourcing websites like Sportskeeda. Even you can pen down a puff piece of your favorite sportsperson & they will most probably publish it. And the other user-generated uncredited source that you cited here doesn't even support the claims of Jwala being the "one of the few recognisable female athletes of the country and has been listed several times among the top most inspiring sportswomen of India". In fact, here are other examples of the unreliable user-generated sources added by you in the Jwala Gutta's article:
 * Here you added a horrible source on which whole of Jwala's 'Playing style' section is based. Later on bot added its archived link here but that doesn't support any info of the section, although it wouldn't have mattered as the source was unacceptable to start with.
 * Here you again cited this Shankar Narayan.
 * Here you cited source credited to some nobody named Tanuj Kar but it can be easily replaced.
 * Here is another one.


 * Secondly, you are not the only one to add these type of sources to the article. In fact, some of other users added even worse sources, e.g. the very first paragraph of the article's lead is based on again a user-generated source. And its author is allegedly a porn actress - if you believe the pic. Now don't ask me how I recognized the pic. ;) Current reference no. 11, 20, 48, 61 are other examples of the user-generated unacceptable sources, which were added by other users.


 * Thirdly, the easier way, which many users adopt here, would've been to remove these unreliable sources as per WP:USERGENERATED & bombard the article with templates like, , , etc. But I didn't do that yet thinking that you might want to sort them out.


 * Finally, as you have already worked so much on this article, it won't be much challenging for you to replace some of these sources with the reliable ones. Those ones for which you won't find the reliable source, you will have to rewrite the relevant portion by citing reliable sources. I could've helped you but I am a bit busy in real life. BTW, I didn't get the alert message of your post. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:08, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I would like to thank you for showing interest in her article. She was the reason I joined wikipedia. :D However, most of major edits are really old and part of my intila editions. There are going to be numerous mistakes amd the article needs extensive amount of work, but, at this point of time I might not have the time. I have made some basic improvements, and will look at the rest when I have time. However, I still stand by the fact thta sportskeeda ref in the lead is acceptable. (In cases use of imdb as a ref has also been alowed usually when the info can be cross-checked in the article.) Thanks again for being enthusiastic about Gutta's article, I will address your queries soon. Numerounovedant   Talk  06:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)


 * There's no hurry at all. I was just giving you some suggestions. My only regret is that, in spite of trying, I couldn't convince you regarding the unacceptability of a certain type of user-generated sources on this Wikipedia. Anyway, before you decide to work on the above article, it would be beneficial to have a look at WP:PEACOCK, WP:ORIGINAL, & WP:SYNTHESIS. Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 17:04, 24 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I am fully aware of whatever it is that is wrong with the article. (Not to undermine any of your suggestion, all of whuch are totally justifiable and aimed at improving thearticle.) I just haven't had time to make corrections, I am grateful to you for helping. I will ping you once I am done editing it, and would appreciate your feedback. Cheers. Numerounovedant   Talk  17:59, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review - GoT
Hi Numerounovedant, I hope everything is fine. I was wondering if you have the time.. could you take up(look at/review) the "Peer review" for Battle of the Bastards(Season 6, Episode 9 of Game of Thrones). I am trying to get this to a "Featured Artice".. (It has already been passed for "Good Article") and I need some one to review and tell me what to fix/do to make that happen.(Peer review/Battle of the Bastards/archive1) AffeL (talk) 20:03, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I haven't been very active here off late, and with the Olympic games having ended u have a lot of articles to update. The work is just piling up, so I'll try to take a look when I some free time. Numerounovedant   Talk  17:19, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Film/Golden Hollywood Contest
Doc's just started up this contest about topics and articles covering Classical Hollywood cinema. Do express if you are interested or not by signing up under the "Editors Interested" section. Thanks. — Ssven2  Speak 2 me 10:20, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I am sorry but I am too busy in RL with college, so thank you for the invite but I'll pass this time. Numerounovedant   Talk  17:17, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you. It's always nice to have editors like yourself appreciate the work! Numerounovedant   Talk  16:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Chad Harris-Crane - featured article candidate
Hello! I apologize for the inconvenience again. Thank you again for your help with previous FAC. I would really appreciate any comments or feedback for my current FAC ( Chad Harris-Crane). I know this article is outside your usual field of interests, but an outside perspective would be very helpful. The FAC currently has a very users who have commented, and an image review. I would greatly appreciate a fresh pair of eyes with this article, as I want to improve as a contributor on here as I am trying to get some of my GAs promoted to featured articles. I understand that you are busy, so it is completely okay if you are unable or would not like to do this.

The link is here if you are interested: Featured article candidates/Chad Harris-Crane/archive1. Aoba47 (talk) 23:04, 20 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I am afraid that I wouldn't be able to help here, due to lack of time on Wikipedia. Numerounovedant   Talk  11:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abhay Deol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imtiaz Ali. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

The 1000 Challenge for Indian cinema
Based on The 10,000 Challenge and within the scope of WikiProject India, a new challenge has been initiated to reach a long-term goal of 1000 article improvements and creations for Indian cinema. Article cleanup and basic referencing improvements, expansions, new articles, DYKs, Good Articles, Featured Articles etc, are all welcome. You and others are invited to participate in this challenge and help Indian cinema in any possible way. If interested, please signup here. Yours truly, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:46, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I couldn't reply here! Thank you for the invite Pavan. Numerounovedant   Talk  17:45, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Do not present the future as history
Hello. Please do not add "news from the future" to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. You cannot say something has happened when it has not happened yet. The ATP rankings are only updated on Monday (they are not updated daily), and you always have to wait for the official update on Monday before you report it as the current ranking. (You can of course say he is projected to become No. 1, which is good, useful information, but the article already says that. You just cannot say it has already happened, because it is not true.)&mdash;J. M. (talk) 15:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, yeah, i was aware that the ranking are out every Monday. ~_~ Anyway, a simple edit summary would have sufficed but thank for going through all the trouble, for whatever it's worth. Numerounovedant   Talk  16:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Regarding other articles.
Hey Numerounovedant, I am Amrik Singh and i want you to please look and make these articles to Fa.So that these articles should not get left behind. Boney Kapoor, Arjun Kapoor, Paresh Rawal, Anupam Kher, Ranvir Shorey, Manish Paul, Kapil Sharma. I am a reader who wants every article to become perfect away from vandalism. I have not any interest in editing on any of these articles. I just want the experienced volunteers to also make these articles to Fa or Ga. Please make these articles to Fa or Ga. Regards, Amrik Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amrik. (talk • contribs) 17:47, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Now that you bring it to my notice I might try to work on Arjun Kapoor's article soon. Numerounovedant   Talk  17:49, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * But please look at other articles as well and make it to Fa. One actor's Article not included above is Sushant Singh Rajput. Boney Kapoor, Arjun Kapoor, Paresh Rawal, Anupam Kher, Ranvir Shorey, Manish Paul and Kapil Sharma articles should reach to Fa by the period of one year. You can do all by yourself or assign it to your friend volunteers on wikipedia.

Regards, Amrik Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amrik. (talk • contribs) 15:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

TFAR
Today's featured article/requests/Kalki Koechlin, please check the blurb, and an altered source, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:08, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I might rework teh wording, but, can you address the image issue and revert it to the original? Numerounovedant   Talk  12:13, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * You can do that, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:29, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Alright, I was a little hesitant on reverting but thanks for the help. Numerounovedant   Talk  13:18, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to all!

 * Back at you ! Thanks for making the work experience at Wikipedia warm and present, you amazing person.  Numerounovedant   Talk  17:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)